ABOVE: Because Bolton likes to watch.
Not Noticeably Shorter Pam Atlas, Escorts Against Islam:
MUSLIM TERROR ATTACK: ‘NINE shot dead’1230 Wounded, Mass Shooting at Fort Hood, US Army Base, Malik Nadal Hasan is MUSLIM CONVERT
‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™
New York AG Andrew Cuomo slapped Intel with a federal antitrust suit today. Ayn Rand-wannabes respond predictably:
Nvidia Rumored to Compete in Supposedly Uncompetitive Market
By Elizabeth Jacobson
Rumors abound that graphics chip maker Nvidia is getting set to enter the x86 processor market. Recall that, according to AMD’s lawyers, the processor market is uncompetitive and being unfairly monopolized by Intel.
Now, if the antitrust lawyers are correct, and the CPU market is uncompetitive and needs government intervention, then there must be some barriers to entry that are keeping other competitors out of the market, allowing Intel to reap outrageous profits. However, if Nvidia can and does enter the processor market and supply an alternative processor product line, where would that leave the antitrust argument?
We’re not sure where it would leave the antitrust argument since it has no relevance to it, but such a development would certainly raise questions as to whether Intel itself is as uniquely great at making CPUs as it constantly claims to be.
Snappy answers to stupid questions, etc., but let’s go a little deeper:
1. Nvidia already commissions ARM-based CPUs on its Tegra platform for CE devices (the Zune HD for example).
2. Via already makes ultra-low power x86 CPUs that compete with Intel’s Atom.
3. Most importantly, the period of time when Intel allegedly behaved anti-competitively is not today and certainly not whatever tomorrow that Nvidia happens to build an x86 central processor business.*
Instead, Intel is charged with illegal anti-competitive practices in a very specific time frame, from roughly 2000 to 2006, during which period AMD began shipping its possibly superior Athlon and Opteron products, yet found difficulty at every turn distributing them to OEMs.
We can’t know what would have happened in that period if Intel hadn’t used its bigger pocketbook to essentially buy its way through this period of competitive disadvantage to AMD without losing its dominant market share. We can guess that AMD might have grown its share to 30 or 40 percent of the market in several processor segments instead of peaking at 25 percent.
What we do know is that the credible competition from AMD certainly seems to have lit a fire of innovation under Intel’s ass in the early to mid-2000s, and Intel later countered AMD with superior Intel products from roughly 2006 to today. That part of the competition played out as it should in organic fashion, but the part where AMD grabbed market share during its own period of superiority obviously never happened … and it’s pretty clear to many people why it didn’t.
*Though it’s worth noting that Intel has told Nvidia it can’t make integrated graphics products for Intel’s current-generation Nehalem architecture, per their cross-license, a point which Nvidia disputes, and which also might explain why Nvidia is even tempted to get into the x86 CPU game in the first place, seeing as how Intel might be perceived as attempting to drive them out of business.
Now this is the type of hilarious bullshit that makes me love Erick Erickson:
Posted by Erick Erickson
The race has now been called for Democrat Bill Owens.
This is a huge win for conservatives.
Except the “win” in this case is a humiliating loss where you drummed a winning Republican candidate out of the race and handed the Democrats a seat they haven’t held since the 19th century.
First, the GOP now must recognize it will either lose without conservatives or will win with conservatives. In 2008, many conservatives sat home instead of voting for John McCain. Now, in NY-23, conservatives rallied and destroyed the Republican candidate the establishment chose.
And what was the final result? Oh right! The Democrats won the seat! A seat they hadn’t won since the 19th century! A seat that they would have assuredly still lost had not the right-wing freak show descended upon rural New York. Please, please say you’ll make this a blueprint for other races, Erick. Please, please…
For all intents and purposes, NY-23 is a trial run for Florida.
There is a God. Erickson and his goon squad are now going on a jihad to replace all semi-non-insane Republicans with unelectable assholes. Could I just die today? Because I don’t think I’ll ever have more fun for the rest of my life.
Not me, but K-Lo after the sixth mudslide to drown the sorrows of NY-23:
Owens Wins [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
Watch it be spun as a defeat for Sarah Palin and the hateful extreme right-wing of the Republican party (Hi! See George Pataki standing next to me?).
That may have made sense to a distraught K-Lo while a vodka buzz and a sugar high were competing for her few remaining brain cells, but honestly what the fuck is this supposed to mean exactly? That the Hoffman defeat was really a victory for the Republican party and a defeat for the Democrats? Or that Hoffman wasn’t part of the extreme right? That George Pataki is part of the extreme right? I think its time for K-Lo to put one of those drunk dialing contraptions on her laptop that will freeze her keyboard if she blows more than 0.15 into the little tube.
If I had told you 15 years ago that Newt Gingrich (!!!) would one day be purged from the conservative movement for not being conservative enough what would you have said? It’d be like hippies booting Wavy Gravy out of Woodstock for being insufficiently gr000oo0vy.
UPDATE: And speaking of crazed reactionaries, TBogg alerts us that Confederate Yankee is a-itchin’ t’ bayonet some hippies:
If our lawmakers abandon the founding principles of this nation, and use their power to obfuscate, deceive, bully and strip basic rights away from the people, then they are forfeit to thesocial contract, even if they have managed to “abide” by the laws they’ve written in support of the state.
Ultimately, laws are only lawful if the govern find them fair and justified. All else is dogma.
And so when power-mad legislatures and executives use direct lies and emotional rhetoric in order to deceive their constituencies in an attempt at tyranny that serves to increase their power while undermining the principles that has enabled this government of the people, for the people and by the people, we owe them no more allegiance.
One may even begin to speculate on whether we owe them civility for their transgressions, which amount to a fundamental betrayal of oursocial contract as Americans.
Unlike other nations and states in times both past and present, we have the possibility of correcting our mistakes and removing the disloyal via the ballot instead of the barrel of a gun.
Let us hope that our elected officials recognize, however, that our patience is not finite, nor our obligation to bear their indecent assault on our liberties unlimited.
I’m struck by how often I’ve read right-wing blog posts that have slowly degenerated into outright murder fantasies. You wonder why they even bother writing long, plausibly deniable justifications for them and don’t just skip to “ME KILL YOU SCUM!!!” and leave it at that.
The amateur detectives and kerning squads of the wingnut blogosphere have been embarrassing themselves lately with the newly-released White House visitor list, apparently unaware that different people can have the same names. Nobody, of course, jumps to a foolish conclusion faster and with more invigorating elan than Jim Hoft, aka the Gateway Pundit, who is convinced that one of the visitors to the White House is Angela Davis, an open member of the Communist Party USA and close buddy of Fidel Castro. This is further proof, of course, that Obama is a Communist parading around as a Democrat just so that he can hoist the hammer and sickle over the White House and force all American children to work on collectivist goat cheese farms.
Now, of course, it’s just plain stupid for people to imagine that the William Ayers on the White House list is, you know, the “ghost writer” for the illiterate President. Everyone knows that Obama is smart enough to make sure that his real confabs with Ayers are top, toppity, top-top secret, are conducted in disguise (usually with fake moustaches, dishdashas, and Ray-Bans), and aren’t conducted in the Oval Office but instead in the basement of a suburban safe house. But the Angela Davis mistake is, well, just flat-out, mouth-slobbering, nose-picking-in-public stupid. Both people named “Angela Davis” on the White House list have different middle initials than Angela Y. Davis, the person that Hoft was thinking about, although in Hoft’s case the word “thinking” is merely a metaphorical representation of the random synapse firing that causes Hoft to wake up with a start from time to time from continual bouts of narcolepsy.
Hoft links to an obscure wingnut blog that was pushing the Angela Davis story apparently unaware that the blog was later shamed into acknowledging its mistake and came up with one of the more novel fail recovery arguments ever. The list, you see, was larded with common and easily mistaken names as a crude practical joke designed to trap conservative bloggers into saying something stupid. Yowser. That’s like blaming the bottle of vodka for a DWI . . . and really meaning it.
ABOVE: Mark Finkelstein (left) and “friend”
Mark Finkelstein, News Blusters
Politico’s Politicized Pic Picks
‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™
It’s almost Halloween. This means that Dr. Tintin has a treat for you, and you don’t even have to turn any tricks to get it. So, hold out your trick-or-treat bags, Sadlynauts, and let Dr. Tintin dump into them a whole mess of Kimberly Daniels. And before you start bitching and fussing and moaning and asking why we aren’t passing out mini-Snickers and Take Five bars like everybody else, I have one thing to say: Kimberly Daniels is so crazy that her column got yanked from Pat Robertson’s site. Now, that shut you up, didn’t it?
Fortunately for us, Kimberly’s posting was mercifully preserved by the kind folks at Charisma and by the Google cache.
Halloween—October 31—is considered a holiday in the United States. In fact, it rivals Christmas with regard to how widely celebrated it is.
Why am I just now being told Halloween’s a holiday? For all these years I’ve been going into the office every Halloween not knowing that the office was closed and that I could have stayed home, put on women’s clothing and gone around the neighborhood asking for free candy.
But is Halloween a holiday that Christians should be observing?
Anyone want to venture a guess here? But first, let’s make up how the holiday was named and throw in some extra Satan:
The root word of Halloween is “hallow,” which means “holy, consecrated and set apart for service.” If this holiday is hallowed, whose service is it set apart for? The answer to that question is very easy—Lucifer’s!
Silly me. And here I was under the foolish impression that Halloween was dedicated to the service of Mars candy and Hershey’s chocolate and the three hundred factories or so in Taiwan and China that make those hyper-flammable plastic costumes sold at your local big box store.
The key word in discussing Halloween is “dedicated.” It is dedicated to darkness and is an accursed season. During Halloween, time-released curses are always loosed. A time-released curse is a period that has been set aside to release demonic activity and to ensnare souls in great measure.
Time-released curses? Who else thinks that somebody has seen one too many time-released Ambien CR commercials on the teevee? (Somnambulism with amnesia of the event has been reported. Do not drive or operate machinery while cursed. If you experience a curse lasting more than four hours, immediately consult your pastor)
During this period demons are assigned against those who participate in the rituals and festivities. These demons are automatically drawn to the fetishes that open doors for them to come into the lives of human beings. For example, most of the candy sold during this season has been dedicated and prayed over by witches.
Well, that explains a lot. Just yesterday I was wondering where all the witches in my neighborhood had gone and now I know that they’re all in Hershey, Pennsylvania, praying over vats of chocolate. I suppose that’s why that dark chocolate Hershey’s Kiss I had yesterday had a slight aftertaste of newt blood and goat semen.
I do not buy candy during the Halloween season. Curses are sent through the tricks and treats of the innocent whether they get it by going door to door or by purchasing it from the local grocery store. The demons cannot tell the difference.
Now, wait a minute. Is Kimberly telling us that demons are smart enough to talk my grandmother into committing sodomy with stray cats while howling at the moon but are too stupid to figure out whether a piece of candy comes from a store or a trick-or-treat bag? I call bullshit.
When nice church folk lay out their pumpkins on the church lawn, fill their baskets with nuts and herbs, and fire up their bonfires, the demons get busy. They have no respect for the church grounds. They respect only the sacrifice and do not care if it comes from believers or non-believers.
Put a pumpkin on your porch and you’re just three demonic Raisinettes away from cutting out your next door neighbor’s liver and frying it up with some bacon, onions and diced puppy ears.
The danger of Halloween is not in the scary things we see but in the secret, wicked, cruel activities that go on behind the scenes. These activities include:
· Sex with demons
· Orgies between animals and humans
· Animal and human sacrifices
· Sacrificing babies to shed innocent blood
· Rape and molestation of adults, children and babies
· Revel nights
· Conjuring of demons and casting of spells
· Release of “time-released” curses against the innocent and the ignorant.
Why do I never get invited to the good Halloween parties? The most frightening thing that ever happened to me at one was when some guy dressed up as Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz had had one too many vodkas and started lifting his dress up over his head.
Chuckles “Chris Crocker” Krauthammer is tired of people being mean to his favoritest president of all-time, George W. Bush:
In the Barack Obama version, there are 50 or so such blame-Bush free passes before the gig is up. By my calculation, Obama has already burned through a good 49. Is there anything he hasn’t blamed George W. Bush for? The economy, global warming, the credit crisis, Middle East stalemate, the deficit, anti-Americanism abroad — everything but swine flu.
Let’s go through each of these one by one, shall we?
The economy went into recession in December 2007. This was on Bush’s watch.
George Bush tore up the Kyoto Protocol and couldn’t even bring himself to acknowledge that climate change was a problem.
The credit crisis? See when the recession started.
Bush spent eight years doing nothing to negotiate peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians and gave Ariel Sharon a thumbs up to just about anything he wanted.
As for the deficit — well now that you mention it, Chuckles, Obama inherited that too. And look: when you couple an inherited deficit with the worst recession since the 1930s, you’re going to get an even bigger deficit. If Obama had come into office and had decided to make deficit reduction his top priority, he’d be getting (rightfully) blamed for plunging the country into a second Great Depression.
And lastly, anti-Americanism abroad. Ah yes, I seem to recall a certain war that really inflamed those feelings. A certain unnecessary debacle in Iraq that was launched on false pretenses. Yes, that was quite sad. And which president launched that war? Oh, right. It was George W. Bush.
Now, I’m not one to say that Obama’s every decision is perfect and must never, ever be questioned. He’s clearly screwed us by continuing to shovel money to the banks and he’s been a flat-out wimp on gay rights issues. But when you look at the sheer number of problems that he’s inherited, you have to at least feel some modicum of sympathy for the guy.
George W. Bush, on the other hand, inherited a country at peace and going through an economic boom. He left it in the midst of two wars and a crippling recession. If that doesn’t put him in the mix for Worst President Evar, I don’t know what does.
UPDATE: Ruh roh:
Here’s a somewhat surprising result from the new Fox News poll. Asked which president is “more responsible for the current state of the economy,” only 18 percent say President Obama. Fifty-eight percent say former President George W. Bush. Nine percent blame both of them. Republicans are the only subgroup of voters who blame Obama, and only by a six-point margin of 35 percent to 29 percent.
Chuckles weeps.
