Pantload’s really outdone himself with this latest (not-)gotcha:
Questioning the Patriotism of High School Drop-Outs [Jonah Goldberg]
This is an intriguing passage from last night:
And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country – and this country needs and values the talents of every American.
What to make of that? On the one hand, it shows one of Obama’s great strengths and innovations as a liberal that he can invoke patriotism in a way that doesn’t seem affected.

But I thought invoking patriotism came naturally to fascists! Ein volk, ein reich… you know. Now Pantload’s saying it’s all affect and Obama just does it with less transparency. But then the only thing worse than a real Liberal Fascist is a pretend one, amirite? I imagine a conversation between like minds:
Otto from A Fish Called Wanda: It’s just as our fellow intellectual, Nietzsche (who was, like Aristotle, a Belgian) said: “What? A Great Man? I see only the actor of his own ideal.”
Pantload: Totally! And Obama’s ideal is, like, FASCISM!
N.Y. Post Cartoonist: I gotcher Nietzsche quote right here. “The disappointed man speaks: ‘I sought great human beings, I never found anything but the apes of their ideal.'” Neener neener!
Pantload: Exactly.
And.. scene. But I digress. Back to Pantload’s post, from which comes a punchline of sorts:
On the other hand, why is it okay to question the patriotism of high school drop-outs when it’s just about the worst thing in the world to question the patriotism of people in other circumstances?
Uh, because urging, even if in the negative, high schoolers to better themselves and their country does not equal smearing political opponents by calling them traitors.
Moreover, I think it says something telling about the current state of liberalism — and the political culture generally — that doing your part to sustain economic growth is a patriotic duty. This may seem normal and natural to people, but this notion is in fact a fairly recent development, with roots in the Progressive era but culminating with JFK’s Cold War liberalism, when outperforming the Soviets economically became a national imperative.
He means, of course, that it’s part and parcel of Liberal Fascism. (Actually, what he’s talking about started in the late Reconstruction Era, if not before. And it is neither liberal nor fascist in and of itself, but then you knew that.)
Update: From a reader:
Mr. JG:
Maybe I’m being too generous to Dear Leader, but I found his reference to the unacceptability of America’s high school drop-out rate to be a remark directed mostly (though subtly) toward black America where that problem is most severe. I would welcome more tough talk to the African-American community, especially coming from someone to whom they’re inclined to listen.
Me: I think this is largely right. I meant to make this point and somehow let it drop from my points. But I don’t think that’s all it’s about either.
Yeah, it can’t be all bad: consider its potential utility in getting the Negroes in line! But that point plus the points before it are merely central to Doughy’s point which has a point, should you decide to take his point (which you surely won’t if you’re a pointy-headed Liberal Fascist Poindexter who typically misses the point, which, the point being, that’s exactly what you are, though you will pointlessly deny it, even when Doughy’s pointing his points right at you.)