Marie’ Does’ Dolchstoss’

Well, I’m feeling a bit peckish. What to do.. Oh, there’s Marie. She used to flirt with me back in the day. So, what’s up Marie?

“Oh, Redardo, last week I went on and on with the stab in the back theme.”

Enchantress!? Mein gott, ja!

Really? Wow. Umm ok. So who’s stabbing Dear Leader in the back this time?

“Leftists, of course.”

Oh, Marie, I love it when you go all Ilsa the She-Wolf on me. It’s not normally my taste but what can I say? You wear it well.

“But there’s more, Redardo. Now the proof, the undisputingable proof is gonna be shown on ABC that Bill Clinton stabbed America in the back! See, there were Saddam – bin Laden links but you Leftists didnt do anything about it when you had the chance and, well,

The Democrat Party has become a dangerous millstone around America’s neck, as they constantly undermine the president by repeating and their out and out lies and moronic talking points. They feed the listless brainwashed American public through a liberal biased media.

Honor the victims of 9/11 by watching the docudrama that tells the real truth. It is time to understand that a war on terror will not go away until all freedom loving people are resolved to stay the course in Iraq and do whatever is needed to protect our civilization. We can only be successful when every American is fully knowledgeable and supportive of President George Bush, our Commander-In- Chief.

I love it when you demand obedience to Dear Leader, Marie. I’m feeling an enemy within right now — within my pants! Would you like to see my fifth column? But there was no link, and ABC’s movie is fiction. Moreover, isn’t your demand that everyone support Dear Leader a little bit idolatrous for a self-professed Christian? I mean, that’s no problem for me, atheistic homo liberal abortionist that I am, but I’m sorta surprised at you…

Anyway, you are yin to my yang, Marie, but I think your jackboots are sexy, and it’s a great fashion statement that they match your bage.


Comments: 120


I’m back if she is…dammit Marie, I had just gotten over you! Come my wingnut whipperwhill, and we will misspell beautiful wods togther!


As though this can compensate for your previous pernicious pedantic pedagogical prissy pretentious populist posting!



Oh wow, sweetheart…I just read that crazy column of yours linked above….you know that homeland security will be watching you for just typing the “assas….” word with the “pres….” word in the same sentence! Is that why you mis-spell, dear? To confuse them? Clever you are in your PePo Thong…clever you are…

Please post a picture of your rear end. Please?


How the hell can you jointly argue that democrats demanding accountability from Bush undermines his ability to look after the national security but also that it’s Clinton’s fault he didn’t work harder on the national security while republicans demanded accountability for a blowjob?

The Clinton people were stuck arguing that the Paula Jones case, which ultimately was exactly nothing, would be a huge distraction from his, you know, presidentin’, and the republicans went on and on about how everyone deserves a day in court and even the president is not above the law (another principle by the wayside, I might note).

Even as they tried to do something about bin Laden, which Bush didn’t see as a threat until after 9/11 and even still considers less of a threat than Iraq was, the republicans screamed that it was all a desperate attempt to scaremonger and distract us from his legal issues. (Now why does that sound familar, btw.)

Marie! Fucking pick a position and stick with it! Either demanding a president be held accountable for breaking the law is undermining his ability to protect us, or it is not. You don’t get to decide based on party affiliation.

Not if you want to be regarded as vaguely rational and fair-minded.


Looking at this new picture of hers, it appears that she’s wearing an evening gown of some sort; the spag-straps indicate a no-back configuration, so I’m guessing a black and fairly formal, yet dead-sexy evening dress. Her face looks much more drawn, too, as if she hasn’t been sleeping. She also looks as if she’s lost a lot of weight….hmm, I’ve seen this before:

Lookout! Hot Wingnut Cokehead hitting the party circuit!! Yum, Yum! She’s got an eight-ball in a bullet, with a flask of Stoli, a pack of Trojans that she never bothers to use, and a couple of Vitamin-B shots for tomorrow morning in her purse. Oh baby, get your girlfriend and meet me in the bedroom. As Mr. Kool-Aide used to say: OH YEEEEEAAAAAHHHH!


Oh, god! She gets me right in the first sentance, with “Five years have past….”

She has a unique solution to ending the war – all we have to do is be resolved and it will magically evaporated and go away:
“It is time to understand that a war on terror will not go away until all freedom loving people are resolved to stay the course in Iraq and do whatever is needed to protect our civilization.”


Ontomonopia (sp?) Goatboy is thy name…


Is Marie Jon’ actually Neve Campbell’s, uh, unfortunate sister?


That’s amazing, Doc Amazing! I never even made the connection. Holy cow! This changes the landscape completely. Could sweet Marie really be Neve! If so, then there’s already pictures of her rear end all over the internets! Oh Joy!

As her agent, I offer a ‘date’ (she does call-ins only, folks, and HOTELS, not motels) with Marie Jon’ to the first person that comes up with Neve Campbell/Marie Jon’ “separated at birth” photos.


Not if you want to be regarded as vaguely rational and fair-minded.

Do not think that is a priority…


She’s obviously fingering herself as she writes that “Bush is our Commander-In-Chief” horseshit. Would someone please tell these asshole primitives that Bush is CIC of the military? Christ.


I’m feeling an enemy within right now — within my pants! Would you like to see my fifth column?

Pure. Comedy. Gold.


This new pic makes Marie look like a dead ringer for an ex of mine. I know it’s not her though, as my ex taught english and…well…

I could be wrong- after all, at least 2 years “have past” since I saw her.


“Five years have past….�

Of course! A tribute to William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey”!

Five years have passed; five summers, with the length
Of five long winters! and again I hear
These crashes, rolling from their Twin Towers
With a sweet inland murmur. — Once again
Do I behold these steep and jagged piles,
Which under a steely Preznit impress
Thoughts of more furious vengeance; and connect
The landscape with the quiet of the sky.


“We can only be successful when every American is fully knowledgeable and supportive of President George Bush, our Commander-In- Chief.”

You know, I used to wonder why I drink so much. I mean beat off so much.



Are you trying to pull me back into that seedy world O’ Marie Jon’?

I’ve put that whole sordid affair firmly into my past, and moved on. Now I have to relive it, with new bonerific pics??

Remember, MJ’ is the one who put me on the S,N! board of directors (and I’m still waiting for my fat paycheck, by the way…)


She talks big, but can she back up her claims? I doubt it.
Obviously, she’s really into role playing, Retardo. Rawr.
Maybe you two can play a little “Find the WMD” wink-wink, nudge-nudge. And when things get REAL frisky, “Abu Ghraib”.

Ugh. That’s such a horrible picture of her.

*sigh* Right. Honor the victims by sitting on your fat duff and watching a movie. Great. That’s bold leadership. Then after that, we can clap our hands, spread the majic pixie dust, click our ruby heels and say three times, “There are no more terrorists.” That should solve that!

“We can only be successful when every American is fully knowledgeable and supportive of President George Bush, our Commander-In- Chief.”

Blurgle-froth! Goddammit! In Marie world, only Bushie is capable of defeating terrorism? Only He has the power, for only He was the chosen one to pull the Sword from the Empty Keg. Does she not know that Lord High Bush let bin Laden go at Tora Bora? Naw, forget it. She cares not for our facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Go back to your Happy Chamber, woman.
Also, Bush: NOT my commander in chief. Because I’m not in the damn military, as are not most of America. I know it gives you all a raging hard on to think of the supreme powerful Leader, but goddamn. I’m suprised no righter has called for a special made “Presidental Military Uniform” for him to wear 24/7. Something with lots of gold spangles and scrambled eggs, maybe a special, President-only hat, like what the Pope has.


Sheesh, I failed to put my shameless self-whoring link into my new-found Snark 2.0 ™ bit…

I wrote:
“I’ve put that whole sordid affair firmly into my past, and moved on


Can you please please photoshop a little black maid’s dress on her? Or maybe her and Malkin in a naked wheelbarrow race?

Oh, God. Sorry.


The fact is that the Democrats don’t want people to remember how they constantly failed in the days leading up to 9/11. Remember when Clinton thought Slobodan Milosevic was a bigger threat than Osama bin Laden?

Remember how bombing Serbia was justified, and removing Saddam wasn’t?

Remember how Clinton shot missiles at a few abandoned factories, instead of going after bin Laden?

The fact is that the Democrat Party is working hard to censor Path to 9/11 because it reveals how they failed before 9/11. They don’t want people to remember what it was like when they ran things. They don’t want people to realize that War on Terror opponents like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Robert Byrd are going to be running the Congress next year (if America gets fooled enough).


“We can only be successful when every American is fully knowledgeable and supportive of President George Bush, our Commander-In- Chief.� Actually, that kind of makes sense, because to be both knowledgeable and supportive of Bush, every American would have to be batshit fucking insane!


Gary, I would think it would be the Republicans who didn’t want people to remember how things were in the 90’s, back when everybody had a job and oil was $14 barrel. See you in November.


Path to 9/11 is on BBC2 right now. It looks like an episode of 24 – I keep expecting Jack Bauer to jump out and start torturing people.

A cop just shouted “Initiate the takedown!”. It won’t be long before someone gets shot through the hand by a guy shouting “Where! Is! The! Bomb!”.

Good God, the warbloggers are going to shoot in their pyjamas when they get a load of it.


Gary, those are excellent points. Why don’t you start a blog so that the whole world can enjoy your penetrating insights? Why should a bunch of Sadly, No! readers have all the fun?

Oh wait, you have:


“The Democrat Party?” Marie and Kaye must be battling to the death now for the most grammatically (and factually) wrong columns.
The Path To 9/11 is being sent out to the Internet. More will be released. Why? Democrats and you liberals want to censor ABC. This is blackmail and un American. Sorry my friends, we do not do this to freedom of speech. Bill Clinton is alive and well, as Madeleine Albright. They can speak out and rebut this docudrama. Let them do so.

The docudrama does not portray Bill Clinton in a bad light. He is shown as things really were at that time. That also goes for the Bush administration. Terrorist caused 9/11, remember that!

When the Ronald Reagan’s docudrama was under fire,no ex president said a thing. Mrs. Nancy Reagan said she was upset. Why? Because her husband was suffering and dying and could not speak to defend what was portrayed in a docudrama. It went to a cable net work and was seen by anyone in it’s entirety.
CBS Won’t Air ‘Reagans’ Miniseries,2933,102110,00.html

Marie Jon’


It’s crazy. Marie knows how to spell “Madeleine Albright,” but the writers of “The Path to 9-11” do not:

Like the Chambers Brothers, my mind is blown.


Hooray! Marie’ agrees with me that moving the docufiction off the public airwaves onto cable is the right move.

Now you’re off to contact ABC and insist on it, right Marie’?


I wish I’d studied law in college; the next few years are going to be a great time for libel lawyers here and abroad. Since the wingnuts all know this is really a “crock-umentary” and yet they’re plastering the most egregious of its lies all over their blogs, can they be sued by Clinton, Berger and Albright along with ABC/Disney?


Glad to see Gary wasn’t deported. Now make a quesadilla.
Hey, remember that time when Bush thought removing Saddam and destroying Iraq’s stability was more important then getting bin Laden? No? Huh, weird.


When the Ronald Reagan’s docudrama was under fire,no ex president said a thing.

Actually, when the Reagan docudrama was under fire, I think Reagan said “Urghlghrlguhgrugrrgh…. grmpf… uunnghunngh.”

Then he shit in his Depends.


Terrorist caused 9/11, remember that!



I did not write this. Gab did. I’m just posting it.


Bubba’s ABC ”Path to 9/11”by Gabriel Garnica
Sunday, September 10, 2006 — Bubba’s ABC ”Path to 9/11” Reaction Speaks Volumes
by Gabriel Garnica

The reports by numerous sources that Bill Clinton and his allies are enraged that ABC’s miniseries “The Path to 9/11” portrays him as considerably responsible for the early failure to capture or kill Osama bin Laden thus paving the way for 9/11 should go down in history as the height of despicable hypocrisy and vile audacity.

The mere fact that this proven liar who disgraced the presidency would dare to be outraged, angered, offended, or shocked by any negative portrayal of him would be hilarious if it were not so pathetic and perfectly typical of his liberal ilk. Bill Clinton, however, often has shown no distaste for being hypocritical, absurd, pathetic, despicable, vile, delusional, arrogant, and, for that matter, quite hilarious as well.

Content Confirmed

Long-time Clinton advisor and aide Dick Morris has told NewsMax that Clinton’s angered reaction “is outrageous” given that Clinton and his national security advisor Sandy Berger “were both responsible for failing to catch or kill Osama bin Laden on several different occasions.” According to NewsMax, the evidence of this failure is documented in the 9/11 Commission’s report and summarized in “Because He Could,” a book on Clinton co-authored by Morris and his wife Eileen McGann, which devotes an entire chapter to Clinton’s mishandling of the threat.

In his book, Morris states that the 9/11 Commission’s findings “highlighted the weak, incompetent, hesitant, and inconsistent attempts of the Clinton Administration to kill or capture Osama bin Laden.” According to Morris, the report showed Clinton and his advisors “at their worst.” Citing three separate failures to either capture or kill bin Laden, Morris shows how each failed due to weakness, cowardice, incompetence, indecisiveness, and plain old-fashioned liberal rubbish.

In one case, Clinton was so concerned that actually killing or injuring bin Laden might lead to accusations that his administration was using assassination as a “policy tool” that he called off effective attempts to do the deed. According to Morris, Clinton’s indecision was due to his failure to effectively connect bin Laden to the 1993 World Trade Center attack and properly assess his danger to the United States.

In a second case, Clinton alerted Pakistan of plans to fire missiles at bin Laden out of fear that Pakistan would mistake those missiles as coming from India. Pakistan then alerted bin Laden allowing his escape. In a third case, Clinton was too worried about being seen as “trigger happy” or using such attacks as “a way of distracting the public from the Monica Lewinsky affair.”

In his book “Intelligence Failures: How Clinton’s Incompetence Undermined America’s Defense and Paved the Way for 9/11,” David Bossie uses comprehensive research and congressional investigations to conclude that “Bill Clinton’s poor judgment, negligence, indecisiveness, and slashing of the military left America a sitting duck for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.”

In summary, there is significant and credible evidence that Bill Clinton made a series of incompetent errors in action and judgment which, combined with his preoccupation with the Lewinsky scandal and subsequent impeachment proceedings, caused the charismatic liar to compromise his full attention and better judgment in handling bin Laden. As my mother has always said, it is nearly impossible to do the right thing while you are too busy watching your own neck.

Excuse Me, Liar-in Chief

The Bill Clinton who is now beside himself in anger over a drama that accurately depicts him as weak, indecisive, incompetent, and distracted is the same man who was caught lying to the public over the Lewinsky affair. This is the same man who has repeatedly denied the accusations of women such as Jean Lewis, Linda Tripp, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Gennifer Flowers, all of whom have been rewarded for coming forward with their stories with mockery, denials, character attacks, and disbelief by Clinton’s lapdog media.

Ignoring the evidence and facts, Bruce Lindsey, head of the Clinton Foundation, and Douglas Byrd, the top attorney in Clinton’s office, have called ABC’s drama “factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate” and a “fictitious rewriting of history.”

As usual, Clinton in particular and liberals in general respond to facts with denial, to truth with lies and to just accusation with boastful arrogance and hypocritical offense.

Pardon Me, Delusional Arrogance

Not content to prop outrage over proven failures, Bill Clinton and his henchmen have aggressively sought to have the ABC drama edited or eliminated completely by demanding these things from ABC boss Bob Iger. As often happens, the same liberals who wail on about free speech remind us that the only free speech that they are interested in is that which they hurl at conservatives and not the arrows of truth fired upon them.

These same liberals who accuse others of intolerance show intolerance for negative publicity. These same liberals who attack Bush as a foolish, incompetent, and bumbling imbecile are not too keen on having their own rock star stoned by evidence. Last of all, these same beneficiaries of endless media bias dare to accuse ABC of bias against them.

As for defending one’s honor, name, and reputation, I have a notion that Clinton is a little late. Although it is likely that the only thing Bubba is sorry for is getting caught, he is the only one responsible for his words and actions. Clinton will argue that enemies have dragged his name through the mud when, in fact, he bought the mud himself and dove right in. Not to worry, for while he and his buddies wail that the ABC drama is “a fictitious rewriting of history” the liberal press and education powers are doing their own “fictitious rewriting of history” by bleaching away his incompetence, cowardice, indecision, and indiscretion. By the time these liberal cronies are finished, Bill Clinton will be depicted as a cross between Jesus Christ, Moses, and Huck Finn.

Perhaps the Clintons can rehash their vast rightwing conspiracy rubbish or play the poor victims of their big, bad enemies once again. Maybe Hillary can sell all of this as yet another unfair attack on the Clintons rather than a peek into what a Hillary Hoopla would be like. All that I see from here is a smiling used-spin salesman biting his lip and bemoaning that his escapades and screw ups have been brought to light once again and not by his typical foes, but by precisely the media that kissed his Arkansas fanny as many times as he “felt our pain.” It must be annoying to be stabbed in the back once in a blue moon by a media seeking ratings and, dare we say, to tell the actual story.

Given the way the Clintons have often bullied people around, distorted the facts, and stomped over their enemies in the pathetic effort to keep their so-called name and integrity pristine, they must be seething at the thought that, this time, they may not be able to bleach away the facts. Let us hope that ABC does not wimp out and edit more to appease Will and Hill.

At the end of day, the mouths and audacity of Bill Clinton and his liberal buddies remind us that they are about charisma over competence, tripe over truth, and stubbornly delusional denial over simple, direct duty.


Liberals, the Clinton people, and their media enablers are in a panic over ABC’s drama because even roaches scurry when lights are turned on. They are so determined to paint their lip-biting hero as a saint that they would deny the sunrise. When the smoke over this latest reality check clears, however, liberals will still tell us that Bush is clueless and weak, Hillary will still pretend that her joint rule with Bill did not appear to be carried out by people smoking joints, and the media will still tell us that 9/11 belongs to Bush.

The legions who hate the Clintons will now have another reason to hate them more. The breathless and brainless boobs who adore them will run to their side in support once again. It is what those indecisive about the Clintons think and do that everyone is wondering about. Hopefully, enough of them will see Bill Clinton’s absurd, delusional, arrogant, and pathetic protest against ABC’s “The Path to 9/11” as a spotlight on just what Bill, Hillary and most liberals are really about.

About the Writer: Gabriel Garnica, Esq., is an educator, licensed attorney, and resident of Long Island, New York. As a conservative Latino college professor working in New York City, Mr. Garnica feels that his picture is found in the dictionary under the term “exception.” He can be contacted at

For More Information On This Story Visit:


There are limits to free speech, though. If not, National Enquirer would only have to say that their patently FALSE stories are examples of “free speech” when they are faced with defamation and libel suits.


Marie, really. You’re not going to have much luck here trying to win people over to the world of wingnuttia. We love your shitty blog, Marie, precisely because it is so shitty. It is written so poorly and is so divorced from reality that we quite literally find it side-splittingly hilarious.

See, what the fine proprietors of Sadly, No do best is make fun of moronic, bat-shit crazy right-wingers like yourself. You bring an added dimension to the table because your grasp of the English language is so poor. You are the proverbial fish in the barrel, Marie, because pretty much everything you write makes no fucking sense.

See, to us, you’re a big joke. None of us could possibly take anything you say seriously. So don’t cut and paste here. We don’t give a fuck about that– it’s boring. Keep writing your own stuff. It’s comedy gold.


Marie J’! Can you pleassssssssssssssse tell me how Noah got the dinosaurs onto the Ark???

Pretty please with a cherry on top?


Marie not only breaks hearts, she breaks links

also I’m baffled as to why she had to C&P someone else’s thoughts on the subject

Is laziness a value Dear Leader would be proud of? WWGWBD?


So if Marie Jon is here… why hasn’t anyone asked her to post nekkid pics on her blog yet?

Hey Marie Jon – could you post some nekkid pics of yourself on your blog?


Bobbie Sterne Built My Hot Rod

Bill Clinton is alive and well, as Madeleine Albright.

Whoa, when did that happen?


U.S. .Politics Today
A Non- Partisan News Service For Political Professionals
Gee, I’m so moronic that this newspaper picks up my op-ed’s Some charge people before they can read them. Cut the defecating words while pointing to my articles. You are ridiculous, as well as closed minded on just about anything .
ABC ignores Democrats, won’t pull plug on The Path to 9-11 9 Sep 2006 05:40 GMT
… be deeply damaged.” A network spokeswoman said ABC has no plans to drop the five-hour … which will air Sunday and Monday. WFTV-Channel 9 will air the commercial-free program, General Manager … said. The program depicts events in The 9-11 Commission Report, starting with the 1993 bombing …

Remember The Path to 9/11 9 Sep 2006 05:39 GMT
… plain facts that are highlighted from the 9/11 commission’s report. Following are a few lines … leading up to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The movie dramatizes what it … Free Fox video Setup Path To 9/11 ABC Altering 9/11 Film After Clinton Officials Express …

Marie Jon’ Remember The Path to 9/11 9 Sep 2006 05:39 GMT
… plain facts that are highlighted from the 9/11 commission’s report. Following are a few lines … leading up to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The movie dramatizes what it … Free Fox video Setup Path To 9/11 ABC Altering 9/11 Film After Clinton Officials Express …

Hello Brad, Gavin and Retardo, many hugs and kisses.


I’m so sick and tired of people saying that the idiot is our “Commander in Chief”. He is absolutely not – he is the Commander in Chief of the military, not of the entire country. I have never heard this title misused to the extent that it has been under this criminal regime. I know our Constitution is being ripped to shreds, but this is not a military dictatorship – yet…


the defecating words



Cut the defecating words while pointing to my articles.


I love you, Marie. Seriously, don’t ever change. – Unless it’s into something a little more comfortable, if you know what I mean and I think you do, you vixen you.


Dammit. Beaten to the punch, once again.


Shit! I read that little screed, but couldn’t stop looking back up at the picture. She makes me damp in the pants … and I’m a guy.

However, I did click the link to the story of Marie and Retardo’s little liaison. I am now thoroughly disgusted.


*sigh* Clenis Clenis neener neener.
I don’t think there’s anyone out there saying Clinton wasn’t a player in this game. If there are, I haven’t read them.
But trying to blame everything on the Great White Devil while playing that Bush was just the aw-shucks hapless bystander is patently wrong and complete bullshit propoganda.
Need we bother with documented instance after instance where the Bush administration was told about the growing threat from al Qaeda and blew it off?
Next time you try to make an arguement about someone (Clinton sux0rz!!1) maybe you should try evidence, instead of just lobbing charge after charge.
And no, saying “read this book by author X!” is not a supporting argument.
Ex. Bush IS weak and ineffective against terrorism, and here’s various government documents, statistics, and statements that prove my point.
Also, get a new picture up. Seriously.


No Fornicatin’ words, either.


Nazis? Alright, who started talking about Prussian Blue? Yes, mikey, i’m looking at you…


Now, that was uncalled for. Let’s have all the tedious trolls in the same thread, if you’d be so kind. Please move along in an orderly fashion.


9/11…consider it Justice {Westboro Baptist church}


Damn, I’m slow tonight. The above wasn’t referring to you, of course, SG.

Right, that’s it. I’m off to bed.


Some Guy!!! C’mon now. I’m old, but I wasn’t in the Wehrmacht, fer cryin out loud. I mean sure, those Prussian Blue chix are cute in a gas-chamber kind of way, but I’m more Benatar than ‘Blue…



Marie Jon’ ..

Hey show me at least some love, I helped make you famous, the least you could do was acknowledge me…

Personally, tonight I will be watching the battle of Tennessee’s son(s) on another network. Go Peyton!


I came for the humor, but I stay for the spam 😉


Uhh, Seb? I think your Spam Karma settings need a little tweak here and there…

Just Sayin



Ever since they yanked the comments over at Joe’s place, this is the most surreal blog evah.


I think as far as spam goes it’s pretty high quality stuff. The Sites are good aswell.


The link as an entire assassination list,it even includes Tiger Woods for some reason .


Hi Tommy!

You didn’t mean Sir Real, did you?

P.S. I think that pic of Karl Rove in Mickey Mouse pajamas has legs. Heh!


Aryan said, September 11, 2006 at 1:16
Oh geez. This guy. I think he trolled WoC earlier this week.


Seek out local drug dealers,Communists,Pimps,abortionists and all corruptors of youth {all dens of iniquity} and execute ! execute ! execute !

Just like Jesus said. Don’t forget the Young Republicans!


Googling “jackboots” FTW!


Hi, Lord Thunder. Yes, “Sir Real.”

What an awesome opportunity we had to talk to MJ’. For instance, I would have asked her about the infuriating apostrophe and her high school English teacher. Possibly what she was wearing. You know.

But instead we get spam. Alas. At least Coulter would have opined about us getting murdered whilst huddled in the Coit tower during the next terrorist attack or something.


Centered on the Sword of Truth, symbolizing the returning to righteousness of our Race, who yet one day will be placed on the right hand of Christ in faith of the sure promise of resurrection.

That’s ’cause he wipes with his left hand, being bodily resurrected an’ all.

If the entire Race is placed on his left side, won’t that make the yearbook photo awkward? I mean, you’d want Jesus in the middle, right? Or would it be like those elementary school pics, with the teacher to one side, holding the sign with the name of the class spelled with those slide-in letters?


Wait, that should read “place on his RIGHT side.” Actually, it should read “placed on his right hand,” which I imagine would hurt like hell. I mean, all those people placed on your hand. Ouchers!


Aryan said, September 11, 2006 at 1:16
Oh geez. This guy. I think he trolled WoC earlier this week

What kind of sick motherfucker would post under the login “Aryan”? I mean, talk about violating everything that America is and everything we’ve ever tried to achieve. These fucktards make even dick cheney look like a great american. I’m thinking what we really ought to have is secular death squads putting these sick pudgy wannabes down like sick dogs. They better be careful what they wish for….



Yeah, mikey, when the rightwing fascist state is enacted, the half-educated racist militia asswipes will be the first ones against the wall…


Not to mention that the Aryans were a tribe in I believe western Mongolia. Not White people.


“Bill Clinton, however, often has shown no distaste for being hypocritical, absurd, pathetic, despicable, vile, delusional, arrogant, and, for that matter, quite hilarious as well.”

But not as hilarious as that post!


“Gabriel Garnica, Esq., is an educator, licensed attorney, and resident of Long Island, New York. As a conservative Latino college professor working in New York City, Mr. Garnica feels that his picture is found in the dictionary under the term “exception.â€?

Whoo!! The best!!! Marie Jon’ owes me a new keyboard.


As much fun as secular death squads would be, it might open us up to charges of hypocrisy. Instead, how about internment camps? Call em hate and ignorance quarantine zones. Just build a fence around north dakota and tell them it’s a newfangled immigrant free zone. We won’t even have to pay relocation costs.
On the other hand, we’ll need to do something to keep them from breeding. First thing to do is add the morning after pill to roofies and alcopops and schnaps. Second thing to do is to spread a rumor in the younger ones that women with clits are hermaphrodites. Final thing to do to prevent breeding is to start a sporting league in the quarantine zones consisting of grown men kicking each other in the balls as hard as they can. If it’s on tv and has beer ads and cheerleaders, it’ll work.
On the other hand, none of this offers a solution to the malkin dilemma.

Oh, and MJ? Having a vagina doesn’t mean your opinion matters. You also need a brain and basic skills, such as literacy.


Aw, man. I didn’t realize the White Supremacist crashed the party. Again?


“Gabriel Garnica, Esq., is an educator, licensed attorney, and resident of Long Island, New York. As a conservative Latino college professor working in New York City, Mr. Garnica feels that his picture is found in the dictionary under the term Power-Hungry Racist Tool.�



A cradle Catholic from birth, Gabriel quickly realized that the Catholic faith was becoming like Baskin-Robbins, with 31 flavors for all tastes. “Many Catholics are like wayward teenagers trying to push the envelope and rebelling against their Father.” Like many people, Gabriel had tried some of these flavors, but he found that he likes his faith more traditional than most. One can always rely on the veritas of vanilla when it comes to the Sacred Deposit of the Faith and all those many novelty flavors that try to make our unique faith more like others only taints the palette of permanence and perseverance, causing everything to eventually sour within the soul. “We are letting our rich faith become stained with modernisim, feminism, humanism, New Ageism, homosexualism, and every -ism you can find, and that is both an abomination and a tragedy.”

from Garnica’s bio at the Daily Catholic


The question, of course, is weither or not they’re listed as a Terrorist organization?


What the fuck happened in this comments section? I leave for a while and you people let anyone in! God, there’s Gary and a Nazi and who knows what else.

Ooooh but Marie came by! Hi, Marie! muah muah xoxox


“Second coming” googlebot, meet “jackboots” googlebot. “Jackboots”, “second coming”.

Now get out.


No Retardo, I didn’t…I mean we weren’t…That is, the nazis, they…Ummm, no, see, the thing is we didn’t kill ANY JEWS. Yeah, that’s right, it was all them….



All this thread needs is Dr. BLT and Annie Angel and the necessary pre-conditions for armageddon will be complete.


You’re pretentious! And pedantic! You are the penultimate paragone of pretentious pedantry, pal!


Oh for the love of Oprah!

Cleanup on aisle nein!


What the hell is going on around here? I step away for a few hours and I miss all kinds of amazing batshittiness. First, I have to respond to this:

Gee, I’m so moronic that this newspaper picks up my op-ed’s Some charge people before they can read them. Cut the defecating words while pointing to my articles. You are ridiculous, as well as closed minded on just about anything .

See, this is why we love you, Marie. This is so amazing, I have to break it down sentence by sentence.

Gee, I’m so moronic that this newspaper picks up my op-ed’s Some charge people before they can read them.

And some use periods to mark the end of sentences. Also, the word “op-ed’s” ironically contains a superfluous apopstrophe, just like our heroine. I’m quite familiar with your columns, Marie. This is how I know without question that you are a complete dimwit.

Cut the defecating words while pointing to my articles.

I don’t even know what word you were attempting to use here, Marie, but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t “defecate.” Words cannot defecate. You are like an unholy cross between Norm Crosby and Ann Coulter.

You are ridiculous, as well as closed minded on just about anything .

You’re calling ME ridiculous and closed-minded? Honey, you wrote the book.


I have to admit, this is an awesome thread.

The OJ Simpson Case


The trolls here are really boring! Why arent they watching the PT911 Dreck?


They have proceeded to mutilate what had the partential to be an instrument of the commendable ideals of education, communication and understanding

“Partential.” Oh, dear.

Listen, revolutionaries, you better attain at least a 6th-grade spelling level if you ever want to take you seriously. I don’t think anyone who thinks “potential” is spelled “partential” has the brainpower to really change the world very much. Go ahead and work on getting that GED before you start making plans for world domination.

There must have been a breakout from some wingnut mental hospital or something.


Listen, revolutionaries, you better attain at least a 6th-grade spelling level if you ever want to take you seriously.

Oops. “If you ever want ANYONE to take you seriously.”

I’m sorry. The stupid, it’s contagious.


You know what? I’m convinced. While I haven’t read anything aryan has posted, the fact that his comments are so long means he must be right, about whatever the hell he’s talking about.
My only regret is that as an only child I can’t marry my sister to ensure the racial purity of my offspring.


We debate Scripture as scholars and judge between doctrines whether they be Scriptural or not.

Why is aryan speaking in ebonics?


Damnitall, I’m as happy as the next Sadly, Noesian! to see wingnut buffoons pile wingnut buffets here on our comment board.

But when they’re like 8 bazillions lines of repetitious spam, can’t we get a cleanup in Aisle Aryan? (Yes, I am asking you, Retardo. I mean you still like us, don’t you???).


Q: How do we know that Cheney and Rumsfeld weren’t behind the Kennedy assassination?
A: Kennedy’s actually dead.

($1 to Neil Gaiman, although I paraphrased it)



While I am not familiar with “Jerry Springer the Opera,” just the very idea of it makes this particular fatwa sound almost reasonable.


I’m not surprised that the AiryOn Nayshun would have Jerry Springer as one of its Icahns.


“Cleanup on aisle nein! ”



Fuck, man, it wasn’t my fault. The hiring hall just sent me down there to load trucks for the out.


Goddamn, you put up one picture of a babe and the place goes to hell.


Wait! Is that Marie or the woman who loses her cell phone in Day by Day?


Yeah–I second the motion, Retardo. While the nutzis are amusing on some level, they are making veiled and quite open death threats here, and I didn’t think that was cool. Oh, and for the benefit of these Dominionist shitfucks, it’s not spelled “Jesus,” or “Yah’shua.” It’s “Jeebus,” you syphilitic hemorrhoids! Gat a goddamned clue, asshats.


Oh, BTW nazi fuckwits, I’m four times as white as you sorry fucks, but I just don’t give a runny crap about it. That’s right–I’m a race traitor! And you are hereby invited to EAT IT, COBAGZ!!1!


I think I removed all of the Nazi posts. Lemme know if I missed any.


Retardo: I still see them.


Dr. Garnica appears to be between jobs. Last year he taught at CUNY-Baruch College. He’s not listed on the faculty this year. Considering all the columns he’s been churning out lately, I can’t imagine he had much time to teach.


Weird. I marked them as spam first, but they reappeared so I had to manually delete them agin, just in a different way.

Anyway, I think I cleaned them out on this thread and on the Commie thread.


I think Dr. Garnica is an adjunct. Just sayin’.


Happy September 11th peeps 😉

Ronald Reagan has a message straight out of hell for you all ;


GoatBoy Rules! Somebody cut me another line…Jesus, where’s the bathroom; I think I’m gonna fall down….


I observed the two moments of silence this morning, in mournful respect.
Then I remembered the people who showed incredible courage, selflessness and resolve on that morning.
Then I not so silently cursed the asses that keep using the day for political leverage, and constantly using fear as a political tool.
And now, a nice lunch.


The Path To 9/11 Is Down Sandy’s Pants

by Bob Parks

As this commentary is being posted mere hours before the scheduled airing of “The Path To 9/11�, there are a few statements that must be made.

The miniseries will air. Given my experience working for Fox’s On-Air Promotion division, the kind of exposure the production has received is something that a television network could only dream of. Not one cent of promotion money has been necessary with talk radio and cable news pundits going off on the subject, as well as all the Clinton lawyers who are officially back on the clock.

Liberals are full of it and remember that every time they lecture all of us about their fraudulent self-celebration of free speech and freedom of expression. Conservatives have tolerated Michael Moore’s “documentaries� and haven’t come anywhere close to the protestations when it comes to the new film that dramatizes liberal wishful-thinking with the assassination of President Bush.

Yes, the right had a victory having Barbra Streisand’s production “The Reagans� banished to premium cable. The difference is that with this “Path to 9/11� controversy, all the Clinton’s men can whine, complain, and write threatening letters. Ronald Reagan may not have remembered how to even turn on his television set while in the final stages of Alzheimer’s, so he couldn’t rebut any of the questionable scenes that were written as fact.

We’ll never know if “The Path To 9/11� is fact or fiction because we’ll never know what former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger stuffed down his pants. As the movie’s script is based on the 9/11 Commission Report, and that report is based partly on documents classified and not, until we know what Berger stole and destroyed from the National Archives during his review of documents so he could prep Bill Clinton for his Commission appearance, we’ll never know if the script (and Commission report) is as accurate as it should be.

Democrats denounce allegations against Berger

Congress to investigate ex-Clinton official’s handling of documents

NBC News and news services

Updated: 8:02 p.m. ET July 21, 2004

WASHINGTON – Democrats assailed Republicans who suggested Wednesday that former White House national security adviser Sandy Berger sought to hide embarrassing materials when he removed classified documents related to the investigation of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The Justice Department is investigating whether Berger committed a crime by removing copies of documents about the government’s anti-terror efforts and notes that he took on those documents. Berger was reviewing the materials to help determine which Clinton administration documents to provide to the Sept. 11 commission.

“Last year, when I was in the Archives reviewing documents, I made an honest mistake. It’s one that I deeply regret,� Berger said. “I dealt with this issue in October 2003 fully and completely. Everything that I have done all along in this process has been for the purpose of aiding and supporting the work of the 9/11 commission, and any suggestion to the contrary is simply, absolutely wrong.�

When asked, Berger said he returned some classified documents that he found in his office and all of the handwritten notes he had taken from the secure room but could not find two or three copies of the highly classified millennium terror report.

“In the course of reviewing over several days thousands of pages of documents on behalf of the Clinton administration in connection with requests by the Sept. 11 commission, I inadvertently took a few documents from the Archives. When I was informed by the Archives that there were documents missing, I immediately returned everything I had except for a few documents that I apparently had accidentally discarded,� he said.

NBC’s David Gregory, Pete Williams, and The Associated Press

Before I get to the relevance of this in regards to the miniseries, let’s clear something up right now. Berger didn’t make an “honest mistake� or “inadvertently took a few documents�. He STOLE and DESTROYED classified documents and that is a crime.




Sec. 1924. Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

So he should have known he was breaking the law, and he lied about his actions by saying in essence that it was an accident. But Sandy Berger’s honesty is a crucial element when it comes to whether the script of the miniseries is as close to accurate or not. He says some of the scenes in question never happened. Can, or should, he be believed?

Berger Will Plead Guilty To Taking Classified Paper

By John F. Harris and Allan Lingual

Washington Post Staff Writers

Friday, April 1, 2005

Samuel R. “Sandy” Berger, a former White House national security adviser, plans to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, and will acknowledge intentionally removing and destroying copies of a classified document about the Clinton administration’s record on terrorism.

The deal’s terms make clear that Berger spoke falsely last summer in public claims that in 2003 he twice inadvertently walked off with copies of a classified document during visits to the National Archives, then later lost them.

He described the episode last summer as “an honest mistake.â€? Yesterday, a Berger associate who declined to be identified by name but was speaking with Berger’s permission said: “He recognizes what he did was wrong…. It was not inadvertent.”

Berger said on CNN’s The Situation Room, “I have written to Mr. Iger and said that we believe that the scenes that we’re talking about are complete fabrications. They simply did not happen. They should be fixed. But quite honestly, at this point, I don’t think this is something you can fix. I think you just have to yank it.”

Berger wasn’t alone writing to Disney Boss Robert Iger. A bunch of Democrat senators gave a veiled threat in a letter to Iger, and ABC that read in part….

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program.

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.


Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid

Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin

Senator Debbie Stabenow

Senator Charles Schumer

Senator Byron Dorgan

In other words, if you run this program, they may relieve ABC of its broadcast license. No writer/producer in Hollywood should have any political leanings. How many complaints did these senators issue about “The West Wing� and their partisan portrayals? Let’s not forget “non-partisan� examples like “The American President� and almost every movie made in Hollywood where the word “Republican� is used as an off-the-cuff, irrelevant-to-the-plot insult.

So, in the end, it seems to come back to Sandy Berger, who seems to be the one holding the credibility of the Clinton Administration’s seriousness on the terror war in his hands.

According to the Hollywood Reporter’s Andrew Wallenstein,

“In recent days, a rising chorus of critics have assailed “Path to 9/11″ for offering an inaccurate depiction of pre-Sept. 11 behind-the-scenes politics. Former Clinton officials, including Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and National Security Adviser Samuel Berger have voiced their objections over scenes that cast their involvement in an unflattering light.

“Sources said ABC already has made minor edits to the miniseries, toning down one particular scene involving Berger that was interpreted by some as suggesting he at one point opted to not order the assassination of Osama bin Laden. The scene was edited to emphasize the culpability of no one particular individual, sources said, who also noted that not every scene that has been called into question will necessarily be changed.�

The way I understand it, there’s one sequence where the CIA and the Afghanistan Northern Alliance surround bin Laden’s house in Afghanistan. They need final approval from the Clinton administration in order to capture him.

They called Washington. They called the White House. Clinton and his senior staff refuse to give authorization for the capture of bin Laden because they’re afraid of political fallout should the mission go wrong. Sandy Burger reportedly tells the CIA team in Afghanistan if they want to capture bin Laden, they’re on their own. If they go in, the administration’s not sanctioning or approving the ” The team abandons the mission, and not long after that, that bin Laden and Al-Qaeda bomb the US embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, killing over 225 men, women, and children and also wounded over 4,000.

Unfortunately, we’ll never know what really happened until we find out what documents were “inadvertentlyâ€? destroyed by Berger. Berger says it never happened. Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson disagrees….

“I was there with Clinton and Berger and watched the missed opportunities occur. Berger was very agitated, he couldn’t get a decision from the president.”

According to Art Moore of World Net Daily, “As a military aide to President Clinton from 1996 to 1998, Patterson was one of five men entrusted with carrying the “nuclear football,” which contains the codes for launching nuclear weapons.â€?

The scene in “The Path to 9/11,” as Patterson recalled from the preview version, unfolds with CIA operatives at the camp on the phone with Berger, who is expressing concern that an attack could result in innocent bystanders being killed. An agent says he sees swing sets and children’s toys in the area. The scene ends with Berger hanging up the phone.

Patterson says his recollection is that Clinton was involved directly in several similar incidents in which Berger was pressing the president for a decision.

Patterson noted he wasn’t sure what Berger wanted to do – whether the national security adviser wanted the answer to be yes or no – but the frustration, at the very least, was based on the president making himself unavailable to make a decision.

Clinton, according to Patterson, did not return phone calls from Berger for more than an hour then said he wanted more time to study the situation.

Patterson writes: “We ‘studied’ the issues until it was too late-the window of opportunity closed.”

Seeing how Lt. Col. Patterson has never stolen secret documents and destroyed some of them, his honesty is not in question. Sandy Berger’s honesty isn’t either. He has no credibility.

If “The Path To 9/11� is not an accurate depiction of events that led up to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attack, it’s because some of the documents used to produce the 9/11 Commission were purposefully removed, thus omitted, by Sandy Berger.

We have the word of Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Berger, and “Buzz� Patterson. Patterson said some of the scenes in question happened. If they hadn’t, Clinton’s lawyers would be suing instead of issuing threats.

History isn’t being rewritten. Thanks to the strong spines of those at ABC, it’s finally being exposed.


Ma’rie J’on, bacon, eggs, sausage and M’arie ‘Jon!

Grand Poobah Jinky

“Gee, I’m so moronic that this newspaper picks up my op-ed’s”

Daring, the vast majority of Americans are fucktards…welcome to the dream.


Wow, Marie Jon’ is now officially a Sadly, No troll. Now, normally I’d be really excited about this, but unfortunately she’s just cutting and pasting. Come on Marie, cut the defecating words and give us some original Marie Jon’ material. Anybody can cut and paste, but nobody can whip the ass of the English language quite like you.


Right, Marie. So, the writers of “The Path to 9/11” admit they based it on speculation and conjecture, but Sandy Berger attempted to take some documents from the National Archives…therefore your favorite conjecture is true?

Do you see the problem here? I have no idea which documents Berger was accessing, or what they prove. And neither do you, and neither does republican operative/talk show host Buzz Lightyear.

Now watch this drive.


Late in the thread, but I just wanted to point this out.

The fact is that the Democrats don’t want people to remember how they constantly failed in the days leading up to 9/11.

The Dems weren’t in power in the days leading up to 9/11.


As the movie’s script is based on the 9/11 Commission Report, and that report is based partly on documents classified and not, until we know what Berger stole and destroyed from the National Archives during his review of documents so he could prep Bill Clinton for his Commission appearance, we’ll never know if the script (and Commission report) is as accurate as it should be.

According to Noel Hillman, chief prosecutor for the Justice Department’s Public Integrity section, Sandy Berger only took copies of those documents and destroyed those. The only reason we don’t know what Berger took and destroyed from the archives is because they are still classified documents and we can’t see them anyway.

Quoth Mr.Hillman: ‘There is no evidence that he did destroy originals. We have objectively and affirmatively confirmed that the contents of all the five documents at issue exist today and were made available to the 9/11 Commission.’


God, it burns me up to see you people make ad hominem attacks and vile references about her personal appearances. The ‘net is just a playground for your prurient fantasies and other people’s feeling be damned. Can’t you just accept the fact that Clinton did nothing more than attempt to assassinate bin Laden? While Bush has done so much more… in also failing to assassinate bin Laden. Look at all Bush did about the obvious number one threat to our nation in his first eight months in office. OK, but you get a pass on threats to national security for your first 10 months, at least. Besides, look at what he did for missile defense in that time. OK, never mind, just look at what he SPENT on missile defense.Anyway, I am SURE that Marie (Jon’) never accused Clinton of using his cruise missile attacks aimed at bin Laden to divert attention away from the Lewinsky scandal. I’m sure she NEVER used the phrase “wag the dog” that was used by the short-sighted right wing pundits, whoever they are. Clearly all those pundits were too obsessed with checking for spelling errors and grammatical mistakes to see that Clinton lacked the courage to ignore the pundits and, um, do, like more stuff. Like what Bush was planning while on vacation in Crawford, August 2001.Marie is right on track. If everyone would just know who the enemy is then we’ll stay the course and continue exactly as we are now. How could we lose? C’mon everyone who believes, clap your hands! Tinkerbelle. Will. Live. Dammit!

And stay away from Marie (Jon’) no matter how much she just oozes sex. It’s all a come on. Like she says, if you want the real Marie (Jon’) you’ve got to pay for it.

Grand Poobah Jinky

..and now my imitation of Phred Felps on teh Inturwheb:


Poor, poor Phred.


Hey Nazi spammer, all you’ve done is prove why the Bible is a shitty thing to base a society on.


Looks like you’re gonna have to check-up on this thread every once in a while, Retardo, ‘cos… look up a few posts. Yep.
An a·pos·tate:
One who has abandoned one’s religious faith, a political party, one’s principles, or a cause.


Islam and Terrorism

(Why we left Islam)


Meet the Apostates





Discussion board


Contact Us

• If you are a Muslim and are hurt by seeing this page, please click here for the Alternate soft version
• If you are a New Apostate, click here
• If you think this site is offensive, click here
• I want to stop Terrorism

Video of Stoning to Death

“Merciful” or “have mercy”?

Click here to watch the Stoning-to-death video
If you are a Muslim, you MUST read this section and watch the video to increase your knowledge of Islam. Increasing one’s knowledge about Islam is farz (compulsory)!
Also, you must force yourself to like stoning, because Mohammed ordered it. If you are afraid to watch the video or have watched it and are disgusted by it, you will likely be punished in Hell for Kufr. So watch the video and do NOT be disgusted!

Stoning to death is a cruel insane Islamic punishment given to people who are married but still voluntarily have sex outside marraige. This punishment was ordered by the “merciful” Prophet, who ofcourse was the messenger of the “merciful” Allah.

Many hadith, including Sahih Bukhari give proof that Stoning was ordered and practiced by Muhammed, for example:

Volume 2, Book 23, Number 413:
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar :
The Jew brought to the Prophet a man and a woman from amongst them who have committed (adultery) illegal sexual intercourse. He ordered both of them to be stoned (to death), near the place of offering the funeral prayers beside the mosque.”

Click here for more hadith which verify that Mohammed ordered stoning

What happens in Stoning?
In stoning to death, the victims’s hands are tied behind their backs and their bodies are put in a cloth sack. Then, this human “package” is buried in a hole, with only the victims heads showing above the ground. If its a woman, she is buried upto her shoulders. This is to give her an seemingly equal (but nonetheless impossible) chance to escape recognizing her lesser physical strength.
After the hapless individual has been secured in the hole, people start chanting “Allah hu Akbar” (meaning, God is great), and throw palm sized stones at the head of the victim from a certain distance (a circle is drawn).
The stones are thrown until the person dies or until he/she escapes out of the hole and crosses the circle. Escaping is impossible, given that the individual’s hands are tied behind their backs and they are buried in a hole upto their necks or shoulders (in the case of males and females respectively).
Naturally, the procedure is extremely barbaric and bloody.

Warning! This is an extremely sick and disgusting punishment, and thus watching this video can make you weak or possibly give you nausea and shock for several days. Please do not watch if you are weak-hearted.

Watch at your own risk!
Video of Stoning to Death

Choose your connection:
DSL or Cable (100kbps) | Dial-up Modem

Mohammed ordered stoning to death.

Video Running time: 10:23(m:s)
Download size: 9.4MB (high speed)

Windows Media Player is needed to play the files

Stoning to death is still carried out in the current era, in Iran and was carried out in the previous Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.

Related: Also see The Stoning (movie)

Currently, there is a stoning-to-death sentence on Zhila and Bakhtiyar Izadi from Iran. There is a Campaign going on to save themon this website:

Note: The stoning videos on this page were copied by permission from the website of Iran-e-Azad, an organization which fights for Freedom and Human Rights in Iran. Their website link is here.

We want everone to watch this video and know the truth about this “peaceful” religion of Islam which is a danger to humanity and human rights. If you have a website or a blog, you are most welcome to link to the video:

Are people in this video extremists? No, they are true Muslims, following the exact orders of their leader Mohammed. This is real Islam in practice. If you are a Muslim and believe stoning is not a part of Islam: Congratulations! You have already partially apostated from Islam. Now you just need to complete your apostasy like we did, and stop believing that Mohammed was a prophet of God. Join our discussion forum to ask for help on how you can leave Islam. Being a humanist is a great alternative to being a Muslim:

Be liberated from the slavery of the imaginary Allah and the false Prophet Mohammed. Leave Islam today!


Random Quran:

“(Here is) a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: in it are rivers of water incorruptible; rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear. In it there are for them all kinds of fruits; and Grace from their Lord. (Can those in such Bliss) be compared to such as shall dwell for ever in the Fire, and be given, to drink, boiling water, so that it cuts up their bowels (to pieces)?” -Quran 47:15 [translation:Yusuf Ali]

Carrot and Stick

Suggest a Verse!

Random Hadith:

“Those who permit silk will be turned into an ape or pig?

Abu Dawud, Book 32, Number 4028:
Narrated AbuAmir or AbuMalik:
AbdurRahman ibn Ghanam al-Ash’ari said: AbuAmir or AbuMalik told me–I swear by Allah another oath that he did not believe me that he heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: THERE WILL BE AMONG MY COMMUNITY PEOPLE WHO WILL MAKE LAWFUL (THE USE OF) KHAZZ AND SILK. SOME OF THEM WILL BE TRANSFORMED INTO APES AND SWINE.”

Low Level of Nonsense

Suggest a Hadith!

© Apostates of Islam

” excerpts ” “God’s Stange Act” By Marie Jon’
In today’s current events, we see a particular faith that has captured everyone’s attention. It seems that those who embrace this religion do not understand that they themselves might be the recipients of God’s strange act if they do not change their barbarous ways. It is our duty to inform radical Islam with truth. There is no honey coating the word of God. If sin is not relinquished, eternal death is the unfortunate outcome.

Phillippians 2:12 “Workout your own salvation with fear and trembling.”

While Muslims protest in the streets wearing their terrifying garb of Jihad, Christians will invite souls to look at the cross that transforms lives to a higher calling without the use of force, threats, and beheadings.

There is no compromise with sin and it’s destroying effects. God eventually will step upon this earth’s history once again and take a commanding control. The Lord will vanquish evil once and for all at His Second Coming.

“The great controversy is ended. Sin and sinners are no more. The entire universe is clean. One pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation. From Him who created all, flow life and light and gladness, throughout the realms of illimitable space. From the minutest atom to the greatest world, all things, animate and inanimate, in their unshadowed beauty and perfect joy, declare that God is love.” The Great Controversy

There is much to be said about the teaching of Islam and virgins who await those who kill infidels as their reward. The only virgins worth mentioning are in the Bible. The ten foolish young women did not have their spiritual lamps lit. This is a good opportunity to point to those within the Muslim faith and appeal to them to use some eye salve. They need to grasp the folly everyone else is seeing.

The words of a dead saint are truly more prophetic than ever. “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. ” 14th-century Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II

The following are a few lines from an AP article: Al Qaeda in Iraq to Pope Benedict XVI: ‘You and the West Are Doomed’

“Protests broke out in South Asia and Indonesia, with angry Muslims saying Benedict’s statement of regret a day earlier did not go far enough. In southern Iraq, demonstrators carrying black flags burned an effigy of the pope.

“Islamic leaders around the world issued more condemnations of the pope’s comments, but some moderates in the Middle East appeared to be trying to put a damper on the outrage, fearing it.”

God is love. He stands like a gentleman and he knocks at the door of man’s heart. He waits to be invited in. This everlasting gospel expounds with redeeming love, and calls to a sick, sin filled world: Isaiah 1:18 “come let us reason together.” The Lord of all beckons and invites His erring children. The Almighty came to save and to redeem the world. There certainly is a compelling difference between Islam and Christianity, the religion of peace. Our God is love, his name is Jesus Christ.


[…] course this is exactly the sort of thing that made me love Marie in the first […]


[…] wing, ev’rything nut That’s what you are So dump Virgin Ben and Gaynor, and come with This fifth-columnist moonbat re-tarrrrd I’ve […]


(comments are closed)