If the conservative crazies really wanted to stop Hilary, they’d vote for Kerry. A Kerry victory puts her out of contention until 2008 (when Kerry would presumably run for reelection). If Kerry is reelected, his Veep (presumably still Edwards) would be assured of the nomination in 2012, making it nigh impossible for Hil to unseat a sitting VP seeking the nomination – her next ”window” would be 2016.

By 2012 Hilary may be too old for the WhiteHouse (65 if my numbers be right) – she’d be 69 in 2016 (tough enough for a man to compete at that age; even worse for a woman). I guarantee that Bill and Hil don’t want Kerry to win. It wrecks their plans. A vote for Bush in 2004 is a vote for Hilary in 2008!

Stop Hilary. Vote Kerry!

It’s very likely that Hillary will run for Health & Human Services Secretary in 2004.

It’s very likely that Hillary will challenge Edwards to a steel cage death match for the Vice Presidency in `04.

It’s very likely that Hillary will run for Health & Human Services Secretary in 2004.

I didn’t know we could vote for these positions.

I didn’t know we could vote for these positions.

Well, it’s another one of those positions where you can be nominated by the person in charge. For some reason we thought HHS secretary was funny. (It narrowly beat out “Surgeon General” in our focus groups.)

Hee hee, that’s quite amusing.

Now that Kerry has picked Edwards as his VP nominee, I’m sure StopHillaryPAC.com is claiming victory!

Naw, the Edwards nomination is obviously just a ruse to throw us off the scent.

Politicians and fishermen are alike: If their lips are moving, they are lying.

“One, two, FOUR!”
“Three sir!”
“THREE!”