WorldNetDaily, as is its wont, is once again at the forefront of critical commentary on all things homosexual:

Could your kids be given to ‘gay’ parents?

Isn’t it possible after all that once the party of the Antichrist is in power the government will kidnap children of heterosexual parents (specifically, Meghan Cox-Gurdon and Michelle Malkin’s) in order to give them to gay parents? Sorry, we mean ‘gay’ parents. Stephen Baskerville opens his article with this:

In the debate over gay marriage, strikingly little attention has been paid to the impact on children.

As long as “strikingly little” means 24/7 non-stop coverage, we’re with Stephen so far.

Almost no attention has been devoted to what may be the more serious political question of who will supply the children of gay “parents,” since obviously they cannot produce children themselves.

Perhaps we can get those children from… The Matrix?:

The matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes, to blind you from the truth.

Having answered this question, let us move on:

…gay couples already seem to enjoy a marked advantage over straight ones in the allocation of supposedly superfluous children.

The supply of superfluous little ones (Mr. Meghan Cox-Gurdon can only get sufficiently drunk so many times after all,) being inherently limited, we shall concede this point to Stephen. Yet we wonder when did all those problems begin?

Ever since the federal government became involved in the child-abuse business some 30 years ago…

Damn liberal nanny state, beating our children!

This is the bureaucratic milieu ? largely hidden from all but those who must endure it ? into which gay marriage advocates want to inject millions of new couples in search of children to adopt.

Millions of gay couple will seek to adopt children? Sadly, No!

The number of truly abused children cannot begin to fill this demand without government help. We know that statistically child abuse in intact two-parent families is rare, and two-thirds of reports are never substantiated. Yet even in those instances of confirmed abuse, a little digging reveals the pernicious hand of the government generating business (and children) for itself.

So even when parents do abuse their children, it’s the government’s fault! Adam Smith’s invisible hand is mistreating Elpatha, Giovanna, Perseus, and Daisy Duke! Is there anything the government won’t do??? :’-(

Child abuse is overwhelmingly a phenomenon of single-parent homes. Government and feminist propaganda suggest that single-parent homes result from paternal abandonment. In fact, they are usually created by family court judges, who have close ties to the social service agencies that need children. By forcibly removing fathers from the home through unilateral or “no-fault” divorce…

Not only will the government steal your children, they will also force millions of mothers to drop their husbands, leaving their kids exposed to the evil influence that is… the single-parent home. Those damn single moms, always abusing their children. We wonder what government statistics show about that:

Among children in single-parent households, those living with only their fathers were approximately one and two-thirds times more likely to be physically abused than those living with only their mothers.

Oh. Well, these men wouldn’t be divorced if it weren’t for that nanny state anyway. What can we do though, oh please do tell us Stephen:

Opponents must bite the bullet and confront the two evils that pose a far more serious and direct threat to the family than gay marriage: the child protection gestapo and the even more formidable “no-fault” divorce machine.

Do you think that goes a bit far? Do you imagine that maybe “bite the bullet” doesn’t mean what Stephen thinks it means? Do you figure that Stephen is a few bullets short of a full revolver? Wait until you see Stephen’s conclusion:

[the public] has been led to view social conservatives, however unjustly, as puritanical bigots who want to deny equal rights to homosexuals ? rights that entail powers of totalitarian dimensions, undreamed of before the sexual revolution

Don’t let gays adopt children — it’s just what Mussolini and Stalin would have done. Saddam Hussein had gay parents adoption chambers for fuck’s sake!