Bushist Dead-Enders
Egad. Dan Riehl is just plain creepy:
Obviously unable to control themselves on even a purely ceremonial night, the Democrat Party, having recently secured but a slim Congressional majority, opted to breeze through any areas for potential common ground in three short introductory paragraphs via spokesperson Jim Webb, so as to get immediately to points of contention between the two parties.
Whoa. Wuh, wuh, wuh. Dan. Dan-o. The Danster. When did the SOTU address become a “purely ceremonial night?” It’s often a platform for the executive branch to unveil new policies and explain to the public the direction they’re taking the country in. There ain’t much ceremonial about it — indeed, the very point of unveiling new policies is (get this!) political.
Now just you watch, ’cause things are about to get really freaky:
At a time when most reasonable experts conclude today’s economy is an extremely positive tribute to the fiscal policy of the Bush presidency, a Democrat Party more interested in wealth distribution and entitlements can’t bring itself to see it that way.
I’ll link as oppose to address mostly the same populist rhetoric we’ve been hearing from Democrats for years. As usual, they seek only to divide America by class, instead of celebrating an America of free enterprise that encourages and allows even the poorest among us to elevate themselves and accumulate wealth as a result of their work.
Nope, it doesn’t matter that polls consistently show that Americans are anxious about the economy, or that data show that America has become less and less class mobile over the years. What matters is that Dan’s stock portfolio is doing just dandy, and everyone who wants to do better will just have to work harder or get a plum wingnut welfare job.
They remain the party which seeks to cultivate a society of average people, as opposed to nurturing what’s best in each and every American by urging them forward in working for their dreams, financial and otherwise.
And you know how much Dan simply hates those average people who weren’t smart enough to get Brent Bozell to cut them checks.
In the world view of today’s Democrats, apparently no one can succeed without government help.
Or if they have a right-wing sugar daddy like the Rev. Moon.
That concept flies directly in the face of most everything that has made America great, through its appreciation for rugged independence and every individual’s unique efforts and strengths.
And of course at a time when we have so many in harms way, with more to follow under the direction of the rightfully elected Commander-in-Chief, naturally Webb and the Democrats would have to bring up Iraq.
Seeing how Bush mentioned Iraq a lot in his SOTU speech, and seeing how the Democrats’ speech was supposed to be a response to Bush, I don’t see how they could have failed to mention Iraq. My God. I can’t believe this is the best that wingnut welfare has to offer.
At a time when we face a global threat from radical Islam and our last best hope is likely seeding much needed reforms through freedom and democracy within the Middle-East, even while acknowledging a far greater sacrifice of his Father’s generation when his country called, Democrat Webb’s message to the America of today is, the best we can do is cut and run and pretend that unreasonable and deadly enemies fully dedicated to our destruction can be negotiated with just as Chamberlain negotiated with Hitler before half of Europe was gone.
In other words, Jim Webb is a pussy who only wants to undermine America’s fighting men and women, up to and including his own son.
I give up. The fact that Dan Riehl actually makes money at all and isn’t consigned to tossing salads for drugs in back alleyways is the most depressing thing in the world.
(Via Mona blogging o’er at Henley’s place.)
UPDATE: Even when he’s just leaving a comment, teh Editors has a way with words:
Dan Riehl is basically the stupidest person alive, ever. Everything he says is stupider than every stupid thing ever said, combined, including everything Riehl ever said, including the statement that this sum is not stupider than. The fact that what this is logically impossible is simply a tribute to how stupid Riehl is. The laws of mathematics would rather kill themselves than deal with his stupidity. Words? Words never stood a chance.
Heh. Indizzy.
Wow. Just…I mean, I’m just…I don’t even know if my brain has processed the level of stupidity here. It’s like he’s Dubya’s stupid brother.
Wait…maybe Dan Riehl is actually Neil Bush!
No one who takes money from Moon can call themselves a Christian. Moon has declared himself the Messiah, in direct violation of the First Commandment. Accepting his money is tantamount to heresy.
Anyone who believes in true traditional American values should start setting up stakes and gathering kindling.
We elect a Commander-in-Chief? Huh? When did that happen?…and you knew he’d hack up a Hitler hairball somewhere in there.
can we start calling them the republic party?
Wait…maybe Dan Riehl is actually Neil Bush!
Nope, Neil also has that stammer, and he’s the admitted family dyslexic so he wouldn’t do well reading off a teleprompter.
But it could be argued that Dan Riehl gets paid the serious Wingnut Welfare (direct deposit, possibly to a semi-legal offshore account, rather than cheetos coupons) because it’s not easy making the Bush family look relatively intelligent, or at least models of restraint, live & in public. Finding someone smart enough to mouth the right words, and yet dumb enough to believe them, is no small undertaking.
I confronted Dan in that very post about his obsession with the “Democrat Party”, and his retarded semantics led me to throw down the fucking gauntlet. It’s on like Donkey Kong. It’s been broughten. You know how the wingnuts now breathlessly declare that the “chickenhawk slur” has been “debunked”? Well, say goodbye to the Democrat Party.
http://democratparty.blogspot.com/
Spread it. Steal it. It don’t matta. You see “the Democrat Party”, you put up a link or the quote. We will wipe this abomination off the intertubes by 2008. The Google bomb begins shortly.
Oh, shut up. You are envious of someone who worked hard to get where he is, and is now reeping the benefits. Something liberals cannot do as their is no benefit to being a slave to Ted Kennedy and the Islams.
Yeah, Riehl called Webb a coward and a traitor too.
A decorated Marine whose son is serving in Iraq.
Bet Riehl wouldn’t say that directly to Webb.
Bastards have no respect for anybody.
As usual, they seek only to divide America by class
Webb: I can’t help noticing that blue isn’t yellow. But perhaps we could work at blending them to make green.
Riehl: Obviously you’re objectively anti-blue and you stupidly believe that yellow can’t become green without help from blue. Everyone knows that if yellow would just try harder, it could become green. Blue deserves to be blue because blue makes use of its unique blue talents. Fucking Democrat party.
Unmitigated asshole.
Please shut up and note that as a liberal you could be put in camps for your huretical views about freedom, you will not fight for it and denigrate those who do? Well, then you are a problem not the solution, so out of the way for you!
Demoncraps want Islam to be state religion.
Hey now. I once sang backup for Ted Kennedy and the Islams, and let me tell you, their was some serious benefits to be reeped.
note that as a liberal you could be put in camps for your huretical views about freedom, you will not fight for it and denigrate those who do?
WTF? I’m stupider than I thought.
The fact is, Reihl has a job and a grip on reality, which liberals do not and their are envious. So often begins the class war.
The fact is, Riehl really grips on the hand job, which libertines envy for naught. So classy begins the affair.
Riehl, Shoelimpy, and now Gary Ruppert: a trifecta of twatitude. I wouldn’t fuck any of you in the ass with annieangel’s dick. Keep treading water, motherfuckers, it’s gonna be a long decade for you morans.
Gary RuPaul: “The fact is, Reihl has a job and a grip on reality, which liberals do not and their are envious.”
What, liberals don’t have jobs? None of them? Every last freakin’ one? Total saturation unemployment straight across the liberal board?
Dude, that’s just amazing*. But it does kinda sorta undercut GOPher claims that the economy is ginnin’ along just dandy, those millions and millions of liberals being unemployed and all. Just sayin’…..
And “their are envious”? Man, it’s just pure poetry when you mash your palms against a keyboard like that….
* “Amazing” in the totally insincere sense commonly used to suggest that the speaker (in this case, Gary) is a mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, paint-huffing cretin who should be institutionalized just for implying he believes his own crap.
Hey now. I once sang backup for Ted Kennedy and the Islams, and let me tell you, their was some serious benefits to be reeped.
Ha! What more needs to be said?
” and deadly enemies fully dedicated to our destruction can be negotiated with just as Chamberlain negotiated with Hitler before half of Europe was gone.”
Right. Which is why the USA was RIGHT THERE on the front lines of Poland on September 1, 1939. Because Hitler was a threat that had to be confronted immediately. NO time for sissy European diplomacy. Not us. We saw a threat rising, and took immediate military action to stop it.
Hehehe. Liberals don’t have jobs. That’s funny. Do you not understand how much work is is to sell illegal drugs to children, and walk to the bank to deposit my Social Security check EVERY month?
Um. OT (and likely inflammatory) but still: I hope the Hillary people paid a lot for the ad.
Total sellouts.
I’m with ya, Mort. Nice to see the guys make a few bucks for all their hard work, though it does keep me away from all those gay abortions I’ve been meaning to have . . . .
I remember them back when they were cool.
can we start calling them the republic party?
I’ve suggested the Re-pube-lickin’ party. Somehow, inexplicably, it has yet to catch on.
“The fact is, Reihl has a job and a grip on reality, which liberals do not and their are envious.�
IS that what I am feeling; envy? Hmmm… let me see, nope, not envy… I think its chagrim that Riehl is paid for this shit, anger that the GOP stopped the war against Bin Laden and Co. so Bush could feel big in front of Daddy, and a hint of… smugness I think… yup that’s smug… that Webb tore Bush a new one.
Why don’t we just keep on calling them flamin assholes?
Riehl, Malkin and The whole Wingnut welfare brigade don’t have real jobs…. not in the hard working, Middle America sense that the Republicans are always paying lip service to.
Thye don’t produce any real goods, they don’t provide a service that has a value established by a free market, since it’s artificially propped up by people like Moon and Murdoch.
Even our Pal Gary has more socially redeeming value than these leeches.
Dan Riehl is one of those wingnuts who are so cute they make me wish they came in mini size to adopt as a pet.
Granted, I’m twisted, but I think it’d be fun to have little G.I. Joe sized wingnuts living in a habitrail. Mini Pam Atlas and Carey Roberts and Dan Riehl would make great pets. I could put them in gerbil balls and they could roll around and try and knock over my bong. Speaking of which, I could force them to get high with me, and have little dress weddings where Dan marries Carey and Pam marries the Rancor from Star Wars. And if they get too annoying, I could squish them.
Ok, I’m bored and that was random, but how does one take Dan Riehl seriously, and/or why?
Myself, I like “Repub”. It’s cognate, and yet carries the hint of ‘repugnant’ and ‘rebuke’ and even ‘pube’. But you could say it on the teevee, at least if the MSM ever stops sucking up to the Repubs.
Oh, and remember: Pie! It’s not just for breakfast, any more!
Publican,
or, een Hispano-felinish: Repuli-culos.
Dan Riehl (artist’s conception)
Es verdad.
Worst Shoelimpy namestealer ever. You are banned for being so unamusing. If you keep this shit up, we definitely won’t win the Weblog Awards next year, and Wikipedia will never pick us back up.
again, to barely take it farther, he’s pretty much saying “how dare the Democra party have a response to the SOTU!!!!!!! what is wrong with them. don’t they know that at a time where the two parties disagree with each other, and one of them runs the country, it is the job of the other to shut up and do as they are told.
it is such galling ignorance of every word of the federalist papers, every thought that our founding fathers had in their head as they created our country. it is a total abnegation of sense. truly this man LOATHES to his core America the idea. His writing and thinking are fascist, pure and simple. how can one of the two leading parties in this country be an engine for the creation of such retarded thinking? DAn riehl is an evil fuck who should be sent to 1935 Italy so that he can get his tongue up Mussolini’s ass far enough to make him happy.
fuck. i hate these fucking pricks.
This is 5th grade writing comprehension.
the Democrat Party, having recently secured but a slim Congressional majority
Funny how when the Rethuglican Party had a slim majority (especially after sElection 2000), they were constantly claiming it was a massive repudiation of that spawn-of-Satan Bill XXXlintoon and the evil, traitorous libruls, yet when the Dems make major gains – enough to give them a similar margin as the Rethugs had at their weakest grip on power, it’s barely a majority to them…
That concept flies directly in the face of most everything that has made America great, through its appreciation for rugged independence and every individual’s unique efforts and strengths.
Why is it that every time some conservative ideologue spooges on their keyboard about “rugged individualism,” I keep thinking of that episode of Dexter’s Laboratory where Dexter obsesses over Action Hank’s “rugged awesomeness?”
You know how you can tell Dan Riehl is the stupidest fuck alive? Not only can he not describe Democratic beliefs accurately (a universal wingnut affliction, after all), he can’t even accurately represent Repubelickin* beliefs!
I mean, “nurturing what’s best in each and every American by urging them forward in working for their dreams” and “appreciation for…every individual’s unique efforts and strengths”? Why, he makes Repubelickins sound like a bunch of molly-coddling feminists!1
*It’s a stretch, I know.
I mean, “nurturing what’s best in each and every American by urging them forward in working for their dreams� and “appreciation for…every individual’s unique efforts and strengths�?
Sounds an awful lot like “from each according to his ability, and to each according to his need”! :O
Can’t help but point out that here’s another area in which Democrats could gain a little standing by helping to move the center in American politics back toward the actual center, and away from this insanely redshifted rightwing cant it’s been allowed to take over the last thirty years……
The reason it’s possible for members of the Republic party to spread this idea that Democrats favor income redistribution is because people who actually DO favor income redistribution have been shut out of the national dialogue. Democrats don’t favor income redistribution. I do. I’m not a Democrat.
And yeah – we really need to start referring to them as the Republic party. Although, considering how illiterate the lot of them are, they’ll all miss the obviuous insult contained in the term.
Indeed, scarshapedstar. Dan Riehl: The Marxist Republican who thinks Democrats are trying to homogenize American culture.
Republican’t works for me. My wingnut fil stopped discussing politics with me because I couldn’t get the name right. hahaha
Also, in re: “Democrat party” meme…..it’s worth pointing out that many of my inner city, educationally disadvantaged high school students have a better grasp on the distinction between a noun and an adjective than is on display by these Republics.
Please shut up and note that as a liberal you could be put in camps for your huretical views about freedom, you will not fight for it and denigrate those who do? Well, then you are a problem not the solution, so out of the way for you!
Damn Shoelimpy is sounding like the stupidest Nazi in the Third Reich. Or maybe the nastiest 8th grade dropout ever.
Also, you are right Brad A., the Editors Rock!
Guys- Shoelimpy isn’t for real. I don’t know how many times I have to keep telling you. He just likes to annoy people by being as obnoxious as he can. In other words, he’s a fake.
Now Ruppert, on the other hand, that’s some real gangsta shit.
Shoelimpy isn’t for real.
Meaning, limpy doesn’t really believe what he/she/it says, and is only trying to derail our though process, such as it is?
Are you basically saying that we need to start ignoring the limp one? (Probably a good idea.)
Are you basically saying that we need to start ignoring the limp one? (Probably a good idea.)
For fuck’s sake, yes. That’s the whole point. I never respond to him directly (unless he says something really funny, like “I hope all liberals die, preferrably at the hands of the terrorists.” That was just brilliant.)
‘S a good point.
At a time when we face a global threat from radical Islam and our last best hope is likely seeding much needed reforms through freedom and democracy within the Middle-East[. . .]
Well, thank god we began with the non-democracies we have the most direct influence over, like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait…
…oh, wait…
At a time when we face a global threat from radical Islam and our last best hope is likely seeding much needed reforms through freedom and democracy within the Middle-East[. . .]
Sure, with those little crystals that they seed clouds with to make rain, only democracy crystals, right? And then reforms and freedom and democracy will rain down upon the Middle East, and lo, the land shall be awash with milk and honey and freedom and democracy and we’ll all sit around singing Kumbayah, right?
And these dickheads claim that they are the realists? Man, they do that without drugs, imagine what the world must be like through their eyes. They make Hunter S. look like a bank manager.
“Shoelimpy isn’t for real.”
I knew it. It’s that RNC Artifical Unintelligence Blogscripting v2.0 that they’ve been touting as a way to save money in their pay-for-posting budget. With what they pay Riehl and Malkin, they gotta cut expenses somewhere. I see v1.0 (code named “Gary Ruppert”) is still active. Given all the grammatical and syntax errors, I figured they’d retire that by version by now.
In the world view of today’s Democrats, apparently no one can succeed without government help.
And yet, how rich would Halliburton and other corporations like them be today without the Republicans?
You are envious of someone who worked hard to get where he is,
Reihl’s writing is the result of hard work on his part? Sheesh.
Heh. Yeah. My recent post on Dan Riehl has a little bit more on this, and a little bit more from Dan. It’s genuinely hard to pick one wingnut as being wingnuttier than any other wingnut, but certainly, Dan Riehl is right up there with the nuttiest of them.
At a time when most reasonable experts conclude today’s economy is an extremely positive tribute to the fiscal policy of the Bush presidency
Economists are one of the most right-leaning groups of academics — but to say that the general consensus is supportive of supply-side economics is utterly false.
Purely ceremonial…constitutional requirement. I get those two confused all of the time.
Jillian said, January 26, 2007 at 12:02
And yeah – we really need to start referring to them as the Republic party. Although, considering how illiterate the lot of them are, they’ll all miss the obviuous insult contained in the term.
Man, that angle is perfect. Plato was a corporatist sob who hated democracy and its values. Describes the Republic Party perfectly. I’m using it from now on.
Plato was a corporatist sob who hated democracy and its values. Describes the Republic Party perfectly
Word…is Jillian a very sophisticated troll?
“Purely ceremonial…constitutional requirement. I get those two confused all of the time.”
That’s OK, the Preznit thinks the Constitution’s pretty ceremonial…
Come back real Shoelimpy!!!!!! The one from Brand Ech!!! suxers!
tibblets
But notice the weasel words he managed to sneak into that sentence: most reasonable experts . In Reihlland, if you don’t agree, you aren’t a reasonable expert.
It’s kind of like the sentence Most reasonable morticians have sex with their cadavers is true if you define reasonable to mean necrophiliac
Brad,
Is calling Republican Party as republic party insulting? If yes, why dont you guys do it? If no, is there any other variation that we should use which is suttle? (not Rethuglican)
Dan Riehl called Webb’s speech ‘relatively treasonous and cowardly’ in comments at highclearing.com: http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2007/01/24/5852#comment-39056
I am in awe.
Seriously, The Editors are right. There are no laws, there are no quantifying measures that can be applied to demented fuckwittery of this nature.
Dan Riehl, amidst strenuous competition from his fellow True Believers, is the dumbest fucking man in THE UNIVERSE.
I vote for “Banana Republic Party.” Pretty much sums ’em up.
If you are going to make allegations, you should first get the facts. While I believe nesbusters may offer some sort of plan linked to ad rev or somehting, I’m really not sure, as, to date, I have lected to not participate in any paid manner with NewsBusters. Perhasp youshould try asking them before you try to smear someone that way. I annot you idiots out of love. I don’t need to do it for money.
The previous comment, if posted by the riehl dan himself, forces me to consider the unimaginable: his stuff is actually edited before it’s posted at riehlworld. What are the odds that there’s someone on the planet with the reasoning power of a three-toed sloth and the morals of Dick Cheney on meth, but with sufficient language skills to correct the nonsensical usage above? The mind boggles.
dan riehl you are so dumb it’s amusing to watch
“Please shut up and note that as a liberal you could be put in camps for your huretical views about freedom, you will not fight for it and denigrate those who do? Well, then you are a problem not the solution, so out of the way for you!”
Damn Shoelimpy is sounding like the stupidest Nazi in the Third Reich. Or maybe the nastiest 8th grade dropout ever. ”
Really? That’s a ShoeLimpy impersonator doing a stone cold Dan Riehl impression. It’s all there; the run-on sentence, the weird syntax; the not-quite-right cliches. That’s Riehl style in a nutshell. Where it belongs.
Alternately, ShoeLimpy is actually Dan Riehl, but that’s not likely, because Dan’s ego is too large to allow him to post under someone else’s name. Because Dan’s a great writer, and we’re just jealous of his talent.
I annot you idiots out of love. I don’t need to do it for money.
How about that squinty face you make? Does someone pay you for that? Because that creeps the living fuck out of me.
If you are going to make allegations, you should first get the facts. While I believe nesbusters may offer some sort of plan linked to ad rev or somehting, I’m really not sure, as, to date, I have lected to not participate in any paid manner with NewsBusters. Perhasp youshould try asking them before you try to smear someone that way. I annot you idiots out of love. I don’t need to do it for money.
Dan, fair enough. Some wingnuts are all about CREAM get tha’ money, dolla-dolla bill, y’all. But others are just in it for love of tha’ game. Clearly, you are one of those.
[…] In the comments to this thread, Dan Riehl writes: If you are going to make allegations, you should first get the facts. While I believe nesbusters may offer some sort of plan linked to ad rev or somehting, I’m really not sure, as, to date, I have lected to not participate in any paid manner with NewsBusters. Perhasp youshould try asking them before you try to smear someone that way. I annot you idiots out of love. I don’t need to do it for money. […]
Only a dirty hippie would be satisfied with a society in which the average member is only average.
Should have his licence revoked; if this man is not happy with dispensing legal drugs because of his beliefs perhaps he should try other employment, or does his income come before his beliefs? WBR LeoP
Having read this I thought it was very enlightening.
I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put
this informative article together. I once again find myself spending a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments.
But so what, it was still worthwhile!