How do you like me now?

As we look to the results in New Hampshire, I can’t help but be reminded of something:

“The Jeb[!] 2016 campaign has never made Iowa a centerpiece to winning the nomination. We have long viewed Iowa as just one of 56 contests,” it reads, adding, “The Granite State [of New Hampshire] has a much better track record in selecting the Republican nominee.”

This is clearly a case of “Sadly, No!” not being appropriate.

 

Comments: 8

 
 
 

We have long viewed Iowa as just one of 56 contest

I suspect he was counting on Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa to put him over the top.

 
 

The campaign insisting that 2 + 2 = 5 will obviously require an ace marketing team, a huge budget and a massive database of rubes.

Go Jeb!

Millions of us in the 2 + 2 = 4 camp are enjoying watching you spend millions proving that the name “Bush” has now been thoroughly discredited, even with the nation’s dumbest rubes!

 
 

This is clearly a case of “Sadly, No!” not being appropriate.

I disagree. Unless we want JEB! to be the GOP nominee, I think “Happily, Yes!” would be a more appropriate response … assuming that JEB! has his facts right about NH. Which he may not considering his misunderstanding of math, statistics and IA.

 
 

Begin the Hindenburg jokes in 5…4…3…2…1…

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/cnn-chris-christie-drop-out

 
 

The fact is, what the federal goverment is doing to the partiots in Oregon is unconsciousable, it is just like Obama is Hitler

 
 

Never mind my comment above: I didn’t see the “not”. I therefore AGREE: Sadly, No! is NOT appropriate.

 
 

@gary “patriots”?

 
 

(comments are closed)