Prefers Funyuns to Responsibilityuns


Above: Blamelessness personified.

Shorter Clifford May
America’s Shittiest Website
“Who’s to Blame for Terrorism?”

  • By demonizing peaceful, moderate wingnuts who constantly urge the U.S. Government to murder as many Muslims as possible, it’s the editors of The New York Times who actually make violence inevitable.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Comments: 101

 
 
 

Which raises the questions: Who decides what constitutes inflammatory rhetoric? And if such rhetoric is unacceptable and intolerable, who should censor it and by what means? (Memo to young readers: Back in the day, great newspapers were defenders of free speech, including that which some would see as inflammatory.)

LOL

 
 

Back in the day, conservatives had what opinion of great newspapers and free speech?
~

 
 

Luckily, Cliffy has the internet, where he can post fact-free hatePOOP to his little black heart’s desire. Now those stupid newspapers and their dumb egghead elites with their fucking thinking and shit can SUCK IT! FREEDOM!!!1!!

 
 

Why is Pamela wearing her nightgown outside?

 
 

Shouldn’t it be “By demonizing us peaceful…” crap?

 
 

nah, I’m pretty sure the ‘we’ is correct. If you take out the ‘peaceful, moderate’ bit, it makes sense. In several ways.

 
 

Why is Pamela wearing her nightgown outside?

i couldn’t tell if it’s a nightgown, the bridesmaid dress from the wedding of a particularly spiteful bride or part of the princess halloween costume she picked up at walmart…

 
 

mingo said,

August 8, 2011 at 14:42

nah, I’m pretty sure the ‘we’ is correct. If you take out the ‘peaceful, moderate’ bit, it makes sense. In several ways.

By demonizing we peaceful, moderate wingnuts it’s the editors of New York Times who actually make violence inevitable.

You mean?

I still think US is the correct one, unless this is some internet meme I’m not aware of.

 
 

or, perhaps, as a convenient stick with which to beat their political and ideological opponents.

i know who i would like to beat…

 
 

Holy shit. Wotta douche. First off, this fucking bullshit about Breivik’s other readings. WHO FUCKING CARES! The problem is that amongst the non-terror related readings was A FUCKING TRUCKLOAD OF RIGHT-WING ANTI-ISLAM ELIMINATIONIST HATE SPEECH.

Also too, you fucking dipwad dipshit asshole scumbag, you are stupid and you smell bad and your mom dresses you funny, probably because she has trouble seeing as a result of her bukkake adddiction.

OMG! Lookit all teh mean nasty things written about extremist right-wing ideology in these big mainstream media publications! It is as bad if not worse than the FUCKING FREEDOM BOMBING THAT’S BEEN GOING ON FOR FUCKING YEARS. How much actual harm has accrued to conservatives due to those op-eds? A fuckton less than Muslims have suffered at the unpleasant end of the War on Terror.

AND HOLY FUCKING SHIT! He was a fucking nutjob whackaloon EXTREMEIST. We get that. Everyone gets that. You’re supposed to denounce these types of guys, not say “shame all them kids got shot, but the important part is that the crazy nutjob who did the shooting has a valid point about Muslims”. You want us to not consider you an extremeist right-wing reactionary with eliminationist dreams where you gun down dozens of muslim-loving liberals? Then maybe, just maybe, you might want to indicate that gunning down dozens of muslim-loving liberals is FUCKING WRONG. NO IFS, ANDS OR BUTS.

I bet Cliff May was one of the “where are the moderate Muslims denouncing all teh Islamoterror extremeism”.

FUCK YOU CLIFF MAY!

 
 

(Memo to young readers: Back in the day, great newspapers were defenders of free speech, including that which some would see as inflammatory.)

also, too back in the day, when you read a newspaper you were able to read things written by actual journalists with writing skills, intelligence and integrity…not the poorly written fapping gibberish that is posted by “journalists” all over the intertoobz…

 
 

Exploiting atrocities to settle political scores through guilt by association is a nasty game

Indeed it is. That doesn’t stop you fuckheads from doing it on a regular basis, does it?

This is the worst of the clown parade rushing to Gellar’s defense. He even manages to make an indirect assertion that their Muslim-hate is partially a defense of feminism. It’s really sad that conservatives are dumb enough to eat this shit.

 
 

Better?

Thank you for changing that. I was about to lose some sleep over it!

 
 

#

HTML Mencken said,

August 8, 2011 at 15:02

Better?

I’ll accept your change. Now I’ll go report this incident to my grammar-nazi superiors.

 
 

Reuters disagreed (with this nutjob’s definition of terrorism). The global news agency took the position that “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” This expression of moral relativism was embraced by many in the media, on the far left and far right, in academia, government, and transnational organizations. And that may indeed have paved the way for Breivik — who unquestionably fancies himself a fighter for European freedom — to believe he could use terrorism to focus attention on his grievances without de-legitimizing those grievances. If it works for militant Islamists, why not for a militant Norwegian?

How many innocent teenagers have to get shot before the media figures out that they are responsible for Breivik and McVeigh and reality television?

 
 

Mornin’ DKW. I’m up here in LEAFS SUCK this week.

 
Ted the Slacker
 

A little different shorter Cliff May:

Our worldview and arguments are identical to Al-Qaeda’s, but anyone pointing that out is with the terrorists and against us. Hey Mom, what’s “irony”?

 
 

Tell you what you fucking asshole shitbag Cliff May. Let’s go into your delusional fucked-up bullshit nonsense fact-free world. Let’s take your pithy “maybe environmental activisim is to blame” nonsense as true.

Here’s the deal then – we start treating the fucking bullshit eliminationist racist hate speech that you and your anti-Islam buddies are spewing the same way we treat “eco-terrorism”. And you and your buddies can go on teh fucking terrorist watch list along with every other single individual who has spoken favourably of a border fance.

 
 

Hey MK. Hope you enjoy your stay here in socialest utopia.

 
 

Exploiting atrocities to settle political scores through guilt by association is a nasty game

I don’t know why I want to strangle this moron worse than the others, but I keep coming back to this statement.

This tactic is THE ENTIRE BASIS OF YOUR ANTI-ISLAMIC PARADIGM you fucking moron. What are you going to do with yourself if you take that weakass POS argument off the table? Oh right, you’re conservatives, it’s ok for YOU to use it, but no one else, right?

How many times have you scumbags invoked 9/11 as an excuse for your inflammatory incitement? You’re so fucking defensive because you’re guilty as shit. You people all know your kinship and fearmongering were a major factor in Breivik’s decision to act. Now you want to wash your hands of the whole thing, blame liberals, blame muslims, blame the media, blame Multiculturalism (whatever the fuck that even is), blame everyone but your pathetic selves for the ensuing violence.

The most baffling piece of the puzzle is that the media you consistently attack is complicit in your little scam. I can’t figure out if they’re just begging to be the ugly chick at the party who will suck Gellar’s dick for some attention and acceptance, or if they’re in on the plan.

I could start my own blog just picking this fucking fascist apart.

 
Xecky Gilchrist
 

I still think US is the correct one, unless this is some internet meme I’m not aware of.

Late to the grammar party, but I also believe “us” is correct since it’s acting as a direct object in that sentence and needs the objective case.

There are dialects that license nominative case in that position, such as Rasta-English (“It remind I of the days in Jericho etc.”)

 
Xecky Gilchrist
 

But not to sidetrack, and HTML’s solution worked fine.

 
 

Here’s the deal then – we start treating the fucking bullshit eliminationist racist hate speech that you and your anti-Islam buddies are spewing the same way we treat “eco-terrorism”. And you and your buddies can go on teh fucking terrorist watch list along with every other single individual who has spoken favourably of a border fance.

Amen, brother.

 
 

I can’t tell how DK-W really feels about this.

 
 

Could somebody explain what this part is supposed to mean?

“Gaarder and Eriksen’s meaning is plain too: Those concerned about such issues as gender apartheid in Saudi Arabia, honor killings within Muslim communities in the West, and the genital mutilation of Muslim girls are, objectively, on the side of neo-Nazis and therefore they also should put a sock in it.”

 
 

In his rambling 1,500-page “manifesto,” Breivik lists the names of many individuals whose writing he has read and who are therefore now being accused of membership in the “Islamophobic blogosphere.” Among them: Mark Steyn, Theodore Dalrymple, Melanie Phillips, Bruce Bawer, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Bat Ye’or, Andrew Bostom, and Pamela Geller. (And he cites Foundation for Defense of Democracies reports and congressional testimony on such topics as terrorist financing and Islamist oppression of Christians in the Middle East.) Anyone familiar with these sources knows that the views they hold vary widely — and not one advocates terrorism.

Not one endorsed “shock and awe”?

 
 

Could somebody explain what this part is supposed to mean?

Shorter:
Because SHUTUP THATS WHY!

 
 

The Times editorial adds: “Even mainstream politicians in Europe, including Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France have sown doubts about the ability or willingness of Europe to absorb newcomers. Multiculturalism ‘has failed, utterly failed,’ Mrs. Merkel said last October.” The implication is clear: If these European leaders have doubts about the worldview and policies the Times and other avatars of progressive opinion endorse, they should take the opportunity to shut up about it.

Who what now? I need a wingnut decoder ring, because that’s not the clear implication I got.

They asserted that “the hatred and contempt from which [Breivik] drew his deranged determination were shared with many others throughout the international right-wing blogosphere,” which they characterized as “Islamophobic” and consisting of “loosely connected networks of people — including students, civil servants, capitalists, and neo-Nazis. Many do not even see themselves as ‘right-wing,’ but as defenders of enlightened values, including feminism.”

Gaarder and Eriksen’s meaning is plain too: Those concerned about such issues as gender apartheid in Saudi Arabia, honor killings within Muslim communities in the West, and the genital mutilation of Muslim girls are, objectively, on the side of neo-Nazis and therefore they also should put a sock in it.

Again, that’s the plain meaning only if you are fucking nuts. It’s like the nutty they pitched after the DHS report on right-wing extremists, pretending it called all righties extreme rather than focusing on a subset; dude, if you want to paint yourself with that brush, and act as if when people abhor terrorists it’s a personal attack on you, go right ahead, but realize YOU are the one calling yourself a terrorist.

Exploiting atrocities to settle political scores through guilt by association is a nasty game, but if we are going to play it, I’d [blame Reuters]

Ha ha.

 
Ted the Slacker
 

Could somebody explain what this part is supposed to mean?

I’ll go with projection.

How many times has a wingnut accused you of being “objectively pro-X” (thanks, Orwell!) because you don’t agree with their approach to dealing with X? Remember when X was Saddam?

I suspect in this Times op-ed, haven’t read it so don’t know, some argument was presented that caused Cliffie to drain his mountain dew, haul out his laptop and furiously deny being pro-honor killings… even though no such thing was implied. Wingnuts are just sensitive like that, you know, having thin-skins and tiny penises.

 
 

What would a German chancellor know about multiculturalism? Other than a small minority of Turkish “guest workers” who are barred from citizenship, Germany is about as racially homogenous as a country gets.

 
 

I realize that I missed an opportunity to invoke a great Sadly No running joke: “You know what OTHER German chancellor had criticisms of multiculturalism?”

 
 

” “loosely connected networks of people — including students, civil servants, capitalists, and neo-Nazis. Many do not even see themselves as ‘right-wing,’ but as defenders of enlightened values, including feminism.””

Ok, I’m officially confused now. I thought Breivik held quite anti-feminist views.

 
 

I realize that I missed an opportunity to invoke a great Sadly No running joke: “You know what OTHER German chancellor had criticisms of multiculturalism?”

Spongebob Squarepants?
~

 
 

I can’t tell how DK-W really feels about this.

I’m delighted Major Kong is visiting LEAFS SUCK. I think everyone ought to come by and see our beautiful Centre of the Universe.

 
 

Actually my dad and stepmom are stopping by sometime soon, I think.

 
 

Most wingnut writing in general, but especially all the ‘don’t-blame-us-for-the-violence-we-promote’ columns, could be summed up with a quote from that great American cinema, Dumb and Dumber:

“You’re it! QUITSIES!”

See, Cliff? I just saved you a bunch of writing time. Now where’s my thank you?

 
 

got another preview sadlyno post in my google reader feed and its a doozie. feels a bit like cheating though

 
 

Yeah me too. It’s got gay stuff innit!

 
 

google reader is definitely cheating.
~

 
 

I’m sure that if some deranged gunman attacked Glenn Beck’s youth camp and killed a bunch of future brownshirts Tea Partiers, and the gunman’s “manifesto” included references to Rachel Maddow, Michael Moore, John Amato and HTML Mencken, absolutely no one would try to attach any blame to those people, amiright?

 
 

Steerpike said,

Shit, they’re already blaming liberals for Breivik’s attack. If this shit happened, they would call for an honor killing of Rachel.

 
 

Oh and LEAFS SUCK isn’t OT. We’re talking about multiculturalism, one of the few spots that LEAFS SUCK can truly be recognized as World-Class*. Half of our residents were born outside of the country. We have the highest per capita immigration rate in the world. There is no one ethnic group which dominates the our immigrant population. For many ethnic groups, LEAFS SUCK is where you’ll find the some of the largest groups outside of their native lands.

And in regards to how multicaulturalism always leads to the failure of society – our crime rates are ridiculously low and real estate prices are actually higher now than they were pre-financial crisis. It’s not all sunshine and lollipops though, we did just recently elect a right-wing whackjob for mayor.

*My hometown has an obsession with this term.

 
 

World-Class*

Every group with an inferiority complex uses this construction.

Atwood for mayor!

 
 

To be fair, LEAFS SUCK’s inferiority complex is World-Class.

 
 

we did just recently elect a right-wing whackjob for mayor.

Well, there go all those nice things you listed!

 
 

Yeah. We just got “core-services review” report a couple weeks ago. The findings? Privatize everything. AWESOME.

 
 


He then went on to say he would close libraries “in a heartbeat” and wouldn’t even recognize Atwood if they passed each other in the street.

wow…way to make yourself sound smart, dude!

 
 

Also, from McGravitas’ link

,,,nearby Hamilton, Ont., which is only a 45-minute commute away on public transit.

LOL! I suppose if you count chartering an airplane to fly Buttonville to John C. Munro. The express train leaves Union station weekdays at 5:34 PM and arrives at Hamilton GO Centre at 6:49 PM.

 
 

LOL! I suppose if you count chartering an airplane to fly Buttonville to John C. Munro. The express train leaves Union station weekdays at 5:34 PM and arrives at Hamilton GO Centre at 6:49 PM.***

***too full of inside leafs suck references for me to properly lol at…

 
 

too full of inside leafs suck references

Oops. Yeah, just saying that you can NOT get to Hamilton from Toronto in 45 minutes on public transit. The shortest possible time is 75, and that’s if you only count the time from when the express train leaves LEAFS SUCK to when it arrives in Hamilton. 45 minutes to get to Union Station in the first place is about average for LEAFS SUCK residents.

 
 

Oops. Yeah, just saying

thaks…i’m now lol’ing as i should be…

 
 

google reader is definitely cheating.

Seems likely a result of confused clocks, no?
.

 
 

He then went on to say he would close libraries “in a heartbeat” and wouldn’t even recognize Atwood if they passed each other in the street.

okay…i gotta go back to this…really? this d00d’s a council person? and his brother’s the mayor? wth? is he really such a tool in everyday life? or is he the canadian michele bachmann?

 
 

dang…now i really want some funyuns…

 
 

Mmmm Canadian Bachmann. Great on pizza with pineapple….

 
 

Who decides what constitutes inflammatory rhetoric? And if such rhetoric is unacceptable and intolerable, who should censor it and by what means?

I’ve had problems with inflammatory rhetoric lately. So my doctor prescribed me an NSAID, steroid eye drops and physical therapy. Since then the inflammation in my rhetoric has gone down immensely.

Perhaps today’s conservatives just need a good dose of NSAIDs? I hope they remember to take the NSAID with a meal, though. Otherwise, you feel quite a bit “sloshy” inside your belly. And conservatives will need to be reminded that a bowl of cheetos does not count as a meal.

 
 

The findings? Privatize everything. AWESOME.

Privatize the Mayor’s job.

I find it unsurprising that when wingnut politicians claim that Governement never created a job, they manage to never recognize the fact that THEIR JOB IS CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

I say they should be cut first.

 
 

“FDD is a tax-exempt, non-profit, non-partisan, non-ideological institution. We do not seek to advance any political party or views.”

Board of Advisors
Gary Bauer, President, American Values (site bio)
Donna Brazile, Campaign Manager Gore 2000 (site bio)
Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), Task Force on Terrorism Chairman (site bio)
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), U.S. House of Representatives (site bio)
Frank Gaffney, President, Center for Security Policy (site bio)
Amb. Marc Ginsberg, Former Ambassador Morroco (site bio)
Charles Jacobs, President, American Anti-Slavery Group (site bio)
Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist (site bio)
Bill Kristol, Editor, Weekly Standard (site bio)
Hon. Richard D. Lamm, Former Colorado Governor (site bio)
Rep. Jim Marshall (D-GA), U.S. House of Representatives (site bio)
Sen. Zell Miller, Former U.S. Senator (site bio)
Richard Perle, Former Chair of the Defense Policy Board and FDD Advisor (site bio)
Steven Pomerantz, Former Assistant Director FBI
Oliver “Buck” Revell, Former Associate Deputy Director FBI
Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), U.S. Senate (site bio)

Coupla interesting names there.

 
 

Yeah, Rob and Doug Jr. The current LEAFS SUCK Power Couple.

That Rob Ford got elected mayor still boggles me. When he announced his candidacy it was considered a joke. Rob was known for being a crack-pot right-wing ideologue. The big Ford Gimmick was that he would submit annual expense reports for his Council Office of less than twenty bucks every year.

Chalk it up to a massive failure of the Establishment guys. Neither right nor left managed to motivate or energize their base during the campaign. Rob basically trounced everyone because he was the only guy actually playing the game.

And now that he’s mayor, his ideological perfectionism and undying commitment to fucking over the poor is totes unchanged. Last month, millions of dollars in funding for community groups – funding that needs to be approved year after year, and always does get approved – was questioned by our mayor. He ended up being the lone dissenter for some of the programs, and he and brother Doug were the sole dissenters on some of the rest. We’re talking about votes of 41-1 or 40-2. So the funding did get approved as everyone knew it would, and could have sailed through Council without all that wasted time and effort. But Mayor Rob insisted that he get his opportunity to vote against it. For no reason other than his own ego, which is somehow flattered by knowing that everyone else thinks he’s wrong.

 
 

It just so happens that me and the missus are seriously considering leaving Austin due to the “new normal” climate. Don’t think I could go from the oven to the fridge that seems to be the norm in Leafs Suck. We’ve been thinking about Costa Rica, Panama or Ecuador (she speaks Spanish and I nod and grin). But, she threw me a curve yesterday and suggested we should look into Portland or Seattle, for the moderate temps. Any advice will be appreciated.

 
 

they manage to never recognize the fact that THEIR JOB IS CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

I say they should be cut first.

this is what i think also every freaking time i hear ‘smaller government!!!” and it really makes we want to dig st. ronnie up and bitch slap him silly..”i’m from the government and i’m here to help.” oh, hahahahah…that’s funnay! you’re part of the government you dumb fucker!

 
 

There is an old lady called Geller
Who by rights should be locked in a cellar
Anyone with a brain
When asked ‘Is she insane?’
Would reply in an instant, ‘Yes, hella’

 
 

But Mayor Rob insisted that he get his opportunity to vote against it. For no reason other than his own ego, which is somehow flattered by knowing that everyone else thinks he’s wrong

they are the canadian michele bachmann!!! zoicks!

 
 

Any advice will be appreciated

i say come to mn…where you get the ungodly heat and humidity (if we’re lucky) in the summer and you can freeze your ass off in the winter…the best of both worlds, really…

 
 

Alternate shorter Cliff May: Shit getting real is my signal to run off squealing like a little girl.

 
 

According to Jeffrey Blankfort, a Jewish anti-Zionist activist in California (former editor of the Middle East Labor Review, and victim of a spying operation directed against him by the ADL), the FDD:

For those of you who haven’t heard of this “foundation,” it is one of the most influential and powerful of the Zionist lobbies which changed its name and sprung into action immediately after 9-11. If you check its board, its advisors, you’ll find a lot of familiar names, the neocons, of course, and some surprises, like the Democrat’s ranking African-American spokesperson, Donna Brazile. It claims to have seven articles from FDD sources appear in the mainstream media every day and if you check its site, that appears to be the truth. That President Bush chose this group for the first of a series of speeches defending his Iraq policy is not an accident but a genuflection to the FDD’s power. Another reflection of its power is the apparent unwillingness of the major media, such as the NY Times, to identify it for what it is.[6]

here

 
 

This stuff really burns my buns!

Why can’t those awful vicious evil terrorist Al Quaida people just learn to be more like the wonderful resourceful brave tough Mujahadeen that helped Ronald Reagan win the Cold War?

 
Lurking Canadian
 

is he really such a tool in everyday life? or is he the canadian michele bachmann?

Short answer: Yes. Yes.

Long answer: The Greater Toronto Area, like many North American metropoles, consists of an urban core, with all that great multiculturalism, public transit and so on that DKW just described, surrounded by a ring of suburbs. Because of a historical fluke, the urban core uses telephone area code 416, whereas the surrounding suburban ring uses telephone area code 905. You often hear “the 905” or “the 416” as a shorthand way of describing an entire way of life.

Now, unlike many US metropoles, the ring of suburbs is not made of white people fleeing from the coloreds. There are ethnic pockets of just about every ethnicity that make up the GTA in one or the other of them. However, it is made up of people who want to BY GOD drive their SUVs to work in the city, then drive home so they can drive their kids to soccer practice, and have no truck with the “urban” types who just want to sip their faggy vanilla lattes on the subway.

So, this douchebag Ford ran for mayor on the platform of (I kid you not), “Stop the WAR ON CARS!”, and the 905ers lined up in droves to vote for him, so he could tear up the streetcar tracks, stop building subways and use all public moneys to build more lanes on highway 401. You see, right now, 401 only has eight lanes in each direction, which is clearly not enough.

 
 

One more –

In September 2007, Media Matters criticized May for failing to disclose his government ties, and those of the FDD, during media appearances. “[May] has appeared in the media several times to defend the administration’s conduct of the Iraq war,” the progressive media watchdog group published on their site. “However, in none of his columns or on-air appearances has May disclosed that FDD has received at least $1.2 million in State Department grants since 2004, or that May himself is a member of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s Advisory Committee on Democracy Promotion.”

here

 
Lurking Canadian
 

Oh, and I meant to say some on-topic things, too. In general, the wingnuts want (and apply) a rigourous double standard. If the speaker is Muslim (or just brown, really) and/or liberal, then any evil perpetrated by anyone that appears to align with their stated goals is THEIR FAULT. On the other hand, if the speaker is a conservative of any stripe, they can stand there and muse “Who will rid me of this meddling [ENEMY]” in front of their armed retainers, but unless you can prove in a court of law that they gave the retainers the weapon and said, in words of one syllable, “Go kill that guy for me”, it’s absolutely not their fault, they were just expressing their freedom of speech and how DARE YOU spit on the Constitution of the United States of America you communist, fascist, Nazi bastard?

Ok, I’m officially confused now. I thought Breivik held quite anti-feminist views.

This is the kind of “feminism” that consists of saying, “Women are badly treated in Iran, so unless you are in favour of nuking Iran until it glows in the dark, you must hate Iranian women!”. It was common to see this kind of argumentation prior to the invasion of Iraq, to prove that feminist anti-war groups were actually racist. You see, if they really cared about women, they’d want to invade Iraq and kill a bunch of Iraqi women to free them from the not as misogynist as our virtuous ally Saudi Arabia’s government, so obviously, they only care about white women.

 
 

You see, right now, 401 only has eight lanes in each direction, which is clearly not enough.

clearly…i should hope they double the lanes in each direction so the suvs have pleeeenty of room to tear it up…

this sounds a lot like on the talk radio guys i listen to (local station is an affiliate and i am to g-dang lazy to change the channel)…he mocks the light rail system that is going to connect st. paul & mpls because it’s ‘feel good socialist crap designed to turn us into cattle…’

i get sooooo pissy when i hear this stupidity…but hey, that’s american exceptionalism for you…

 
 

We got you beat on the free-crack-pipes front.

Make room for one more immigrant.

 
 

‘feel good socialist crap designed to turn us into cattle…’

Maybe you should call in and tell him that there is a special car reserved for halfwitted, uninformed radio personalities. Strictly for relocation…you know. JUST FUCKING GET IN THE CAR, JUDEN.

 
 

LC,

Yes and no. No one in the 905 votes for Mayor of Toronto. All of our transit money that was going to dedicated right-of-way transit lines, I believe seven in total – has been dumped into one single line so it can be buried and not eat up precious car lanes.

Ford got voted in by the “inner suburbs” – Etobicoke, North York and my own neighbourhood of Scarborough. It wasn’t only teh “War On Cars” that got him in (although this was a big factor), it was his promise to “Stop The Gravy Train”. Because for some reason, a lot of LEAFS SUCKians believe the nonsense about the budget being 99% waste. Or something.

 
 

Also, teh 401 hits eighteen lanes wide at Pearson.

 
 

Or something.

Like the Leafs making the playoffs?
~

 
Lurking Canadian
 

DKW lives in Toronto. Believe his version. I thought the amalgamation had spread the city limits farther, but I stand corrected.

Also, teh 401 hits eighteen lanes wide at Pearson.

I am too busy trying not to get killed on the race track that is 401 at Pearson to count that high.

 
Marion in Savannah
 

DKW, it’s been about 150 years since I was in LEAFS SUCK (loved it). A friend of mine lived in a neighborhood called Rathnally. Do they still consider themselves “The Republic of Rathnally,” as they did back then?

 
 

DKW, it’s been about 150 years since I was in LEAFS SUCK (loved it).

Here’s a guy trying to recreate Toronto in 1861.

 
 

Retcon O’Brien:

If you want to understand the conservative future, imagine a mob laughing & mocking a man with Parkinson’s Disease … FOREVER.

Winston Schnook:

Dude! Can I get a side of extra-large fries with that?

 
 

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggggggghhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

for fuck’s sake, goatse is less disturbing.

 
Marion in Savannah
 

Jeez, Hogeye, now I’m going to have nightmares for weeks…

 
 

Hey, kid want to see a brain spin on the edge of self-awareness, frightened, burning, screaming, trying desperately to have their cognitive dissonance protect them from the raw unblinking reality that they are terrible people responsible for great evil?

Sure, you do. Just come into the alley.

See it starts like this:

Who deserves the blame for the terrorist attacks in Norway? My answer would be the perpetrator and no one else — unless it turns out there really is a modern Knights Templar or some other organized movement that sent him on his mission of mass murder.

But there are those who disagree, who see this atrocity as part of a wider conspiracy — or, perhaps, as a convenient stick with which to beat their political and ideological opponents.

Oh, yes, convenient stick of course. That convenient stick not being the accusation of a grand conspiracy, but rather having the ability to read the words that Breivik copied and pasted himself to form his manifesto, making hate collage poetry out of the right-wing id, an id that the brave and the bold of Bizarro World have been trying to instill in “godless countries like Norway”.

And then it ramps in high spin, finding this cul-de-sac nice and warm:

After the attacks of 9/11, there were individuals and groups (emphatically including the policy institute I head) making the case that terrorism should be defined as the use of violence against civilians to further a political cause, and that expressing a grievance by intentionally killing other people’s children is never justified.

We argued that civilized people, of whatever religion or nationality, ought to be able to agree on this principle, and, if they did, then those who target innocents would be seen only as terrorists, unequivocally condemned by the “international community.”

Oh, did you know? Is that how you defined terrorism? Why, how noble and forgiving you were, looking beyond creed and ideology to condemn all terrorist acts equally no matter the cause, and condemn all attacks on children as the basest of all terrorism.

From this, the National Review has been the first to label right-wing attacks against liberals in this country as terrorism and demand the same harsh punishments and broad-based retaliations that they would for Muslim terrorists. They have been the first to condemn the Israeli Army as terrorists and demanded the ceasation of support for their country after their many bombings and acts of aggression have paid their toll in the deaths of innocents and children. Similarly, they’ve been the brave few who have found the courage to call their own US military a terrorist organization after it was found out that many US missions targeted kids only defending their actions as “collateral damage” and especially once it was found out that kids were being tortured in front of their parents at Abu Ghraib. These are always the actions of terrorism and as such, must be unequivocally condemned by the international community.

Now, there seems to be a dark shadow. Hasn’t there been a bit of “selective outrage” with regards to incidents and haven’t they condemned anyone who views incidents like this as terrorism as evil bastards?

I mean, wasn’t there that whole beginning section on how it was unfair of anyone to view this incident, the single largest single-person shooting, and one of the most deadly and terrifying deliberate attack on kids in history as anything more than one lone figure unconnected to any ideology and unworth exploring in any way for motivations in the hope of preventing such tragedies again, much in the way we explore muslim ideology to try and understand 9/11?

Oh, of course, I’m so silly. I underestimated the great heart of these brave conservatives. Not only do they wish to look past creed and condemn all attacks as terrorism, they only want blame to fall selectively. Why they reject our broad-based labeling of all muslims as terrorists and enemies and broad-based solutions to addressing it. In fact, they take the radical solution that only those directly involved should be condemned for their actions. So our war against Islamic Terrorism ended the day of 9/11 for all the hijackers were dead. The only thing left to do was condemn their wholly isolated actions.

By demonizing those concerned by the pathologies afflicting the Muslim world and emanating from it

Huh

This construct already has led to a weird sort of affirmative action for Islamic extremists.

That doesn’t sound right

Had he been a white supremacist instead of a Muslim supremacist, do you think his views would have been ignored and he would have been able to rise in the American military as he did?

Also lol on that. If he’d been a white supremacist, we’re seeing here that he would have been given high office as we see with the generals leading the Iraq War effort who claimed it was “a new Crusade” and the goal was to “convert the heathens by fire or faith” or the many many fuckers who joined just to shoot up some brown-skinned ragheads and have been allowed to without censor. Fuck, some guy deliberately targets a rival political group because he views them as too soft against the “Islamic menace” and you can’t wait to bury that up, but the War must continue against “Militant Islam”.

Also, note that they said they do not discriminate by creed, and then this:

To be sure, there may be some Europeans and Americans who suspect that all or most or too many Muslims endorse the crimes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Anwar al-Awlaki, and other self-proclaimed jihadis. That’s wrong. But it’s no less wrong to encourage the fiction that Muslims are victims and that Christians, Jews, and Hindus are their victimizers.

Why thank you for that humanizing gesture.

Huh, earlier you said you condemned all actions, by all people who harm the innocent, but here you acknowledge the innocent muslims. You are saying there are innocents there. But you deny that they can be victimized by scorched earth campaigns that see no friend and see all as culpable with the crimes of the few. Where are the condemnations that were promised? The even-handed point that there have been Israeli and American terrorists in this never-ending war against “Militarist Islamics”.

Huh, where is even the terrorist label for those guys. I mean, you’re setting them up as the one true evil and they’re not even worth calling terrorists. Didn’t you say that you labeled all who targeted children as terrorists? So, we need to be vigilant against some non-terrorist mother-fuckers, possibly killing innocent Muslims which would make us terrorists, and forget about any connection Breivik might have had to the outside world, despite being an ultra-terrorist by their definition?

Hmm, this seems fishy.

ack to the Times editorial: It states that there is a “disturbing, and growing, intolerance across Europe for Muslims and other immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.” Where is the evidence for that? Which European countries have closed their borders to Muslim refugees? Which European countries have passed the equivalent of Jim Crow laws? Which European mass murderers have targeted innocent Muslims? The answer is none, but of course innocent Muslims have been slaughtered — and continue to be slaughtered — by Iran’s rulers, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, and Tehran-backed Shiite militias in Iraq. Do the math: Muslims, more often than Christians, Jews, or Hindus, are the victims of Islamic militants.

Well, my proof might be that a Norwegian man killed 90 kids because he thought his country wasn’t oppressing Muslims enough, it might be that Muslims are seen as collectively responsible for “a few bad apples” while their counterparts are hand-waved away by weasels like yourself. I’m starting to suspect that there isn’t any cohesive philosophy and this is just the weasel mind screaming to find a wordier version of “nuh uh, you are.”

In his rambling 1,500-page “manifesto,” Breivik lists the names of many individuals whose writing he has read and who are therefore now being accused of membership in the “Islamophobic blogosphere.” Among them: Mark Steyn, Theodore Dalrymple, Melanie Phillips, Bruce Bawer, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Bat Ye’or, Andrew Bostom, and Pamela Geller. (And he cites Foundation for Defense of Democracies reports and congressional testimony on such topics as terrorist financing and Islamist oppression of Christians in the Middle East.) Anyone familiar with these sources knows that the views they hold vary widely — and not one advocates terrorism.

Except apparently that which they create, argue for, and speak on behalf again and again. Breivik copy and pasted his manifesto. All his objectionable words (and his words are cited to, of course, argue that we need to double-down on killing Muslims as the “moderate solution” that rejects extremism) were from these sowers of murder, who have argued and still to this day argue for the deaths of one’s enemies, including children, a crime you condemned as terrorism.

He goes on to state that Breivik cites other figures who weren’t wingnuts. Many of whom are founding fathers, so basically, because he quoted the founding fathers of America like a wingnut then any acknowledgment that he was in every way a product of American wingnuttery is akin to burning the books of the Founding Fathers (no seriously, he makes this claim)

Does that imply that those writers share the blame for Breivik’s murders? Shall we burn their books? (Memo to young readers: Read them while you can.)

He also argues that it’s beyond the pale to condemn the philosophy that Breivik copy and pasted for having blood on its hand, lest the environmental movement be similarly brushed with blood because of The Unabomber (like he hasn’t been used to tar every environmentalist for the last 15 years, despite being one of the few terrorists that can be legitimately called a “lone crazy”, was thoroughly condemned by environmentalists and was given no support directly either ideologically or after the fact unlike every other “right wing lone crazy”) and the Sierra Club (WTF, when the hell has the Sierra Club killed anyone or even advocated killing, the worst they have done is stood in front of some bulldozers and run some political campaigns to save various bits of green belt).

So yeah, that’s right, as long as your terrorist fellow-traveler cites a single source that isn’t your nutjob asses, then it’s unfair to view him as a complete cipher and any extrapolation to the ideology that shaped him is the true terrorism that’s responsible.

Oh yes, the shorter is accurate, he ends claiming literally that:

By demonizing those concerned by the pathologies afflicting the Muslim world and emanating from it, Times editorial writers and their allies are actually giving credence to Breivik’s worldview.

We see the mind spin, throwing up its chaff. Wordy dances and false ideologies thrown up in order to make the rationales of a child seem like actual thought. “Not my Fault”, “I know you are but what am I”, “Nuh uh”.

The job is complete, the brain is saved from reality and the mind can go on hating, even let off the pressure on that little bit of truth digging into their brain. They don’t hate all muslims, like Breivik, who was an Environmentalist jew writer for the NY Times anyways, so therefore their campaign against “muslim extremists” can go on unabated.

So, now little child, now that I’ve snuck these rotten mangos onboard, allow me to further break and warp your fragile mind. You shouldn’t have come in here. You should never have come in here.

That noise that has been ringing in your ears over and over through each blockquote was the sound of a thousand dog whistles set at their loudest. You thought those examples odd in phrasing? That’s because they were just red meat to the base, notes to remind them who to hate when they feel attacked and they always feel attacked.

And I brought those hungry mangos on board and now they must feed.

The blood of children must continue to sate their bloodlust if they are going to disown more “lone crazies” and “single actors” while supporting them 100%. It’s feeding time, my child.

Oh don’t worry, I’m sure the National Review will label this as terrorism…

Heh, I kid.

 
 

Ok, long disturbing comment out of the way, this is a true work of irredeemable evil.

I mean, I joke that it’s like the other works we’ve seen, desperate attempts to weasel responsibility and self-awareness and retain the “I’m the good guys, bad things are never my fault” qualities that make conservatism what it is.

But it’s not.

It’s basically someone blaming the victim and “fascism is liberal’s fault”ing entirely through carefully coded dog whistles.

It was “unfair attack”, “lone crazy”, “we’re the ones who fight terrorism”, “moral relativism”, “environmental terrorism”, “NY Times”, “Iran” and so on.

Just nothing but hitting the various hot buttons on the right-wing monster in the most cynical heartless manner possible. And then the phrasing of the regular words are designed to mimic a good faith argument. A liberal good faith argument and claim it as a conservative one while simultaneously condemning the liberal approach (the one they are claiming to follow, no less) as the greatest of all evils and “moral relativism”.

This was not a person, as I joke, whose brain is desperately working to shield themselves from reality, but rather someone who noted very calmly that “their team” had a problem and wanted to set themselves to fixing it, make it somehow the “other team’s problems”. This is the work of a PR flak working for Satan.

Pam Atlas and Debbie Schlussel might be the scum of the Earth, devoid of empathy, and holding hearts of glass, but this is the face of true evil. If I built my self-awareness gun, Debbie and Pam might be reduced to wrecks, but this man would simply smile evilly and continue walking.

He knows what he’s doing and he doesn’t fucking care.

 
 

It was “unfair attack”, “lone crazy”, “we’re the ones who fight terrorism”, “moral relativism”, “environmental terrorism”, “NY Times”, “Iran” and so on.

The most important weapons against terrorism are bombs.

 
 

I am too busy trying not to get killed on the race track that is 401 at Pearson to count that high.

Race track? Even at 18 lanes, traffic on the 401 is often at a standstill. You probably had lots of time to count lanes.

Do they still consider themselves “The Republic of Rathnally,” as they did back then?

That area is way swanky – them Forest Hill folks are in a completely differen LEAFS SUCK than I am so you probably know moar of that area than I do.

if a citizen of the us of a (or any other country i guess) has a dui or dwi, can they not drive in leafs suck?

If your license is currently valid and not suspended, you can drive in LEAFS SUCK. So, provided you come from a jurisdiction where they don’t suspended your license when caught drunk behind the wheel, you’re fine.

PS March in LEAFS SUCK? Usually we’ve had some spring thaw. You’d probably not have seen much snow, depends on the year. And while we have had some nasty blizzard-like weather in March, that month also has some of the clearest days we get. All the better to see the mountains of dog POOP thawing onto the sidewalks.

 
 

Substance-

He did say he wanted to treat all terrorism equally, so, yeah, let’s blow up the National Review with a bomb. And hey, we still won’t be persecuting Pam Atlas directly, because our terrorism response is to kill the terrorist adjacent and those who look at us askance after the fact.

I’m sure, ideologically consistency would force them to view this as fair.

 
 

If your license is currently valid and not suspended, you can drive in LEAFS SUCK. So, provided you come from a jurisdiction where they don’t suspended your license when caught drunk behind the wheel, you’re fine.

PS March in LEAFS SUCK? Usually we’ve had some spring thaw. You’d probably not have seen much snow, depends on the year. And while we have had some nasty blizzard-like weather in March, that month also has some of the clearest days we get. All the better to see the mountains of dog POOP thawing onto the sidewalks.

what if the license (and we are not talking about ME here!) was suspended, and then re-instated?

and thanks for telling me that march in leafs suck isn’t all that bad now! where were you 26 years ago when the decision was being made? in western mn, that is still pretty much winter and we didn’t want to travel just for more of the same…

 
 

what if the license (and we are not talking about ME here!) was suspended, and then re-instated?

Then you are good to go.

March ’85 wasn’t great for LEAFS SUCK so maybe you lucked out. There were snow days, and on the handful of warm days – it rained. The 4th in particular was downright crappy. You can have a look for yourself.

Also, too. 1985 was a pretty shitty year for the Leafs (who suck).

 
humbert dinglepencker
 

Cliffy is a moron. He was a moron when he “wrote” for one of the defunct Denver dailies, and he’s a moron to this day. And an asshole.

 
 

Then you are good to go.

thanks…if i ever get up there, i will give you a holla…

 
 

So, where’s the party, sweeties????

 
Alkonholics Anonymous
 

I hope you’ll all enjoy my new album: “Assfucking Pam Geller” soon to be released on Random Records.

 
 

Policies of tryrancy and facism have been an insidious driving force within governmental bodies, military forces, policing units and privacy sectors worldwide. Pervasive nazi ideologies interlace democratic proceedings, as destructive biological warfare; black mold veining through margarine.
There is compelling evidence that suggests Hitler did not in fact commit suicide, and lived for many years after the end of world war two; continuing to evolve a long-term plan for world dominance. Maniacal sadists have continued subliminal messaging, and policies of terror. Mussolini is a revered figure for many misguided souls, and some nazi’s identify themselves with his name; a sure indicator of identity loss, which is crucial to brainwashing success.
Policies of population control have been enforced by the United Nations. Officials at the World Health Organization develop bacteria intended for warfare, inoculants whose side effects include infertility, and cospire against humanity. The freulein and leaders at United Nations are given free reign, so long as their official agenda includes measures conducive to population control.
In recent years, violence has escalated. Torture practices, and mutilation techniques, (inclusive of forced plastic, constructive surgeries, sex-change operations) are official nazi policy, with many persons victimized. The desecration of corpses is a growing concern, an ongoing atrocity. Bodies are being made into masks, full body suits with artificial eyes overlaying the natural eye underneath. The skull is modified to allow the “dead head” to be placed over a live human’s head. There was three such “costumes” (may they rest in peace) on the bus the other day. The skin is treated, nonetheless is in a state of decomposition, and slowly deteriorates. Bodies are being desecrated, unburied, recovering the implanted technologies. Forced cannibalism in nazi iniations and after demonstrations (murders) during meetings is becoming commonplace.
All major countried world-wide have citizens, immigrants and officials whom are nazi’s. Nazi’s are found in all shades, and this is not an issue facing particular ethnicities.
There are peaceable solutions to threats of violence.
We, The Pacific Army ask the Canadian governmental, military and policing authorities deactivate and/or sieze nazi spyware and weaponry from their counterparts. This is a state of emergency. There has been silent unwillingness to inform the public regarding technologies utilized to infringe upon the basic human rights of its citizens; and used to creat mass confusion and subduement. Previously, the Canadian government vetoed use of sonic boom for crowd control, and it is still in use, affecting people in their homes and workplaces. The Canadian military’s actions have been unconscionable. The soldiers, officals, and officers who have pledged their duty to the citizens of Canada in good faith have a responsibility to halt nazi activities, first and foremost within their own sectors. This is a state of emergency.
Displacement is a world-wide, widespread issue. Many unidentified person, or those with aliases and disguises have found their way to Canada via the black market, abducted and wrenched from their families. Others choose migrancy as a way of escaping the attention of ethical officers, officials, and security guards, travelling to assist with the securement of a nazi regime. There are many such individuals in Canada now. There are also nazi Canadians abroad.
We, The Pacific Army, request that Canadians and people the world round unite for the purposes of peace. We cannot sit idly by, as many have for years, and wait for government officials, military and policing forces to offer assistance, and to respond with honesty. 911 calls are not responded to; the screams of a young girl being sexually assaulted by a police officer is recorded, and added to the sounds the sirens. The red and blue lights flash on, and a sex offender gloats behind the wheel of a police vehicle.
The Canadian military have special forces trained in torture techniques. Abroad and at home, foreigner and citizen alike are inflicted with the “humanitarian” efforts of the military. Virtual reality gear, compellors and impulse control inhibitors send digital transmissions to people, assisiting and/or creating violent episodes. It is possible to send these transmissions to multiple persons and locations at once. Spatial maps and transpositioning ensure accuracy of blows, gunfire and weapon placement. This technology has many other possibilities, such as transpositioning finger placement on a guitar. Some policing stations now have the same technology, as do nazi’s with no professional status.
We, The Pacific Army advise persons to limit spending as much as possible, as funding for nazi activities is pervasive and much is pilfered or skimmed from businesses and corporations. There are too many too list. An unusual or compelling urge to make a purchase is indicative of an electronic impulse transmission.
Communications have improved, but remain modified and/or limited through the use of various technologies. Improvements in this are substantial, and appreciated.
Sincerely, The Pacific Army.

 
 

Small aircraft and commercial airplanes are releasing massive amounts of chemicals in the air, creating an atmosphere of subduement, and confusion; affecting cloud cumulations and precipitation; and altering memory retention. The air contamination must cease.
The use of word transpositioning and electronic messaging with the use of various newer spyware and communication technologies in conjunction with the synchatron is creating forcefields of pressure in the atmosphere. Due to the efforts of many information technologies specialists, physicists and other talented individuals, the effects of these technologies has been minimized. Rapid increases in air pressure within flight paths and air tunnels is a public hazard, and puts passengers and flight personnel at risk. Wind tunnels force flight paths, forcing stop-overs, and creating influx’s in certain areas. Murderers and abducted persons are being sent to Saskatoon, Canada, steadily, daily.
Surgeries, procedures, disguises, alias, and fraudulent documentation are being utilized at borders and stations. Displacement and abductions contribute to mass confusion, and the evasion of culpability of terrorists.
The Pacific Army therefore recommends all nations consider no-fly zones for some areas. Airport, train and border security have the technologies, such as retinal scans that eliminate the possibility of fraudulent activity. Unfortunately, there is complicity at security levels. We, The Pacific Army encourage all racial-profiling activity to cease and desist.
This is a state of emergency.

 
 

The official policies of the Canadian governmental bodies are based upon the principles of social liberalism. This is the social contract. The government is now infiltrated and saturated with practices of facism. This is an act of treason on the part of appointed officials, elected persons, military officials and police officers. The official agenda of the Canadian military is one of humanitarianism. Those who do not comply with these standards are in fact treasonous. The policies of facism have been prevailing. Nazi’s have no authority under Canadian law.

 
 

SAY TO NO KFC, and starbucks. and walmart. and albums.

 
 

Isn’t she Pretty in Pink, NOT? She makes the Psychedelic Furs look über glamorous!
Pammycakes Geller never ceases to amaze (and not in a good way).

 
 

(comments are closed)