Even The Title Of Hindey’s Post Is A Lie


ABOVE: Adult toy (left); Right-wing dildo (right)

John Hinderaker, Powertools IV:
A Post I’d Rather Not Write

  • It doesn’t bother me that Elena Kagan might be a lesbian. Instead, what upsets me about her is that she would almost certainly be opposed to laws that discriminate against lesbians.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Comments: 71

 
 
 

Into the void again.

 
 

Hm, a Dildo eating a Dildo. Is that a 21st century Wingnut ouroboros?

 
 

I’m surprised there isn’t more overt criticism of her looks. That’s next.

 
 

Christ. I got of the boat.

Do. Not. Get. Out. Of. The. Boat.

Allow me to provide a longer shorter:

Because the White House went after serial plagiarist Big Ben Domenyech and Democrats acknowledge and welcome people who aren’t str8, Caucasian Christian males, the Senate Judiciary Committee gets to grill Kagan about whether she’s a big old dyke, nyah, nyah, nyah. But don’t worry: “This conclusion, if it follows, is not due to some perverse, prurient interest in Ms. Kagan on the part of conservatives. No such interest exists.”

Yes, they just get to ask her over and over and over again if she’s a lesbian and really, I don’t know how she can prove she’s straight to the satisfaction of folks like Mr. ICBM but because Democrats allow queers and dykes to parade around openly, she’s going to have to have sex with a man and clearly enjoy it, right on the hearing room floor.

See? DON’T GET OUT OF THE BOAT.

 
 

Arky,

too late. Now I have to scrub my brain with bleach. Or acid. I mean, wtf:

In the more or less ideal world envisioned by the Founders, anyone who asked about Kagan’s sexuality would get the only appropriate response–It’s none of your damn business. Unfortunately, that Rubicon was crossed a long time ago.

DON’T GET OUT OF THE BOAT.

 
Right-wing Dildo
 

Why won’t lesbians play with me?

 
 

Maybe this comic will help clear your brain:
http://www.salon.com/entertainment/comics/this_modern_world/2010/04/19/this_modern_world

“Our top story: a professional athlete has been caught inserting his breeding apparatus into an inappropriate mating partner!”

 
 

In the more or less ideal world envisioned by the Founders, Supreme Court don’t have no bitches.

Fixed.

Myra Bradwell would’ve kicked Assrocket’s ass around the courtroom.

 
 

Hell, Roger, Myra Breckenridge would’ve kicked Assrocket’s ass around the courtroom.

 
 

Always. Trust. The. Shorter.™

Shorter Shorter Hindrocket: Closeted self-hating gay man hates all gays, closeted or not. She should be more like Dan Blart.

 
 

Didn’t these jackasses go after Sotomayor because she was a wise Latina? When did they suddenly become all “don’t ask, don’t tell” about candidates?

 
The Tragically Flip
 

Ugh, Obama’s fiendish 11 dimensional ploy to get me to support Kagan for SCOTUS by having all the wrong people vehemently oppose and smear her is working very well. No, they couldn’t go with the usual “she’s too liberal” blah blah, they had to go right for queer baiting the mad dogs so all us people burdened by consciences feel like Kagan has to win or those fuckers do.

It’s a boggle. Well played Grandmaster O.

 
 

Didn’t these jackasses go after Sotomayor because she was a wise Latina? When did they suddenly become all “don’t ask, don’t tell” about candidates?

The goal posts are to be located at least ten yards down-field of the ball at all times.

 
Ted the Slacker
 

Make that three idjits who got out the boat.

That is some rotten mango out there, hoo boy. Still, look on the bright side, there’s a marvellous veiled dong reference, courtesy of teh assrokit… “This is the kind of story we’d rather not touch with a stick.”

 
 

The goal posts are to be located at least ten yards down-field of the ball at all times.

I see. That’s going to make us kick field goals.

“This is the kind of story we’d rather not touch with a stick.”

See what he does here?

 
 

I seek an honest Republican, one who will cut thru the bullshit and call her a “cuntlicker” or “carpetmuncher”.

Perhaps Bob Owens….

 
 

Well, Dodgy, he comes close:

Domenech eventually retracted his claim under pressure, but not before vehement White House denials made it appear that a charge of being gay was on par with child molestation.

I didn’t realize Tony Perkins worked at the White House

 
 

“Our top story: a professional athlete has been caught inserting his breeding apparatus into an inappropriate mating partner!”

What? No news of the mercantile caste?

They never mention the mercantile caste any more, not after they attempted that scam where they encouraged sentients to purchase fake certificates for obtaining shiny stones when they knew no shiny stones were to be had. Globbdamn MSM!

 
 

a charge of being gay was on par with child molestation.

You know I’m am a carnivore but I occasionally have a salad…OH. MY. GOD. I’m a vegan!!!!!!

 
 

Globbdamn MSM!

It’s cadre of khatri!

 
 

You know I’m am a carnivore but I occasionally have a salad

I give millions to charity, but do they call me a philanthropist? I am CEO of a major corporation, but do they call me a captain of industry?

But munch one little leaf…

 
 

You know, we should have a some laws, just for gay people, that prevents them from doing things that we “normal” or “wholesome” folks take for granted. For instance, I don’t think I should be drinking out of the same water fountain because of the possiblilty of teh ghey rubbing off* on me. Furthermore, maybe, just for my own sanity, we should make them wear felt rainbows on their shirts — so we know who we’re dealing with.

*VMR

 
 

Perhaps we could gather them in camps, Esteev. You know, concentrate them in one place.

 
 

Hm, I hadn’t thought about that. That’s not a bad idea, Actor. We could probably use them as cheap labor too. Being that no one thinks of them as a full-person — maybe 3/5ths of a person, but no more, we could just get rid of them entirely. That would seem easier than our current beating around the, uh, bush.

 
 

Uh, where’d that italics come from I wonder? My post musta gotten ghaid.

 
 

We could probably use them as cheap labor too.

Hell, just think of all the jewelry we could harvest from them!

 
 

My post musta gotten ghaid.

EEEWWW EWWWW EEEEEWWW TEH GHEY !

*deep masculine voice* Hey, guys, I’m just going to go abuse a few girlfriends and fix my car before the notable sports competition comes on TV! I shall have a cheap beer or several while watching! ‘Cause I’m MASCULINE. *URK*

 
 

Hell, just think of all the jewelry we could harvest from them!

Bleh, it’d just be earrings and cockrings and weird shit like that.

 
 

Bleh, it’d just be earrings and cockrings and weird shit like that.

Look up the ass! Look up the ass!

 
 

Hey, guys, I’m just going to go abuse a few girlfriends and fix my car before the notable sports competition comes on TV! I shall have a cheap beer or several while watching! ‘Cause I’m MASCULINE. *URK*

Do not forget the deep fried snack foodstuffs made of starches!

 
 

actor212 said,

April 20, 2010 at 14:44

But munch […]

heh. That’s all I got on a Tuesday.

 
 

But munch […]

DAMMIT!

Hoist on my own petar…

 
 

Do straight people not have biases?

 
 

The goal posts are to be located at least ten yards down-field of the ball at all times.

So they don’t move the goalposts, we do by moving the ball…

Domenech eventually retracted his claim under pressure, but not before vehement White House denials made it appear that a charge of being gay was on par with child molestation.

Riiiight, WE’RE the ones that bring up pederasty any time legalizing gay marriage or equal rights for gay folks is mentioned.

 
Lurking Canadian
 

but not before vehement White House denials made it appear that a charge of being gay was on par with child molestation.

Actually, what the White House said was “He’s lying. We don’t entertain lies.”

I suppose they would have gotten some hipster cred if they had followed up with, “Not that there’s anything wrong with that,” but I don’t think pointing out falsehood is equivalent to claiming you’ve been libeled.

I am surprised by the White House’s response, though. I would have expected something more like, “The White House does not comment on the private lives of members of the judiciary”.

Hinderaker must not read Greenwald, or he wouldn’t have said, “Whatever she is, she’s definitely a liberal!”

 
 

I would have expected something more like, “The White House does not comment on the private lives of members of the judiciary”.

The Dunn response does mention something about Domenech applying outdated stereotypes to single working women, which is pretty close.

 
 

“Senate Judiciary Committee gets to grill Kagan about whether she’s a big old dyke”

Isn’t asking one’s sexual orientation during a job interview against the law?

 
 

Isn’t asking one’s sexual orientation during a job interview against the law?

IOKIYAR

 
Lurking Canadian
 

The Dunn response does mention something about Domenech applying outdated stereotypes to single working women, which is pretty close.

I guess. I just don’t expect unequivocal answers from politicians, especially about something like this. After they make a strong statement that Domenech is lying, all the Rs have to do is find one woman who’s willing to say she once made out with Kagan at summer camp and the whole story changes to “Why is the White House covering this up? See, we told you they secretly hate gay people!”

I guess I wish they could do more to shift the dialogue in the direction of “It’s none of your damned business”, but that’s just me hoping for a pony, and it occurs to me that the bit you quoted (which amounts to “Shame on you for saying this” is a start).

 
 

So they don’t move the goalposts, we do by moving the ball…

We shouldn’t be playing at all. The fact that filthy libs refuse to see that our role in life is to stand on the sidelines cheering the neo-cons is one of the many things that makes non-bigots like scudmuscle so angry that he accidentally says bigotted things.

 
 

LC,

I think the problem lies (or lays) with the Lewinski affair. The appropriate response then would have been what you suggest: “None of your damned business.”

However, Clinton’s ego got in the way. It’s almost like he wanted to get caught womanizing (not an unusual male response, by the way). Once it became fair game for the President, any other public official would have to be subjected to inquiries into their personal lives.

Yea, it would have been the correct response, but it would only have served to give the GOP a bigger and more relevant argument to make.

 
 

I got off the boat and noticed that the internet needs fixing:

“Here is the problem: we live, thanks to the Left Right, in an era of identity politics.”

There … fixed!

Anyway … the right is in a tizzy because some righties are spreading rumors that Kagan is gay and some lefties are saying “yahoo!”? I guess righty-tighties are just mad that their rumor strategy is backfiring because “oh noes, she’s gay” doesn’t really scare people away anymore.

 
 

@Pere Ubu

That’s just the miracle of Capitalism In Action and it must never be questioned. If it was wrong, the Invisible Hand would have slapped those bankers silly and taken all of their lunch money. Since they’re obscenely wealthy and getting weathier, they have one nothing wrong. QED

Why, oh why do you hate America?

Religion – the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich.

 
address my envelope, lips!
 

The Righty-Tighties are longing for her to be a lesbian; then they get to fantasize about two women getting it on while they watch through the entire confirmation hearings. It doesn’t matter if she’s good-looking or not; the mere mention of the word “lesbian” is enough to get their bow ties a-twirling.

They’re prudish pervs, every one of them. Their God says they can’t have any fun, even when they want to, so they get really mad whenever someone comes along who isn’t even concerned about their judging disapproval. The whole sex with farm animals argument against gay marriage is because Pat Robertson was caught with a chicken once, but everyone’s pretending it didn’t happen.

…but they can’t get it out of their minds, so they pretend it’s teh Gayz who want it chicken-lickin’ good.

 
 

There was a whisper campaign about Sotomayor possibly being a closeted dyke, too. Kristol was involved in spreading the rumor, though, so there can’t be any truth to it.

Of course, they don’t like uncloseted lesbians any better.

 
 

There was a whisper campaign about Sotomayor possibly being a closeted dyke, too.

Considering there was a not so whispery campaign about H. Clinton (not to mention all the dark hints that grandmama N. Pelosi would shove SAN FRANCISCO VALUES down America’s throat), it might take less time to list the female Democrats whom the Republicans haven’t accused of slurping bearded clams.

 
 

First they came for Goldman Sachs, but I wasn’t a Wall Street banker that engaged in fraud so I said nothing.

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2010/04/now-they-are-coming-for-goldman-sachs.html

 
 

You know who else slurps bearded clams?

Straight males!

You know who else was a straight male?

Hitler!

BTW — doesn’t “The Bearded Clam” sound like a bar where Jack, Janet, Chrissy and Larry would hang out? You know, when they got tired of the scene at the Regal Beagle?

 
 

BTW — doesn’t “The Bearded Clam” sound like a bar where Jack, Janet, Chrissy and Larry would hang out?

Fixed for gender reflection

 
 

You know who else slurps bearded clams?

Straight males!

You know who else was a straight male?

Hitler!

I hear DKW’s mom has a fondness for the ol’ Anschluss, if ya know what I mean.

 
 

Also, from AJB’s link:

This administration already has emasculated the entire private health insurance industry….

Wingnuts really are obsessed with PENIS, aren’t they?

 
A concerned citizen
 

“This conclusion, if it follows, is not due to some perverse, prurient interest in Ms. Kagan on the part of conservatives. No such interest exists.”

The special Congressional blue ribbon panel investigation into the problem of small mammary glands wasn’t formed due to some perverse, prurient interest. If you are not a certified bikini inspector like I am, I can understand why you might not appreciate all that goes into it, but I can assure you, no such interest exists. Childishly calling such an important investigation the ‘itty bitty titty committee’ does a great disservice to democracy.

There are legitimate questions whether the harridan/lesbian sex mage Michelle Obama will eventually lead to her huband making breast implants illegal under Obamacare, and perhaps even forced mastectomies and emasculating haircuts for all the hot babes out there. And didn’t Jesus say something about taking care of the babes?

 
Big Bad Bald Bastard
 

Hm, I hadn’t thought about that. That’s not a bad idea, Actor. We could probably use them as cheap labor too. Being that no one thinks of them as a full-person —

It won’t last, the interior decorating gin will make their manual labor obsolete.

 
 

I braved the Longer. Started doing a paragraph-by-paragraph deconstruction.

And this very unintentionally revealing sentence appeared:

“homosexuals are a group recognized by liberals as having a special claim on our storehouse of “rights”;

So in his view, rights are stored away for safekeeping. Apparently because there’s only so many of them – **and the more people who have rights, the less rights there are for everyone else**.

Isn’t that illustrative of the conservative mindset? Full rights must be kept available for the few – if more people have rights, that dilutes the value of those rights for each person.

As opposed to creating a society of equality, where every individual in the society benefits from a society of full equality.

 
 

It won’t last, the interior decorating gin will make their manual labor obsolete.

Well, then we’ll send them out to the field to pick sconces.

 
 

By George, I think you’ve got it! It’s another meme of the conservative mindset that *”There Isn’t Enough (of anything) For Everyone*. Liberals say “yes, there IS enough to go around- and no one has to go without.”

And both groups are referring to Rights and Possessions and EVEN natural resources. Used with a small fraction of sense, there would be plenty for everyone. A naive, sophomoric assumption my conservative brothers tell me. Greedy, miserly people *alway*s say that about less grasping, or even generous types.

 
 

Dang it~ above comment ment for ‘another j’ and his/her courageous discovery of the “vault of rights” statement.

 
 

Storehouse of rights.

 
 

You see, a lockbox for social security is just crazy moonbat talk. After all, we might need that money for something important, like our wars. Now lockboxes for rights, that’s another story entirely; if we don’t lock ’em up, the dirty fag0rts might abscond with them.

 
Turbine Yukon Palin
 

So, lesbians shouldn’t get to rule on gay stuff. Then black judges shouldn’t get to rule on race stuff. Jewish judges can’t rule on Jewish stuff. Ditto for Catholics and aborti — oh, wait.

It’s interesting to see this too because Judge Walker, the Prop 8 trial judge and George H.W. Bush appointee, is one of the stately old queers of California. And the squawking that will inevitably erupt should he rule for the plaintiffs in the Perry vs Schwarzenegger case will be about exactly this sort of thing, never mind that he was randomly assigned to the case.

 
 

concerned citizen-

Nice Jamie Babbit reference.

And another j, that is the conservative mindset in a nutshell.

There aren’t enough rights for everyone, we better hoard them for the privileged less they be devalued by your grubby hands.

 
 

The story began when Ben Domenech, blogging for CBS News

Whooaaaah. Hold up. Back up the motherfucking boat. When did this happen?

 
 

So in his view, rights are stored away for safekeeping. Apparently because there’s only so many of them – **and the more people who have rights, the less rights there are for everyone else**.

Oh. I thought storehouse of rights was arsehole-speak for: “Life sure was better when them darkies/f^ggots/women didn’t have any rights.”

 
 

Isn’t that illustrative of the conservative mindset? Full rights must be kept available for the few – if more people have rights, that dilutes the value of those rights for each person.

As opposed to creating a society of equality, where every individual in the society benefits from a society of full equality.

If everyone is fully equal then no one can be obviously inferior.

 
 

Hey, Hindey! Is that a dildo in your mouth, or are you just glad to see me?

 
 

Well now that you’ve explained it, that makes perfect sense.

 
Spengler Dampniche
 

AHAHAHAHA oh shit that picture slays me dead! That is all. I have no teh funneh today.

 
 

“Once it became fair game for the President, any other public official would have to be subjected to inquiries into their personal lives.”

Wait a minute–are you saying that witchhunt was Clinton’s fault? I don’t remember it that way. Jump on it if I’m wrong, but I thought that was a Republican show of force after the 1994 “revolution”. It was the Repub’s perverted fault then that our country got overtaken with old-man-bj stories…and it’s their fault now that this sad dialogue’s even being fielded.

THEY made it fair game, and so did we, by going along with it.

 
 

Wait a minute–are you saying that witchhunt was Clinton’s fault?

I’m saying he should have handled it better. That’s not blaming him. Anyway you slice it, the GOP would have come armed for bear (they were PISSED that he co-opted so many of their positions to win the election).

A simple “none you bizenass” out loud and in public would have put the spotlight squarely on the accusers to explain why a witchhunt was necessary. Instead, the most effective defense was shunted to the side and left to the likes of Larry Flynt to rebut.

 
St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon
 

Y’know, the bothersome part for me about this post is it took me like a whole day to notice that wasn’t a corn dog this time.

 
 

(comments are closed)