If you’re done contributing to The Human Fund…
We have the new feel good about yourself cause of the year:
The Libby Legal Defense Trust
Because everybody loves The Libby — it’s true! If you contribute, maybe Scooter can have someone give Byron York reading comprehension lessons:
CIA leak prosecutor refuses to turn over evidence to Libby
That’s Byron’s headline. What evidence did Fitzgerald refuse to turn over? Let’s see:
In a December 14, 2005, letter to Fitzgerald, Libby’s lawyers asked for “Any assessment done of the damage (if any) caused by the disclosure of Valerie Wilson’s status as a CIA employee.” In the same letter, Libby’s team asked for “All documents, regardless of when created, relating to whether Valerie Wilson’s status as a CIA employee, or any aspect of that status, was classified at any time between May 6, 2003 and July 14, 2003.”
Did Fitzgerald refuse to turn over evidence? Sadly, No!
Fitzgerald declined both requests. “A formal assessment has not been done of the damage caused by the disclosure of Valerie Wilson’s status as a CIA employee, and thus we possess no such document,” he wrote in a January 9, 2006, response.
Part II:
Fitzgerald wrote, “We have neither sought, much less obtained, ‘all documents, regardless of when created, relating to whether Valerie Wilson’s status as a CIA employee, or any aspect of that status, was classified at any time between May 6, 2003 and July 14, 2003[.]
Is reading really that hard?
In a throwback to the last Republican administration as sleazy as this one, I first read that as “The Liddy Legal Defense Trust”.
Jillian – I saw the same thing.
Is reading really that hard?
For conservatives, Sadly, Yes.
If it says Libby Libby Libby
On the docket docket docket
You’ll be paying paying paying
From the pocket pocket pocket…
At least, you will be if you’re a co-conspirator. Not that I know anything about hush money. I don’t even know what a pound of hush goes for these days.
(Apologies for the commercial jingle flashback – idle childhood and all that, you know.)
Reading is just as hard as writing for those wacky wingnuts.
To be slightly esoteric:
When was the last time you saw a wingnut make any real sense? No.
That’s all I’m saying. — “MCH’ “
MCH’
MCH, is that your tribute to Marie Jon’Benet’s err…unique name scheme?
MCH’
MCH, is that your tribute to Marie Jon’Benet’s err…unique name scheme?
Arrgh…stupid comments form hiccuped on me…
Maybe if there’s a little extra money left over, Scooter can take Byron out for a real Big Boy haircut, too. (Not that his Little Lord Fauntleroy isn’t adorable.)