Unfortunately, it is my solemn duty to out Ed Whelan as… Frank Burns.

I thought you meant a different kind of outing…

M. Edward Whelan III is the President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He directs EPPC’s program on The Constitution, the Courts, and the Culture. His areas of expertise include constitutional law and the judicial confirmation process. As a contributor to National Review Online’s Bench Memos blog on judicial nominations and constitutional law, he was a leading commentator on the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

Mr. Whelan, a lawyer and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, has served in positions of responsibility in all three branches of the federal government. From just before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, until joining EPPC in 2004, Mr. Whelan was the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. In that capacity, he advised the White House Counsel’s Office, the Attorney General and other senior DOJ officials, and Departments and agencies throughout the executive branch on difficult and sensitive legal questions.

So, Ed has both an initial initial and a trailing number. Yup, pure wingnut.

Does that mean I can release these photos of MEW during a midnight … uh … tour of a petting zoo?

I guess it’s time to come clean before somebody outs me… I’m Climson Murridge, inventor of the tin harp.

“In that capacity, he advised the White House […] on difficult and sensitive legal questions.”

One wonders just what sensitive questions those were? Torture? Illegal wiretaps? The possible t is rather long as the White House had it’s dirty little fingers everywhere.

Who?

List, possible list. I blame WordPress.

“and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia,”
Pretty much all you need to know about Eddy to know he’s a worthless hack jobber. Scalia is in-fucking-pants-on-head-SANE.

Also, this reminds me of
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=128895&title=Bloggers

One wonders just what sensitive questions those were?

The bio blurb attached his recent Washington Post op-ed piece, which Tintin shortered, notes he worked for the OLC and then adds the following: “His portfolio did not include national security matters.”

Why does it not surprise me that Mr. Ed runs the Ethics policy center?

El Boggo has also recently noted some of Mr. Whelan’s other assholery.

I found another GOP non-entity saying stupid things we can make fun of.

(It’s not hard. I heard Sarah Palin was overflowing with tasty gibberish all week.)

“In that capacity, he advised the White House […] on difficult and sensitive legal questions.”

So now we know who outed Valerie Plame.

No, no, no. They surround us!!

The man himself. If his legal career ever fizzles, he’d make a fine undertaker.

Did someone mention Glenn Beck?

How did Glenn Beck’s movie do? I hear it did as well as “Expelled” and “American Carol” COMBINED!

Meanwhile, back OTville, I’m shocked, SHOCKED I SAY, to hear that Lindsey “Drama Queen” Graham is is in the closet.

When did go in the closet?

Tsk. Tsk. And Whelan is such the petulant bitch that he happily admits that exasperation was the motivation for outing Publius. That’s some intellectual rigor he’s got there.

Be advised that Ed Whelan’s email address is visible in the images of the email exchange on publius’s post. Make use of that information how you will.

Frank Burns Eats Worms

Does that mean I can release these photos of MEW during a midnight … uh … tour of a petting zoo?

How can you tell that it’s him in that fursuit?

Oh.

Ewww.

Same email address for Whelan appears on his page at his wingnut welfare gig: Ethics and Public Policy Center. Those Republicans and their Orwellianisms, huh?

“In that capacity, he advised the White House […] on difficult and sensitive legal questions.”

He’s probably the guy who obtained the press credentials for the male hooker.

So, Publius has open comments and Whelan doesn’t allow comments, yet Publius is the coward? And a logical argument has no impact unless it’s attached to a proper name and job title?

How quaint.

Outing a blogger because he/she makes effective arguments?

Disgusting.

That post by Whelan is amazingly snotty.

The fReichtardus Motherfucki view this as the harshest punishment evar because their worst fears involve public disclosure of their private lives.

Of course, 85% of their private lives involve behavior likely to damage livestock and they spend a lot of time calling for the condemning 6% of what they get up to with consenting human adults.

By their projections ye shall know them.

The Ethics and Public Policy Center.
“I’ll take Oxymorons for two hundred, Alex.”

So outing a pseudonym wins an argument? I wonder what class in law school prepares you for that.

And that MEW3 works for the Ethics and Public Policy Center only proves his point when he outs a pseudonymous blogger.

Irony gets it on the head like a baby fur seal.

Ed Whelan sounds like the kind of guy who’s been googling the price of fertilizer and fuel oil.

The “Ed Whelan blows goats” rumor: So not true.

Also, this reminds me of
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=128895&title=Bloggers

Oooh, colbertkilledapanda.com is available again. That’s tempting.

The man himself. – snorghagen

So Spiny Norman is correct — he is Frank Burns!

*

Actually his behavior reminds me a bit of a coworker who will start to do something completely uncollegial. Then when you call him on it (indirectly) and say “if anybody were to do [uncollegial thing Y which coworker X is about to do], that would be horribly uncollegial” (note that this quote nowhere says that X was going to do Y), he’ll say “I never said I was going to do [Y], how dare you be so unethical to accuse me of such”.

Suffice it to say that X has already been sued by former female employees for creating a hostile workplace. Our employer is using the same sort of defense Madeline Kahn (playing Pat Nixon) gave of Dick “he’s not anti-semitic, he hates all minorities” Nixon: X is not sexist, he’s mean toward everyone!

Check out the EPPC’s list of fellows and scholars. Many of them served in the George W. Bush administration in some capacity. Whelan, Levin, and Kurtz, in addition to their important work with the EPPC, contribute to the National Review. Arkes is an uberschmuck. Also, Rick Santorum.

Righteous Bubba said,

M. Edward Whelan III is the President blah blah blah He directs EPPC’s program on yak yak yak yak His areas of expertise include blart blark blerk blorkity blark As a contributor to National Review Online wheep whoop whappity whop … &etc.

In a word: Douchebag.

I’m shocked, shocked I say!, to learn that yet another right-winger is an unprincipled whiny asshole at heart.

It can now be revealed that Ed Whelan is in fact a cancerous pustule on Jonah Goldberg’s asshole.

S th bmmssh sd h dsn’t wnt t rn GM nd Chryslr. h rlly? Thn why r cngrssmn lrdy prssrng thm t kp plnts nd wrhss pn fr pltcl (nstd f cnmc rsns? lrdy Bwny Fwnk hs prssrd GM nt kpng pn prts wrhs n hs dstrct. S gss Bwny Fwnk cn nw d t GM wht h dd t Fnn nd Frdd.

Byctt Gvrnmnt Mtrs nd Crsslyr. Byng n f thr prdcts s vt fr B nd Bwny Fwnk. Thr prdcts r t f th qstn fr ny frdm-lvng ndvdl.

S th bmmssh sd h dsn’t wnt t rn GM nd Chrysr. h rlly? Thn why r cngrsmn lrdy prssrng thm t kp plnts nd wrhss pn fr pltcl (nt cnmc) rsns? lrdy Bwny Fwnk hs prssrd GM nt kpng pn prts wrhs n hs dstrct. S gss Bwny Fwnk cn nw d t GM wht h dd t Fnn nd Frdd.

Byctt Gvrnmnt Mtrs nd Crsslyr. Thr prdcts r t f th qstn fr ny frdm lvng ndvdl.

Gvrmnt Mtrs wll wrk t s wll s th SSR. Th SS wll crsh nd brn s wll.

“Now who’s the hitman” … dear gawd, I love it. The lack of self-awareness, the ass-backwardness of it. It’s a nugget of pure wingnutty petulance.

Fuck you, asswipes.

Tintin is a big, shaggy cunt.

I love the fact that this schmuck is 50, that’s half a fucking century, and he’s still acts like the petty little shit who ran around screaming “I’m gonna tell on yooooou!” if he didn’t get his way.

Oh wait … He’s a Republican.

Never mind.

Notice the left wing can’t debate issues. They just censor people and shut them down.

No wonder you support the “fainress doctrine”, your ideas just don’t hold up in a real marketplace of ideas.

We’re the Party of the unsuccessful, the lazy, union parasites, welfare cheats, racist minorities, Muslims, anti-semites, pussies, lesbian feminazis, and queers.

Do all the ops have sand up their pussies again?

“No wonder you support the “fainress doctrine””

It’s not endearing to post things that are counterfactual, twirp.

If you feed the troll you have to take it home with you.

I did it once and found they’re impossible to potty train.

| said,

Fuck you, asswipes.

Now, that’s a real example of debating the issues! Oh, how I wish I had the rhetorical skillz of the great and mighty |!

the lazy, union parasites, welfare cheats, racist minorities, Muslims, anti-semites, pussies, lesbian feminazis, and queers.

That sounds like a hell of a party, apart from the anti-Semites. I’ll bring the chips and dip.

nly sd tht, r dd slvs, bcs my pst bt Bwny Fwnk trnng th GM blt nt slsh fnd ws cnsrd.

gn, ll frdm lvng ndvdls mst Byctt Dtrt. By crs md n mrc bt wth nn-prstc lbr, lk ccrds nd Cmrys.

| said,
June 7, 2009 at 16:44

“Tintin is a big, shaggy cunt.”

Ed Whelan, is that you?

Why are Republicans so angry?

It wouldn’t have anything to do with the perpetual ass-kicking delivered to them by their BLACK president, would it?

Don’t the trolls realize that every time they post anywhere, Obama’s FBI, gifted with almost infinite power by the Treasonous Obama Patriot Act that Obama and Clinton both signed back in ’01, forges yet another document claiming that said troll engages in acts of badger buggery and ham rape?

Quick! Look out the window! You may yet catch them spying on you! (There’s a listening device hidden behind the toilet.)

Why doesn’t the left tolerate dissent? Why there always trying to cruch their opponents?

The left is always using underhanded schemes to defeat their opponents because they know they can’t beat them in fair fight!

Liberals can’t debate their opponents, so they just try and censor them.

Oh look, an unused car battery!

Is Obama going to repeal me?

Why can’t the left just hear the right out? Why do they always have to resort to authoritarianism, I’ll tell you why, because they hate freedom.

The left just censors opponents becuase they know that conservatives have all the answers. That’s why we cut liberals’ tongues out – to teach them about the importance of freedom of speech.

Yeah, Ronald Reagan sent us some more napalm!

Here in South Africa, the left is always trying to censor us. Even when we put them in jail, they still won’t hear out conservative arguments fairly.

Now, where did I put Jack Abramoff’s bank number?

The fact is, General Motors is now going to become just another….

…oh wait, this thread is about Ed Whelan. Sorry! I’ll go post at a more appropriate venue.

What does Scalia need clerks for anyway? He just pulls his decisions out of his ass. (see DC handgun ban.)

He just pulls his decisions out of his ass. (see DC handgun ban.)

He pulled a handgun out of his ass in DC? I didn’t realize he has a concealed carry permit.

Ohhhh, he’s just grumpy cause the feminazis never invite him to watch their wild lesbian orgies. He has to go to those lame-ass boring orgies, where the women just lay there, making stupid half-interested noises and thinking up ways to spend their husbands’ money, and there’s no lavender-scented KY jelly on tap.

Ever see an eight-ended vibrating dildo in action, buddy boy? Yeah, I thought not.

Oh, and for you, Eddy
http://www.failhorn.com/

douche \’düsh\ n [It.] 1: a Whelan. 2: oft. paired with cannon, nozzle and geyser.

Isn’t it cute when the [insert name of troll, wingnut, Gov. of Alaska etc.] tries to argue [insert any topic]? Its like getting fashion advice from a circus clown. “One should never wear big red floppy shoes after labor day!” “Your rubber nose should always match your belt buckle!”

I wonder why Whelan blogs as “Ed Whelan,” but his professional bio gives his name as “M. Edward Whelan, III,” while the District of Columbia Bar Assn lists him as “Martin E. Whelan, III.”

“Martin E. Whelan” is his given name, “M. Edward Whelan III” is the name he uses to feel fancy, and “Ed Whelan” is his down-home folksy name. A name for all situations.

“In that capacity, he advised the White House […] on difficult and sensitive legal questions.”

And the Bush administration is so well-known for its strict adherence to the spirit as well as the letter of the law, never twisting it to their own purposes or ignoring it entirely to do the blatantly, outrageously illegal and unconstitutional when expedient, and NEVER relying on amoral douchebag lawyers for ostensible coverage of those acts.

“Martin E. Whelan” is his given stripper name, “M. Edward Whelan III” is the name he uses to feel fancy during drag performances, and “Ed Whelan” is his down-home folksy name. A name for all situations.

Fiqqsd.

“bayville” at TBogg’s pointed out this Dan Riehl condemnation.

That a writer at a site like NRO would stoop to outing an anonymous liberal blogger is, hopefully, far more a discredit to Whelan and NRO, than it is trouble for said blogger. Were it up to me, Whelan would be gone as an NRO blogger. I think it somewhat revealing when so called professionals start looking like the children out here, as opposed to the more traditional amateur bloggers. It’s likely one reason why many started blogging and reading blogs back before so many alleged professionals decided they had to catch the wave.

When big douchebags call you on your douchebaggery, you know you’re a very big douchebag.

I did it once and found they’re impossible to potty train.

Boy do I know about that! Happened to me with Troofy. Little fucker shit all over everything. Had to take him to the ASPCA. This one looks like it has even less sphincter control.

To be fair DrDick, you did put quite a large amount of castor oil in his food just for shits and giggles didn’t you?

‘Purge this Troofy!’

The left hates democracy because conservatives love it. That’s why I needed the CIA to overthrow my elected prime minister.

Sorry, I’ve got SAVAK on line two…

To be fair DrDick, you did put quite a large amount of castor oil in his food just for shits and giggles didn’t you?

With castor oil you get a lot of the former but not many of the latter.

Or so I’ve heard.

Good thing you didn’t put Castro oil on his ass Arky or you would have nationalized his shit.

…The fact that Volokh’s post did not embarrass me is amply attested by my promptly linking to, and praising, Volokh’s “characteristically thoughtful critique.” The fact that I saw no reason to be embarrassed by his post is amply explained by the closing paragraphs of my post exposing publius.

…what IS that sucking noise????

Good point Arky, but now gocart mozart has inspired me.

Troofy + Castro oil = nationalized shit = filling for shitmoats = profit!

Euripides –

I think you have just come up with a plan to eliminate the national debt! Here, Troofie, here, boy…..

I can’t help but note that for all of Whelan’s ire at anonymity, he does not name the person who told him who publius was. Using an anonymous source to out a pseudononymous blogger.

“In an email to publius, he asked, “Now who’s the hitman”?”

I don’t even get this. Isn’t the obvious answer, “still you, douchelicker?”

I mean, it doesn’t even make sense.