Uh, fine, I’m not going to click on the link, so can somebody tell me what th’ french fry she’s on about now?

Uh, fine, I’m not going to click on the link, so can somebody tell me what th’ french fry she’s on about now?

A conservative commentator said that Malkin spewed venom and Malkin responded by spewing venom.

A conservative commentator said that Malkin spewed venom and Malkin responded by spewing venom.

To be fair, she responded by having her big, strong, chivalrous men spew venom for her. You know, because she has traditional values.

Maybe one of her fan club will send fake anthrax again. That one never gets old!

My heart was never so moved than when I looked upon the sadness in Michelle Malkin’s eyes, as she read these words about her being ‘venomous’, and then drew herself up to full striking height, unfolded the ribs that formed the hood just below the back of her head, and then struck repeatedly at the mirror that happened to be beside her.

I just needs ya ta spar a few rounds wit’ Malkin, let her hit ya couple times. Five bucks a round. An’ don’ tap her on the jaw.

Russell was the wielder of the “no class” consciousness!

Someone ought to tell her that her face is starting to freeze like that.

Shhh! They’re turning on each other, don’t distract them!

And also that there is no plastic surgery to fix years and years and YEARS of Hardcore Stupid.

We’ve switched their Folger’s with injections of Malkin venom. Let’s see if they notice.

I hope Erbe learned her lesson. She should have just said that all the women except Malkin had been maligned in the article.

Malkin does have her man bitches on a short leash. lol My Alaskan Malamutes are way smarter than they are.

Two Malkin Males battle for their lady’s favor.

To be fair, she responded by having her big, strong, chivalrous men spew venom for her.

Those are her Malkintents™. Similiar to winged monkeys.

In her conservative world doesn’t that make her hubby the biggest non-man bits evah?

Translation: It’s not okay to talk about “hatef**king” conservative women…unless they are rowdy, incivil conservative women who don’t behave nicely enough to be on my obscure PBS show. In which case, they deserve all the vulgar misogynist attacks they get!

It is indeed hypocritical that some people get a certain kind of treatment and others do not. What a mysterious world.

[spits in bucket]

In her conservative world doesn’t that make her hubby the biggest non-man bits evah?

Well, it would normally, but Jesse is in the basement wrapped in webbing and is beyond caring about his manhood or lack thereof.

There you go again, being all mean & snarky … Malkin’s the nicest child-stalking internment-camp-advocate in town!

(Translation: even at this distance I’m scared to move lest she sense my attempt at escape through her belly-scales.)

I heard Michelle was so pissed at the article she published Hef’s home address. Large amounts of creepy, doughy Malkinites have been seen peering through the bushes, but it’s entirely possible they were already doing that.

So which is more amusing; There are conservatives that find Malkin to be as repulsive as normal thinking people do or that Malkin is shocked and offended to find out not all conservatives think she was born out of the butt of God and should be worshiped as holy chit?

Me I’m undecided which makes me laugh the most.

but it’s entirely possible they were already doing that.

Buy me a drink, I’ll tell ya some stories.

uh, since when was hatefucking misogynist? Can’t one hatefuck a dude if they so choose?

I’ll bet Hef has marble countertops, too.

Gavin M. has a serious case of Democratic Ditto-Head Syndrome if he doesn’t realize that Bonnie Erbe made a fool of herself with that blog entry. And if he did realize that and played it for laughs, well meet the new wannabe bullies, same as the old wannabe bullies.

Lloyd Blankfein is laughing his ass off.

A conservative commentator said that Malkin spewed venom and Malkin responded by spewing venom.

Perfect. I need not visit the link.

Gavin M. has a serious case of Democratic Ditto-Head Syndrome if he doesn’t realize that Bonnie Erbe made a fool of herself with that blog entry.

CMike does not realize that it is Malkin’s reaction that is funny and it is assumed that Erbe is an idiot in any case: she identifies as conservative, yes?

Apparently Blankfein’s laughed-off ass is now posting comments at Sadly, No! under the name CMike. Or somebody’s ass. Or just an ass.

CMike has a lot of nerve calling someone else a bully while I’m still stalking the playground. Show a llittle respect or I’ll stalk your children, publish your home address, and punch out your pets.

We’ve switched their Folger’s with injections of Malkin venom. Let’s see if they notice.

That’s some very amusing shit right there.

I might have noticed a similarity between Malkin and McArdle (besides having the same initials)…

If you criticize either one, their minions show up and try to defend her. Even if she doesn’t link herself to the post.

For instance, Brad Delong defended McArdle recently (and he was basically right although he went way, way too far in praise of Megan) and the very first comment was like, you talkin’ bout Megan McArdle, noted idiot? Or some such.

And another commenter came along, all like, what have you got against her?

Now McArdle’s monkeys are much nicer than Malkins, as you would expect.

Its like they google their goddess’ name regularly and speed over to any new hit. Could it be?

Uh, except they didn’t bother to give me any trouble. And I thought my recent take-down of Megan was pretty good, Right Here.

What do I have to do to get the attention of the economic-idiots who read McArdle? I have tried so hard…

@Righteous Bubba:

Thanks for the link to the ‘Defense of Internment’ debate.

I read it at the time, I am sure, but it still is a good read.

God Malkin is so pitiful.

For those who won’t click over, (I usually won’t but wanted the Erbe link), Michelle notes the creamy goodness of the comments over at USN&WR site, says something like, of course I am going to be blamed for them, even the ones before I posted the link, and then, heh.

In other words, she doesn’t plan to have to get irate at the fact that the comments she is being blamed for were posted conveniently a period of time before her own post went up, and how could she possibly be blamed for that??

This time, at least.

And yes, the possibility that a heads-up email goes out a couple hours earlier did, in fact, occur to me.

It’s always been like this; any criticism of Our Women brings out huge hordes of howler monkeys… quite apart from the deep authoritarian streak that runs through most Republicans/Conservatives and requires them to leap to the defence of any holy cow, the fact that it’s a women triggers both the deluded White Knights (remember how Troofie even used that ‘nymn for a while?) and the frankly deeply disturbed who make up a good portion of the most fanatical. You know the ones, those who would never get a date normally and who can now only relate to women as idealized forms of their own biased assumptions about what femininity is (like The Troof does again, natch); Notice that the kind of Conservative beauty held up and supposedly making Liberals jealous is almost always one of the usual cheesy stereotypes… Blond and leggy like Coulter, Asian and thus that mail-order-bride sexiness for Malkin, boob job and blow job lips like Pam Gellar… and whilst they show what might be classed as an independence or strength of character, that independence takes on no form other than aggressive screaming of things that might annoy liberals; It’s just another form of infantile wish fulfilment. But the moment they step off the reservation and challenge any of the Republican orthodoxy they are torn to shreds; how many of these so-called “Women” dared criticize the response to the recent “Hate Fuck” nonsense about “Their” women as equally degrading? Or the nonsense about Hillary Clinton or Janet Reno before it? Because you see “Real” women like being reduced to their genitalia if it’s politically pornographically pleasing, you see…?

Did you morph her picture into that photo on the post or thats all her? Positively venomous is she..
Also, is she a Latina, asian and something else combined? Just wanted to know coz then I can tell how temperamental she is.

Righteous Bubba said,

June 4, 2009 at 5:44

Russell was the wielder of the “no class” consciousness!

True dat, but you still have to give Gavin the “18 kinds of awesome” award giving us old folks a shout-out with that.

Like school in the summertime

I’m not old!

Oh. Oh, I see. Now that it’s conservative women who are being exploited by Playboy, the Reptilians have suddenly learned a new word: “misogyny.” You know, that figment of the feminazis’ imagination that was made up by ugly lesbos who couldn’t get a man anyway. That same non-existent form of so-called “sexism” which contards have ridiculed and denied and yet against which simultaneously have girded their and their women’s precious loins for lo these hundreds of years. I see.

So I’m not sure which particular appropriation makes me more nauseated: The con-bloggers’ pearl-clutching poutrage at the very idea–the very idea!–that “their women” are being objectified and made sport of in porn rags, or the Malkin thing’s even daring to use the word “feminism” defensively in any sense whatsoever.

Now that it’s conservative women who are being exploited by Playboy, the Reptilians have suddenly learned a new word: “misogyny.”

One wonders where they were when Bo Derek was making appearances month after month with her lady lovelybits hanging out for the world to see.

Oh, wait. I think I answered that a few threads back…

r the Malkin thing’s even daring to use the word “feminism” defensively in any sense whatsoever.

It can talk?!!

God Malkin is so pitiful.

Pity is wasted on the poutraged.

Anyone remember Citizens United Not Timid? Good times.

Russell was the wielder of the “no class” consciousness!

Malkin is like school on Sunday. No class.

Our Lady of Internment camps won’t sign a copy for Max Blumenthal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v54fMGZBPo

Remix version. Heh indeedy

Sorry, lets try that again.
Remix version! Heh indeed!

uh, since when was hatefucking misogynist? Can’t one hatefuck a dude if they so choose?

Works for Skeletor…

I never got to read the Playboy article in question, and I’m sure it’s fairly stupid. But isn’t some of the outrage, particularly the claims of sexism, a bit overblown? It sounds like the author is merely referring to what is sometimes called the “grudge fuck” (sex between two people who dislike one another or disagree about something) which has no connection to rape whatsoever. Surely even wingnuts have heard of this. Then again, it took them weeks to figure out what “teabagging” was . . .

Russel would have been the one to say “no class.”