It’s not easy having ratings that low. In fact, one might say “It’s hard work.”

I wanna know, “WHO ARE THESE 38%????” I know literally zero of them, even my very conservative father has conceded that Dubya’s a turkey.

“WHO ARE THESE 38%????”

Their an odd breed that dwell in caves and don’t get out much. Some haven’t seen the light of day for years.

Be vewy vewy quiet, they startle easy.

What’s a good source for presidential approval poll data over time?

My man Andrew just pointed me at the following curiosities:
http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_8911_image001.gif
http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_9432_image001.gif
http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/nixon-bush.gif

One of my neighbors would almost certainly reckon it a bargain, and Bush a Godly protector, even if he managed to in fact kill off every living creature on the planet but himself, her, and her yappy dog.

Needless to say, she does not approve of my household *at all*.

I’m crushed.

You’re using the Old School Jay Garrick Flash, huh? Interesting choice. I’m a Wally West man, myself.

Oh yeah, and it’s good to see people finally waking up and seeing Bush for the lying douchebag he is. If only it happened before the election.

I really need to start working on that time machine again. I gave up when I realized that I had no idea what a flux capacitor actually was. Oh well, back to the old drawing board.

I have a terrible, terrible suspicion that these poll numbers may turn out to be like the exit poll numbers of the 2004 election. I wonder if there hasn’t been some sort of demographic shift in this country that makes polling data all for shit until the pollsters reconfigure how to properly take the American pulse again.

But I hope to goodness they’re right.

Actually, 38% sounds unreasonably high to me.

so, fully one in three americans support the president?

sounds like a mandate to me.

Jay’s pretty spry for someone who has been around since the 40s. Barry’s the one that is my favorite. Hasn’t stopped me from reading about Wally though.

Hopefully 38% isn’t the floor for Bush.

You think a flux capacitor is hard? Try building a Cosmic Treadmill…

Try building a Cosmic Treadmill…

Yeah, that has the additional problem of requiring superspeed to operate it.

Truman, surprisingly, rated the lowest

Not surprisingly. Truman’s integration of the armed forces was the cause of the Dixiecrats fiasco, where Strom Thurmond and other Southern Democrats split off from the main party. It led to the historic Dewey Defeats Truman headline, almost costing Truman the 1948 election.

On the other side of the fence, that Hiroshima/Nagasaki deal didn’t make him very popular with many liberals, either.

So Harry pissed off both the rednecks and the hippies. Is it really surprising he’s low man on the totem pole, POTUS-wise?

Didn’t Barry end up as a crazy maniac trying to kill all the other Flashes? Or was that Brainiac 5?

We haven’t had a nice, distracting politically-motivated Orange Alert in quite some time. Wonder why they stopped doing that?

Because the election’s over.

The country lost.

i thought nixon dipped into the 20s.

sadly, i know plenty of people in the 38%. hell, i know people who will personally suffer because of bush’s piss poor response to katrina who are in that 38%.

the reason is simple. look at how much wingnut propaghanda there is. one could easily get all one’s news from wingnut propaghada and have no clue it was wingnut propaghanda.

Bush Supports Home-Bred Terrorists

The administration and the Bush appointed Justice Department are so obsessed with a foreign ?war on terror? that they have chosen to look the other way concerning home-bred terror perpetrated by our own government officials against U.S. citizens.

Below is a quote from an American prosecutor that President Bush and Alberto Gonzales?s Justice Department believe is just fine,

“The last claim involves a statement made to attorney xxxxxxx warning that the defendant would be charged with additional crimes if he did not clam[sic] down. The statement is a reference to the defendant’s continued harassment of the victim and the investigating officer in this case through the court process. The defendant has filed a civil action against the victim because of his participation in this criminal case. The State is currently reviewing a contempt charge against the defendants because of this activity. The statement was a proper warning made through the defendant’s representative.”

This is an actual written quote from a powerful republican prosecutor filed in court documents. It is a federal crime to threaten someone for filing civil litigation in federal court or for their participation in federal civil litigation. Threatening someone with adverse consequences whether it be breaking their arm or threatening them with an illegal and frivolous criminal prosecution is known as extortion and obstruction of justice. The above open-ended threat also constitutes violation of the federal racketeering statutes and federal civil rights crimes. The fact that the criminals in this instance carry government issued badges and guns heightens the terror, which is now also approved by the President and Attorney General Gonzales.

A glance at the legal system?s own ethical cannons explain very clearly why threats of this nature against civil proceedings are forbidden and criminal,

?? The civil adjudicative process is primarily designed for the settlement of disputes between parties, while the criminal process is designed for the protection of society as a whole. Threatening to use, or using, the criminal process to coerce adjustment of private civil claims or controversies is a subversion of that process; further, the person against whom the criminal process is so misused may be deterred from asserting his legal rights and thus the usefulness of the civil process in settling private disputes is impaired. As in all cases of abuse of judicial process, the improper use of criminal process tends to diminish public confidence in our legal system.? ?

Obstruction of federal civil litigation by the government itself is not only a crime against individual victims, it constitutes an attack on the integrity of the federal court system signaling a demise of the rule of law and adversary court process in this country. This trend is advocated by the current administration and the Justice Department. The courts have become a powerful tool for the government to abuse and manipulate.

In correspondence, President Bush failed to respond to this issue. Alberto Gonzales and his Justice Department indicated that the conduct was fine and not even a civil rights violation. Senator Elizabeth Dole had an equally callous and unethical response to this crime targeting the federal courts.

The above quote constitutes the on-going threat of violent arrest and incarceration for exercising a right clearly protected by the first amendment ?redress of grievances in federal court. Government threats of criminal retaliation for a citizen?s pursuit a civil claims in federal court is also an impermissible coercion tactic violative of Due Process.

Constitutional rights of our own citizenry must be secured before preaching abroad concerning foreign constitutions, rights and freedoms.

In the same series of correspondences, the President, Attorney General Gonzales and Senator Dole expressed no concern about the threats of violent arrest and incarceration targeting citizens for merely attempting to exercise the clearly established first amendment right to attend and observe courthouse proceedings. Secret courts are not a precept that should be sheltered or embraced by our President or the Justice Department.

While the above instances reveal how this country is evolving into a police state with zero concern for rights, liberties and freedoms, ironically, we hold ourselves up as the example for others to emulate. President Bush, lets get it right here before we attempt to impose our system on others. Our military is risking their lives in foreign lands to protect rights, freedoms and liberties that currently exist only on paper in this country. The politicians that have directed our troops to engage in foreign conflict are the very same individuals who have waged a war to undermine our constitutional rights within our own borders.

The willingness of those in power to inspire fear in the public with threats of political imprisonment for stating a position, filing a paper in court or merely attending a court proceeding is terrorism. The President and Justice Department?s willingness to allow these practices support and encourages further terrorism.

Alberto Gonzales? Justice Department concludes that the above, ?does not involve a prosecutable violation of federal criminal civil rights statutes [18 U.S.C., ?? 241, 242].?. See statutes below. In the United States today, the mere exercise of basic First Amendment rights is met with terrorist threats of arrest and political imprisonment reminiscent of Stalinist Russia while the courts have become government manipulated secret tribunals hiding the terror acts.

Bill Smith
North Carolina
bush_crimes –at– yahoo.com

This piece authored under a penname to avoid retaliation.

UNITED STATES CODE Title 18

Sec. 241. – Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death

Sec. 242. – Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death

This might be a dumb thing to point out but Bush is never going to do anything as stupid as getting democracy right in America. That would mean he wouldn’t get his illegal war of agression and his fascist withholding of basic human rights towards “enemy combatants”.