I guess Kaye got tired of looking goofy in her Renew America glamour shot, ’cause she’s got a new pic up:

Hmmmm… it’s not as much fun, is it? Thankfully, I saved the Tiger Kaye picture on my hard drive:

Yeeeeah, that’s the Kaye we know and love!

Speaking of, she’s got a new column up today. You’ll be glad to know that while her new picture is an improvement, her writing still sucks. Let’s check it out!

That’s a pretty crappy opening, Kaye (hey, I’m just calling it – like I see em’).

If one judge or even three for that matter, can overrule congress and the will of the people, my suggestion is to send the congressional do-nothing members home for good!

Damn right! We’ll abolish both the judicial and legislative branches, leaving America at the mercy of Grand Inquisitor Alan Keyes.

Just think of the beau-coos of money we could save if the outlandish salaries and retirement benefits for 500 plus House Representatives and 100 Senators were halted ? not to mention the salary of their aides.

Since Kaye’s proposal to radically restructure the government would require Congress to pass an amendment putting itself out of a job, I don’t see this happening any time soon.

So far, almost every important law signed into existence by the president has been overturned by one liberal judge or another, and the rulings have not thus far been challenged by lawmakers or the president. So realistically…who needs lawmakers?

You guys remember when liberal judges overturned No Child Left Behind, the Patriot Act, and the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill? Well if you don’t, you can jog your memory the Kaye Grogan way: by huffing rubber cement.

Above: Kaye’s creative muse.

It’s obvious the balance of powers has shifted dangerously into the hands of just a few. And for the most part ? they have lost the ability to correctly interpret the existing laws, making up their own laws from one ruling to another as they stumble “unsteadily” along.

Just like Kaye after a night of drinking at the Chippendale show.

Many legislatures stood around scratching their heads, as news surfaced of Gavin Newsom the mayor in San Francisco, California concerning the issuance of illegal marriage licenses to same-sex partners as fast as the licenses could be printed out.

I think many are still twiddling their thumbs over the fact Mayor Newsom decided to take matters into his own hands, making up his own laws, and quickly applying them concerning same-sex marriages.

And who, pray tell, voided the 4,000 same-sex marriage licenses issued by San Fransisco? Why, those commies at the California Supreme Court, that’s who!

I’d say this blows a major hole in Kaye’s argument, but honestly, I’m not really sure what her argument is.

Whether one agrees with a law or not ? does not give them the right to ignore or break the law they disagree with or make up their own laws. We are still a country that is supposed to be governed by laws, although we are presently on a slippery slope due to many liberal groups actively involved in getting rid of the laws they don’t like or want to conform to, all the while pushing for underhanded ways to suppress the rights of those who disagree with them.

So unlike us liberals, Kaye respects the rule of law, which is why she urged President Bush to “use his executive power” to save Terri Schiavo- which presumably meant overruling several Florida courts and sending in the National Guard to slap a feeding tube into her arm.

I just don’t know why I find it amusing that House Majority Leader Tom DeLay is under such scrutiny by the liberal news media, while the liberal Democrats’ black kettles keep multiplying ? but I do.

You keep multiplying black kettles? That’s a rather occult of you, Kaye…

It’s a good thing “throwing rocks at glass houses” is just a hypothetical way of pointing out how one guilty party ignores the planks in their own eyes ? while pointing out the splinter in their brother’s eye, otherwise the Democrats would be paying out a lot of money to have their windows (constantly) replaced in their lavish homes.

But first we have to surgically remove the planks in our eyes. It’s tough enough to repair a house without a piece of wood lodged in your retina.

Without the Internet news ? few would know about the investigations going on in the Hillary Clinton New York Senate campaign fund raising tactics where many alleged discrepancies seem as abundant as “Carter’s Little Liver” pills. Even fair and balanced Fox News Network is letting this news intentionally fly over the top of their heads, while they keep to the forefront news of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay’s (alleged) discrepancies involving ethics violations, which he vehemently denies. If DeLay is guilty of any wrong-doing he needs to be dealt with accordingly, but at the same time, most of the other politicians need to get in the long line and be dealt with in the same manner. And in the meantime: they need to duck every time they throw rocks to avoid the boomerang effect.

Uhm, wasn’t this column supposed to be about dismantling Congress for tolerated liberal judges? Or maybe it’s just my stupid liberal bias expecting continuity…

And since many liberals can’t seem to understand when a conservative writer is using parody or satire in their otherwise sometimes boring opinion pieces, I’ll just have to use another illustration other than the elephant standing on an ant’s shoulders (pointed out by a liberal in an email sent to me of how impossible it is for a poor ant to bear the weight of an elephant on its shoulders ? duh!) ? to demonstrate how “unfair and unbalanced” all news entities tend to be.

Even with the jokes, your pieces are still boring, Kaye.

Lighten up and find a little humor if you can liberals!

Hey, I think the picture of you in the tiger get-up is pretty hysterical:

Hee-hee-hee… oh lordy, you look goofy in that outfit…

Speaking of judges (again)…

Hey whaddya know, we’re finally back to the judges!

I find it highly amusing that the Democrats are threatening again to filibuster the judicial nominees of conservative judges brought before the judicial panel selected by the president for confirmation. The ever transparent Democrats are maintaining that conservative judges have no place on the courts, and they don’t seem to have any problems with exposing potential judges to litmus tests, if they are of a conservative nature, at the same time berating the Republicans if they dare to apply the same tests to liberal contenders who are favored by Democrats to stack the courts.

Frankly speaking ? all of the “crybabies” in Washington. . . need a gigantic pacifier stuck in their mouths!

Sounds kinky, Kaye. My place or yours?