Nice seeing you again Aunt Mostert, but we have to go now

At Renew America, Mary Mostert asks:

After all, people with tuberculosis can receive a quarantine order issued by their County Department of Health that requires them to remain in an institution for at least 6 months, while taking anti-tuberculosis medicines, until they are no longer contagious. Why aren’t we doing the same with those infected with HIV?

The answer is:

Could it be because we’d have to quarantine so many people in government and in the media…

Does this have anything to do with Jews’ love for anal sex?

 

Comments: 12

 
 
 

That’s not even the best part! She wants to launch a pre-emptive strike on those “most likely” to get HIV:

So, why don’t we use the communications systems we have and the knowledge we have about what is causing AIDS to prevent MILLIONS of deaths annually in the AIDS epidemic by quarantining anyone involved in homosexual sex, sharing needles in the use of illegal drugs and having sex with more than one heterosexual partner?


I think it’d just be easier for all the Wingnuts to take over Utah and form their own country, personally. What would the name be? Jesustan?

 
 

I was wondering if anyone was going to blog the ravings of this Jeezofascist beeyatch. She seems to think that just because she didn’t have sex before marriage (or after most likely) that the majority of Americans, especially those “saltathaearth” Midwesterners, were virgins until wedded. If we, as she proposes, “quarantined” (i.e., placed in interment camps) every person she mentions, then we’d have to fence off at least half the continent. Which, I don’t doubt, would be just fine with her. Then she could stop worrying about possibly brushing up against someone icky.

 
 

Tell ya what, Mary – when you can give someone AIDS by coughing on ’em, THEN we do a quarantine. Until then, shut yer filthy Jesushole, you dumb cow.

 
 

Y’know, I think her idea has a possibility in a “please, don’t throw me into the briar patch” kinda way.

If us sinners are essentially granted autonomy over our lives and given some good land to live on (Massachusetts, New York, California… hell, all the blue states), we could finally be free of the wingnuts! Brilliant!

“Oh please, Mrs. Mostert, whatever you do, PLEASE don’t throw me into the economically prosperous, secular and fun quarantine camp…”

 
 

Sadly, fewer and fewer matchbook cover universities are offer epidemiology coursework – and we the people are the poorer for it.

 
 

by quarantining anyone involved in homosexual sex, sharing needles in the use of illegal drugs and having sex with more than one heterosexual partner?

When you add in that last one, I think it would be easier to quarantine everyone not on the list.

 
 

*by quarantining anyone involved in homosexual sex, sharing needles in the use of illegal drugs and having sex with more than one heterosexual partner?*

Or why not just use a condom, fuckwit?

 
 

Remember to check box next time, stupid fool.

 
 

“by quarantining anyone involved in homosexual sex, sharing needles in the use of illegal drugs and having sex with more than one heterosexual partner?”

Since we like to make fun of people’s grammar here, this is actually a very specified group, if you pay attention to her use of the comma and the word “and”. She didn’t say anyone involved in homosexual sex OR sharing needles… OR having sex….

So you would have to qualify under all three criteria to be quarantined.

 
 

I wonder how she expects this quarentine to be implemented. “From now on, we’re going to round up all the homos and stick them in a cage. Excuse me, are YOU a homosexual?”
“No”
“What about you?”
“No”
“Gee, this is going to be tougher than we thought…”

 
 

Ha! Bill that reminds me of “It’s very hard to find a Vietnamese man named Charlie.”

 
 

cake or death!

 
 

(comments are closed)