*ajustin John Deere cap*

A-yup, thass whut Ah’m a-hearin’ two….

Ugh. Some of comments over there are even worse than the post.

I need to go lie down.

In good news, Dan Riehl’s slime blogging has been memorialized at wiki. Firm answers indeed.

This effort to shame Dan Riehl would work if he was capable of feeling shame.

I think he and Billy Jo wuz throwin’ sumthin’ off the Tallahatchie Bridge.

All she did was hire him to bust up a chiffarobe.

Day-um! I don’t which is worse – the original post of Riehl’s justifications of his “crime reporting” in the comments.

Just when you think these guys can’t be any bigger assholes, they manage to cross the line in more reprehensible ways.

“original post or” oops

Best comment on the thread:

Maybe he was the kind of pervert who fantasizes about beating up kids he sees on the subway.

One doesn’t rule anything in or out without some firm answers.

OMG DAN RIEHL KILT HIM!

Why does Dan Riehl refuse to deny the allegations that he rapes and murders children. I would like to believe that he is innocent but his silence is very suspicious.

This is the best comment on his thread.

I think Dan Riehl raped him and killed him, consistent with what may be Riehl’s potential pattern of homosexual rape and mass murder. Before any more people start going bonkers that I’m accusing Riehl of anything, take a breath. I’ve done a fair amount of crime blogging mixed in with politics over time. One doesn’t rule anything in or out without some firm answers.

Posted by: unriehl world | Sunday, September 27, 2009 at 10:06 PM

“Just when you think these guys can’t be any bigger assholes”

Goatse should have taught everyone that assholes are infinitely expandable.

We better warn Ana Marie Cox: Dan Riehl is going to rape her next.

Updated: I should add that this all started as Ana Marie Cox Tweeted it as “what she was reading” – and has re-Tweeted on it, bless her sweet little azz.

The first thing I thought of when I heard of Sparkman’s death was Granny on the Beverly Hillbillies going on about “revenuers.”

Riehl picks a fight with Little Green Footballs. Lets hope it is to the death.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Charles Johnson’s Continuing Major Malfunction

I see Little Green Football’s has Michelle Malkin as his “Outrage of the Day!” and he has taken up the practice of using an unflattering screen grab from the Left to picture her. He also manages to work up a post attacking me on down.

I’m only pointing it out as he has so few readers anymore it’s all too easy to miss. At least he’ll get an extra year or two from that masturbatory fantasy of a webserver I picture him sleeping with these days.

Come forth and multiply my little lizards, we must have new hatchlings, oh yes, oh wow!

Seriously, from an adult, even in CA? I guess in hindsight, he always was a bit of a kook. Maybe Daddy took the toy soldiers away too early when Charlie was a little boy.

zzzz

Watching someone’s machine break can be a terrible thing, if it doesn’t put you to sleep.

Neocon Birchers like Dan Riehl troll for reaction to keep lefties off guard.

It’s not the likes of Beck/Limba/Malkin/Riehl that are on the back foot for Sparkman’s lynching. That’s the point.

Wow. I never imagined I’d be cheering for Charles Johnson, but with Malkin AND the Baby Rapist aligned against him?

OMG DAN RIEHL KILT HIM!

It would be irresponsible not to at least consider the possibility.

Though I guess I’m happy about Chuckles Johnson’s return to the realm of the sane, I can’t say I actually trust the man to remain here.

“At least he’ll get an extra year or two from that masturbatory fantasy of a webserver I picture him sleeping with these days.”

Now Danny, I think it is a bit unhealthy to spend so much time fantasizing about Charles Johnson nocturnal emissions.

He had this little gem in today’s, um, piece:

America’s existing social welfare system has left us with no better than animals prowling the streets in some quarters here, as sad as that is to say.

Which explains his overreaction to a couple of kids talking smack on the DC subway.

using an unflattering screen grab from the Left to picture her

Well, any picture of Malkin speaking is “unflattering.” When she’s quiet she looks “attractive” (or would, if you didn’t know her), but the moment she revs up, her face instantly transforms into screaming psycho bitch. If you had no knowledge of American politics and spoke no English, and watched Malkin on TV with the sound off, you would immediately be asking yourself, “Who is this crazy lady?”

“He also manages to work up a post attacking me on down.”

As your 5th grade English Composition teacher, I am appalled by this sentence. Where did I go wrong Danny?

America’s existing social welfare system has left us with no better than animals prowling the streets in some quarters here

Yes. Around here we call them health insurance companies. And banks. Predators, really. Completely without the civilizing influences of law and order, these entities prey upon the helpless, stealing every last penny they have, and quite frequently leaving them to die. At one time they must have served a purpose in our social order but that time has passed, and now these entities suffocate progress in America while providing little or no value in return.

Slippy,

Someone’s been watching “The Corporation,” I see…

We better warn Ana Marie Cox: Dan Riehl is going to rape her next.

Oh, yeah, he’s obsessed with Ana Marie Cox’s ass. He was going on about mounting her from behind or something like that. Very disturbing.

And this is just so, so, so sad: “‘I completely broke down,’ Josh Sparkman said. ‘It’s always just been me and my dad. It’s all I have, and I don’t have him anymore. I’m just kind of by myself.'”

I hope that Riehl is fucking ashamed of himself.

Back in the Clinton era, there was Scaife’s Arkansas Project, which alleged the murder of a federal worker to keep him silent about Whitewater. Nowadays, we’re seeing the actual murder of a federal employee, found on 9/12, and in the Daniel Boone National Forest in southern Kentucky.

Right about now we ought to be asking ourselves “Where will the next Fort Sumter Be?”

Today Riehl is claiming that Sparkman wasn’t hung because he wasn’t found hanging, according to one source that some other blogger (The Other McCain) got drunk with and started having a goof with spoke to.

I hope that Riehl is fucking ashamed of himself.

I would like to wish Dan Riehl the joyful experience of waking up at 2 or 3 or 4 a.m. every morning, sitting bolt upright, horrified that something is very wrong in his life and that he’s running out of time to rectify it before it consumes him like a gigantic python.

But being the cold-blooded son of a bitch that he is, he probably sleeps like a baby every night.

I hope that Riehl is fucking ashamed of himself.

That and $4 will get you a latte.

But being the cold-blooded son of a bitch that he is, he probably sleeps like a baby every night.

Things like this make my atheist ass wish that karma and/or heaven actually existed. As it is, I’ll just have to imagine him dying cold and alone, like the sad little pissant he is.

“America’s existing social welfare system has left us with no better than animals prowling the streets in some quarters here, as sad as that is to say.”

Also this. What does “left us with no better than animals” even mean Danny? I think the time to stop huffing spray paint and retake 5th grade Composition is long overdo. I am sorry I failed you Danny.

Someone’s been watching “The Corporation,” I see…

Thanks for reminding me to add this to my Netflix queue.

I don’t which is worse – the original post of Riehl’s justifications of his “crime reporting” in the comments.

It’s not crime reporting, it’s crime blogging. Get your non-existent qualifications straight.

Karma, as I understand it, is not poetic justice. It just means that when you act like a vicious hateful yahoo, you are in fact a vicious hateful yahoo, and consequently you live in a world with one more vicious hateful yahoo. It is more subtle than most people think. But it is automatic.

He closed his comments before I could remark that all of his blogging is a crime.

,i>Karma, as I understand it, is not poetic justice. It just means that when you act like a vicious hateful yahoo, you are in fact a vicious hateful yahoo, and consequently you live in a world with one more vicious hateful yahoo. It is more subtle than most people think. But it is automatic.

This is true in the Buddhist understanding of karma, but I think that the Hindu and Sikh versions of karma are pretty much “you reap what you sow,” which I do not believe exist. But the type of karma you outlined totally exists–it’s just unfortunate that the vicious hateful yahoos take the rest of us down with them.

He closed his comments before I could remark that all of his blogging is a crime.

He’s been doing that a lot lately.

an unflattering screen grab from the Left

Seems to me I recognize that image from Fox News Channel. My cable system doesn’t offer anything called “the Left” — does yours?

Or maybe he just means we’re seeing the left side of her face. Dan should really learn to write more clearly, but I understand raping and murdering innocent children takes up most of his time.

Things like this make my atheist ass wish that karma and/or heaven actually existed. As it is, I’ll just have to imagine him dying cold and alone, like the sad little pissant he is.

If there is an afterlife, may Riehl’s resemble an endless DC Metro ride completely filled with loud-talking minority youths.

Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing. Heh. Indeed. Hmm. Ouch. Read the whole thing.

an unflattering screen grab from the Left

Old Norbizness post?

Derbyshire calls for the end of female suffrage because we are puny retards with tiny brains who just want the nanny state to take care of our baybeeeeeeees because men are fucking losers who can’t cut it at fatherhood.

Have no fear- the other Inspector McCain is on the scene and will get to the bottom of things- in particular, that of the 20-year old newspaper editor with the tatoo. Just keep sending money.

Derbyshire calls for the end of female suffrage…

He can start with Ann Coulter.

Waitaminute: Men are irresponsible layabouts, therefore women should lose their voting rights? Makes perfect sense as always, Derby.

Speaking of racial stereotypes…so, ok I probably should be banned from teh librul innertubes 4 LEIF for sharing this but, this was too damned funny:

Karaoke Fail.

I had to share this comment, by our own Sir Charles, at Stephen’s post on this at Cogitamus:

I’ve seen pictures of Dan Riehl and although it’s sheer speculation, I have done a lot of speculative blogging im my time, and I’ve got to say, the man has the look of a double goat fucker about him.

Now don’t get all excited and jump to the conclusion that I’ve said Dan Riehl fucks twin goats. I am merely saying if there was a couple of violated goats in your area, he’d be the first suspect (or “goat-two guy”).

Well, and maybe some folks just don’t think the fedrul gubmit got no right no ways to be snoopin’ around a man’s still.

You don’t have to eat it, kid, but it is a ham sandwich.

TruculentandUnreliable said,
September 30, 2009 at 19:00

Dammit, I clicked.

Always. Trust. The. Shorter.TM

Ahem, FYWP.

an unflattering screen grab from the Left

That’s known as a candid photo, Dan. It’s what happens when you don’t have an army of spin doctors attending your every move and some speck of your public image gets out unpolished.

It’s how we discover that people are who they actually are, i.e., the lunkheaded asshats they think they get to be because they’re entitled, as opposed to their neat and buttoned-down conservative image which is who they want us to think they are..

Well with Safire passing away, the NY Times needs a new right wing columnist. I think Derby has just submitted his application. “Women shouldn’t vote because they vote Democrat” is precisely the antidote the Times needs to balance out Paul Krugman’s rampant extremism.

Willy,
Preview has given up the ghost, so I hope I’m doing this right, but:
™

Waitaminute: Men are irresponsible layabouts, therefore women should lose their voting rights?

Ayup. Somebody has mommy issues.

an unflattering screen grab from the Left

How terrible it was for The Left to take a candid photo of Michelle Malkin when she was not at her best.

Oh, what’s that you say? It was a shot of when she was making an appearance on national TV, and speaking her mind about issues of the day?

Well with Safire passing away, the NY Times needs a new right wing columnist. I think Derby has just submitted his application. “Women shouldn’t vote because they vote Democrat” is precisely the antidote the Times needs to balance out Paul Krugman’s rampant extremism.

I heard Derbs was trying out for America’s Next Top Pundit. The Times better snatch him up before WaPo elevates him to being a star in the douchebag firmament.

Ah, so I see Derb’s rationale for repealing women’s sufferage can be boiled down to one thing:

“Women don’t vote for my Team.”

I have to say, it’s almost refreshing for him to be so blatant about it, rather than camoflage it in some philosophical, biblical, moral or biological poppycock. It’s not a matter of principle to him, it’s just if they couldn’t vote, his Team would win.

g, that really has been the operative conservative electoral strategy – keep people who don’t vote for us from voting. Derby is only breaking the “but don’t admit it” rule.

Oh, goody! If the Times gets Derbyshire they’ll have the trifecta: Bobo Brooks, that pasty little putz Don’t Douthat and Mr. “don’t let them wimmens vote” Derbyshire. Makes my widdle heart go pitty-pat. Makes my widdle stomach gurgle ominously…

Thanks, DKW. I’ll try to remember that. &trade

LOLZ.

it’s just if they couldn’t vote, his Team would win.

Derbyshire: Pitcher or catcher?

Ball boy.

You saying he washes them balls, Flip?

“Women don’t vote for my Team.”

Right? Fucking classic. God forbid that he consider that the reason why women don’t vote for his team is because they’re smart enough to know a group of losers when they see one. He’s like the ugly, rude slob who proclaims that all women are frigid bitches because they won’t fuck him.

Peg Boy

It’s not a matter of principle to him, it’s just if they couldn’t vote, his Team would win.

Shorter conservatives: More of the wrong kinds of people show up at the polls than the right ones.

For further reference, see ACORN

The Tragically Flip said,
September 30, 2009 at 20:01

Ball boy.

I see what you did there.

Waitaminute: Men are irresponsible layabouts, therefore women should lose their voting rights?

this is analogous to “men are out-of-control lust-crazed animals, so women need to be enslaved”.

Women have abortions, therefore Derbyshire should be castrated.

Waitaminute: Men are irresponsible layabouts, therefore women should lose their voting rights?

this is analogous to “men are out-of-control lust-crazed animals, so women need to be enslaved”.

Or “She was wearing a miniskirt, so she had it coming”

Bruce Lee shoulda kicked Derb a fuck of a lot harder than he did.

So let me get this straight. Women can’t be trusted with the right to vote because they can’t see the obvious signs when the fathers of their children are homosexual child predators who have tendencies to get up in trees and hang themselves nude after taking the census. And because Barack Obama is clearly one of those men, we have to engineer a military coup family intervention.

Wow. It actually makes sense.

That is, if you’ve done a Rush Limbaugh dose of hillbilly heroin before you read it.

Shorter Derbyshire: “Women are willing to vote for a nigger. This scares me.”

Sure the fact that Riehl is so fucking full of shit, he’s made it his middle name – and if it weren’t for shit, then Dan Shit Riehl™ would be a hollow and empty excuse for a human being.

That said, I did enjoy one of his linked quote thingies:

…That’s when he found a small bag of what appeared to by marijuana. A field test confirmed it.

Shorter Derbyshire:

he is, indeed, a very tiny man.

I’ve never really understood that “Malfunctioning Glenn Reynolds Robot” thing. Is that trolling? Or is it supposed to be funny?

Shorter Derbyshire: “Women are willing to vote for a nigger. This scares me.”

Only a panty-dropper like Obama, though.

…That’s when he found a small bag of what appeared to by marijuana. A field test confirmed it.

Is it coriander? No no no! Gimme da ganja, mon!

I’ve never really understood that “Malfunctioning Glenn Reynolds Robot” thing. Is that trolling? Or is it supposed to be funny?

Heh. Indeed. Read the whole thing.

I’ve never really understood that “Malfunctioning Glenn Reynolds Robot” thing.

Join the club.

I heard somewhere that on the internet there is report about Dan Riehl being arrested for lewd conduct with an underage boy, but the charges were dropped because of threats to the child’s family. Anyone else hear that? Why hasn’t Dan Riehl publicly denied these serious allegations?

We’d be better off if women didn’t vote because then instead of Obama we’d have crazy John McCain and Sarah Pa… hol’ up, hol’ up, I think I’m seeing YET ANOTHER problem with his “thinking.”

Karma, as I understand it, is not poetic justice. It just means that when you act like a vicious hateful yahoo, you are in fact a vicious hateful yahoo, and consequently you live in a world with one more vicious hateful yahoo. It is more subtle than most people think. But it is automatic.

Sir Philip Sidney captured the essence–after describing a particularly odious character, he remarked:

In short, he was such a man that no one could wish him worse than to be himself.

Oh, and Mr. Sparkman was from Kentucky, so he wouldn’t be a carpetbagger but a scalawag.

We’d be better off if women didn’t vote because then instead of Obama we’d have crazy John McCain and Sarah Pa… hol’ up, hol’ up, I think I’m seeing YET ANOTHER problem with his “thinking.”

Obviously he just thinks that women should be seen and not heard! Unless they’re mavericks. Also.

I heard somewhere that on the internet there is report about Dan Riehl being arrested for lewd conduct with an underage boy, but the charges were dropped because of threats to the child’s family. Anyone else hear that? Why hasn’t Dan Riehl publicly denied these serious allegations?

Serious allegations indeed. It would be irresponsible not to speculate about Riehl’s obsession with little boys and his violent nature.

Obviously he just thinks that women should be seen and not heard! Unless they’re mavericks. Also.

I think it runs a step or two deeper than that – Palin wouldn’t have been nominated if Hillary Clinton hadn’t been a contender, which couldn’t have happened unless teh wimminz were allowed to vote.

Like that?

Tn’U: I just saw that Derbyshire gem elsewhere. I think his core thinking is that women vote left, so don’t let them vote. The reasons they vote left are secondary. At the base of this isn’t sexism — that’s the sideshow — it’s his distrust of democracy.

See also the last big flip-flap about how black people are racist because they don’t vote for a party that was recently* openly pro-racist.

*then, more recently developed a coded language and started using some real high school debate BS to try to target blacks as the real racists, etc.

I think it runs a step or two deeper than that – Palin wouldn’t have been nominated if Hillary Clinton hadn’t been a contender, which couldn’t have happened unless teh wimminz were allowed to vote.

And Obammy wouldn’t have been nominated if black folks weren’t allowed to vote, plus “those people” usually vote Dem, too! Obviously only white male property owners should be allowed to vote, and then only if they promise to vote for Republicans.

Obviously only white male property owners should be allowed to vote, and then only if they promise to vote for Republicans.

Indeed! Otherwise, what is the point of having a democracy?

At the base of this isn’t sexism — that’s the sideshow — it’s his distrust of democracy.

I agree. And it’s basically what Ann Coulter said, too. But I still think that Derbs has mommy issues.

Indeed! Otherwise, what is the point of having a democracy?

Leftist!

Indeed! Otherwise, what is the point of having a democracy Republic?

Hannitized for your safety

“This effort to shame Dan Riehl would work if he was capable of feeling shame.”

I don’t care if he has enough of a soul to feel shame or not.

He disgraced himself with that post & he compounds his folly by standing by it & leaving it up … so I want to see him get a LOT of surprise magazine subscriptions (like the NAMBLA Newsletter, Underage Scat-Munchers’ Digest or Hot Jailbait Monthly) delivered to both his home & workplace, & many many pizzas delivered at 2AM.

I want him to get phone-calls in the dead of night that just say “I know what you did” & then hang up.

I want him to wake up to burning bags of shit on his doorstep.

I want him to have a little taste of what he’s so generously given to the Sparkman family – no, I take that back – I want him to have much much more of it than he’s dished out, because if he gets bent over the proverbial hood & made to squeal like a pig this time, maybe he keeps his child-molesting, livestock-fondling paws away from his keyboard next time & spares another innocent family a world of pointless hurt … & just because I’m such a mean little bastard.

What jim said. Twice.

What do Michelle Malkin and Sarah Palin think about the “Let’s repeal women’s sufferage” chapter in Derb’s new book? I wonder…oh, well.

I also wonder if Sparkman’s family would have a case against Riehl for libel or defamation or something. Sparkman wasn’t ever a public figure when he was alive, and there doesn’t seem to be anything remotely resembling a justification for Riehl publishing that piece.

Didn’t we used to have laws about that kind of thing?

What do Michelle Malkin and Sarah Palin think about the “Let’s repeal women’s sufferage” chapter in Derb’s new book?

Wouldn’t they have to qualify as “women” to care?

I mean, Derb didn’t say anything about taking the vote away from harpies, now did he?

@actor212: Oh, it’s better even than THAT.

The Malkins and Coulters of the world have been assured by their corporate handlers that once the world has changed, there will be special exceptions made to the rules, just for them. That’ll be a nice payback for all the times they were snubbed in gym by those prep-school cheerleader bitches!

I suspect similar promises have been made elsewhere. “Oh, well of course we’ll still let YOU vote, Mr. Steele. You’ve been such a help to the cause!”

People who trade child pornography and snuff films use computers and so does Dan Riehl. I’m simply speculating on one possible alternative, however impolite.

he has taken up the practice of using an unflattering screen grab from the Left to picture her.

Apparently fairness demands that you only use MM’s right profile.
The other possibility is that Riehl could not a proper sentence to save himself form.

Obviously only white male property owners should be allowed to vote, and then only if they promise to vote for Republicans.
That’s the only way you can be sure that their votes are not driven by identification with some sort of group identity.