If Karl Rove thinks he can push a bunch of pussyfied RINO candidates on us, he’s got another thing coming. The movement wants real Genghis Khan conservatives, not squishy centrists like Attila the Hun.
Holy sweet Jebus, I’m gone for a couple of years and look what I miss: crown jewels of wingnuttery! Our old pal Adam “Shove them into human-sized microwaves” Yoshida has become an author of military science fiction or, as he likes to call it, future history. He’s already written two novels, A Land War in Asia and A Blast of War, and considering Yoshi’s previously stated desire to glennocide pretty much everyone in the world apart from American Republicans and British and Canadian Tories, I can well imagine the content of these books.
Above: Uncle Yoshi wants You to join the U.S. Wankery
Apparently he’s sold a few copies and is therefore letting his fertile imagination run wild with ideas for future volumes. One idea is a story about how genetically and politically superior humans on Mars are forced to show the likewise inferior humans (liberals) left on Earth just who’s boss when an alien presence threatens the solar system. Another story will focus on a plucky young billionaire conservative who recruits an army of mercenaries and topples dictators in Africa (I take it Yoshi is a fan of Mark Thatcher); I modestly suggest the title Heart of Fartness. As for his third idea, I’ll leave it in our favorite Japanese-Canadian fascist’s own words: Read the rest of this entry »
Then there was the madness of social disorder, best exemplified by the deranged ideas in liberal circles about homelessness. This disastrous phenomenon was viewed as the result of evil Ronald Reagan social policies, not as the result of the wholesale emptying-out of psychiatric institutions and jails.
Koch stood athwart famed liberal institutions that hotly defended the rights of people to live in the city’s streets, even though they were a clear danger to themselves and others and the most visible mark of a society no longer able to maintain any kind of civil order.
It was one of Ronald Reagan’s evil social policies to empty-out the psychiatric institutions, first state-wide when he was governor of California and then nationally as President.
Of course anyone who kicks the sick and poor in the teeth is all right with a Pod Person, and the late NYC mayor certainly qualifies. But always the greatest concern for Pod People when considering another human being is the attitude to rightwing Jewish identity politics. If one is of The Tribe and puts it and its Eastern Mediterranean real estate first among all things in life, then one is deemed a Good Person; if not, then one is a Bad Person, a self-loather, a functionally non-Jew. JPod happily decides Koch was good and in that Chosen context he’s probably right.
Perfesser Corncob instructs the hayseeds on proper gender roles. Surprise, surprise: those who resist the grand liberal project of the pussification of the western male — a giant pink floral-scented Death Star, as it were, aiming its menstrual and moody superlazer directly at the testicles of virtuous keyboard kommandos — will be rewarded with moar seks:
the guys who do the most lawn work, car repair, driving and bill-paying – traditional men’s jobs – who have the most sex in marriage, the study suggests. The same is true for women who do the most traditional female housework, according to the study published in the February issue of American Sociological Review. . . .
In other words, the study concludes: “Men or women may, in essence, be turned on (however indirectly) when partners in a marriage do more gender-traditional work.”
Whenever I do the blog thing, after a while — and it’s happening again — I inevitably get sucked into an Althousian vortex of distracting bugfuckery and I end up with a half dozen incomplete drafts; not, I think, because I have ADHD but because, unlike George W. Bush, I’m curious about too many things. So many psychopaths fascinate, are fascinating.
Norman Podhoretz, the silliest living neoconartist since the late Irving Kristol left this Earth for the fiery fink tank of hell, recently sat down with Peter Robinson and Bernard Lewis for a chat aboard the post-election National ReviewCruise of Resentment. One thing to know about Poddy is that he hasn’t changed since the 1970s; every piece he writes or interview he gives will convey the following themes: America and Israel are beseiged by a monolithic foe, liberals within the West always backstab the virtuous neocons who want to send other people’s children overseas to fight the enemy, and that Poddy has personally suffered deeply for his courageous advocacy through the years at the hands of liberals who’ve said mean things about him but history will prove him right in the end.
I am saddened to note that in the current culture of journalism truly brave TV pundits like Erick Erickson, who attacked RINOs from the right on CNN, and Kirsten Powers, who attacks many Democrats from the right on Fox, are rare birds indeed, deserving admiration and awe from all fair-minded people.
At about 16:55 or so into the vid Charen channels David “Donner Party” Frum and spews the following:
It is economically possible to raise children with just a mother in the home, and we see this throughout Western Europe, we see it in other countries and we see it here. Unless, I guess, there’s that lash of necessity, that fear of real privation, people will make poor decisions about their families; and one of the jobs of conservatives (it seems to me) is to argue strenuously for doing what’s best for the well-being of women and their children — is marriage.
The whole thing so far is chock full of crazy, but Charon the Ferrywoman is in especially fine form here because she is showing how the original ideologies of the modern wingnut movement, libertarianism and social conservatism (fanatical religiosity), naturally flowed together into a fusionist river of awfulness. Make the people suffer economically, improve their characters, save their souls.
Macho retired crusader General Jerry Boykin hilariously confides to Chris Wallace that allowing women in combat roles would humiliate him “as a man,” because of, umm, “personal hygiene” issues:
“Now, as a man who has been there and as a man who has some experience in those kinds of units, I certainly don’t want to be in that environment with a female because it’s degrading and humiliating enough to do your personal hygiene and the other normal functions among your teammates.
Killing or converting Muslims is one thing; taking a piss or shitting with chicks around? Too scary! But of course nothing new. As retired United States Air Force colonel Martha McSally (as quoted in the Crooks & Liars piece) put it, “men and women have been serving together for years.” So “the privacy argument [is] a ‘red herring.’” To which General Boykin would no doubt reply ‘exactly, hehindeed’ because that monthly, as it were, red herring is the source of the other implied objection in Boykin’s and so many other masculine fossils’ resistance to integration. The thought that a comrade in arms might have to change her tampon saps morale and might as well signal surrender to the enemy. Next thing you know these moon-cycled, oozing pseudosoldiers will be replacing kevlar with Chantilly lace and tastefully arrange scented candles rather than set claymore mines. How are soldiers like the General supposed to kill a raghead if there’s an all-powerful, disarming vagina nearby?
Roy strikes comedy gold written by a contributor to Mrs. Perfesser Corncob’s Basement O’Randroids:
Forgive me if this is the wrong place to put this.
But this is an observation after using Okcupid futility for a few years now. Pretty much every single women on the site is a liberal who doesn’t want to date conservatives. (They have a match question for this)
Even women who are Ayn Rand fans. Even women who are hard core Christians, anti-abortion, anti-sex before marriage, etc, etc, etc
The few exceptions are “centrists” who don’t want to date conservatives.
What gives? Is it just the web site? Are most women who lean conservative already married? Are women just more prone to be liberal?
I’ve probably always known it but my recent return to wingnutology has confirmed it: For the sad and sexually frustrated denizens of Battlestar Conservatardia, All of This Has Happened Before and All of This Will Happen Again:
Millions of Women Have Been Indoctrinated to Not Fuck Me
By Dirk Wade
Finally, somebody said it. The so-called “modern” woman is a frigid ice-bitch who hates men. Hat tip to the ol’ Perfesser for having the cojones to open up this can of worms, big time. Preach it, brother!
[Pause to note the expert interpretation by Sadlynaut D.A.'s old blog mate Mr. Wade and indeed Parrotline itself, a treasure of a blog fossil.]
That Instapundit post is full of sexual FAIL, too. I suppose if there’s any difference between then and now it’s the average fapulent wingnut’s perception of the number of women, poisoned by liberalism and identity politics, who cruelly condemn brave sofa samurai to a life of masturbatory squalor. Then it was probably most women but now it seems as if all women of a certain age not already married are repulsed if not revolted by conservative masculinity. The window has slammed shut, yet through it male winguttia can see that objects of their frustration not only hook up with liberal d00dz (or worse, other women!) but also swing elections for the Kenyan Antichrist. The most they can hope for apart from starbursting on the couch to the Moose Queen* is that wingnut welfare will provide an occasional convention photo-op whereby there might be a thrilling brush against Pam Geller’s sideboob or a chance to see Ann Coulter’s adams apple up close while she signs a soon-to-be-crusty eight by ten. Too bad so sad but then as so many conservatives say, this is the Age of Austerity.
Ace’s bizarre conflation of masculinity with political identity or, at least, with political success has gone from one extreme to the other, yet has stayed the same. Remember the old days when Bush was King, Ace was the most macho sort of Joker, and liberals were ugly queens who took it in the ass, their bacon and play-doh bits aquiver and pendulous breasteses “clattering” like bags of sand? Time and electoral fortune have apparently changed all that. Gone is the ass-kicking Ace, and he no longer frets that homos might masturbate to pictures of his winsome and rugged good looks, a younger, pudgier George Lucas with his head caught in a trash compactor. Though his tone is still resolutely “fuck you,” he identifies no longer with the (albeit frustrated) fucker but with the “weaker” fuckee:
[L]eftism is a different beast. Leftism considers concerns of process to be a weakness, and [sic] indulgence for sissies and the faint-hearts; the only thing that matters — the only thing that should be a concern for the properly-masculine, properly-indoctrinated New Man of the Left is outcomes.
Any tactic, fair or foul, is permissible in the quest for the Leftist State.
Now, until recently, liberalism had at least tried to give some lip service, and perhaps some actual consideration, to the faggy notions of process, fairness, access, and such.
But no longer. The press is actually not more nakedly liberal now; in fact, it’s never been more illiberal, at least not since some press organizations romanticized fascism, Naziism, and socialist dictatorship in the tumultuous years of the thirties.