<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please, Not In My Backyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift and Others on Satire-Gate (The Obama New Yorker Cover)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-632174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift and Others on Satire-Gate (The Obama New Yorker Cover)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-632174</guid>
		<description>[...] an absolutely literal and accurate accurate depiction of the secret life of the Obamas , see here, here, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an absolutely literal and accurate accurate depiction of the secret life of the Obamas , see here, here, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631948</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631948</guid>
		<description>Gosh, thanks, Clif - you just made me feel a LOT less depressed about being celibate for so long - yow!
&lt;blockquote&gt;

MzNicky said,

July 15, 2008 at 1:23

Wow! Y’all are &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt; today! Is it simply TOO MUCH to ask if we could try criticizing Ms. Leary based on her — uh — not focus on her physical appear… er — hell, fuck it. She’s hideous.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

BULLSEYE! We have a winnah! Get the little lady a Kewpie-Doll!

Some of these folks really &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; look like they think, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, thanks, Clif &#8211; you just made me feel a LOT less depressed about being celibate for so long &#8211; yow!</p>
<blockquote>
<p>MzNicky said,</p>
<p>July 15, 2008 at 1:23</p>
<p>Wow! Y’all are <i>mean</i> today! Is it simply TOO MUCH to ask if we could try criticizing Ms. Leary based on her — uh — not focus on her physical appear… er — hell, fuck it. She’s hideous.</p></blockquote>
<p>BULLSEYE! We have a winnah! Get the little lady a Kewpie-Doll!</p>
<p>Some of these folks really <b>do</b> look like they think, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweasel</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631633</guid>
		<description>Iron-clad Rule of the Internets:  The people who need to read Snopes never do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron-clad Rule of the Internets:  The people who need to read Snopes never do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodrowfan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631524</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodrowfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631524</guid>
		<description>Want to see the difference between Left and Right and just who depends on lies and hate? Check SNOPES. Look at the spam emails about Obama and McCain and compare. There are as of today (14 July) 24 emails listed on Snopes about Obama and his wife. 22 of the 24 are critical. Of those 22 critical just 1 (one) is true (although it lacks context). Five (5) are a mixture of true and false. Two (2) are marked as &quot;undetermined.&quot; The remaining fifteen are LIES. (one positive email is true).

Then look at the McCains. There are just 4 emails listed. Only 1 is critical, and it is marked as &quot;undetermined.&quot; The other 3 are true (although they sometimes only tell half of the story).

So out of 22 emails with verifiable claims about the Obamas, 20 are either partially or completely untrue.

If you didn&#039;t know anything else about the two political parties in this country this alone should tell you which group depends on lies, smears, and hate.  Even a Backyard Conservative should be able to figure that out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to see the difference between Left and Right and just who depends on lies and hate? Check SNOPES. Look at the spam emails about Obama and McCain and compare. There are as of today (14 July) 24 emails listed on Snopes about Obama and his wife. 22 of the 24 are critical. Of those 22 critical just 1 (one) is true (although it lacks context). Five (5) are a mixture of true and false. Two (2) are marked as &#8220;undetermined.&#8221; The remaining fifteen are LIES. (one positive email is true).</p>
<p>Then look at the McCains. There are just 4 emails listed. Only 1 is critical, and it is marked as &#8220;undetermined.&#8221; The other 3 are true (although they sometimes only tell half of the story).</p>
<p>So out of 22 emails with verifiable claims about the Obamas, 20 are either partially or completely untrue.</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t know anything else about the two political parties in this country this alone should tell you which group depends on lies, smears, and hate.  Even a Backyard Conservative should be able to figure that out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauro</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631520</guid>
		<description>To be fair, I don&#039;t think wingnuts actually believe that crap about Obama being a Muslim and so on.  If that were the case, we wouldn&#039;t be pissed off about the cover (which I think is actually humorous as satire).  The problem is that stupid voters actually believe that crap, and when stupid voters see the cover, they&#039;ll be reinforced in their crappy beliefs.  Stupid voters are whom we&#039;re trying to win over.  Many stupid voters will vote for Obama because they&#039;re black or for McCain because they teach their children creationism because it&#039;s easier to understand than evolution.  Stupid voters are the ones who have prejudices and who base their choices on something the media tells them without really making the effort to determine which candidate is better.  They&#039;re the ones who vote for the guy they&#039;d rather have a beer with, who think that an intelligent candidate isn&#039;t like them and therefore shouldn&#039;t be president, etc.  I think we&#039;re lucky in this election that our candidate does not repel the black stupid voters like he probably repels the other stupid voters, who would generally be repelled by the Democrat regardless by the idiotic Republican talking points.  So as far as stupid voters are concerned, we&#039;ve got enough of them voting for us that we should be OK when the nonstupid voters come in.  Stupid people is definitely, I think, the swing demographic.

Of course, by pointing out that some stupid people are black I am in no way possibly implying that this holds true for all stupid people or all black people or anything of the sort.  I&#039;m just talking about the intersection of the two sets.  Call me an elitist -- I am an elitist -- and it&#039;s probably un-PC to say this, but the low-information voter is I think the biggest obstacle to a working democracy, and this was recognized by the Founders, who implemented the Electoral College to ensure that such low-information voters wouldn&#039;t get to be the deciders, since they&#039;ll probably decide for the wrong reasons.  And yet, they hold the balance of our political system, and I think they hold it mostly to the right, so if we can convince liberals to vote more often and convince these low-information voters to do what we tell them instead of what they tell them, we&#039;ll be in business.

And say what you will about Obama&#039;s merits, these low-information voters don&#039;t really know anything about them.  Since usually these low-information voters are biased toward the Republican (since the Republicans say dumb things that make them seem &quot;tough&quot;, etc.), we&#039;re a leg up now that some of those low-information voters can play identity politics.  To say that this entire election is about identity politics would be entirely incorrect, of course, but I do think that the battle for the low-information voters depends on it, which is why the nonstupid Republicans really would like to push the Muslim and anti-Patriot rumors at them.  Any informed voter can see past it easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, I don&#8217;t think wingnuts actually believe that crap about Obama being a Muslim and so on.  If that were the case, we wouldn&#8217;t be pissed off about the cover (which I think is actually humorous as satire).  The problem is that stupid voters actually believe that crap, and when stupid voters see the cover, they&#8217;ll be reinforced in their crappy beliefs.  Stupid voters are whom we&#8217;re trying to win over.  Many stupid voters will vote for Obama because they&#8217;re black or for McCain because they teach their children creationism because it&#8217;s easier to understand than evolution.  Stupid voters are the ones who have prejudices and who base their choices on something the media tells them without really making the effort to determine which candidate is better.  They&#8217;re the ones who vote for the guy they&#8217;d rather have a beer with, who think that an intelligent candidate isn&#8217;t like them and therefore shouldn&#8217;t be president, etc.  I think we&#8217;re lucky in this election that our candidate does not repel the black stupid voters like he probably repels the other stupid voters, who would generally be repelled by the Democrat regardless by the idiotic Republican talking points.  So as far as stupid voters are concerned, we&#8217;ve got enough of them voting for us that we should be OK when the nonstupid voters come in.  Stupid people is definitely, I think, the swing demographic.</p>
<p>Of course, by pointing out that some stupid people are black I am in no way possibly implying that this holds true for all stupid people or all black people or anything of the sort.  I&#8217;m just talking about the intersection of the two sets.  Call me an elitist &#8212; I am an elitist &#8212; and it&#8217;s probably un-PC to say this, but the low-information voter is I think the biggest obstacle to a working democracy, and this was recognized by the Founders, who implemented the Electoral College to ensure that such low-information voters wouldn&#8217;t get to be the deciders, since they&#8217;ll probably decide for the wrong reasons.  And yet, they hold the balance of our political system, and I think they hold it mostly to the right, so if we can convince liberals to vote more often and convince these low-information voters to do what we tell them instead of what they tell them, we&#8217;ll be in business.</p>
<p>And say what you will about Obama&#8217;s merits, these low-information voters don&#8217;t really know anything about them.  Since usually these low-information voters are biased toward the Republican (since the Republicans say dumb things that make them seem &#8220;tough&#8221;, etc.), we&#8217;re a leg up now that some of those low-information voters can play identity politics.  To say that this entire election is about identity politics would be entirely incorrect, of course, but I do think that the battle for the low-information voters depends on it, which is why the nonstupid Republicans really would like to push the Muslim and anti-Patriot rumors at them.  Any informed voter can see past it easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorghagen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631517</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorghagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This blog is a product of over 25 years of biting my tongue…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shoulda seen an orthodontist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This blog is a product of over 25 years of biting my tongue…</p></blockquote>
<p>Shoulda seen an orthodontist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayville</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631502</link>
		<dc:creator>bayville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631502</guid>
		<description>hey, when did one of the Sutter brothers get an NRO column?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, when did one of the Sutter brothers get an NRO column?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragon-King Wangchuck</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631500</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragon-King Wangchuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631500</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And who&#039;s smearing whom?&lt;/i&gt;

Well, I don&#039;t know - let&#039;s go to the tape:
Obama smears on McCain - can&#039;t think of one, but I&#039;m sure gin soaked Anne&#039;ll come up with one.
McCain smears on Obama - Hamas candidate.

So I&#039;ll have to go with the GOP guy, barring new evidence.

Oh wait, you&#039;re talking about campaign staff and surrogates, after all you linked a story about where Wesley Clark answered a direct question honestly and correctly.  But what of the question about Obama&#039;s Muslimosity - &lt;a href=&quot;http://isbarackobamamuslim.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;answer here&lt;/a&gt;.  Or flag-pin-gate or certificate-of-live-birth-gate or Larry-Johnson-is-full-of-shit-gate?

But let&#039;s talk about McCain&#039;s time in a POW camp.  That prepares to be Commander-in-Chief how?  Because he&#039;s going to piss off so much of the world, he may well end uo being captured again?  Anyways, kinda funny how McCain&#039;s point-man to defend himself from these &quot;swift-boat&quot; attacks is none other than Swift Boat Veteran for Lying About John Kerry Bud Day himself.

So who is smearing whom?
At the risk of repeating myself, barring new evidence, I&#039;ll have to go with the GOP guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And who&#8217;s smearing whom?</i></p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know &#8211; let&#8217;s go to the tape:<br />
Obama smears on McCain &#8211; can&#8217;t think of one, but I&#8217;m sure gin soaked Anne&#8217;ll come up with one.<br />
McCain smears on Obama &#8211; Hamas candidate.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ll have to go with the GOP guy, barring new evidence.</p>
<p>Oh wait, you&#8217;re talking about campaign staff and surrogates, after all you linked a story about where Wesley Clark answered a direct question honestly and correctly.  But what of the question about Obama&#8217;s Muslimosity &#8211; <a href="http://isbarackobamamuslim.com/" rel="nofollow">answer here</a>.  Or flag-pin-gate or certificate-of-live-birth-gate or Larry-Johnson-is-full-of-shit-gate?</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s talk about McCain&#8217;s time in a POW camp.  That prepares to be Commander-in-Chief how?  Because he&#8217;s going to piss off so much of the world, he may well end uo being captured again?  Anyways, kinda funny how McCain&#8217;s point-man to defend himself from these &#8220;swift-boat&#8221; attacks is none other than Swift Boat Veteran for Lying About John Kerry Bud Day himself.</p>
<p>So who is smearing whom?<br />
At the risk of repeating myself, barring new evidence, I&#8217;ll have to go with the GOP guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodrowfan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631494</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodrowfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631494</guid>
		<description>all the snotty remarks about her looks and her response is  that we protest too much about her comments about Obama??  OK, she&#039;s not the sharpest wit, is she...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the snotty remarks about her looks and her response is  that we protest too much about her comments about Obama??  OK, she&#8217;s not the sharpest wit, is she&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631475</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631475</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Roger said,

July 15, 2008 at 2:19 

To be fair maybe the next cover should be McCain as the Manchurian Candidate.

&lt;/i&gt;

Noooooooooooooooo.

Don&#039;t let &lt;strike&gt;Reverend Henry Kane&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXawavC9B34&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John McSame in&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Roger said,</p>
<p>July 15, 2008 at 2:19 </p>
<p>To be fair maybe the next cover should be McCain as the Manchurian Candidate.</p>
<p></i></p>
<p>Noooooooooooooooo.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let <strike>Reverend Henry Kane</strike> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXawavC9B34" rel="nofollow">John McSame in</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ice weasel</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631464</link>
		<dc:creator>ice weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631464</guid>
		<description>Backtard annie burped up, &quot;Protesting too much by far. You&#039;re all such victims.&quot;

To quote our esteemed hosts here &quot;Sadly, No!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backtard annie burped up, &#8220;Protesting too much by far. You&#8217;re all such victims.&#8221;</p>
<p>To quote our esteemed hosts here &#8220;Sadly, No!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631460</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631460</guid>
		<description>And maybe I read, I watched, I thought, and I reached a conclusion.

And maybe this conclusion has nothing to do with a secret plan to blow up my own country, to allow it&#039;s government to be overthrown, or, in spite of my oft-stated somewhat militant atheism, to allow Islamic clerics to take over my country and administer a system of Shari&#039;a justice, but rather my sincere belief that perhaps the path the bush/cheney administration has us on is unsustainable and destructive to america&#039;s wealth, stature and values and I&#039;d like to see us follow a different path.

No?

Pretty much not possible?

Oh.  Never mind then....

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And maybe I read, I watched, I thought, and I reached a conclusion.</p>
<p>And maybe this conclusion has nothing to do with a secret plan to blow up my own country, to allow it&#8217;s government to be overthrown, or, in spite of my oft-stated somewhat militant atheism, to allow Islamic clerics to take over my country and administer a system of Shari&#8217;a justice, but rather my sincere belief that perhaps the path the bush/cheney administration has us on is unsustainable and destructive to america&#8217;s wealth, stature and values and I&#8217;d like to see us follow a different path.</p>
<p>No?</p>
<p>Pretty much not possible?</p>
<p>Oh.  Never mind then&#8230;.</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WereBear</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631458</link>
		<dc:creator>WereBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631458</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;sophisticated satire–which is total trash&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There. Obviously she thinks sophisticated satire is total trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>sophisticated satire–which is total trash</p></blockquote>
<p>There. Obviously she thinks sophisticated satire is total trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorghagen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631454</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorghagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631454</guid>
		<description>Anne Leary, referring to commenters at Sadly, No:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Or maybe…you guys say what Barack Obama wants you to say.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, but the computer chip Obama&#039;s minions implanted in my brain leaves me no choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Leary, referring to commenters at Sadly, No:</p>
<blockquote><p>Or maybe…you guys say what Barack Obama wants you to say.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but the computer chip Obama&#8217;s minions implanted in my brain leaves me no choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631449</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631449</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; They bring out how close minded both sides are…
&lt;/i&gt;

Sure.  One side says one and one is zero, the other says it&#039;s two.  Why can&#039;t we all sensibly agree one + one = one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> They bring out how close minded both sides are…<br />
</i></p>
<p>Sure.  One side says one and one is zero, the other says it&#8217;s two.  Why can&#8217;t we all sensibly agree one + one = one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631447</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631447</guid>
		<description>To be fair maybe the next cover should be McCain as the Manchurian Candidate.

I love these elections.  They bring out how close minded both sides are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair maybe the next cover should be McCain as the Manchurian Candidate.</p>
<p>I love these elections.  They bring out how close minded both sides are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Max</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631444</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631444</guid>
		<description>Annie has responded:

http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/07/silly-sadly-no.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie has responded:</p>
<p><a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/07/silly-sadly-no.html" rel="nofollow">http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/07/silly-sadly-no.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631429</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631429</guid>
		<description>Scuse me, I meant to say &quot;Backward Conservative.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scuse me, I meant to say &#8220;Backward Conservative.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631427</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631427</guid>
		<description>Stop picking on The Backward Pundit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop picking on The Backward Pundit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Max</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9867.html#comment-631424</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9867#comment-631424</guid>
		<description>I blame Bill Clinton&#039;s penis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame Bill Clinton&#8217;s penis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

