30
The Brain Is The Weakest Muscle
Hi, everybody! Did you miss me? I know musclehead revolutionary Kevin McCullough did, because he got me a present.
I was hoping with a headline like “WHY OBAMA’S ‘CONDOMS’ DON’T WORK,” it would be about how Barry X is a rapacious, fecund Negro sex predator who was actually behind the tragic knocking-up of all those poor girls in Gloucester, MA. Sadly, that’s not the direction Kev took, but I’m not gonna say he disappoints:
When Barack Obama took his message of condoms to Rick Warren’s pulpit at Saddleback Church he knew at the time that he was about to advance deceit to the gullible congregation and get away with it.
Questions to the Obama campaign about the great condom deception were referred to mustachioed spokestwirler Snidely Whiplash.
As this correspondent warned before it happened, Obama would be the victor (because of the concept of “implied endorsement”) and Warren’s congregation, the American people, and those who faced the threat of HIV/AIDS would be the ones to suffer. How I wish I had been wrong!
Obama was the victor, of course, because he wants people to get AIDS and die. And you can tell that McCullough is sincere in his wish that he had been wrong, because in the very next paragraph, he brags about how Rush Limbaugh gave him props for always being right about Obama.
Yet Obama is wrong on the Gospel of Condoms. For all the “Praise Jesus” and “Yes Lords” he may utter, his understanding of sexual advocacy, mental processing, emotional awareness, and most importantly adaptive behavior, run 100% in total contrary dispute to Biblical truth.
And, man, the last person you want in the White House is a guy whose understanding of mental processing and adaptive behavior is more than, say, 30-35% in contrary dispute to Biblical truth. Oddly, I did a search for “emotional awareness” and “sexual advocacy” over at Bible Gateway and nothing came up — but that’s what we have guys like Grant Swank and Doug Giles for, to find that stuff.
For the last seven years Congressman Waxman has annually held up funding for abstinence - claiming it didn’t work. Of course logical people everywhere are still scratching their heads at that one, because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.
Abstinence is also 0% reliable when not practiced, but pointing that out is probably against one of the commandments or another. So better not to mention condoms at all: Why tell people about a method of disease prevention that’s 90% effective when used, when they’ve already got one that’s better? It’s the same reason I don’t think we should tell drunk drivers that they can get a cab. We should just tell them not to drink, and whatever happens after that, we have done our duty.
This has been true since we first began seeing AIDS cases develop. Elected officials should have called for quarantine for the public good, forced those who were diagnosed early on to notify past partners, and a whole bunch of other common sense steps. Normal steps that had been our previous policy as it related to communicable diseases were all ignored.
Actually, given America’s shameful history of dealing with sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis and gonnorrhea, it’s quite in keeping with ‘normal steps.’ And, given its very specific mode of transmission and relatively low fatality rate, a quarantine would no doubt be seen as punitive. Finally, we do not require victims of other sexually transmitted diseases — especially ones suffered primarily by heterosexuals — to notify past partners, so it’s a bit hard to understand why we should “force” AIDS sufferers to do so. But all of this is secondary to Kev’s main point, which is that sex is bad:
Obama could have stood in Rick Warren’s pulpit and proclaimed that sex is a function that God designed for those in lifelong marriage. In doing so he certainly would have been biblical in his position - but it would have ticked off every gay activist that as of this week has now pledged money, grassroots support, and votes.
He might also have pissed off unmarried straight people, divorced people, or anyone who doesn’t like to think of sex as a “function” designed by God to create children, much like eating is a function designed by God to create turds. But who needs those people’s votes? Clearly Obama needs to be courting evangelicals, who have been such a big part of the Democratic base in recent years!
The sad thing is that in the CDC’s analysis they casually mention that the age group of “man” that is most at risk presently in the HIV surge are black boys 13-24 years of age.
A sad statistic, to be sure. Let’s see if Kevin can, through a percussive explosion of #1 super-ignorance, turn it into something even worse! I bet he can.
13 years of age? Why are HIV infected adult males raping 13 year old boys? Why are they getting away with it?
Gosh, Kevin, I don’t know! Could it be:
1. Because “13-24 years of age” implies a demographic range beyond merely 13-year-old boys?
2. Because there are ways to get AIDS other than sex?
3. One of which is on the increase among young black males?
4. Because even if they were contracting AIDS through sex, it wouldn’t necessarily imply being raped by savage infected adults?
5. For example, AIDS can be transmitted through consensual heterosexual sex, an activity traditionally enjoyed by young males of all races?
Oh, sure, all of those things seem reasonable enough, but they’re not going to let Kevin write awesome sentences like this one:
Without authentic discussion about the choices we make in life, without quality advice about the moral, physical, emotional and mental health consequences we will suffer as a result of our choices, children are literally being raped to death.
To recap: If Barack Obama is elected president, roving gangs of gay Negroes will rape your children to death. Only 127 days until Election Day!
Kerlyssa said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:39
Shorter Musclehead.jpg-
o.O
Seriously though, is one of his eyes way bigger than the other, or is it just me?
Some Guy said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:43
“Elected officials should have called for quarantine for the public good, forced those who were diagnosed early on to notify past partners, and a whole bunch of other common sense steps.”
Because, as we know, looking at someone with AIDS will give you AIDS and face cancer.
Gee, Mr. Wilson, if your abstinence only plan is 100% effective, why do we need to quarantine anyone?
“Obama could have stood in Rick Warren’s pulpit and proclaimed that sex is a function that God designed for those in lifelong marriage.”
Just like it is the animal kingdom. I dare you find me an antelope who will have sex before being married.
“that is most at risk presently in the HIV surge are black boys 13-24 years of age.”
Kevin should walk up to a group fo 18-24 black and call them “boys”. Hilarity ensues!
“13 years of age? Why are HIV infected adult males raping 13 year old boys? Why are they getting away with it?”
13 year olds having sexual contact with anyone except being raped by Teh Gays? That’s unpossible!
“Without authentic discussion about the choices we make in life, without quality advice about the moral, physical, emotional and mental health consequences we will suffer as a result of our choices, children are literally being raped to death.”
And so long as we hide the truth that we don’t like, then every thing should be hunky dory.
This guy has a creepy obsession with raping children. I’m just saying.
shawn214 said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:43
I can’t bear to look…does he mange to tie this in to the recent Supreme Court decision barring the death penalty for adults who rape children? Has the SC just paved the way for the aforementioned hordes?
Doctor Missus Marita said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:44
I don’t want to point fingers on the whole Gloucester thing, but doesn’t Bradrocket spend a lot of time on the North Shore?
The Total Dick-Head said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:47
The question is:
can he teach English at a Junior College?
Douglas Watts said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:49
Every time I go to Saddleback Church, my cock hurts.
Annisquam said,
June 30, 2008 at 5:50
Nothing to see here except fish heads.
Move along.
Thursday said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:04
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: if these folks are so obsessed with “saving” marriage for lifetime, hetro partners, then they should be demanding that divorce be made illegal and that the law should be retroactive.
Everyone back to their first spouses! Hurry up, folks, God’s waiting!
stryx said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:30
The Gospel of the Condoms?
I guess that’s one of the lesser known parables.
g said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:34
because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.
Best laugh line of the post!!!
ifthethunderdontgetya™²³®© said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:43
I practice abstinence every day, and I still haven’t perfected it.
ifthethunderdontgetya™²³®© said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:44
Maybe I’m not trying hard enough.
Jennifer said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:54
The Gospel of the Condoms?
I guess that’s one of the lesser known parables
Maybe you’d recognize it by its chapter and number: Fellatians 69.
Smut Clyde said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:57
sex is a function that God designed for those in lifelong marriage.
It would be irresponsible for me to speculate about the group for whom God designed the function of mutual masturbation.
Andrew A. Gill, SLS said,
June 30, 2008 at 6:58
Mister Leonard Pierce, stop dissembling!
You know darned well that AIDS isn’t spread by HIV. Stop with the urban legends. It’s spread by gay buttsex! And that’s a scientific fact.
Andrew A. Gill, SLS said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:02
Oh, also:
because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.
Mr. McCullough, I have a Yeshua bar Yosef on line one.
noen said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:09
What’s wrong with his eyes? Maybe he has a glass eye or something.
Flying Spaghetti Monster™²³®© said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:11
noen said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:09
What’s wrong with his eyes? Maybe he has a glass eye or something.
One of his eyes has seen the glory of the coming of the lord.
social_invalid said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:13
Wow, the unrelenting torrent of stupid that spews from the right is mind boggling…
Mr. Wonderful said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:19
Well. Speaking for myself, yes: I missed you.
Otherwise: Jeebus. These people. If there is a God, why does He let
people believe in God and utter nonsense like this?
noen said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:27
“children are literally being raped to death.”
Yes, let’s keep that in mind by repeating it to ourselves over and over and over and over. For the full effect also try to picture it in your mind.
Death of (Hussein) Rats said,
June 30, 2008 at 7:56
It would be irresponsible for me to speculate about the group for whom God designed the function of mutual masturbation.
English public school boys?
Righteous Bubba said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:08
run 100% in total contrary dispute to Biblical truth.
As do history archaeology physics medicine astronomy geology biology and a bunch of other 100% total wrongola fields,
The Great Blizzard of 1993™²³®© said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:20
Righteous Bubba said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:08
run 100% in total contrary dispute to Biblical truth.
As do history archaeology physics medicine astronomy geology biology and a bunch of other 100% total wrongola fields,
Satan iz tricksy, RB.
Shell Goddamnit said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:26
please forgive my total lack of link-fu
But I think I have identified this person with the odd-sized eyes
http://www.bovil.com/index.php?option=com_gallery2&Itemid=47&g2_itemId=1600
What a diabolical disguise!
Red said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:28
I beg to differ. The brain is the sexiest part of the body.
Mr. Bath Bear said,
June 30, 2008 at 8:58
Pretty sure that’s no Fonzie jacket, unless I missed some Halloween episode where Fonzie dresses up like an A & R guy from 1992. Not totally impossible, I suppose.
Andrew A. Gill, SLS said,
June 30, 2008 at 9:26
I beg to differ. The brain is the sexiest part of the body.
I would suggest that it’s not the sexiest part of his body, but I shudder to think what that part would be.
owlbear1 said,
June 30, 2008 at 9:38
Uhm, excuse me, but uhm, why does God NEED a leather jacket?
GeoX said,
June 30, 2008 at 10:06
Might I just point out that whenever anyone angrily claims that OTHER PEOPLE are misunderstanding the Bible, and that ONLY THEIR VERSION is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH, they’re basically claim to be God? I’m just saying. It seems like that kind of arrogance might run counter to their faith. But perhaps not.
Andrew A. Gill, SLS said,
June 30, 2008 at 10:10
Uhm, excuse me, but uhm, why does God NEED a leather jacket?
God is the most badass thing in the universe.
Anything badass can be made more badass by adding a leather jacket.
If God were to put on a leather jacket, it would make Him more badass than He already is.
Therefore, God must, by necessity, always wear a leather jacket.
God does not wear cheap leather jackets two sizes too big and made out of imitation pleather, though.
Bistroist said,
June 30, 2008 at 10:40
I beg to differ. The brain is the sexiest part of the body.
I would suggest that it’s not the sexiest part of his body, but I shudder to think what that part would be.
<zappa>
What’s the ugliest part of his body?
Some say his nose
Some say his toes
I think it’s his mind
</zappa>
Andrew A. Gill, SLS said,
June 30, 2008 at 10:55
Ah, Zappa.
Was there anything he couldn’t do?
LD said,
June 30, 2008 at 10:57
I think the whole abstinence thing is a funny concept. It’s like saying that if you fall from a roof, the only 100% sure way to not get hurt is keep falling downwards.
It is sort of correct claim, but it doesn’t really help in anyway.
Sort of like abstinence.
Rugged in Montana said,
June 30, 2008 at 11:00
The problem with you LIE-brul sexualists is that you have sex, which is an unnatural act. We here in the Heartland of the USA of America know that our bodily fluids are sacred and so we refuse to part with them (a good part of my basement is filled with well-sealed mason jars in sturdy shelving), unlike you dissapated pre-verts, leaving deposits of your precious essence where ever you can find a willing partner for your nasty business. Between that and the pelican problems, its no wonder that gas costs what it does, its a sign of G*d’s anger with us, his chosen people. USAUSAUSA!!!
Smut Clyde said,
June 30, 2008 at 11:14
It is sort of correct claim, but it doesn’t really help in anyway.
On the bright side, every hour Kevin spends writing for Townhall is an hour when he isn’t writing documentation and help-files for Micro$oft.
Crissa said,
June 30, 2008 at 12:31
What’s ‘mental processing’? ‘Cause I don’t think this guy has it.
Also… Obviously all those black 13 year olds are practicing abstinence if being raped is how they’re getting HIV, right? Oh, wait, that would mean abstinence isn’t 100% reliable…
Okay, on a more serious note, this is the same way they get the ‘Abortion Rate’ - by taking the number of pregnancies reported and taking away the number of births. Nevermind that there are dozens of other reasons far more common than a doctor inducing an abortion, but hey!
javafascist said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:05
And the other’s that way from practicing abstinence every night (twice on weekends.) The nuns were right!
(on reread, I regret commenting on the Flying Spaghetti Monster(as played by ifthethunderdontgetya)’s marvelous joke. I’m sure it’s probably an oldie but made me spew coffee across the cube. Win!)
Arky - Sexual Orient Express said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:06
Jesus fucking Christ. It is too damn early in the morning for this bullshit.
Quarantine? Yeah, talk of quarantine began roughly around the time people realized it wasn’t just going to wipe out the f^ggots. The dickheads called for quarantine because they knew “Boo hoo. Now I’ll have worry about who I screw!” wouldn’t be a good selling point.
Yeah! If that whore Ryan White had kept it in his pants, shambling fuckwads such as myself wouldn’t have torched his house!
Yeah. It couldn’t possibly have been contracted from an HIV+ mother. Nooo. Must be the roaming bands of Cooties Carrying Child Molesters!
Fuck. Thanks dude. My day is ruined.
kiki said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:31
Given what McCretin apparently considers hardcore super-sex according to his comments on the Mass Effect kerfuffle, his opinion on carnal matters should arguably be taken with a shipping crate full of salt.
In fact, I’d like Li’l Kevvie to confirm whether or not he’s ever had sex. I can imagine him and the Virgin Ben hanging out on a Saturday night, talking about how glad they were to be ’saving themselves for the right woman’, while all the time yearning for each other’s soft caress…
Robert M. said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:31
I would give a lot to live in a parallel universe where this was a mean-spirited distortion of McCullough’s conclusion, rather than an accurate summary.
kiki said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:32
That would be a universe of strange internet traditions indeed - ones of which we were previously unaware.
slippy hussein toad said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:36
Marty Feldman called, and he wants his eye back.
Adolph Hitler called, and would like his ideology back.
There’s no more Godwin’s Law in this world. There are simply people who ARE fascist nutjobs, people who don’t realize it, and people who are fighting it with a sort of grim resignation.
Magda Carter said,
June 30, 2008 at 13:46
Shawn214: can I get this right?
The SCOTUS allows execution of juveniles in some states but not - by law - of adult offenders who have committed child sexual assault?
Not that I believe in the death penalty myself - disregarding certain offenders who have committed certain crimes against people I love who wouldn’t want to come too close - but is that the legal hierachy on capital punishment? I don’t get it.
Southern Beale said,
June 30, 2008 at 14:06
Every sperm is sacred! It’s about time the evil Democrats stopped this jihad against the sacred sperm, plunging to their rubbery deaths. It’s Condom-nation!
Jon H said,
June 30, 2008 at 14:40
Not that I’m dissenting against the proposition that this man is a walking hemorrhoid, but I have a quibble with this:
Finally, we do not require victims of other sexually transmitted diseases — especially ones suffered primarily by heterosexuals — to notify past partners, so it’s a bit hard to understand why we should “force” AIDS sufferers to do so.
It shouldn’t be that hard to understand. Other STD’s are fairly easy to cure and are well-understood. HIV is treatable, and controllable, but not curable. For a long time HIV infection was a likely death sentence.
Consider a similarly challenging disease: multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis. Health agencies try to track down and notify people who, for instance, have been on an airplane with a person suspected of having it. I assume they’d make an effort at finding the patient’s recent sexual partners too, if any.
Now, granted, a disease transmitted by air is a whole ‘nother level of danger, but the point is that it’s not totally crazy to suggest notification of people potentially exposed.
There are certainly arguments against notification policies for HIV, such as fears that the list of sex partners could result in closeted people being outed or blackmailed, or even that such lists could be doctored and used to falsely accuse people of being gay in order to gin up a bogus scandal. Larry Sinclair could have a field day until someone checked the kerning on his list of partners.
And when people like this GOP fartnozzle are talking about what should be done with people with HIV/AIDS, it’s best to assume he has visions of Kristallnacht dancing in his head.
But it is just silly to compare HIV-exposure notification to our handling of STDs that can be cured with a course of antibiotics..
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
June 30, 2008 at 14:56
RB,
You actually managed to parse run 100% in total contrary dispute to Biblical truth. ‘Cuz that sentence to work not in sense making does. Oops, I forgot to throw, in, the, extra, commas,,, (oooh, I’m trademarking the com-lipsis)
Anyways, here’s the bit that I thought needed attention:
Ummm, where to start? Abstinence is the truth? Well, sometimes I wish that The Truth would abstain, but this statement is just dumb. Although I guess it does explain the wingnut’s undestanding of the idea of proving a negative. Condoms are the lie. Yes, those deceitful condoms, always offering me better long-distance rates,,,™ but they aren’t better at all!
But the best part is The only problem is -. Worshipping at the altar of indulgence? No problem. Hedonism is fine as long as no condoms are involved. Being a disciple in the Gospel of Condoms? If a powerful congressman believed in a holy book written on latex prophylactics, the only problem isn’t his disdain for abstinence funding.
I imagine that in Kevin’s fevered dreams, the Islamo-atheistic-homo-fascists come marching for him wearing inflated giant condoms on their heads like an insolent mockery of the papal mitre, chanting ribbed for her pleasure, ribbed for her pleasure, ribbed for her pleasure,,,™
Comrade Rutherford said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:02
Damn! Republican writers are dumber than a bag of hammers!
Comrade Rutherford said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:14
*because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.*
Well there’s a lie right there. If he means abstinence to refer to actual penetration, then he is flat out wrong. Even if lovers don’t even touch each other, if the male ejaculate lands on the vulva, pregnancy can ensue.
And who in the world would ever think for a second that horny teenaged lovers are not going to be all over themselves every second they can? Doesn’t this chump recall his own teen years of being a horn-dog?
Abstinence-only is the stupidest thing and has contributed to the increase in unwanted pregnancies in areas where the GOP has been pushing it recently. Teach abstinence as a first line of defense, fine. But have a fallback position! Make sure teens know what to do if they DON’T abstain! Put girls on the pill - have boys carry condoms.
The only form of birth control that has a LOWER fail rate than condoms is failed abstinence!!!
Jake H. said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:15
13 years of age? Why are HIV infected adult males raping 13 year old boys? Why are they getting away with it?
So apparently seeing the number “13″ in print prompted this bizarre nonsequitur.
28
28?!? Why have 28 giant necrophiliac lizard bunnies taken over city hall in Ann Arbor, MI? Why are they getting away with it?
Jake H. said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:17
Doesn’t this chump recall his own teen years of being a horn-dog?
I can guarantee you his Tigger doll with the tear in the crotch will never forget it.
D.N. Nation said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:17
Oh wow, Mister Pierce. Permission to use this line from now on?
Jay said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:29
Funding for abstinence? Not doing the nasty is free last time I checked.
pedestrian said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:46
Kevin’s Logic:
1) 13 year old boys have AIDS
2) AIDS is God’s punishment for butt secks
3) Butt secks is for homos
4) Homos are effeminate middle-aged men in Hawaiian shirts who squeal “Oh, Mary!”
5) 13 year old boys enjoy riding bikes, not middle aged queens.
6) Homos must be raping adolescants (always suspected as much)
7) God can’t tell the difference between rape and consensual sex.
8) God gives 13 year old rape victims AIDS to punish society for not putting all the homos in camps.
9) PROFIT!!
tigrismus said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:47
What’s wrong with his eyes? Maybe he has a glass eye or something.
Glass eye=eye dildo. I’m telling you, this guy is gonna be found dead with two SCUBA masks on…
pedestrian said,
June 30, 2008 at 15:51
Not doing the nasty is free last time I checked.
You aren’t thinking like an economist. Depending on your assets, the opportunity cost could be upwards of $200/hr.
Caveat said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:02
“…sex is a function that God designed for those in lifelong marriage…”
I’d best give my neighbour’s cat the news. Not to mention my neighbour…
mextremist said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:13
As one of the most liberal members of this blog, I am aware of all negro child rape traditions.
kc said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:13
owlbear1 said,
Uhm, excuse me, but uhm, why does God NEED a leather jacket?
He doesn’t need it; He just doesn’t like the way it looks on McMusclehead.
Brandi said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:18
Doesn’t this chump recall his own teen years of being a horn-dog?
You’re assuming his sexual partner(s) wasn’t something like this.
Sorry Senor Wences.
Jon H said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:24
Glass eye=eye dildo. I’m telling you, this guy is gonna be found dead with two SCUBA masks on…
Orbital stimulation is the devil’s work.
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:32
I just wanted to address this:
Umm, Kev, if it’s only a few fleeting seconds, maybe you should be considering a condom or six.
Brian Fantana said,
June 30, 2008 at 16:46
They’ve done studies, y’know. Sixty percent of the time, it works every time.
SomeNYGuy said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:03
Indeed, I have no doubt that sex with Kevin McCullough is bad.
We have forwarded Kevin’s question to Cardinal Law for comment, but we cannot disturb him while he’s in the hot tub.
DrDick said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:07
Oh dear, sweet, latex free, glow-in-the-dark, plastic Jeebus vibrating butt plug! This screed is so stupid and totally counter factual on so many levels.
“[Abstinence] is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.”
Uh-huh. Except that based on extensive research on the subject “abstinence only” has a failure rate of about 60% over 5 years. A fact supported by the astounding efficacy of the rhythm method of birth control.
“sex is a function that God designed for those in lifelong marriage.”
Yep. That is why human females, uniquely among animals (except those species with demand ovulation) are continuously sexually receptive rather than only during or around their fertile period. It also explains the uniquely human trait of concealed ovulation where even the woman does not generally know when she is fertile (see rhythm method above). Both of these distinctive features of human sexuality seem primarily to function to promote indiscriminate screwing around with out regard to reproduction or marital status.
Jeebus, but wingnuts are stupid. Especially the theocratic variety.
Doc Washboard said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:11
Another one of those times that I sing hosannahs to the glory of our language.
tj said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:13
Sure, he’s a douche. And I’m not saying he’s not bat-shit crazy. But from the article he quotes from on HIV resurgence:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25398121
“The jump was highest — an increase of 12.4 percent — among boys and men between the ages of 13 and 24 years who had sex with other males, particularly among ethnic minorities.”
“The rate of new diagnoses declined in all other transmission categories — injection drug use, high-risk heterosexual contact, and other routes of transmission.”
So he’s actually right (at some level - there’s still a lot of other circumstances) to blame this on homosexuality.
But to think the only way 13 year olds have gay sex is to be raped by adults, that is quite a leap.
SowellFan said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:16
I can understand why you leftists keep harping on how great your whatever-feels-good method of teaching children about sex and marriage is…you’ve got stock fully invested in what Dr. Sowell, Star Parker, and others have called the Culture of Meaninglessness. So while you think you’re doing these children a world of good, in actuality you’re only making yourselves feel good, which is what your worldview rests upon. Maybe once you fix the man you see in the mirror you can stop poisoning our children with whatever-feels-good, but sadly, those who have the littlest to contribute to society speak up the most. That’s something I’ve come to find to be true as I’ve grown older. Maybe you’ll get it one day too. Or Sadly, No!
SomeNYGuy said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:20
Or you could blame it on the bossa nova.
Dorothy said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:22
For the last seven years Congressman Waxman has annually held up funding for abstinence - claiming it didn’t work.
Hm…I strongly suspect that Waxman is saying that “abstinence-only sex education” doesn’t work. Cause I fail to see why Congress would be funding “abstinence”–how much does it cost to not have sex, anyway?
Of course logical people everywhere are still scratching their heads at that one, because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.
Except when rape happens–damn! someone beat me to it.
Finally, we do not require victims of other sexually transmitted diseases — especially ones suffered primarily by heterosexuals — to notify past partners, so it’s a bit hard to understand why we should “force” AIDS sufferers to do so.
It shouldn’t be that hard to understand. Other STD’s are fairly easy to cure and are well-understood. HIV is treatable, and controllable, but not curable. For a long time HIV infection was a likely death sentence.
Well, many STDs are easy to cure. Several (herpes, HPV, syphillis) are not. And just about any STD is more difficult to cure in women than in men, and women are much more likely to contract an STD from an infected male than the other way ’round (damned mucus membrane!). Still, we don’t force men disgnosed to notify their past partners when they are diagnosed. Encourage? Yes. Force? No.
And even if we did, “quarentine” is a completely unnecessary and abusive reaction to any blood borne pathogen. And even if it weren’t, it would be more important to round up the hemophiliacs than the homos.
g said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:23
sadly, those who have the littlest to contribute to society speak up the most.
yes, we’ve observed this. When are you going to STFU?
Simba B said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:24
SowellFan fails for not mentioning law(s) of economics.
SowellTrain said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:25
I can understand why you leftists keep harping on how great your whatever-feels-good method of teaching children about sex and marriage is… Some of those tranny hookers are damn fuckin’ hotttttt!!!!!!!!
GoatBoy said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:26
the Gospel of Condoms?
On a teen-raping gay stood an old rubbered hoss,
the emblem of suffering and shame;
and I love that old hoss where the dearest and best
for a world of hedonism were lain.
So I’ll cherish the old rubbered hoss,
till my beards at last I lay down;
I will cling to the old rubbered hoss,
and move with it some day to P-town.
g said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:31
As tj points out above, the study says:
“The jump was highest — an increase of 12.4 percent — among boys and men between the ages of 13 and 24 years who had sex with other males, particularly among ethnic minorities.”
So why, given the many possibilities here, does Mr. Wall-eye jump to the conclusion that:
HIV infected adult males [are] raping 13 year old boys?
One could just as easily jump to the conclusion that 24 year old repressed self-hating engineers who happen to be Chinese-American are having unprotected sex in Minneapolis bathrooms. Why no outraged cry over this?? Rampant butt secks in the engineering community!
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
June 30, 2008 at 17:44
It’s time for a good old fashioned Condom Gospel singalong!
McCullough feared and trembled,
When his crack-whore she did shove
A lubed up durex sheathing
And said “no glove, no love
Go, wear it on your weiner,
Over the warts and weeping sores
Twenty bucks bought you half an hour,
Hurry up or it’s twenty bucks more.”
Righteous Bubba said,
June 30, 2008 at 18:12
SowellFan fails for not mentioning law(s) of economics.
Karl Marx has an awesome bunch of those in a big book and everything.
kiki said,
June 30, 2008 at 18:20
‘Those who have the most bigotry and ignorance to contribute to society speak up the most.’
Fixed that for you, SowellFan. And yeah, we fuckin’ heard you already.
jim said,
June 30, 2008 at 18:43
Yes indeed - one of those peepers looks like he boosted it from someone else, alrighty. Peter Lorre wants his gimmick back, M-Head!
Wowsers - he really literally LOOKS two-faced … that is down-home in-your-face (!) irony if ever I saw it. If not poetic justice at work.
Pulling It Out Of His Ass ALERT!:
Even back in the Triassic period when I was in high-school they were including a hearty dose of info as to abstinence in the “Health” unit everyone had to take - & I’m inclined to doubt that the whole dumbing-down trend since then has led to it being totally verboten matter in class or even reduced it at all. Even way back then many of us knew, not all that many years later, that the trend would go from a few gays with HIV to a LOT of straight folks with it - due in no minor part to “Abstinence Uber Alles” anti-prophylaxis atavistic ass-clowns grinding eagerly on their mighty axe of righteousness, wrath & superstition, the might of their faith sustaining them in the face of paltry real positive effect - while more & more died slow horrific deaths. I’ll never forget how a vast wave of smug sick joy resonated among the fudamentalists as the HIV pandemic got its sea-legs, & noone else should either - it’s a modern religious motif worth remembrance.
I’m sure the victims’ families appreciate the earlier tribe of muscleheads who were such a boon in their lives.
Without authentic discussion about the choices we make in life, without quality advice about the moral, physical, emotional and mental health consequences we will suffer as a result of our choices, children are literally being raped to death.
Okay, but OTHER than having a skull filled with septic pus, how are you doing? That’s not content, it’s drainage. Holy Squiff! Though it technically DOES parse, it’s some of the most Yea, Verily dog-butt fugly parsing I’ve seen in these here Interwebs … not counting specimens from teenage Mecha-Goth emos on dope, I mean. It’s proof in text form that rhetoric is NOT a vitamin.
Believing your own bullshit as hard as you can fails to mitigate its pungent reek.
jim said,
June 30, 2008 at 18:56
Maybe once you fix the man you see in the mirror you can stop poisoning our children with whatever-feels-good, but sadly, those who have the littlest to contribute to society speak up the most.
Your willful ignorance makes me LOL.
Try least not LITTLEST, goofball. Your literacy needs nearly as much help as your world-view, & thus you’re pitiful - that’s a long & nasty highway you’re wandering on.
Blaming the ideological section that gave you the liberty, right & ability in the first place (however nominalized by hyper-conservative power-whores in recent history) to even come on this thread & snarl, slaver & snipe — well, that makes me ROFLMAO.
g said,
June 30, 2008 at 18:59
jim, I think Sowellfan is a parody troll.
Or maybe not.
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
June 30, 2008 at 19:07
Or maybe not.
I think maybe not Fake SowellFan. “Culture of Meaninglessness” I’m Feeling Lucky’s to Star Parker’s column from the 28th. So this SowellFan reads Star Parker regularly. That’s a hefty sacrficie to make just for a larf, but then again, it appears that some people are really dedicated to the art of parody trolling.
SowellTrain said,
June 30, 2008 at 19:12
I not only read Star Parker, I fucked Star Jones.
WereBear said,
June 30, 2008 at 19:26
I imagine that in Kevin’s fevered dreams, the Islamo-atheistic-homo-fascists come marching for him wearing inflated giant condoms on their heads like an insolent mockery of the papal mitre, chanting ribbed for her pleasure, ribbed for her pleasure, ribbed for her pleasure,,,™
Thanks a bunch, that’s why I stopped by, sick AND funny…
I think Kevin and those like him worry that they weren’t exactly wanted.
javafascist said,
June 30, 2008 at 19:57
Just don’t blame it on the rain.
(Sigh, if only I wasn’t at work I could find a youtube of that travesty of a song.)
sisterrosetta said,
June 30, 2008 at 20:27
(June 30, 2008) Delaware Newspaper Doing Damage Control For Delaware AG? (Larry Sinclair)
There are always at least two sides to every story.
Delaware Newspaper Doing Damage Control For Delaware AG?
Posted by Larry Sinclair on Sunday, June 29, 2008
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/delaware-newspaper-doing-damage-control-for-delaware-ag/
In addition, I never paid for any stay at the Rodeway Inn with any Money Orders for one day much less for Three Weeks.
Also, I was released on $5000 unsecured bond on Monday, June 23, 2008 after appearing before the New Castle County Superior Court.
Read the whole thing.
bago said,
June 30, 2008 at 20:41
His eyes are screwey because he had a botched eye-bortion.
Quicksand said,
June 30, 2008 at 23:26
I’m pretty sure the assertion that “abstinence - when practiced is 100% reliable” is also “100% in total contrary dispute to Biblical truth.”
Hell, if it were, we wouldn’t even HAVE a New Testament.
Dean Booth said,
June 30, 2008 at 23:41
“because it is 100% scientifically provable that abstinence - when practiced is always 100% reliable.”
As I understand the odd beliefs of these Christian folks, this principle would rule out there being a Jebus.
Dean Booth said,
June 30, 2008 at 23:42
Drat — beaten by quick-draw Quicksand!
jgmurphy said,
June 30, 2008 at 23:42
Killer idiot paragraph:
“In what even they admitted was a story that should have been released far sooner, the World Health Organization admitted that outside of the section of Africa where the Gospel of Condoms has been preached heavily by Obama and his ilk - there would be no forthcoming world pandemic of HIV/AIDS. Social scientists had noticed that the trends were leading this direction for several years but the pressure finally caught up to the WHO, who finally told the truth. One spot where even in Africa AIDS is not expected to turn pandemic… Uganda - a nation that heavily adopted abstinence programs, educated their people, and saw dramatic results.”
So let’s see now: If you TALK about condoms and nobody wears them and people die of AIDS, it is your fault for talking about them? Obvious point, admittedly, but this wacky logic completely begs the question of whether condoms work when THEY ARE ACTUALLY USED (hint: they do).
But it’s so much more fun to talk about the “dramatic results” in Uganda (I would need to see backup doc to believe it) because THEY have used our favorite AIDS deterrent: i.e.: no sex. (Gee, what do Christians have against sex, anyhow?)
Dean Booth said,
June 30, 2008 at 23:47
Keeping an eye out for illicit sex
Tehanu said,
July 1, 2008 at 0:59
Doesn’t this chump recall his own teen years of being a horn-dog?
I’d bet real money that he’s repressed those memories because of being deeply, DEEPLY in the closet … hence the leather jacket … but I wouldn’t want to take unfair advantage of any idiot who’d take the bet.
Doctorb said,
July 1, 2008 at 1:27
Yeah actually though it looks like HIV rates in Uganda have really declined dramatically. The thing is that in Uganda they really took on a big public education/ public health effort to fight HIV, and it included abstinence and monogamy (”zero grazing”), but I think importantly the added message: if you are going to have casual sex, use a condom every time. Also health programs for rapid testing and various public figures talking openly about their own infections, because really if you think about it, stigmatizing people with a disease is the best way to ensure that people don’t learn about it.
Here’s a boring presentation.
Doctorb said,
July 1, 2008 at 1:45
Oh sorry the point I wanted to make about Uganda was that they didn’t adopt an abstinence-only plan. Also, please don’t use “beg the question” to mean “invite the question”. It means assuming your proposition in one of the premises, like this:
Abstinence protects 100% against sexually transmitted diseases.
Suppose that abstinence-only education results in complete abstinence.
Therefore, abstinence-only education protects 100% against sexually transmitted diseases. QED, neener-neener, I win.
(See, rather than actually prove something, I invite you to “suppose” it).
edgyspice said,
July 1, 2008 at 1:57
Does anyone understand what the fuck SowellFan is trying to say with that comment? There isn’t even an argument there. It boils down to, “You liberals, doing your liberal things! Well, someday you’ll realize how terrible that is!” *slow clap*
Elliot said,
July 1, 2008 at 2:09
Abstinence is 100% effective? Tell that to the Virgin Mary….
Rightwingsnarkle said,
July 1, 2008 at 2:48
Looking at this closet-case reminds me of a George Carlin line, to paraphrase:
“Why is it that the people who’re so worked up about butt-fucking, nobody’d even want to butt fuck them in the first place?”
jim said,
July 1, 2008 at 4:34
Abstinence is 100% effective? Tell that to the Virgin Mary….
1. Place the above on bumper-sticker.
2. Attend NASCAR rally, Liberty Lobby meeting or GOP event.
3. Hear the Good Ol’ Boys’ heads exploding like Orville Reddenbacher’s Popcorn.
4. ?????
5. PROFIT!
Ben said,
July 1, 2008 at 5:10
Never mind his eyes. Why is he cosplaying the Ninth Doctor? Can’t someone at the BBC put a stop to this?
kobie said,
July 1, 2008 at 5:45
I bow down to my gay negro rapist overlords.
Mrs Tilton said,
July 1, 2008 at 11:17
I can imagine him and the Virgin Ben hanging out on a Saturday night, talking about how glad they were to be ’saving themselves for the right woman’
Kev and Ben’s scrota feel like bags of sand. Very, very small bags of sand.
kiki said,
July 1, 2008 at 13:15
LOL @ ’scrota’.
They are scrota.
A pair of scrota.
tigrismus said,
July 1, 2008 at 15:45
I can imagine him and the Virgin Ben hanging out on a Saturday night, talking about how glad they were to be ’saving themselves for the right woman’
Yeah, but which one eats the biscuit?
Bill S said,
July 2, 2008 at 3:51
Oh, my sweet Lordy-Gordy.
This guy is almost tragically lunkheaded.
He starts by saying the only foolproof way to prevent HIV is to never have sex, then concludes that kids are contracting HIV as a result of rape. So, um…just abstain from getting raped?
How does a person this stupid get a column published anywhere? Isn’t it cruel to encourage him? Shouldn’t somebody be taking him aside after reading this, and gently explaining to him, “No, Kevin, 13-year old boys aren’t contracting HIV by being raped by adults. It’s more likely that…
oh, shit, I can’t do this. You’re an adult! HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A BRAIN-DEAD, LOGIC-IMPAIRED FUCKWIT?”
And then ever so gently, tap him on the back of the head with an iron skillet.
Mr Blifil said,
July 2, 2008 at 6:13
I always knew that Obama was a child-raping motherfucker. What are McCain’s plans to seize custody of his young daughter’s? For their own good and the good of the nation. Making sexual advances to people 20 years your junior should not be practiced until you’re old enough to manage a successful campaign for the Senate and you are within 12 months of firming up your divorce papers. After that, it’s fuck anything that moves, life’s short, live a little…