<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is wrong with this picture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama's Foreign Policy Stance</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-696404</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama's Foreign Policy Stance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-696404</guid>
		<description>[...]First, in all three conflicts, Democrats postponed the initiation of direct combat as long as possible. In only one, World War I, did Wilson decide to join the war without prior direct attack. Roosevelt maneuvered near war but did not enter the war until after Pearl Harbor. Truman also maneuvered near war but did not get into direct combat until after the North Korean invasion of South Korea. Indeed, even Wilson chose to go to war to protect free passage on the Atlantic. More important, he sought to prevent Germany from defeating the Russians and the Anglo-French alliance and to stop the subsequent German domination of Europe, which appeared possible. In other words, the Democratic approach to war was reactive. All three presidents reacted to events on the surface, while trying to shape them underneath the surface.[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]First, in all three conflicts, Democrats postponed the initiation of direct combat as long as possible. In only one, World War I, did Wilson decide to join the war without prior direct attack. Roosevelt maneuvered near war but did not enter the war until after Pearl Harbor. Truman also maneuvered near war but did not get into direct combat until after the North Korean invasion of South Korea. Indeed, even Wilson chose to go to war to protect free passage on the Atlantic. More important, he sought to prevent Germany from defeating the Russians and the Anglo-French alliance and to stop the subsequent German domination of Europe, which appeared possible. In other words, the Democratic approach to war was reactive. All three presidents reacted to events on the surface, while trying to shape them underneath the surface.[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Althouse's Amazing Decolletage</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-627180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Althouse's Amazing Decolletage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-627180</guid>
		<description>Now here is some serious prime-time crazy (from Taibibi&#039;s article):

&lt;i&gt;A few paces away, I catch up with a man named Ron Saucier and a woman who would only identify herself as Mary. Ron says his problem with Obama is the integrity thing. &quot;He exaggerates too much,&quot; Ron says. &quot;He&#039;s not honest.&quot;

&quot;OK,&quot; I say. &quot;What does he exaggerate about?&quot;

&quot;Well, like that time he was saying he had a white mother and a white grandmother,&quot; he says.

I ask him how this is an exaggeration.

&quot;Well, he was saying . . .&quot; he begins. &quot;As if that qualifies him to . . .&quot;

Despite my repeated prodding, Ron seems unable or unwilling to say aloud exactly what he means. Finally, his friend Mary, a grave-looking blonde with fierce anger lines around her eyes, jumps in, points a finger and blurts out one of the all-time man-on-the-street quotes.

&quot;Look, you either are or you aren&#039;t,&quot; she says.

&quot;And he aren&#039;t,&quot; Ron says, nodding with relief.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now here is some serious prime-time crazy (from Taibibi&#8217;s article):</p>
<p><i>A few paces away, I catch up with a man named Ron Saucier and a woman who would only identify herself as Mary. Ron says his problem with Obama is the integrity thing. &#8220;He exaggerates too much,&#8221; Ron says. &#8220;He&#8217;s not honest.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;OK,&#8221; I say. &#8220;What does he exaggerate about?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, like that time he was saying he had a white mother and a white grandmother,&#8221; he says.</p>
<p>I ask him how this is an exaggeration.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, he was saying . . .&#8221; he begins. &#8220;As if that qualifies him to . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite my repeated prodding, Ron seems unable or unwilling to say aloud exactly what he means. Finally, his friend Mary, a grave-looking blonde with fierce anger lines around her eyes, jumps in, points a finger and blurts out one of the all-time man-on-the-street quotes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Look, you either are or you aren&#8217;t,&#8221; she says.</p>
<p>&#8220;And he aren&#8217;t,&#8221; Ron says, nodding with relief.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o'scrod</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-627057</link>
		<dc:creator>o'scrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-627057</guid>
		<description>Christopher thanks for your response. I agree, voter choice is comparatively limited in presidential elections in the US. The solution is to explicitly establish parties in the Constitution by amending the document with a mechanism that assigns seats in the House to parties according to their performace in Congressional elections, as measured by the percentage of the total vote won. In other words, a shift away from the current direct election of one candidate to a combined direct election of one candidate plus party preference vote. This would produce a winner with a face, the successful direct candidate, plus a winning party, the one preferred by most voters. It would when supplemented by voter registration improvements have a good chance of producing genuine democracy in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher thanks for your response. I agree, voter choice is comparatively limited in presidential elections in the US. The solution is to explicitly establish parties in the Constitution by amending the document with a mechanism that assigns seats in the House to parties according to their performace in Congressional elections, as measured by the percentage of the total vote won. In other words, a shift away from the current direct election of one candidate to a combined direct election of one candidate plus party preference vote. This would produce a winner with a face, the successful direct candidate, plus a winning party, the one preferred by most voters. It would when supplemented by voter registration improvements have a good chance of producing genuine democracy in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipYrWhig</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-627006</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipYrWhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-627006</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To me, Obama seems very much like Blair: basically a centre-rightist at best, who pretended to represent the kind of change people were desperate for, and once empowered, continued to shove the country to the right.&lt;/i&gt;

I thought Tony Blair was a version of Bill Clinton.  That would make Obama a simulacrum of a simulacrum.  Like a Monkees tribute band.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To me, Obama seems very much like Blair: basically a centre-rightist at best, who pretended to represent the kind of change people were desperate for, and once empowered, continued to shove the country to the right.</i></p>
<p>I thought Tony Blair was a version of Bill Clinton.  That would make Obama a simulacrum of a simulacrum.  Like a Monkees tribute band.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626948</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626948</guid>
		<description>The Tories are currently without positions. That doesn&#039;t mean that they aren&#039;t on the right, as they will demonstrate when they lie their way into power. It just means they are not letting on just how far to the right they actually are. Because the British are sick of Labour, they are willing to project whatever they want onto the blank canvas of Cameron.

It&#039;s funny that you mention the UK, actually. To me, Obama seems very much like Blair: basically a centre-rightist at best, who pretended to represent the kind of change people were desperate for, and once empowered, continued to shove the country to the right. 

People are not generally leftwing, sadly. They tend to be rather conservative. People want change in the number of dollars that flow into their pockets much more than they want change in others&#039; lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tories are currently without positions. That doesn&#8217;t mean that they aren&#8217;t on the right, as they will demonstrate when they lie their way into power. It just means they are not letting on just how far to the right they actually are. Because the British are sick of Labour, they are willing to project whatever they want onto the blank canvas of Cameron.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that you mention the UK, actually. To me, Obama seems very much like Blair: basically a centre-rightist at best, who pretended to represent the kind of change people were desperate for, and once empowered, continued to shove the country to the right. </p>
<p>People are not generally leftwing, sadly. They tend to be rather conservative. People want change in the number of dollars that flow into their pockets much more than they want change in others&#8217; lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelogos</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626915</link>
		<dc:creator>thelogos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626915</guid>
		<description>Barry is useless. He threw the best foreign policy attack dog he has under the bus.
&quot;Get disappointed by someone new&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry is useless. He threw the best foreign policy attack dog he has under the bus.<br />
&#8220;Get disappointed by someone new&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Buddha</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626693</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Buddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626693</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rightwingsnarkle said,

June 30, 2008 at 5:34

He’s had her traipsing around in her panties/thong these past few days.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ummm... when has he &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; drawn her with more than panties/thong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rightwingsnarkle said,</p>
<p>June 30, 2008 at 5:34</p>
<p>He’s had her traipsing around in her panties/thong these past few days.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ummm&#8230; when has he <b>ever</b> drawn her with more than panties/thong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Buddha</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626692</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Buddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626692</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;lobbey said,

June 30, 2008 at 11:59

The right wing swing in Europe is not universal, but is notable in some respects, but most of the right wing parties in Europe (with the exception of the Mussolini wannabe in Italy) would be accused of been leftist loons in the US. However, the labour party in the UK has traveled so far to the right, that the old Tory party is probably more left wing. Its a sad thing, but they have doomed themselves, people are naturally left wing in my opinion.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, I heard about the Tories being more liberal than the Tories on a few positions than and was really shocked.

I know the Spaniards went further left since &lt;strike&gt;Al Queda&lt;/strike&gt; some small Moroccan terrorist group blew up those trains.  Australia has also gone left because the people were sick of John Howard and his party (which like UK&#039;s Labour has drifted far right of its original intention.  And yeah, I know Australia is not in Europe, but I decided to throw it out there).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>lobbey said,</p>
<p>June 30, 2008 at 11:59</p>
<p>The right wing swing in Europe is not universal, but is notable in some respects, but most of the right wing parties in Europe (with the exception of the Mussolini wannabe in Italy) would be accused of been leftist loons in the US. However, the labour party in the UK has traveled so far to the right, that the old Tory party is probably more left wing. Its a sad thing, but they have doomed themselves, people are naturally left wing in my opinion.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I heard about the Tories being more liberal than the Tories on a few positions than and was really shocked.</p>
<p>I know the Spaniards went further left since <strike>Al Queda</strike> some small Moroccan terrorist group blew up those trains.  Australia has also gone left because the people were sick of John Howard and his party (which like UK&#8217;s Labour has drifted far right of its original intention.  And yeah, I know Australia is not in Europe, but I decided to throw it out there).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragon-King Wangchuck</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626654</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragon-King Wangchuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626654</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Well, her hips are lying that way, but her torso is supine.&lt;/i&gt;

I think we already covered the total awesome-ness that is Chris Muir&#039;s idea of how spines can move.  I&#039;m trying to figure out how she&#039;s almost completely visible behind the other guy.  They&#039;re supposedly asleep, so either her right side is bizarrely distended or whatever it is they&#039;re lying on is pitched torwards the viewer somehow.  Also, he sleeps with his glasses on and a TV remote glued to his hip.

This strip is actually funnier if you read it backwards.  The redhead first realizes the extent to which Chris Muir has been whoring her out, she then smashes herself in the head as hard as possible, killing herself by snapping her own neck like a twig and leaving her head hanging in a grotesquely unnatural position.  All while he remains obliviously asleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, her hips are lying that way, but her torso is supine.</i></p>
<p>I think we already covered the total awesome-ness that is Chris Muir&#8217;s idea of how spines can move.  I&#8217;m trying to figure out how she&#8217;s almost completely visible behind the other guy.  They&#8217;re supposedly asleep, so either her right side is bizarrely distended or whatever it is they&#8217;re lying on is pitched torwards the viewer somehow.  Also, he sleeps with his glasses on and a TV remote glued to his hip.</p>
<p>This strip is actually funnier if you read it backwards.  The redhead first realizes the extent to which Chris Muir has been whoring her out, she then smashes herself in the head as hard as possible, killing herself by snapping her own neck like a twig and leaving her head hanging in a grotesquely unnatural position.  All while he remains obliviously asleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Alison, without Qetesh</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626652</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Alison, without Qetesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626652</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I know the shit won’t actually burn, but the journalists might.&lt;/i&gt;

Sadly, no! Many years ago, I dated a bloke whose father was a fireman. His favourite work anecdote involved a large fire at the local sewerage treatment plant: picture the poor fireys trying to wade through burning &#039;slurry&#039; without it pouring into their boots, and you&#039;ll have some idea. Some of the guys couldn&#039;t deal with it, even with the masks and breathers (and throw up in one of those and you&#039;ll know about it). There&#039;s something about aged and mixed effluent, at least when it burns, that &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; turns the stomach, apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I know the shit won’t actually burn, but the journalists might.</i></p>
<p>Sadly, no! Many years ago, I dated a bloke whose father was a fireman. His favourite work anecdote involved a large fire at the local sewerage treatment plant: picture the poor fireys trying to wade through burning &#8216;slurry&#8217; without it pouring into their boots, and you&#8217;ll have some idea. Some of the guys couldn&#8217;t deal with it, even with the masks and breathers (and throw up in one of those and you&#8217;ll know about it). There&#8217;s something about aged and mixed effluent, at least when it burns, that <b>really</b> turns the stomach, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MzNicky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626644</link>
		<dc:creator>MzNicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626644</guid>
		<description>[&lt;i&gt;gets up, pours coffee, turns on computer, checks out S,N!, sees name strewn throughout a thread]&lt;/i&gt;

Uh...wha..?

I think Mr. Douglas Watts is still upset because I made a non-condemnatory remark about Ralph Nader on a different thread a few days ago. 

&lt;i&gt;I’m thinking about filing a complaint with the dean over at UT law for the Ole Perfessor’s increasingly inappropriate, peeping tom-esque photos displayed at InstaDoofus.&lt;/i&gt;

D.N. Nation: I might be of service in that regard. Contact Gavin for details, if interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<i>gets up, pours coffee, turns on computer, checks out S,N!, sees name strewn throughout a thread]</i></p>
<p>Uh&#8230;wha..?</p>
<p>I think Mr. Douglas Watts is still upset because I made a non-condemnatory remark about Ralph Nader on a different thread a few days ago. </p>
<p><i>I’m thinking about filing a complaint with the dean over at UT law for the Ole Perfessor’s increasingly inappropriate, peeping tom-esque photos displayed at InstaDoofus.</i></p>
<p>D.N. Nation: I might be of service in that regard. Contact Gavin for details, if interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626642</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626642</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.&lt;/i&gt;
Riddle of the Sphinx, beta version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.</i><br />
Riddle of the Sphinx, beta version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobbey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626641</link>
		<dc:creator>lobbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626641</guid>
		<description>The right wing swing in Europe is not universal, but is notable in some respects, but most of the right wing parties in Europe (with the exception of the Mussolini wannabe in Italy) would be accused of been leftist loons in the US. However, the labour party in the UK has traveled so far to the right, that the old Tory party is probably more left wing. Its a sad thing, but they have doomed themselves, people are naturally left wing in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right wing swing in Europe is not universal, but is notable in some respects, but most of the right wing parties in Europe (with the exception of the Mussolini wannabe in Italy) would be accused of been leftist loons in the US. However, the labour party in the UK has traveled so far to the right, that the old Tory party is probably more left wing. Its a sad thing, but they have doomed themselves, people are naturally left wing in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auguste</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626634</link>
		<dc:creator>Auguste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626634</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Worst palindrome ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Worst palindrome ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626628</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626628</guid>
		<description>Chris Muir has given me a reason to join http://hatebook.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Muir has given me a reason to join <a href="http://hatebook.org/" rel="nofollow">http://hatebook.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626627</guid>
		<description>Looking at the other cartoon, it appears the elephant man is going down on the female character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the other cartoon, it appears the elephant man is going down on the female character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626599</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626599</guid>
		<description>Luckily, it&#039;s tomorrow already, and Muir is back to his usual shtick of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/2008/06/30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a white guy pretending to be a black guy chewing out black guys for not being more like white guys&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, it&#8217;s tomorrow already, and Muir is back to his usual shtick of <a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/2008/06/30/" rel="nofollow">a white guy pretending to be a black guy chewing out black guys for not being more like white guys</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsnarkle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626590</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsnarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626590</guid>
		<description>The cartoonist Muir (if, by cartoonist, we mean somebody who picked up some pens and paper at the local Wal-Mart) is depicting the lady lying on her side, sort of. 

Well, her hips are lying that way, but her torso is supine.

Her left leg is on top, flexed at the knee and hip. That big bump is her upper thigh, left butt cheek, and hip.

He&#039;s had her traipsing around in her panties/thong these past few days.

How do I know this? I&#039;m a little ashamed to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cartoonist Muir (if, by cartoonist, we mean somebody who picked up some pens and paper at the local Wal-Mart) is depicting the lady lying on her side, sort of. </p>
<p>Well, her hips are lying that way, but her torso is supine.</p>
<p>Her left leg is on top, flexed at the knee and hip. That big bump is her upper thigh, left butt cheek, and hip.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s had her traipsing around in her panties/thong these past few days.</p>
<p>How do I know this? I&#8217;m a little ashamed to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Buddha</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626589</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Buddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626589</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bad said,

June 30, 2008 at 3:56

A little offtopic, but can someone explain to me what is going on with the woman in this Day by Day comic?

Is that the largest testicle I’ve ever seen between her legs? Is she pregnant, but with a severely prolapsed uterus? Or is her far leg simply filled with fluid because of elephantiasis?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Good lord!  His drawing of women is getting worse day by day (pun intended).  It won&#039;t be long until they&#039;re just large blobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bad said,</p>
<p>June 30, 2008 at 3:56</p>
<p>A little offtopic, but can someone explain to me what is going on with the woman in this Day by Day comic?</p>
<p>Is that the largest testicle I’ve ever seen between her legs? Is she pregnant, but with a severely prolapsed uterus? Or is her far leg simply filled with fluid because of elephantiasis?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good lord!  His drawing of women is getting worse day by day (pun intended).  It won&#8217;t be long until they&#8217;re just large blobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protected static</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9799.html#comment-626588</link>
		<dc:creator>protected static</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=9799#comment-626588</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;mikey, I could hunt up the story I saw linked here a few months ago, but … no.
Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Probably more like years, not months... Enumclaw says, &quot;Just say &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002384648_farm16m.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;neigh&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>mikey, I could hunt up the story I saw linked here a few months ago, but … no.<br />
Let’s just say it involved a man, a horse and eventually, a hearse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably more like years, not months&#8230; Enumclaw says, &#8220;Just say <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002384648_farm16m.html" rel="nofollow">neigh</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

