Jun
12
12
We all knew this was coming
Bless you, FOX News, for doing all you can to help Barack Obama get elected president:
(Via.)
Maybe next time FOX can express shock that catering at Obama’s fund raisers doesn’t consist solely of fried chicken and 40Oz. bottles of King Cobra.
Bloody racists.
Matt T. said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:47
Wait. What?
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:48
Where’s my iced tea mofo?
Matt T. said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:49
Number one, that’s not even what “baby mama” means, is it?
Cargo said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:50
Is Cindy McCain a “baby mama”? Is Laura Bush a “baby mama”?
Brad said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:50
No, Matt, it isn’t. A “baby mama” is a term used to describe a woman who got impregnated and whose man left her. That’s obviously not the case with the Obamas since they’re, you know married.
God FOX is amazing.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:51
Also, if they don’t serve Malt Liquor or mad dog at least, they aint gettin ME there.
Yummmmmm, Fried chicken….yummmmmmmm
¡El Gato Negro! said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:51
Lawyers Guns and Money has another fun example.
Jimbo said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:51
I’m sure Kathy Shaidle can tell us what a “baby mama” is.
Btw, KS is getting married. Just, um, throwing that out there.
El Cid said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:52
I think Michelle Malkin should take this important story directly to Michelle Obama by surprising Mrs. Obama with some a that ‘citizen journalism’, and then revealing how awfully radical and violent Michelle Obama is when she tells Malkin exactly where she can put her story.
mikey said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:55
These fuckers aren’t even pretending anymore, are they?
Damn.
Know what?
We live in interesting times.
Dammit….
mikey
WHackwhacker said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:56
In a way, I hope the Rethugs pursue this line of attack because I think it’ll be the third rail of the 2008 election. Like Dick Durbin said, there’s a special ring in Hell for people who go after candidates’ families.
zhak said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:57
Fox News: Keepin’ It Classy.
Fozzetti said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:57
I hope Mrs. Obama hits back, hard, at FOX and the others. Gloves off.
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:58
To paraphrase the great George Carlin, “Bill O’Reilly would jump on that shit in half a minute!”
*Looks up*
Damn, someone beat me to it!
serena kitt said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:05
The point of the chyron is that “liberals” are saying this. Because it’s “liberals” who call Michelle Obama a baby mama. Heh. Indeed.
*aaaand… scene*
Arky H8r of VürdPress said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:05
Let’s see. It’s June. I say FAUX blows the N word by … the end of June.
Latchkey Man said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:07
I’m surprised Fox didn’t Photoshop gold teeth on Michelle.
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:09
And how long until Fux is selling that Obama plush monkey on its shitty website?
noen said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:09
Wait… Michelle is back on Fox? I thought they canned her ass.
zoe from pittsburgh said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:11
They don’t seem to even understand what a “baby momma” refers to. It’s slang that some men use to refer to the mother of their child(ren), someone who is not their wife. Therefore it doesn’t apply to Mrs. Obama.
Keep it coming FauxNews, first the “terrorist fist jab” and now “Obama’s baby momma.” Next thing you know they’re going to accuse him of spitting watermelon seeds at McCain.
noen said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:14
Have you ever seen a political party die? I think we got front row seats.
OTB said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:16
Next up on Fox News:
Outraged Conservatives: Stop Picking On Bill O’Reilly’s Anchor Baby Cum Bucket!
Matt T. said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:17
Brad,
I thought so. I didn’t think the definition left a lot of wiggle room and I’m sure, were it to evolve as the language often does, I certainly wouldn’t hear it first from Fox News. I just wonder which particular dog this is supposed to whistle up. I mean, even the Klan goobers are sharp enough to realize she’s misusing the phrase egregiously. Doesn’t Michelle have kids? Couldn’t she check with them first if she was unclear on the whole “baby mama” concept?
That’s just obnoxiously stupid and racist. And she’s lying about the whole “liberals are saying” thing on top of it. Goddamn. Ya know, if I walked through Downtown smoking a joint, they’d throw my ass in jail, but this horrible person gets paid to be a miserable jackass. How much Pepto Bismol y’all reckon Malkin goes through trying to patch up the holes in guts from holding in all that bile she carries around? Sheesh….
whiskybent&hellbound said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:18
This is good news, right? In a sick kind of way. That’s all they got, which is nothin’.
Like the chump who backs down from a fight, gets all the way across the parking lot or the end of the block and then yells ‘faggot’ over his shoulder,
Ain’t Fox’s ratings droppin’ like a roast beef turd down a dry, bottomless well?
N__B said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:19
“Is Cindy McCain a ‘baby mama’?”
It boggles the mind just to read those words. She’s a staunch Republican wife, standing by her man with a faint grin on her face as he makes an ass of himself.
Phoenician in a time of Romans said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:25
Wait a minute - I want some confirmation that this isn’t a Photoshop job first. Who captured this?
I mean, even for Fox it’s difficult to believe.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:27
Have you ever seen a political party die? I think we got front row seats.
Naw. It died some time ago. This is where the chicken runs around with its head cut off.
lobbey said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:28
I’m sure Kathy Shaidle can tell us what a “baby mama” is. Btw, KS is getting married. Just, um, throwing that out there.
Please tell me you joking! Is there really a man out there that desperate? Wonder how he turns her on, watch the “…immigrant in cages…” bits from ‘Children of Man’, read Mark Steyn in a scary voice, calls her Cathy Lopez while being masturbated…….
Man, I’ve just ruined my own day!
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:28
Which, by the way, I have seen, having chopped off a few chicken’s heads in my day. Just establishing credibility is all……
whiskybent&hellbound said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:32
PeeJ, 5:27.
Ding!Ding!Ding!Ding!
Rich said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:33
King Cobra rulz
mikey said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:33
Wow.
Just…
Wow.
What do you suppose they’ll be pulling out of their collective asses in september?
This is a full-on terrified hate-fest, and the fences are coming down.
It will be ugly, for sure, but it will ultimately not matter.
For whatever that’s worth…
mikey
another jim said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:35
“This just in - Professor Griff will be Secretary of Education!”
And the funny thing is, it would be great if that actually happened - just to hear the heads exploding.
Rightwingsnarkle said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:38
The funniest part (if by ‘funny’ we mean ‘pathetic’) is Malkin saying at one point in the clip, “Conservatives are actually the victims here,” since the Michelle Obama sliming/rumors are all originating on ‘left wing blogs,’ especially sites that support Hillary, she says.
You can’t make this shit up.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:40
This is excellent news. FOR HILLARY!
Rightwingsnarkle said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:40
oops, here’s teh clip
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:41
Says a lot about Fox that they’d treat a prospective First Lady like celebrity trash.
Gundamhead said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:48
Yeah, well I’m sure Liberals are actually the real racists and this stuff is just central to that point. And anyway Michelle once said she hates whitey…well maybe not really, but what does it say about her that I believed it, huh?!
God, these people can’t actually win can they? Obama’s not perfect but…dear God I hope he wins!
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:49
“gratuitous and cheap shots”
Oh gawd I do love it. Not only has der Roverer’s grand plan (possibly) eternally trashed the GOP, these fekkin idjits are too stoopids to understand they’re defeating their own interests.
The irony is too delish.
Me said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:52
Says a lot about Fox that they’d treat a prospective First Lady like celebrity trash.
Just wait until she actually is the first lady, then you’ll see some bullshit. Remember how the last Democratic first lady was treated? And she was white, and didn’t do “terrorist fist-bumps”.
All I can say is, get used to it. I honestly wasn’t expecting this level of racist horsecock until after the conventions, but I see I’ve underestimated rightwing malignancy yet again.
D.N. Nation said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:54
Michelle Obama is Barack Obama’s wife.
Fucking racist douchebags.
The Truth said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:54
Yeah, calling someone a baby daddy sure is trashy. (Search for the phrase).
Liberals at S,N!: Oh noes you dont trooth, it is NOT exactly the same phrase, and therefore QED I win the debate and besides I am ever so smart and I just learned what that phrase means anyway so now I win the debate again.
Reality check, liberals: MO already used that phrase. It’s not my cup of tea, mind ye, but once again my assertion plays out: the more MO speaks, the better McCain’s chances get.
SGEW said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:56
I wonder how much of this was just Fox News trying to be “hip.”
“Uh . . . how do, you know, young “urban” people talk about things? What kind of “with it” language can we use?”
“. . . Baby Mama?”
“Sure! That sounds ‘hip’! Put that up there!”
I honestly can’t tell what’s spoof, what’s real, or what’s merely ironic anymore. I really can’t.
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 5:59
the truth, the caption above says “baby mama.”
Whatever point you were trying to make, the transcript on CNN you link to shows Michelle Obama saying “my baby’s daddy”, not “baby daddy.”
soonergrunt said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:01
This didn’t take long, either–
http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/06/11/racist-obama-doll/
Gary Ruppert said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:01
The fact is, the Obamas are nigras. Which means they are fair game, not being of sufficient racial quality to lead our nation. Also, THEY are being racists by constantly making fun of “whitey”, but the liberal media covers up for this and loves them. Why is McCain being pilloried by liberals when they are biased?
Me said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:02
Um, “The Truth”? Please stop trying to compete with sentient adults. It makes you look real bad. Thanks.
GoatBoy said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:03
“My baby’s daddy”
Nice try though, Mr. Rove.
GoatBoy said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:03
dang
g said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:04
Da Troof is a piece of shit.
patrick said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:05
This is just the beginning of the trash-madness.
Expect to hear both Barack and Michelle characterized as beneficiaries of affirmative action enrollment and grade inflation, and thus undeserving of their education.
Expect some insinuation that Barack Obama used to date white women.
Expect that Obama will be derided as talented but lazy and averse to hard work.
Expect that no racist attack is too disgusting for these sick fucks who are shitting their pants over the thought of President Obama.
Matt T. said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:05
it is NOT exactly the same phrase,
Well, it isn’t that it’s not exactly the same phrase, it’s not the same phrase at all. She’s refering to her “baby”, i.e. her child. Not “baby daddy” - note the lack of the possesive s - which you’re supposed to say as one word. Now, that transcript may be misleading and Michelle Obama may have refered to her Harvard-educated, U.S. Senator husband as a “baby daddy”. Or you could be full of shit, and given your past performances, I’m inclined to follow the latter.
Just ’cause you don’t like black people don’t mean the rest of us have to be stupid assholes, too.
Black NASCAR Star said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:06
People are saying they are shocked by what FOX snews says ???
Gary Ruppert said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:06
The heartland is, FACT!
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:06
That’s ok soonergrunt. Etsy has some nifty Obama jewellery etc and some not so nice McCain doodadery.
Smut Clyde said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:08
Knowledgeable insiders are mentioning the name of Mike as McCain’s running-mate.
Dan Someone said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:09
I cannot believe they had that text sitting there on screen while Malkin says “Where backlash will come is if people make gratuitous and, uh, cheap shots at her that have nothing to do with the substance of what she’s saying….”
If I didn’t know that irony was already long dead and moldering in an unmarked grave by a county road in Texas, I would have sworn that killed it.
commie atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:11
The Truth said,
Fuck off, asshole.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:11
Heh. Sorry (NOT!) you trollyishous fucks. There’s gonna be a darkie in da house and dey aint nuttin choo can do ’bout it.
Not only that, he’s gonna have a fag prolly running some big serious shit thang. Yep, he luvs dem fags and lesbos!
An….an…gawdam! Al gore is gonna be secretary of Teh Future!
BWA HA HA HA HA
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:13
Herr Clyde, my hat goes off to you yet again!
Drummer Hoff said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:14
Outraged conservatives: Stop picking on dumbass racists!
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:15
If I were in the campaign doodad business I’d built a McCain farting doll and sell it with a miniature realdoll (TM) to symbolize McCain’s penchant for abandoning loyal wives who, while waiting grief-stricken for their POW husbands have car accidents and become disabled in favour of rich trophy wives. For a discount I’d throw in a Joe Lieberman belching doll and call it a threesome.
commie atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:16
Gary Ruppert said,
And you can fuck off too, parody troll or not. I’m sick to death of the lot of ya.
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:17
“Is Cindy McCain a ‘baby mama’?”
No, but Carol McCain is.
Too far?
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:21
Not directly related to the Obamas, but O’Reilly’s jumped into the racist shitpool. (Via Atrios)
noen said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:21
Arky:
Let’s see. It’s June. I say FAUX blows the N word by … the end of June.
By September they’ll all be in blackface.
Brandi said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:22
Shorter The Truth:
HOMPH CHEETOS HURF DURF HUGLAGHALGHALGHALHUGLAGH
robert green said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:22
i think we can all just agree that obama is too black, too white, too rich, too poor, too elitist, too out-of-touch, too street, too harvard, too young, too inexperienced, too muslim, too christian, too wrong christian, too atheist, too much, too many people too much huhuhuhu and be fucking done with it.
and watch him win 40 plus states while we are at it.
tb said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:22
This racist meltdown is going to be fascinating to watch. I’m dying to see what will be the form of the first use on Fox News of the word “nigger.” Look for many more gratuitous uses of the tarbaby and spade metaphors of course. And of monkey.
commie atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:24
and watch him win 40 plus states while we are at it.
Word. I smell a landslide.
(And I’m tired of being rejected by WordPress. Ain’t I rough enough?)
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:26
On a related note, I wandered off to have my dinner
.
>> left over chicken Milanese on a fresh bed of mixed greens dressed in balsamic vinaigrette<<
.
and surfed through the channels.
Calamity Hannity has …. Rudy G.! playing strategist.
Jeebus how can we have gotten so lucky?
Righteous Bubba said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:29
Rudy G.! playing strategist.
“If we cite people with Obama signs on their lawn with as many bylaw infractions as we can spot, we win!”
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:31
Yeah, I love O’Reilly that wealthy suburban kids have values.
That’s almost as hysterical as thinking that black people scream “mother fucker” in restaurants and eat with their feet.
Has he ever left the FOX studio?
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:33
^ that O’Reilly thinks
what the fuck? I just proofread that!
dAVE said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:41
after chasing up the link tree, I sent the monkey Obama people a nice little note. Here’s the link:
http://www.thesockobama.com/contact.html
They’re in Utah.
Righteous Bubba said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:45
Just wanted to share this.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:46
The level of cuisine, wine and whisky commentary here has fallen below acceptable thresholds.
What’s more, the poopielishish content is sub-par.
No to mention the fucking pro-fucking-fanity factor.
Also, poop.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:49
Just wanted to share this.
Er, um, what da fokk wuz dat? I’m so confiused.
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:49
eJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:46
The level of cuisine, wine and whisky commentary here has fallen below acceptable thresholds.
Just wait until we start shipping our “Eau de Dino” with every case!
Righteous Bubba said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:51
Er, um, what da fokk wuz dat? I’m so confiused.
Me too. When I do an image search I use a greasemonkey script to directly link to pictures from Google so I can grab ‘em quickly and never see the image in the context of the page. Mr. Freaky there came up in a search for “angry”.
sigyn said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:52
I followed Smut Clyde’s link; am I a bad, bad person for laughing hard at this?:
A pickled chicken head was also on display with Mike, but this was not Mike’s original head, as a cat had already eaten it..
That’s just the sickest, funniest thing I’ve heard all week.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:53
Eewwwwww…..
sigyn said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:54
My kids just informed me that I am, indeed, a bad bad person.
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:56
That’s just the sickest, funniest thing I’ve heard all week.
Wanna see pictures of my cock?
[/desperately searching for barn**.jpg]
Johnny Pez said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:58
The basic problem for the GOP is that they’ve spent the last 40 years using racist dogwhistles against white candidates. Now they’re facing a black candidate and the racism is becoming overt. They can’t stop themselves. They can’t not be racist.
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 6:59
Not directly related to the Obamas, but O’Reilly’s jumped into the racist shitpool.
That happened some time ago when he visited a restaurant in Harlem and commented that he was surprised to see black people using cutlery and ordering politely from menus.
Djur said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:00
Fuck that weak King Cobra shit. Rainier Ale, man. Green Death 4 Lyfe.
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:02
Ahem. Let me rephrase that. O’Reilly’s jumped into the racist shitpool AGAIN.
Snorghagen said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:02
More Republican desperation… Notorious Ohio Republoloon Jean Schmidt accused her opponent of conducting “grotesque medical experiments” on human guinea pigs.
just how stupid are we Trendy Here! said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:04
[...] through Downtown smoking a joint, they’d throw my ass in jail, but this horrible person … credit : [...]
Galactic Dustbin said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:04
Mark my words, in a few months FOX and Friends are going to do a segment with helpful hints on how to make your own genuine down home cross burning. The blond bimbo will suggest serving macaroni salad.
justme said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:06
We can hope that they just lock him in at night with a falafel and a fresh pair of shorts.
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:06
Lesley, I saw a video.
P.S. Jean Schmidt is almost like a human guinea pig. Only less human.
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:13
Apparently not. Remember how Olbermann busted him for not going down to the homeless shelter that was barely a hundred yards from the Fux Snooz NYC studios to see the homeless vets?
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:14
You mean she’s a “human-animal hahbryd?” Oh NOES!! ZOMG!!! Alert the media!!!
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:17
You mean she’s a “human-animal hahbryd?” Oh NOES!! ZOMG!!! Alert the media!!!
This is creational to mah purnt.
Olson Johnson said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:20
Never mind that shit! Here comes Mongo!
justme said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:22
Can they please, please re-release Blazing Saddles as the comedy hit of the summer?
Please?
PeeJ said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:22
ittdgy: you spend entirely (too much | not enough) time perusing teh u-toobz.
Just sayin.
Also, poop.
commie atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:25
Can someone please explain to me how the good people of Ohio re-elected that worthless piece of shit Jean Schmidt?
handy said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:27
You stay classy, Rupert Murdoch.
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:31
ifthethuderdontgetya, gotta love the comments on that youtube, especially this exchange
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:34
commie atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:25
Can someone please explain to me how the good people of Ohio re-elected that worthless piece of shit Jean Schmidt?
There’s a whole lotta fungie-magelicas down round Cincinnati.
They’ve got a giant billboard sign to let you know:
HELL IS REAL
(The dum fukkers are too stoopid to realize this is their welcome to Cincinnati sign, but this should surprise no one.)
tbati said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:38
The problem with that whole shizznit is that how does the Obama camp (specifically Michelle) respond without sounding, oh, I don’t know, too uppity? If she comes out hard against it, she’s an Angry Black, but if she ignores it, then what?!
this is going to get really, really ugly. I just hope our ghetto-terrorist-fister-elitest-latte-sipping-muslim-commie-radical-not-black-black-supremicist-not-blackenough-christian-radical-oh-did-i-mention-muslim-democrap nominee doesn’t do anything to fuck it up…
justme said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:38
(knock at window)
Good evening, Sheriff. Sorry about the “Up your’s, nigger”. I hope this apple pie will in some small way say thank you for your ingenuity and courage in defeating that horrible Mongo.
Hmmm. Thank you. Much obliged. Good night.
(knock at window)
Of course you’ll have the good taste not to mention that I spoke to you…
Of course. Good night.
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:43
Lesley, the comments on youtube and the comments here at our own casa S,N! have got me alternately befuddled and doubled over with laughter.
But only one of those is good for you, teh doctors say (I’m waiting for Smut Clyde to weigh in before I decide for sure).
~
Mister DNA said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:43
Harriett Van Johnson: What did he say?
Dr. Sam Johnson: He said, “The Democratic presidential nominee is near”.
Tyrant King Porn Dragon said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:49
“No, Matt, it isn’t. A “baby mama” is a term used to describe a woman who got impregnated and whose man left her. That’s obviously not the case with the Obamas since they’re, you know married.”
To actual black people, ‘baby momma’ means ‘a woman who got impregnated and whose man left her.’ To Fox News, it just means ‘black ghetto slut’.
“Let’s see. It’s June. I say FAUX blows the N word by … the end of June.”
I estimate that within a month, someone on Fox will be seriously claiming that Barack Hoo-seen Obama is not the father of Michelle Obama’s children.
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:49
The problem with that whole shizznit is that how does the Obama camp (specifically Michelle) respond without sounding, oh, I don’t know, too uppity? If she comes out hard against it, she’s an Angry Black, but if she ignores it, then what?!
She shouldn’t have to respond. Voters should respond en masse and tell that network to stop being knuckle-dragging assholes.
cowalker said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:50
Lesley said:
If I were in the campaign doodad business I’d built a McCain farting doll and sell it with a miniature realdoll (TM) to symbolize McCain’s penchant for abandoning loyal wives who, while waiting grief-stricken for their POW husbands have car accidents and become disabled in favour of rich trophy wives.
I like the idea of the farting McCain doll. You could just use one of the original Barbie dolls for Cindy.
Ponytail Barbie
Cindy
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:51
G’night, Peeples!!
City of Cavemen™²³®© said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:58
One more thing.
For all the talk of beetles and punk and such, this is the best version of this song. Evuh.
justme said,
June 12, 2008 at 7:58
Ahhh, you’re using the “S” word.
dim-witted badger said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:00
How about this Barbie doll?
Fucking pelicans
tbati said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:03
Right, Lesley, you and i know that, but for fuck’s sake, does 3% of the rest of America understand it?!
It should be repudiated, rebuked, denounced, disassociated, and whatever-the-fuck-all-else, but will it be? If the aggrieved party doesn’t stand up and say WTF, how does it get out there? And if the aggrieved party stands up, how is she not labeled as a “victim” (dogwhistle)?
i’m going to have to go into a cave for the next 6 months. this is going to kill me..
justme said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:12
Does every line of that movie still work for just about any situation?
Some Guy said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:30
Obama for Presidizzle, my American nizzles. Blaze a fatty and swear in, ho.
Lesley said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:49
Aggrieved parties aren’t obligated to react directly, and not reacting doesn’t automatically make someone a coward or a victim, as you put it. I’d suggest the opposite. Reacting to these lowlifes would mean lowering herself to their level. It’s not in the best interest of her partner’s campaign and her future as a first lady to confront stupid hecklers and bullies. Leave that for the base and lawyers to take care of.
I’m sure she and her husband are prepared for all kinds of bullshit. If Michele follows her husband’s example (during the mudslinging he took from Hillary), she’ll be controlled and dignified throughout the campaign. This worked in Obama’s favour. Hillary came out smelling like an asshole while Obama looked dignified and in control. Michelle’s obligation is to support her partner and impress the voters; demonstrate to them what kind of First Lady she will be. Some are comparing her to Jackie Kennedy. That’s an enduring compliment. Engaging slimeballs, getting angry over shit like this in public, will only put her reputation at risk (which is what Fox would love, of course).
When all is said and done, she’ll be the classy dame and they’ll look like the low lifes they’ve always been.
That said, viewers and voters should respond loud and often to these vile attacks, whether they support her or not.
stickler said,
June 12, 2008 at 8:56
Justme:
Does every line of that movie still work for just about any situation?
Hilariously, Yes!
Seriously. Look at a transcript, do yoga for ten minutes, then turn on CNN. Swear to God, you’ll be channeling Blazing Saddles within the hour.
Doctorb said,
June 12, 2008 at 9:17
Next on CNN, our continuing coverage: where the white women at?
just how stupid are we | Lasts information said,
June 12, 2008 at 9:17
[...] Comment on We all knew this was coming by Matt T.That’s just obnoxiously stupid and racist. And she’s lying about the whole “liberals are saying” thing on top of it. Goddamn. Ya know, if I walked through Downtown smoking a joint, they’d throw my ass in jail, but this horrible person …Comments for Sadly, No! - http://www.sadlyno.com [...]
just how stupid are we | Hottags said,
June 12, 2008 at 9:18
[...] Comment on We all knew this was coming by Matt T.That’s just obnoxiously stupid and racist. And she’s lying about the whole “liberals are saying” thing on top of it. Goddamn. Ya know, if I walked through Downtown smoking a joint, they’d throw my ass in jail, but this horrible person …Comments for Sadly, No! - http://www.sadlyno.com [...]
Smut Clyde said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:15
But only one of those is good for you, teh doctors say
As a Herr Doktor, I advise befuddlement.
goat or panic said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:15
“Does every line of that movie still work for just about any situation?”
It’s twuu! It’s twuu!
goat or panic said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:21
If I were to caption that photo of Michelle Malkin with:
“Just please, not in the eyes.”
Would that make me a bad person?
Smut Clyde's monkey butler said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:22
conducting “grotesque medical experiments” on human guinea pigs.
Any medical experiments conducted upon human guinea pigs are — by definition! — non-grotesque, and a valuable addition to the sum of human knowledge..
I should also point out that the spleen is a far-overrated organ.
Also, poopy.
a very public sociologist said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:29
Goat, methinks that would make you a saint …
J. A. Baker said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:43
Geez. What is it with these spam trackback links?
Smut Clyde said,
June 12, 2008 at 10:56
My kids just informed me that I am, indeed, a bad bad person.
Fortunately my daughter has disgust fatigue.
Alex said,
June 12, 2008 at 12:08
This is desperation - it’s closing time at the meat market.
I have a theory, anyway; they realise there’s an arse-kicking in the near future, and what they are now interested in is which section of the movement cops it worst. They’re scared of a reaction against the movement conservatives in general, and so they’ll do anything to ensure that the 25%ers turn out and get their crazy on enough that they can stay a credible lobby on the Right. What they want is a Charge of the Light Brigade (White Brigade?), a myth they can call on in the future, like that of the undefeated South. Their campaign’s real targets are people like Hagel, Kevin Phillips and John Cole.
Rob (Formerly) In Toronto said,
June 12, 2008 at 12:21
Which of the self-hating visible minority wingnuts will be the most annoying this season? I know that Malkin always has a headstart because she is such a skillful purveyor of douchebaggery but are there others that I should watch so that I can have shit to blog about?
And damn, what is up with that spam filter anyway? I hate captchas but maybe that would be a better idea. Makes it damn near impossible to blogwhore …
Gary Ruppert said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:00
The fact is, liberals are terrorist faggots.
Inquiring Mind said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:02
Gary Ruppert said,
Didn’t get Ruppert get into a little “trouble”?
Concerning children?
Just thought I’d ask
Inquiring Mind said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:03
Gary Ruppert said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:00
The fact is, liberals are terrorist faggots.
And Ruppert is a child molester.
Magda Carter said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:08
Hold on people. We are in for the ride of our lives.
The world's child molesters said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:40
Please don’t associate Gary Ruppert with us. We do have some standards, and we don’t want everyone to hate us even more than they already do.
MajorKong said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:41
And Ruppert is a child molester.
No, no, no. You need to do it Fox News style!
Some people say that Ruppert is a child molester.
See? Then it’s not slander because you’re just reporting what some people say.
El Cid said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:46
I give the Malkinites credit for always picking some fake controversy which is clear enough to send dog whistles to their highly attuned fellow racists, but which are never quite by the book simple flat out racism for which they can be condemned.
Thank goodness the “macaca” line was delivered by George Felix Allen Jr. in such a punk, cheap, bullyish manner such that everyone clearly knew he was being a flat out prick; if it had been a dropped mention of “macaca” in another sentence, with no emphasis, there might have been one of these weird debates in which people were trying to explain to the public just what “macaca” might possibly mean.
atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 13:57
The next few months will test H. L. Mencken’s dictum pretty rigorously, I bet.
MajorKong said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:03
Another fun H.L. Mencken quote:
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
Caveat said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:09
The Douchebaggery keeps on coming…someone I know in the US thinks Fox runs ‘news’ and I can’t make her understand the difference between ‘news’ and ‘bias based on stupidity and ignorance’. Oh well…
What I find especially hilarious is that it’s visible minority Uncle Tom Muffkin who appears on the screen, looking darker than the elegant, educated and intelligent Mrs Obama.
I guess that last phrase was a bit of a ‘duh’ though.
On the upside, this is about all these guys have, it is not unexpected and it just screams ‘desperation’.
Caitlin Sith said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:15
“After the break, will Obama bring our “Soulja Boys” back from Iraq?”
Some People said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:19
Gary Ruppert is a child molester.
There, it’s been entered into the public record. Have at it.
Jim/The Velvet Blog said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:31
I’m sort of out of the Malkin loop.
Last I remember, she said she’d never, ever appear on the Fox News again because of something Geraldo Rivera said about her.
How long did this position stand?
Ruthie said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:42
Maybe next time FOX can express shock that catering at Obama’s fund raisers doesn’t consist solely of fried chicken and 40Oz. bottles of King Cobra.
No, FAUX-following “Whinin’ Whitebreads”(TM) don’t even know what King Cobra is. Although I imagine they’re anxious just thinking about how many sub-woofers will fit in the trunk of the Presidential limo!
Ruthie said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:48
Cargo said,
June 12, 2008 at 4:50
Is Cindy McCain a “baby mama”? Is Laura Bush a “baby mama”?
I don’t think that’s possible. Republican men are into jailbait, and Republcan women allegedly reproduce, if at all, by parthenogenisis.
WereBear said,
June 12, 2008 at 14:54
Malkin got tossed for being “too crazy” (heh!) according to Some People.
But now they realize they need… More Crazy!
Too bad they can’t get Better Crazy.
somedude said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:02
Ok, they’ve lost me. Am I supposed to believe the Obama’s are limousine riding elitists, or straight out of the heart of the ghetto? Are they some sort of hybrid ghetto elitists?
WereBear said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:02
Obama will not be passive about this, it’s a link to Fight the Smears:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/
Handy linkies for loony emails.
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:04
Personally, I’m wondering why they’re going after her at all. It worked with Hillary when Bill was president, because of their ties in business deals, her brushing off of Bill’s flirting with women; it also worked with Teresa Kerry, because of her inheritance of an empire and how John married into it (and isn’t funny how this is a “good thing” when it comes to McCain?… IOKIYAR!).
But really, Michelle Obama has nothing vaguely scandalous that can be used as an attack, so they just go after the fact that she’s black.
TR said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:05
I finally watched the video at TPM. At the precise moment where they’re running chryons that read “Obama’s Baby Mama” and “Malkin Called Her ‘Obama’s Bitter Half,” there’s Michelle Malkin insisting that conservatives have not attacked her unfairly or made any cheap shots. Priceless.
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:06
I have a fever… and its only cure is more
cowbellcrazy!atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:06
Why? Because racist bullshit works with a significant portion of the populace.
We just gotta hope the downside of this tactic is bigger than the upside.
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:11
That’s the whole absurdity of this tactic. If the only thing you got is that she’s black, why not just keep going after Barack for being black?
White Male, Jew of Liberal Fascism said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:14
I’m voting Republican!
White Male, Jew of Liberal Fascism said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:17
Damn you, Wordpress for chewing up my link!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU&eurl=http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/1035/92599/511/534449
atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:25
Yeah, that’s true. I think they might go for this because it’s sneakier, though. It’s not quite saying, “Can’t you see the man’s a Nig–?” It’s a bit more indirect.
I’m not saying it’s a good tactic, or something that ought to be done. It’s just that you asked, why the heck are they doing this? And I’m looking at why, exactly, they might be doing that.
Sure, this tactic is absurd. Doesn’t mean it will necessarily fail, though.
Dan Someone said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:27
The problem with the “Fight the Smears” thing is that they concede half the battleground by essentially agreeing that the substance of the smear is negative. For example, the smear that Obama is a Muslim is answered with, basically, “That’s a lie” — when the proper response should be “No, as a matter of fact, he isn’t a Muslim, but so what if he were?”
By the way, Rob (ex) from Toronto: I love the fact that the Google ads that came up when I read your link had the following headlines:
[Bottom of the post]
Suffering from vaginal odor?
[Sidebar]
Feminine Douche
Michelle Malkin
Job Discrimination
Hullaballoo Music for Kids
(The sidebar is almost a haiku. Beautiful.)
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:30
The trouble is, people who haven’t actually experienced racism don’t always have the best understanding of it. Most white people are more worried about being unfairly called racist than they are about being discriminated against.
Which do you think will be easier for them to believe? That Obama is trying to guilt his way into the presidency by claiming racism at every corner, or that the media has a widescale bias against black people? Keep in mind two things:
1) A large chunk of Democrats were just convinced of the former.
2) There is a broad perception that the media has a liberal bias - because prominent conservative figures in the media are constantly accusing the media of having a liberal bias.
If you ask me, we are better off ignoring this shit as much as possible, at least in wider forums. If the election becomes about race, we lose. Why do you think that Fox is provoking this?
El Cid said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:31
“C’mon people! He’s BLAAAAAACK! Black black blackety blaaaaack! BLACK! Bla-bla-bla-bla-bla-bla-blaaaaaaaaaaaaack!”
WereBear said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:37
Actually, I think this might backfire.
Since their whole gambit has been to pretend they are upright, and moral, and care about Teh Peeps, and so forth… while whistling at the knuckle-draggers who are the base of their power. So-called Undecideds could then vote for the “Have-a-Beer” guy with a clear conscience. “He said he was a Compassionate Conservative!”
But will the people whose knuckles do not drag the ground reconcile their continued support when the masks are off and they are forced to openly side with the barely sentient bits of primoridal muck who comprise Faux Noise? Can they then square their greed with their knowledge of who, precisely, they are getting into bed with?
My theory all along was that most people were fooled by W, and that’s why they voted for him. Only the Base (and was there ever a better term for them?) really knew what was going on, and didn’t care.
Well, looks like the whole country will be the lab for my theory. Thank you!
Legalize said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:43
They’re going after here because what’s worse than one darkie? Two darkies. That’s really the extent of their thinking on the matter.
Legalize said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:43
“going after HER” rather.
jenniebee said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:43
Wow, this could get fun!
FOX News sez: Obama denies rumors, plans to create Sec. of Kill Whitey
Bill O: clearly, Fox was saying that Obama denied rumors about his plans to create a Cabinet-level position dedicated to the task of Killing Whitey. Fox is defending Obama here, it’s liberals who are so obsessed with race, they never stop seeing color. Mark, what do you think about this?
Mark S: MUSLIMS R IN UR YURP OUTBREEDING UR… I’m not saying “Aryans” here, so it’s ok. LEBENSRAUM agggghhhhh!
Michelle M: Legitimate questions have been raised about whether Obama really meant it when he denied that he plans to Kill Whitey. Since the MSM is refusing to investigate, I’ve taken it upon myself to go to his house and take photos of the notes on his refrigerator. You can clearly see a grocery list written on this one. Here, you can see the family is buying chicken, melon and hummus. Notice anything missing? Where’s the Miracle Whip?
Peggy N: Is it responsible to ask whether that “melon” is cantaloupe or watermelon, or, if elected, Obama would put Farrakhan in charge of a task force to round up and exterminate all white Christians? It would be irresponsible not to!
Glen R: Heh. Indeed.
atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:45
If you ask me, we are better off ignoring this shit as much as possible, at least in wider forums.
Maybe, maybe not.
Whatever the best macro-strategy for Obama’a campaign is, I think we can be useful as those people who are not attached to Obama’s campaign, but can call people out on crap like this. Like what the wingnuts are for the Republicans. Least, I hope we can do that.
not even an mba said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:47
Because if there is a backlash against swiftboating Michelle Obama, it’s the conservative bloggers that are going to start it. Michelle Malkin? I concede that she’s an expert on provoking backlash with underhanded tactics - but I suspect that that’s not why you’ve got her on screen. Well, let’s see what our intrepid citizen journalist has to say:
Only using reality-based criteria to attack a political opponent? Not basing attacks off of innuendo, rumor and the crazy stuff of their fevered nightime totments?
That sure sounds like the wignutt-o-sphere.
javafascist said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:47
Mel Brooks needs to re-release Blazing Saddles this year so he can secure the Academy nomination for Best Documentary.
“But not the Irish!”
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:50
Maybe Obama should use this song for his campaign.
not even an mba said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:54
Well, that was almost right. I guess I’ve been having some fevered nighttime totments too.
Aaron said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:57
The problem with that whole shizznit is that how does the Obama camp (specifically Michelle) respond without sounding, oh, I don’t know, too uppity?
Laugh at it and them.
MO: “You know, that’s totally ridiculous, but then they probably don’t even know what a “baby mama” is. Sometimes, you just have to laugh at it - they’re so out of touch, it’s funny!”
Chris Tucker said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:57
Is this YOU, Gary Ruppert?
Mugshot
It would be irresponsible NOT to speculate!
Smiling Mortician said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:57
If the only thing you got is that she’s black, why not just keep going after Barack for being black?
‘Cause she’s blacker. No, really. I have an awful feeling that the BillO types are actually thinking things like but wait, he’s got a white mother so technically he’s not really blackblack. It makes me nauseous just thinking this, but there you go.
do yoga for ten minutes, then turn on CNN
Yup. So I can vomit up my own ass.
Scott said,
June 12, 2008 at 15:57
I do think that the over-the-top racism getting waved around by Fox and the GOP stands a good chance of pushing more people to vote for Obama.
Let’s not forget that Pat Buchanan’s keynote address back in ‘92 scared a shitload of people away from Bob Dole and the GOP that year. And even as racist as his speech was, it wasn’t nearly as bad as the stuff already glurping out of the GOP sewage pipes. On top of that, Brand Republican was nowhere as badly tarnished prior to the convention as they are right now.
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:01
John Cole of Balloon Juice is a good example of someone who was once suckered into Bush’s “folksy-ness”, but has seen through it. Cole lives in WV and identified with it, and voted for Bush twice. Not long after the ‘04 election (and with much wrangling from Sadly Naughts ;) ), he realized that he made a huge mistake and has abandoned the GOP.
Hopefully, there is a large number of others like him who became disillusioned with the GOP’s “salt of the earth” ruse.
DAS said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:01
Maybe next time FOX can express shock that catering at Obama’s fund raisers doesn’t consist solely of fried chicken and 40Oz. bottles of King Cobra.
That is complete ignorance. I dunno in general, but my homies always serve BBQ (that’s so good, it’d make the press forget about McCain) and cans of Nattie Ice.
ahem said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:06
Fourteen dollars says it involves Juan Williams, thus making it ‘okay’ for Crap Krapphammer to join in.
atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:14
If you ask me, we are better off ignoring this shit as much as possible, at least in wider forums.
Or is your point that we should not interrupt an error on the part of FOX News? That is a good point too.
just how stupid are we | HotBlogSearch.com said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:17
[...] thinking he will change …Mental Help Net Questions and Answers - http://www.mentalhelp.net/Comment on We all knew this was coming by Matt T.That’s just obnoxiously stupid and racist. And she’s lying about the whole “liberals are [...]
Grace Nearing said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:20
In a way, Fox is no different than the NYT and Maureen Dowd, who in her last column delicately implied that some people (actual numbers, identities, and statements not given) “think” America isn’t ready for Mammy to take over Miss Ellen’s ceremonial duties at Tara.
There are some who think it will be harder for America to accept a black first lady — the national hostess who serenely presides over the White House Christmas festivities and the Easter egg roll — than a black president….
Is this true? I’d like to meet these “some who think” types, if only to verify their actual existence. Anyway, this Mammy-as-Presidential-Hostess story was dutifully picked up by Wolf Blitzer on CNN and away we go.
WereBear said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:22
If there’s a theme for this election, it’s this:
No Ignoring The Shit
We can’t. It doesn’t work. John Kerry thought those Swiftboat attacks were ridiculous on their face (they were) and that people would ignore them (they didn’t.)
There’s a certain segment of the population who are sheep, not goats. They NEED to be led. They HAVE to be led. They BEG to be led.
We have to grab them by the back of the neck and say, “This is Shinola. And THIS, see this here, this right here, in your face? That’s shit.”
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:23
I think we should feel free to have fun with it here. Turning piss into comedy gold is what this place is all about. Anyway, who cares what a bunch of jerks on the internet think? I guess I meant that we shouldn’t start calling our local news stations and doing sit-ins over it to get the mainstream press on the story. Because we all know, they will just fuck it up worse, repeatedly, for like a month straight.
I don’t know why I worried that we were going to go on an activist spree anyway. I must have confused Sadly with Orange Satan or Atrios.
Fox News said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:30
Did we mention that she’s BLACK?
Jersey Tomato said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:34
The way the campaign should deal with this is by ridicule, followed by a sad “what did you expect from them” shake of the head. First you make a little joke about it, as someone suggested above: perhaps referencing expectations that Fox will soon be reduced to talking about watermelon and fried chicken. Then you say “but seriously, folks…this is what it has come to for the Republicans. They’re wrong about everything, and they know it, so they’re trying to save their asses by appealing to the worst in us - to our prejudices, fears and resentments. That’s all they have left. Is that how you want this election to be decided? Just remember, when you hear stuff like this over the next few months, treat it like something you stepped in. Don’t ignore it, because you’ll only trail the stink around after you. Don’t argue with it, because it’s beneath your notice. Just scrape it off your shoe, consider the source, and move forward.”
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:35
OT but the Supreme Court just ruled that detainees at Guantanamo Bay have the constitutional right to challenge their detention in civilian courts.
Which raises the old question, “How many divisions does the Supreme Court have?”
Legalize said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:35
You can always count on the Malkin thing to keep on digging: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/11/were-going-to-hell/
Blue Buddha said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:40
I dunno. She could be useful for security, by saying things like, “Miss Scarlet, thar’s Yankees in the kitchen!”
Reading posts and comments on some blogs (*cough* *cough* No Quarter *cough*), I wouldn’t doubt there are quite a few people out there who think that WH festivities will be “tarnished by an uppity negro”.
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:48
There are some who think it will be harder for America to accept a black first lady — the national hostess who serenely presides over the White House Christmas festivities and the Easter egg roll — than a black president….
It’s a valid point. We may have to bring in the hostess with the mostest.
D.N. Nation said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:50
Oh, Michelle. Michelle Michelle Michelle.
What can you say?
D.N. Nation said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:51
Speaking of the Malkinites, Chris Muir’s been pretty awesome lately. Dude had his hip, conservative urbanites kick some random liberal’s ass.
sophie brown said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:56
And let’s not forget, while we call Michelle Obama names and throw around racial slurs that CINDY MCCAIN was a drug adicted thief who avoided a federal felony conviction solely because she is the wife of a senator. How is the media having a conversation about whether candidate’s wives are fair game without talking about that????? I think anyone on the dem side should mention cindy mccain’s drug hx every time they are asked about candidate spouses. Every time.
Caveat said,
June 12, 2008 at 16:57
I’m reading a good book right now - The Political Brain by Drew Westen. It’s about why people vote (and think/react) the way they do.
Reason and Logic: Zip
Emotion and Subconscious: Lots
He explains why the Dems always play it the wrong way. You can’t ‘be above’ this kind of bullshit and you can’t ignore emotion in the campaign. You have to address attacks swiftly without buying into the framing. You also have to stop worrying about offending people because obviously, there’s a percentage you’ll never get anyway.
Example: Who cares about offending people who are totally anti-abortion? They’re already lost. You have to go for your own supporters and the ones that are moderate - which is most people. The book goes into statistics showing that most people support Choice, gun control measures of some kind, etc.
By letting the GOP define the terms, tell the stories, frame the arguments and use Orwellian double speak (Clear Skies? LOL), the Dems aren’t playing to win, or on an even field.
He gives examples of major fuckups from the past and how they should have been handled.
Barry is handling this garbage properly. If he doesn’t address it, the subliminal impression is that there’s no argument, so it must be true. You can’t let these douchebags do the talking.
not even an mba said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:05
So is Truthy Malkin’s source or the other way around?
I’ve tried the links and Ctrl-F for baby daddy and come up with what is probably the usual amount of support these wingnuts have. Bupkes.
Now, there is one hit from Malkin’s second link but the phrase is used by forum commenter Patriot who wants us all to know that
Maybe someone can clear up this whole baby daddy thing for me.
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:07
So is Truthy Malkin’s source or the other way around?
I don’t think that we should rule out the possibility that Truthy IS Malkin.
tigrismus said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:15
Legalize, that links is great! Her evidentiary link to “prove” her assertion that Michelle Obama has used “baby momma” is to a pseudonym on a comment board, who asserts that she has, but provides no evidence. Some guy on the internets says he heard it! CASE CLOSED!
not even an mba said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:16
I don’t think that we should rule out the possibility that Truthy IS Malkin.
That’s one of the many reasons I love these threads. Right now I’m imagining the real walrus, Bolton, planning out his next Ruppert post. Or Bill-O e-mailing Mackris all the Iris posts he’s penned to demonstrate that he’s a changed man with newfound respect for womyn.
WereBear said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:18
I just realized that, essentially, Malkin has called Barack & Michelle Obama’s children… bastards.
Legalize said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:22
Obama does seem to get better and better at handling the horse shit thrown at him. I think this was one of the benefits of the long Primary campaign. Hillary’s campaign operated just like the GOPers will from here on out. He’s already created a team that is totally dedicated to heading off winger internet smears and fomulating responses to them.
Rachell Maddow’s advice with respect to this is the most effective I think: specifically name, expose, and mock the smear merchants. WHO CARES if you offend their followers? Anyone who puts stock into the crap spewed by the Malkin thing is not going to come around.
It’s time the Dems stop worring about the mouth-breather constituency.
javafascist said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:24
Speaking of the Malkinites, Chris Muir’s been pretty awesome lately. Dude had his hip, conservative urbanites kick some random liberal’s ass.
You really do have to admire his willingness to so accurately document his sexual fantasies while attempting (and failing) to weave them into some coherent narrative. It’s penthouse forum, PG rated and in comic form.
atheist said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:28
Hillary’s campaign operated just like the GOPers will from here on out.
Well, not exactly. Hillary never went nearly as low as the GOP is going to go, repeatedly. Hillary’s tactics were an innoculation.
pedestrian said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:29
Wow, that anonymous poster on a message board that Malkin links to for “proof” is hilarious!
Certainly SOUNDS credible, no? Did she look like she was on crack? Did Larry Johnson get a video?
Djur said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:35
An accurate depiction of Truth’s daily occupation.
I LIKE TO PRETEND I’M JACK MCCAIN AND ATTACH TWELVE TOILETS TO STRINGS AND DELIVER CLOSING ARGUMENTS TO THEM: WE THE JURY (CLAMP CLONK CLAMP BONK) FIND BILL AYERS SUPER GUILTY
not even an mba said,
June 12, 2008 at 17:41
Now, let’s try to be understanding. Babies bring out a protective streak in all of us. Just mentioning babies can provoke violent responses, for example, check out this response to something as innocuous as a jelly baby.
D.N. Nation said,
June 12, 2008 at