Comments on: Oh not that again

By: Gary Michael Coutin

Gary Michael Coutin — Wed, 11 May 2005 08:09:50 +0000

You are missing the point. He’s not an “illegitimate President.” He’s not the President (period). I proved this in court. See hesnotthepresident.com. The action’s of an unconstitutitonal President are null and void. See http://news.indiainfo.com/2003/04/15/15musha.html.

I welcome your comments on the suit.

Yours truly,

Gary Michael Coutin, Esquire

By: RETARDO

RETARDO — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 21:44:31 +0000

I suppose, then, that Kent Brockman was prescient in asking if something was arglebargle or fufurah.

By: merl

merl — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 10:32:28 +0000

How do they explain the Clinton surplus?

By: Tom Beck

Tom Beck — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 03:15:06 +0000

“Hmm, if Dornan considers Clinton a ‘triple draft-dodger’ (I’m guessing that means three deferments) does he consider Cheney a ‘quintuple draft-dodger’ and Ashcroft a ‘septuple draft-dodger’? And what does he call Dubya, who used Daddy’s clout to get into the Texas Air National Guard, learned to fly an obsolete plane that he knew wasn’t used in Vietnam, didn’t take his physical and got grounded (because he was afraid of drug testing?), went AWOL instead of showing up in Alabama, and cost taxpayers a million or so dollars in doing all of that?”

He considers Dubya the greatest American of all time. After all, Republicans are God’s Very Elect, so they can do anything they want (things no one else is permitted to do). Cheat on your wife while she’s being treated for cancer? You’re a Republican, of course you can do that! Send others to die in a war you’re too chicken to serve in? No problem, Mr. Republican! Belittle a Democrat’s Purple Heart for arguably a more serious wound than yours? Claim that the US has an indisputable right to do whatever it claims is in its national interest but no other country has the same right? Absolutely – YOU’RE A REPUBLICAN! It would never even occur to you that the standards you measure others by could possibly apply to you and yours. After all, God told you so.

By: Frederick

Frederick — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 01:08:52 +0000

Hmm, if Dornan considers Clinton a “triple draft-dodger” (I’m guessing that means three deferments) does he consider Cheney a “quintuple draft-dodger” and Ashcroft a “septuple draft-dodger”? And what does he call Dubya, who used Daddy’s clout to get into the Texas Air National Guard, learned to fly an obsolete plane that he knew wasn’t used in Vietnam, didn’t take his physical and got grounded (because he was afraid of drug testing?), went AWOL instead of showing up in Alabama, and cost taxpayers a million or so dollars in doing all of that? btw, former Texas Lieutenant Governor Ben Barnes is supposed to be on “60 Minutes” tonight talking about how he got Dubya into TANG at the behest of a Bush family friend. “60 Minutes” is supposed to have a bunch of other new information about Dubya’s “service,” too.

By: BenA

BenA — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 00:31:55 +0000

Couple points….

1) One of the bizarre side-effects of all the nonsense about Clinton’s illegitimacy is that it contributed to leading Democrats’ unwillingness to correctly label Bush illigitimate, especially in the early months following his selection.

2) It was a mandate to the effect that democrats were too damn stupid to keep a good thing going, so we chose to either cast our vote for Bobblehead Nader, or stay home. At least the republican sheep can say they closed ranks behind their party, wereas democrats decided to scatter their votes the four winds.

Any evidence for this semi-self-flaggelation (“semi” because I assume marceaumarceau himself got out and voted for Gore)? What proof do you have that the GOP did a better job of closing ranks than the Dems? A very small percentage of Dems (much smaller than pre-election polls) voted for Nader, but a similarly small percentage of GOPers voted for Buchanan. Nader arguably made FL close enough to steal, but Buchanan cost Bush NM, and quite possibly IA. Also, Rove and company have claimed ever since that millions of (presumabely GOPer) Evangelicals failed to vote. And if you _are_ going to attack Democratic voting patterns, why not mention the millions of registered Dems who voted for Bush? They far outnumbered those who voted for Nader, yet oddly rarely get mentioned.

By: George Johnston

George Johnston — Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:31:45 +0000

A triple draft dodger? Avoiding the US draft and what other two countries? Ot was someone throwing Belgian ales on tap at Clinton? That would make him a trippel draft dodger.

By: marceaumarceau

marceaumarceau — Wed, 08 Sep 2004 22:47:20 +0000

Sorry, my voice I’ll try to muffle,
I got a little kerfuffle, my feathers were a ruffle
as I packed my duffle.

By: marceaumarceau

marceaumarceau — Wed, 08 Sep 2004 21:42:24 +0000

Well, Bush’s election was a mandate for change after all.

It was a mandate to the effect that democrats were too damn stupid to keep a good thing going, so we chose to either cast our vote for Bobblehead Nader, or stay home. At least the republican sheep can say they closed ranks behind their party, wereas democrats decided to scatter their votes the four winds. Same in 2002 elections: we had a chance to put some brakes on this runaway train. Instead, we let the repugs crap on some true patriots who even now are trying to fight the Bush smear machine.

-whew, end of rant.

By: glenstonecottage

glenstonecottage — Wed, 08 Sep 2004 21:00:58 +0000

The WSJ: putting the “R” into “Orwellian”!