the classic null set

Now commemorated as lovingly detailed handcrafted porcelain figurines! Collect all zero!

It also explains how bad they are when they are honest.

The motto of their psyches must be, “No rock left unturned, no grub too slimy.”

Once someone properly identifies a member of the set “great White House speech writers,” I will consider if Pegster is a second member. My current opinion, however, is we have here the classic null set, as the two sets “great speechwriters” and “White House speechwriters” don’t overlap.

I think he meant “short bus.”

And approximately 100% of white people voted for the white guy in the Republican primary. They’re not voting on his policy positions, they’re voting on… skin color.

Also, 100% of voters both in the last election AND the Republican primaries voted for the white guy who had a penis. They’re not voting on his policy positions, they’re voting on… anatomy.

But I guess the All Powerful Forgiving Lord and Father Happy Bottom Okay Or I Kill You thinks he’s the cat’s pajamas, so there.

McCain is clearly a genetic mistake with his pasty and cancerous skin, stooped figure that makes him look like a movie hunchback, wrinkly and watery eyes, thin hair, and a twisted soul

I believe you’re wrong about the stooped hunchback thing. Not genetic but environmental; his hosts broke a lot of his bones during his captivity in Vietnam and his skeleton never fully recovered. Frex, he can’t lift his arms past shoulder level (which of course tells you exactly what that unspeakable gobshite in the White House did the first time he shared a platform with McCain: grabbed his hand and tried to lift their arms up high. Epic fail, and intense pain for McC.) McCain’s stooped, hunchbacky figure actually earns him points.

You’re right about the rest of it, though, especially the twisted soul.

Shit, that’s how Norwegians order food in restaurants in Sweden.

I would certainly pay good money to see him fly around the studio at Fox in a strainined to the max anti-grav suit.

Especially if he crashed on Brit Hume.

Anti-war = appeasement? Just imagine how much better off the world would be today if there’d been a strong & organized enough anti-war solidarity movement to thoroughly cut off the Nazis’ money pipelines before they got into power – they were technically bankrupt so many times they lost count, but someone from the Junkers (or even Wall Street) always mamaged to bail them out & keep their evil circus from going under. [ /history wank ]

There’s been a lot of cultural noise made as to how WW2 was the last “Just War” – but none as to how easy it’d've been for the other industrialized nations to neutralize the militarism in both Germany & Japan via the mighty dollar, long before either 1936 or 1939. The world played along, forgiving fascism its “quirks” on behalf of the sacred Bottom Line – & the world paid dearly for its cynicism. After the horrific reality of “The Great War” nobody could say they didn’t know the cost of arms races & nativism run amok – but unfortunately that knowledge is as gone now as most of those are who experienced it first-hand, worldwide.

Some Einstein to wash the taste of Blakely away -

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

“He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.”

“Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them.”

Bro .

D N Nation found this turd at Hillis44 and passed it on, as it were, “Pres. Bush ,in a speech in Israel,called him an appeaser.McCain gave his AMEN and Hillary is just sittiing back and enjoying the Curtain coming down slowly and effectively on BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. She is one Sharp and lovely brave woman.MY prayers for her,are being heard.”

Gladly, No! This Clinton freak has his/her/its head directly up aforementioned’s ass. In fact, Clinton did not sit back but stood up straight like a Democrat (we knew you could) and was heard to roar (hear her roar),

“President Bush’s comparison of any Democrat to Nazi appeasers is both offensive and outrageous on the face of it, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy. This is the kind of statement that has no place in any presidential address and certainly to use an important moment like the 60th anniversary celebration of Israel to make a political point seems terribly misplaced. Unfortunately, this is what we’ve come to expect from President Bush.

“There is a very clear difference between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy and that difference will be evident once we take back the White House. ”
(h/t to Oliver Willis
http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/15/hillary-clinton-ftw
)

Woo fuckin Hoo, we’re on the direct track to a big win in November.
Ti-ra-la-la-i-tu! I gloat! Hear me gloat!

(I am hoping that the treatment of this particular Clinton freak makes it clear that Clinton followers and Clinton freaks are not the same. Personally, given the number of Republican trolls and provocateurs I see lurking everywhere, I’m not really sure there’s much overlap between the groups.)

His various asides on the subject of Niall Fergusson make me long for a proper article.