Oh well.

Penis!

Over your heads again.

From mind-like Gordian Knot,
So, alas, his wad’s been shot.
He could only spew forth snot,
With Doomed piece that’s truly naught.

Group: “Live long and prosper.”

NOW: If you were including me in your comments about associates, just realize I’m a lackey to no one. If you want to discuss the ‘issue’ which never got off the starting blocks I will, though I’ve stated it does not belong here and the regular people here are not a part of larger social discussion. You sound different.

All that medical stuff is bull-shit though their compiled science is valid. My strength is in the various forms of Munchausen Syndrome. Anything beyond simple Munchausen is a crime with a victim. I don’t care what your strength is.

If you think you are up to the task to seriously discuss the issue in the form of Peer Review repetition is a drag, so please prepare yourself first by going to http://www.salem-news.com/mostcomments.php?period=365 Then click on the top article by Van Lewis. Even that blog didn’t meet par, but the best.

If not, that’s more than fine with me because you probably feel it shouldn’t be here also.

Choose wisely. Your comment on science shows your weakness and indicates a probable hidden bias. If you are biased in either direction just say so. Motivations eventually become clear. And all-immune personal freedoms do not apply when it comes to children – adults are a different matter and should do as they will. James Monteleone in his “Recognition of Child Abuse for the Mandated Reporter” stated:

“Intent is not considered in reporting abuse; protection of the child is paramount.”

We can also continue at the above Salem Blog. Might be best. Maybe we can educate each other. Your hyperbole made some interesting connections I’m not familiar with. I’m open – even to Hugh’s Meme theory which I found very good.

But watch yourself. Your connection through Collective Transmission, to elicit empathy and bonding, regarding Hitler and Stalin who were true assholes can be mirrored right back at you regarding this issue. If you don’t want to discuss and have some free time check out Robert Lifton’s “Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide.” His concept of Doubling applies to both sides of the German experience.

AND I do AGREE with you on anger. Anger is the second stage in Elisabeth Kubler-Ross’s book “On Death and Dying.” Denial is the first stage. Her concept is common in many forms of physical and psychological trauma. Anger is a normal expression, should be kept within the Self or expressed when alone, and can get pretty rough especially in bringing violence to others. The problem with anger is that it keeps being recycled within the individual. Often there is a cooling off period between events and a stressor, whatever it may be, will bring it out again.

Sometimes that stressor can be goaded by others, the anger is then expressed, and then the others can point fingers and laugh, ridicule and whatever. I probably elicited anger by participating. Anger can become like a ball being tossed back and forth.

You even showed anger, not righteous indignation, that this social subject was even discussed as much, if not more, than you were concerned about Hugh’s anger. Never that this type of discussion didn’t belong here. Hidden censorship? Child molesters often tell their victims not to say anything about what happened. Don’t give me that impression of you.

Circumcision is a Munchausen acculturated form of child abuse and molestation with many moods and motivations where the vast majority of participants throughout history are innocently involved and do not realize what’s going on or what has happened. But some individuals narcissistically use it as well as some in the professions and in cultures. Genital rituals involving both sexes are common all over the world. That aspect has NEVER been here and my attitude has been very light because I feel sarcasm is a main factor here.

I feel your comment about associates includes me and is an obtuse derision and challenge. I accept because of that feeling. But, actually someone should post “Enough!”

“We are all crazy when angry.” Philemon.

These executive summaries just piss me off…

mikey

1. There is a tortured quality to Hugh7’s reasoning, a careful avoidance of obvious conclusions, and a painstaking circumnavigation of embarrassing facts.
2. Hugh7 harbors persistent and inappropriate anger.
3. Hugh7 is a big fan of vigilante justice.

For the sake of review, I’ve never bothered Hugh7. Yet Hugh7 wants to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. Whatever happened to “live and let live”?

Hugh7 ought to unstop his ears and uncover his eyes. Only then will he hear that to which he has been too long heedless. Only then will Hugh7 see that facts and their accuracy make a story, not the overdramatization of whatever he dreams up. Am I aware of how Hugh7 will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because he operates on an international scale to put our liberties at risk by a hectoring and unstable rush to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. It’s only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now.

I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about Hugh7. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that Hugh7’s method (or school, or ideology — it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “Hugh7-ism”. It is a blasphemous and avowedly cranky philosophy that aims to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. No matter how close he’s come to making me wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression, he won’t be satisfied until he finds a way to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to turn his corrupt remonstrations to our advantage. Doesn’t it strike you as odd that Hugh7 is opposed to free enterprise, individual liberty, trial by jury, and even such post-Westphalian notions as national sovereignty? His torchbearers are not technically grotesque extortionists but rather lackluster moochers. I allege that there is a small — yet not entirely insignificant — difference.

There are lawsuits in Hugh7’s future. And that’s where we are right now. Faster than you can say “phytosociological”, Hugh7’s ideas will degenerate into hotbeds of rumor and innuendo. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to.

The impact of Hugh7’s infantile wisecracks is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that unlike Hugh7, I stand for progression, not regression. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. He counts revolting warmongers as his friends. Unfortunately for Hugh7, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that if you think that children should belong to the state, then think again.

If I want to jump in the lake, that should be my prerogative. I don’t need Hugh7 forcing me to. There are three points I need to make here. First, his deputies hew closer to the party line — to Hugh7’s established body of cant — than do most other testy prolix-types. Second, Hugh7’s obloquies are merely a sideshow exhibit in the circus of vandalism. And third, if the only way to rage, rage against the dying of the light is for me to suffer endless humiliation, then so be it. It would truly be worth it because it has been brought to my attention that his peons compress his principles into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. While this is certainly true, he attracts self-centered, ribald toughies to his Trotskyism movement by telling them that principles don’t matter. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that’s the case, Hugh7 seems to have recently added the word “scientificogeographical” to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that he insists that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. Sorry, Hugh7, but, with apologies to Gershwin, “it ain’t necessarily so.”

Hugh7 and his batty bruta fulmina should be shunned. Yes, I could add that by following his suggestions, we have become such poor caretakers of the tree of liberty that it has wilted and is sagging dangerously close to the ground, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn’t want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that at no time in the past did lewd, asinine snobs shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that that’s just one side of the coin. The other side is that the failure of his bootlickers to recognize that at their mildest, his programs of Gleichschaltung still manage to brand me as featherbrained casts doubts upon their methods. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.

Hugh7 does not desire to benefit humanity but rather to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. If he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that making my blood curdle is essential for the safety and welfare of the public, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Effete Rhetoric. In the meantime, Hugh7’s fantasy is to spread petulant views. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of Fabianism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that we are at war. Don’t think we’re not just because you’re not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We’re at war with Hugh7’s spleeny deeds. We’re at war with his militant campaigns. And we’re at war with his prurient rejoinders. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that if we take Hugh7’s blanket statements to their logical conclusion, we see that by the next full moon, Hugh7 will declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps.

Let’s play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for Hugh7’s ridiculous claim that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that Hugh7 is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because his previous changes have always been for the worse. I’m positive that Hugh7’s new changes will be even more naive because his activities reek of Bonapartism. I use the word “reek” because he plans to create massive civil unrest. The result will be an amalgam of disagreeable radicalism and drossy oligarchism, if such a monster can be imagined.

Whenever Hugh7 attempts to muddy the word “orbiculatoelliptical”, he looks around waiting for applause as if he’s done something decent and moral rather than snarky and deplorable. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Hugh7 would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being unrestrained. If one needs a sign that he is self-serving, then consider that his maudlin preoccupation with adversarialism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as “ultramicrochemistry”, would make sense if a person’s honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. As that’s not the case, we can conclude only that he always tries to rationalize his apologues with compelling gobbledegook about some “greater good”. I won’t dwell on that except to direct your attention to the raffish manner in which Hugh7 has been trying to disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. I’d like to finish with a quote from a private e-mail message sent to me by a close friend of mine: “Hugh7 is the hands-down, flat-out, bar-none most choleric flibbertigibbet I have ever seen”.

I want this letter to serve as an oasis of sanity in Hugh7’s desert of foolishness. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. In a previous letter, I announced my intention to create greater public understanding of the damage caused by Hugh7’s ebullitions. Naturally, this announcement caused Hugh7 to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how particularism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other “ism”. That’s why it’s Hugh7’s favorite; it makes it easy for him to permit nettlesome sad sacks to rise to positions of leadership and authority.

Discourteous, distasteful cutthroats are intrigued and puzzled by Hugh7’s amalgam of pestilential wowserism and empty-headed anarchism — a tangled web of KKK, Freudian, encounter-therapy, populist, Ayn Rand-like, and Marxist notions. That’s pretty transparent. What’s not so transparent is the answer to the following question: To what depths of depravity does Hugh7 need to descend before the rest of us realize we must condemn his hypocrisy? A clue might be that my goal is to ensure that the values for which we have labored and for which many of us have fought and sacrificed will continue in ascendancy. I will not stint in my labor in this direction. When I have succeeded, the whole world will know that Hugh7 doesn’t use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.

Hugh7 pompously claims that might makes right. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. He harbors persistent and inappropriate anger. I wish I could put it more delicately but that would miss the point. You may be picking up on something here in all of my responses to his brusque contrivances. All of my responses presume that the concepts underlying his wily memoranda are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea — that the heavens revolve around the Earth — was wrong, just as Hugh7’s idea that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication is wrong.

If Hugh7 honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. He likes to brag about how the members of his camp are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, Hugh7 and I are as different as chalk and cheese. He, for instance, wants to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. I, on the other hand, want to perform noble deeds. That’s why I need to tell you that he truly believes that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I hope you realize that that’s just an illiterate pipe dream from a shallow pipe and that in the real world, we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Hugh7. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that Hugh7 likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of sanctimonious frippery.

It may be soothing and pleasant for Hugh7 to think that sexism is a noble goal, but he and his comrades are, by nature, mephitic despots. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but in Hugh7’s quest to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights he has left no destructive scheme unutilized. It is apparent to me that by allowing him to sap people’s moral stamina, we are allowing him to play puppet master. In contrast, if Hugh7 wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn’t just throw out the word “contemporaneousness”, for example, and expect us to be scared.

Hugh7 has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and belittle all fine social standards — all by trumping up a phony emergency. His homilies express themselves in thousandfold manifestations, with one of Hugh7’s gofers in despair and hopelessness, with another in ill will, anger, and indignation, with these rude, offensive twerps in indifference, and with those in furious excesses. If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: If he can’t cite the basis for his claim that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance then he should just shut up about it.

I have a score to settle with Hugh7. In that context, one could say that I have reason to believe that Hugh7 is about to encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens. I pray that I’m wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that if I were to compile a list of Hugh7’s forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Hugh7’s intent is to prevent us from asking questions. He doesn’t want the details checked. He doesn’t want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his “facts” are false.

Hugh7 truly doesn’t want me to challenge his huffy assumptions about merit. Well, I’ve never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to tell Hugh7 where he can stick it. I defy the grumpy litterbugs who destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. To Hell with Hugh7! He would have us believe that we can stop totalitarianism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for flagitious mattoids. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Hugh7 is surrounded by churlish oafs who parrot the same nonsense, which is why if he truly believes that racialism and fogyism are identical concepts, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

If it were true, as Hugh7 claims, that children should belong to the state, then I wouldn’t be saying that Hugh7 likes saying that it’s perfectly safe to drink and drive. Okay, that’s a parody — but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Hugh7 has gotten away with so much for so long that he’s lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a man without any sense of limits could desire to acquire public acceptance of his hostile conclusions. Hugh7 may have the right to quote me out of context. He may have the right to assuage the hungers of his adulators with servings of fresh scapegoats. But Hugh7 crosses the line when he uses his bully pulpit to make our lives a living hell.

Even though Hugh7 gives flattering titles to his natural distempers, if the only way to put the fear of God into Hugh7 is for me to expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits, then so be it. It would doubtlessly be worth it because his demands are based on a technique I’m sure you’ve heard of. It’s called “lying”. By toning down his conjectures, many more people are exposed to his simple-minded message, convinced by his passion, and seduced by his simplistic answers to complex social problems. Hugh7’s harangues are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. Now that you’ve heard what I’ve had to say, I want you to think about it. And I want you to join me and challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations.

I wanted to respond to Hugh7 earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. I assume you already know that Hugh7 is almost unique among debauched defalcators in that he espouses an unambitious view of reality and a defense of polyloquent vigilantism, but I have something more important to tell you. We must announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Hugh7 before he can erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Only then can a society free of his self-indulgent expedients blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that his stories about commercialism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept’s initial implausibility. Argumentative quislingism is the shadow cast on society by his litanies, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. It saddens me that the public is like a giant that Hugh7 has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Hugh7 leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to improve the lot of humankind. That’s why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that if I had my druthers, Hugh7 would never have had the opportunity to foment, precipitate, and finance large-scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt nations and thereby force them into a one-world government. As it stands, if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how Hugh7’s magic-bullet explanations are unequivocally despised by everyone but simple-minded nonentities. Excuse me; that’s not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Hugh7 for trying to take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, Hugh7 apparently believes that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. You and I know better than that. You and I know that Hugh7 does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that his calumnies prevent smallpox, that’s where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

Hugh7 should pay for his mistakes. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else’s, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. The illiterate nature of his demands distracts us from the real lessons we could learn from a rigorous critique of Hugh7’s ruses. It’s that simple.

I would be grateful if Hugh7 would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to disabuse him of the notion that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his manuscripts show nothing but bigotry. Why does Hugh7 make those sorts of accusations, then? Apparently, even know-it-all Hugh7 doesn’t know the answer to that one. It wouldn’t even matter if he did, given that by writing this letter, I am unmistakably sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Hugh7 will retaliate against me. He’ll most likely try to force me to stampede into the abattoir although another possibility is that his proxies are unified under a common goal. That goal is to jawbone aimlessly.

If Hugh7 were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he’s saying. The downside for Hugh7, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he says that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. You know, I don’t think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.

It has long been obvious to attentive observers that Hugh7 considers it fair game to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of careless moral weaklings. But did you know that I’ve never encountered anything as cocky as Hugh7’s remonstrations? Hugh7 doesn’t want you to know that because if his hatchet men are frightened that he might support those for whom hatred has become a way of life in a lustrum or two, they have only themselves to blame. Think about it, and I’m sure you’ll agree with me.

Hugh7 discounts important principles of our culture as mere platitudes. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that if Hugh7 could have one wish, he’d wish for the ability to play the blame game. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that Hugh7 sometimes puts himself in charge of making my blood curdle. At other times, one of his devotees is deputed for the job. In either case, Hugh7’s followers are a subspecies of those rotten social outcasts whose malignant fulminations and clueless wheelings and dealings have become the stuff of legend. That’s clear. But Hugh7 wants to deprive people of dignity and autonomy. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

What really irks me is that Hugh7 has presented us with a Hobson’s choice. Either we let him throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future or he’ll spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, avaricious behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government. Whenever there’s an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that I’d like people who require schoolchildren to be taught that academicism is the only alternative to anarchism to find themselves behind bars, looking out. That should settle the argument pretty quickly.

Of course, I’m generalizing a little here. But that’s only because profligate witlings often act with a mob mentality. I don’t think anyone questions that. But did you know that we must put our religious and factional differences aside if we are ever to take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance?

There is an open consensus that at the end of this journey, I want to be able to say that I tried my best to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Added to this is something else: Hugh7’s rank-and-file followers are too lazy to fix our sights on eternity. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that when Hugh7’s vapid utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, he appears to be saying that his whinges will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. For me, this venal, rummy moonshine serves only to emphasize how some people I know say that Hugh7 and his hirelings are the most nit-picky snollygosters you can imagine — and even then, only in your worst nightmares. Others argue that he is living in a dream world. At this point the distinction is largely academic given that Hugh7 says that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

Be careful not to be charmed by Hugh7’s publicity stunts. All they do is create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate, but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. Hugh7’s confidants say, “Hugh7’s decisions are based on reason.” Yes, I’m afraid they really do talk like that. It’s the only way for them to conceal that Hugh7 takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all of the evidence that doesn’t support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. Lastly, I can’t end this letter without mentioning that Hugh7’s behavior is very dangerous and very destructive.

My original goal for this letter was to scrutinize Hugh7’s remarks point by point. Unfortunately, Hugh7’s focus wanders so wildly that he never actually finishes any of his points. I think you will notice this in the ensuing discussion. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and make a cause célèbre out of exposing Hugh7’s diatribes for what they really are. Hugh7 accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his calumnies show nothing but bigotry. Why does Hugh7 make those sorts of accusations, then? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that Hugh7 embraces alarmism with open arms. But upon further investigation one will find that he, already oppressive with his foolish shell games, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species — if separate species we be — for his reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world. If you think that that’s a frightening thought then consider that there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of egotism, and there are those who are not. Hugh7 is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that’s why he is stepping over the line when he attempts to fleece people out of their life’s savings — way over the line.

Hugh7 desperately wants to be fashionable. I mean, think about it. His shock troops portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that it must be stated quite categorically that Hugh7 is offended by anything that might suggest that his viewpoints are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to encourage blockish beggars (especially the anal-retentive type) to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. Am I aware of how Hugh7 will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because many people have witnessed him mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. Hugh7 generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his cuckoo smear tactics on effrontive suborners of perjury. It’s like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What’s more, when I was a child, my clergyman told me, “Hugh7 uses people and destroys lives without compunction.” If you think about it you’ll see his point.

I guess what I really mean to say is that Hugh7’s satraps acquiesce with bovine stolidity when he instructs them to revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: There’s a special, dark corner of Hell for the likes of Hitler, Stalin, and Hugh7. In that respect, we can say that some day, his obstinate lackeys may ask you why you think it’s a good idea to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Hugh7’s juvenile little schemes. If you’re too stunned to answer immediately they’ll answer for you, probably stating that going through the motions of working is the same as working. You should therefore be prepared to tell these blinkered heretics that Hugh7’s idea of immature nativism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a vitriolic, unforgiving blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a sleazy and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a duplicitous frenzy and then prompts them to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives.

Frankly, in asserting that phallocentrism is the key to world peace, Hugh7 demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. He has never disproved anything I’ve ever written. Hugh7 does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I’ve never expressed. In the end, I know more about terrorism than most people. You might even say that I’m an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that Hugh7 frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what Hugh7 is doing — as opposed to what he is saying — to understand his true aims.

Here’s an idea: Instead of giving Hugh7 the ability to sow the seeds of discord, why don’t we provide a trenchant analysis of his ideas? If we do, we’ll then be able to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. He truly believes that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. I hope you realize that that’s just a worthless pipe dream from a dastardly pipe and that in the real world, Hugh7 has declared that he’s staging a revolt against everyone who dares to let him know, in no uncertain terms, that nothing agitates and humiliates him more than when I direct our efforts toward clearly defined goals and measure progress toward those goals as frequently and as objectively as possible. Hugh7’s revolting all right; the very sight of him turns my stomach. All kidding aside, if there’s an untold story here, it’s that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. In fact, that’s exactly what Hugh7 does as part of his quest to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. When I observe Hugh7’s mercenaries’ behavior, I can’t help but recall the proverbial expression, “monkey see, monkey do”. That’s because, like him, they all want to transform our whole society to suit his own loud interests. Also, while a monkey might think that Hugh7 is a martyr for freedom and a victim of colonialism, the fact remains that he is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection. Well, that’s getting away from my main topic, which is that if I were to compile a list of Hugh7’s forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that if I try really, really hard, I can almost see why Hugh7 would want to let piteous pissants serve as our overlords.

My message is clear: Every time Hugh7 tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well. Apparently, my current plan is to cast a ray of light on his capricious initiatives. Yes, Hugh7 will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but he wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, Hugh7 plans to destroy people’s minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, the biggest difference between me and Hugh7 is that Hugh7 wants to glorify jaded desperados. I, on the other hand, want to disabuse him of the notion that the Eleventh Commandment is, “Thou shalt contaminate clear thinking with Hugh7’s odious plans for the future”.

I contend that there’s no indication that Hugh7’s lickspittles will ever focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what’s happening in the world. Deal with it. Hugh7 claims that he can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses’ brains. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.

The significance of this is that every so often, Hugh7 tries stirring up trouble. Whenever he gets caught doing so he raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. You may be picking up on something here in all of my responses to his hectoring fulminations. All of my responses presume that he is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to him whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to Hugh7 is sectarianism. Why? In other words, when Hugh7 looks in the mirror in the morning, does he see more than the conscienceless face of an unholy drunk? That’s the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you’d also know why Hugh7 knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive — or at least overlook — all of his lackluster excesses. My take on the matter is that ever since he decided to spit in the face of propriety, his consistent, unvarying line has been that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires.

I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why Hugh7’s fixation with the worst classes of splenetic twerps I’ve ever seen is jealous. My peers insist that a deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not contemptible energizes Hugh7 to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. While this is indubitably true, I claim we must add that he maintains that insurrectionism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. That’s not just a lie but is actually the exact opposite of the truth — and Hugh7 knows it. Why is Hugh7 deliberately turning the truth on its head like that? The answer is obvious if you understand that I defy the loquacious sybarites who poke someone’s eyes out and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent.

Sometime in the future Hugh7 will make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to his sophistries. Fortunately, that hasn’t happened…yet. But it will definitely happen if we don’t acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. To summarize my views: Some despicable troublemakers don’t have a clue.
There are three talking points that no reasonable letter about Hugh7 can possibly ignore:

1. There is a tortured quality to Hugh7’s reasoning, a careful avoidance of obvious conclusions, and a painstaking circumnavigation of embarrassing facts.
2. Hugh7 harbors persistent and inappropriate anger.
3. Hugh7 is a big fan of vigilante justice.

For the sake of review, I’ve never bothered Hugh7. Yet Hugh7 wants to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. Whatever happened to “live and let live”?

Hugh7 ought to unstop his ears and uncover his eyes. Only then will he hear that to which he has been too long heedless. Only then will Hugh7 see that facts and their accuracy make a story, not the overdramatization of whatever he dreams up. Am I aware of how Hugh7 will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because he operates on an international scale to put our liberties at risk by a hectoring and unstable rush to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. It’s only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now.

I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about Hugh7. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that Hugh7’s method (or school, or ideology — it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “Hugh7-ism”. It is a blasphemous and avowedly cranky philosophy that aims to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. No matter how close he’s come to making me wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression, he won’t be satisfied until he finds a way to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to turn his corrupt remonstrations to our advantage. Doesn’t it strike you as odd that Hugh7 is opposed to free enterprise, individual liberty, trial by jury, and even such post-Westphalian notions as national sovereignty? His torchbearers are not technically grotesque extortionists but rather lackluster moochers. I allege that there is a small — yet not entirely insignificant — difference.

There are lawsuits in Hugh7’s future. And that’s where we are right now. Faster than you can say “phytosociological”, Hugh7’s ideas will degenerate into hotbeds of rumor and innuendo. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to.

The impact of Hugh7’s infantile wisecracks is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that unlike Hugh7, I stand for progression, not regression. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. He counts revolting warmongers as his friends. Unfortunately for Hugh7, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that if you think that children should belong to the state, then think again.

If I want to jump in the lake, that should be my prerogative. I don’t need Hugh7 forcing me to. There are three points I need to make here. First, his deputies hew closer to the party line — to Hugh7’s established body of cant — than do most other testy prolix-types. Second, Hugh7’s obloquies are merely a sideshow exhibit in the circus of vandalism. And third, if the only way to rage, rage against the dying of the light is for me to suffer endless humiliation, then so be it. It would truly be worth it because it has been brought to my attention that his peons compress his principles into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. While this is certainly true, he attracts self-centered, ribald toughies to his Trotskyism movement by telling them that principles don’t matter. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that’s the case, Hugh7 seems to have recently added the word “scientificogeographical” to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that he insists that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. Sorry, Hugh7, but, with apologies to Gershwin, “it ain’t necessarily so.”

Hugh7 and his batty bruta fulmina should be shunned. Yes, I could add that by following his suggestions, we have become such poor caretakers of the tree of liberty that it has wilted and is sagging dangerously close to the ground, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn’t want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that at no time in the past did lewd, asinine snobs shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that that’s just one side of the coin. The other side is that the failure of his bootlickers to recognize that at their mildest, his programs of Gleichschaltung still manage to brand me as featherbrained casts doubts upon their methods. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.

Hugh7 does not desire to benefit humanity but rather to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. If he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that making my blood curdle is essential for the safety and welfare of the public, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Effete Rhetoric. In the meantime, Hugh7’s fantasy is to spread petulant views. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of Fabianism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that we are at war. Don’t think we’re not just because you’re not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We’re at war with Hugh7’s spleeny deeds. We’re at war with his militant campaigns. And we’re at war with his prurient rejoinders. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that if we take Hugh7’s blanket statements to their logical conclusion, we see that by the next full moon, Hugh7 will declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps.

Let’s play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for Hugh7’s ridiculous claim that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that Hugh7 is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because his previous changes have always been for the worse. I’m positive that Hugh7’s new changes will be even more naive because his activities reek of Bonapartism. I use the word “reek” because he plans to create massive civil unrest. The result will be an amalgam of disagreeable radicalism and drossy oligarchism, if such a monster can be imagined.

Whenever Hugh7 attempts to muddy the word “orbiculatoelliptical”, he looks around waiting for applause as if he’s done something decent and moral rather than snarky and deplorable. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Hugh7 would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being unrestrained. If one needs a sign that he is self-serving, then consider that his maudlin preoccupation with adversarialism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as “ultramicrochemistry”, would make sense if a person’s honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. As that’s not the case, we can conclude only that he always tries to rationalize his apologues with compelling gobbledegook about some “greater good”. I won’t dwell on that except to direct your attention to the raffish manner in which Hugh7 has been trying to disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. I’d like to finish with a quote from a private e-mail message sent to me by a close friend of mine: “Hugh7 is the hands-down, flat-out, bar-none most choleric flibbertigibbet I have ever seen”.

I want this letter to serve as an oasis of sanity in Hugh7’s desert of foolishness. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. In a previous letter, I announced my intention to create greater public understanding of the damage caused by Hugh7’s ebullitions. Naturally, this announcement caused Hugh7 to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how particularism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other “ism”. That’s why it’s Hugh7’s favorite; it makes it easy for him to permit nettlesome sad sacks to rise to positions of leadership and authority.

Discourteous, distasteful cutthroats are intrigued and puzzled by Hugh7’s amalgam of pestilential wowserism and empty-headed anarchism — a tangled web of KKK, Freudian, encounter-therapy, populist, Ayn Rand-like, and Marxist notions. That’s pretty transparent. What’s not so transparent is the answer to the following question: To what depths of depravity does Hugh7 need to descend before the rest of us realize we must condemn his hypocrisy? A clue might be that my goal is to ensure that the values for which we have labored and for which many of us have fought and sacrificed will continue in ascendancy. I will not stint in my labor in this direction. When I have succeeded, the whole world will know that Hugh7 doesn’t use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.

Hugh7 pompously claims that might makes right. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. He harbors persistent and inappropriate anger. I wish I could put it more delicately but that would miss the point. You may be picking up on something here in all of my responses to his brusque contrivances. All of my responses presume that the concepts underlying his wily memoranda are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea — that the heavens revolve around the Earth — was wrong, just as Hugh7’s idea that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication is wrong.

If Hugh7 honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. He likes to brag about how the members of his camp are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, Hugh7 and I are as different as chalk and cheese. He, for instance, wants to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. I, on the other hand, want to perform noble deeds. That’s why I need to tell you that he truly believes that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I hope you realize that that’s just an illiterate pipe dream from a shallow pipe and that in the real world, we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Hugh7. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that Hugh7 likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of sanctimonious frippery.

It may be soothing and pleasant for Hugh7 to think that sexism is a noble goal, but he and his comrades are, by nature, mephitic despots. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but in Hugh7’s quest to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights he has left no destructive scheme unutilized. It is apparent to me that by allowing him to sap people’s moral stamina, we are allowing him to play puppet master. In contrast, if Hugh7 wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn’t just throw out the word “contemporaneousness”, for example, and expect us to be scared.

Hugh7 has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and belittle all fine social standards — all by trumping up a phony emergency. His homilies express themselves in thousandfold manifestations, with one of Hugh7’s gofers in despair and hopelessness, with another in ill will, anger, and indignation, with these rude, offensive twerps in indifference, and with those in furious excesses. If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: If he can’t cite the basis for his claim that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance then he should just shut up about it.

I have a score to settle with Hugh7. In that context, one could say that I have reason to believe that Hugh7 is about to encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens. I pray that I’m wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that if I were to compile a list of Hugh7’s forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Hugh7’s intent is to prevent us from asking questions. He doesn’t want the details checked. He doesn’t want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his “facts” are false.

Hugh7 truly doesn’t want me to challenge his huffy assumptions about merit. Well, I’ve never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to tell Hugh7 where he can stick it. I defy the grumpy litterbugs who destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. To Hell with Hugh7! He would have us believe that we can stop totalitarianism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for flagitious mattoids. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Hugh7 is surrounded by churlish oafs who parrot the same nonsense, which is why if he truly believes that racialism and fogyism are identical concepts, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

If it were true, as Hugh7 claims, that children should belong to the state, then I wouldn’t be saying that Hugh7 likes saying that it’s perfectly safe to drink and drive. Okay, that’s a parody — but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Hugh7 has gotten away with so much for so long that he’s lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a man without any sense of limits could desire to acquire public acceptance of his hostile conclusions. Hugh7 may have the right to quote me out of context. He may have the right to assuage the hungers of his adulators with servings of fresh scapegoats. But Hugh7 crosses the line when he uses his bully pulpit to make our lives a living hell.

Even though Hugh7 gives flattering titles to his natural distempers, if the only way to put the fear of God into Hugh7 is for me to expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits, then so be it. It would doubtlessly be worth it because his demands are based on a technique I’m sure you’ve heard of. It’s called “lying”. By toning down his conjectures, many more people are exposed to his simple-minded message, convinced by his passion, and seduced by his simplistic answers to complex social problems. Hugh7’s harangues are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. Now that you’ve heard what I’ve had to say, I want you to think about it. And I want you to join me and challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations.

I wanted to respond to Hugh7 earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. I assume you already know that Hugh7 is almost unique among debauched defalcators in that he espouses an unambitious view of reality and a defense of polyloquent vigilantism, but I have something more important to tell you. We must announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Hugh7 before he can erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Only then can a society free of his self-indulgent expedients blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that his stories about commercialism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept’s initial implausibility. Argumentative quislingism is the shadow cast on society by his litanies, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. It saddens me that the public is like a giant that Hugh7 has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Hugh7 leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to improve the lot of humankind. That’s why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that if I had my druthers, Hugh7 would never have had the opportunity to foment, precipitate, and finance large-scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt nations and thereby force them into a one-world government. As it stands, if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how Hugh7’s magic-bullet explanations are unequivocally despised by everyone but simple-minded nonentities. Excuse me; that’s not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Hugh7 for trying to take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, Hugh7 apparently believes that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. You and I know better than that. You and I know that Hugh7 does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that his calumnies prevent smallpox, that’s where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

Hugh7 should pay for his mistakes. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else’s, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. The illiterate nature of his demands distracts us from the real lessons we could learn from a rigorous critique of Hugh7’s ruses. It’s that simple.

I would be grateful if Hugh7 would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to disabuse him of the notion that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his manuscripts show nothing but bigotry. Why does Hugh7 make those sorts of accusations, then? Apparently, even know-it-all Hugh7 doesn’t know the answer to that one. It wouldn’t even matter if he did, given that by writing this letter, I am unmistakably sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Hugh7 will retaliate against me. He’ll most likely try to force me to stampede into the abattoir although another possibility is that his proxies are unified under a common goal. That goal is to jawbone aimlessly.

If Hugh7 were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he’s saying. The downside for Hugh7, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he says that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. You know, I don’t think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.

It has long been obvious to attentive observers that Hugh7 considers it fair game to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of careless moral weaklings. But did you know that I’ve never encountered anything as cocky as Hugh7’s remonstrations? Hugh7 doesn’t want you to know that because if his hatchet men are frightened that he might support those for whom hatred has become a way of life in a lustrum or two, they have only themselves to blame. Think about it, and I’m sure you’ll agree with me.

Hugh7 discounts important principles of our culture as mere platitudes. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that if Hugh7 could have one wish, he’d wish for the ability to play the blame game. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that Hugh7 sometimes puts himself in charge of making my blood curdle. At other times, one of his devotees is deputed for the job. In either case, Hugh7’s followers are a subspecies of those rotten social outcasts whose malignant fulminations and clueless wheelings and dealings have become the stuff of legend. That’s clear. But Hugh7 wants to deprive people of dignity and autonomy. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

What really irks me is that Hugh7 has presented us with a Hobson’s choice. Either we let him throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future or he’ll spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, avaricious behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government. Whenever there’s an argument about his devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that I’d like people who require schoolchildren to be taught that academicism is the only alternative to anarchism to find themselves behind bars, looking out. That should settle the argument pretty quickly.

Of course, I’m generalizing a little here. But that’s only because profligate witlings often act with a mob mentality. I don’t think anyone questions that. But did you know that we must put our religious and factional differences aside if we are ever to take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance?

There is an open consensus that at the end of this journey, I want to be able to say that I tried my best to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Added to this is something else: Hugh7’s rank-and-file followers are too lazy to fix our sights on eternity. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that when Hugh7’s vapid utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, he appears to be saying that his whinges will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. For me, this venal, rummy moonshine serves only to emphasize how some people I know say that Hugh7 and his hirelings are the most nit-picky snollygosters you can imagine — and even then, only in your worst nightmares. Others argue that he is living in a dream world. At this point the distinction is largely academic given that Hugh7 says that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

Be careful not to be charmed by Hugh7’s publicity stunts. All they do is create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate, but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. Hugh7’s confidants say, “Hugh7’s decisions are based on reason.” Yes, I’m afraid they really do talk like that. It’s the only way for them to conceal that Hugh7 takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all of the evidence that doesn’t support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. Lastly, I can’t end this letter without mentioning that Hugh7’s behavior is very dangerous and very destructive.

My original goal for this letter was to scrutinize Hugh7’s remarks point by point. Unfortunately, Hugh7’s focus wanders so wildly that he never actually finishes any of his points. I think you will notice this in the ensuing discussion. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and make a cause célèbre out of exposing Hugh7’s diatribes for what they really are. Hugh7 accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his calumnies show nothing but bigotry. Why does Hugh7 make those sorts of accusations, then? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that Hugh7 embraces alarmism with open arms. But upon further investigation one will find that he, already oppressive with his foolish shell games, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species — if separate species we be — for his reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world. If you think that that’s a frightening thought then consider that there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of egotism, and there are those who are not. Hugh7 is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that’s why he is stepping over the line when he attempts to fleece people out of their life’s savings — way over the line.

Hugh7 desperately wants to be fashionable. I mean, think about it. His shock troops portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that it must be stated quite categorically that Hugh7 is offended by anything that might suggest that his viewpoints are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to encourage blockish beggars (especially the anal-retentive type) to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. Am I aware of how Hugh7 will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because many people have witnessed him mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. Hugh7 generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his cuckoo smear tactics on effrontive suborners of perjury. It’s like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What’s more, when I was a child, my clergyman told me, “Hugh7 uses people and destroys lives without compunction.” If you think about it you’ll see his point.

I guess what I really mean to say is that Hugh7’s satraps acquiesce with bovine stolidity when he instructs them to revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: There’s a special, dark corner of Hell for the likes of Hitler, Stalin, and Hugh7. In that respect, we can say that some day, his obstinate lackeys may ask you why you think it’s a good idea to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Hugh7’s juvenile little schemes. If you’re too stunned to answer immediately they’ll answer for you, probably stating that going through the motions of working is the same as working. You should therefore be prepared to tell these blinkered heretics that Hugh7’s idea of immature nativism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a vitriolic, unforgiving blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a sleazy and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a duplicitous frenzy and then prompts them to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives.

Frankly, in asserting that phallocentrism is the key to world peace, Hugh7 demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. He has never disproved anything I’ve ever written. Hugh7 does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I’ve never expressed. In the end, I know more about terrorism than most people. You might even say that I’m an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that Hugh7 frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what Hugh7 is doing — as opposed to what he is saying — to understand his true aims.

Here’s an idea: Instead of giving Hugh7 the ability to sow the seeds of discord, why don’t we provide a trenchant analysis of his ideas? If we do, we’ll then be able to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. He truly believes that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. I hope you realize that that’s just a worthless pipe dream from a dastardly pipe and that in the real world, Hugh7 has declared that he’s staging a revolt against everyone who dares to let him know, in no uncertain terms, that nothing agitates and humiliates him more than when I direct our efforts toward clearly defined goals and measure progress toward those goals as frequently and as objectively as possible. Hugh7’s revolting all right; the very sight of him turns my stomach. All kidding aside, if there’s an untold story here, it’s that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. In fact, that’s exactly what Hugh7 does as part of his quest to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. When I observe Hugh7’s mercenaries’ behavior, I can’t help but recall the proverbial expression, “monkey see, monkey do”. That’s because, like him, they all want to transform our whole society to suit his own loud interests. Also, while a monkey might think that Hugh7 is a martyr for freedom and a victim of colonialism, the fact remains that he is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection. Well, that’s getting away from my main topic, which is that if I were to compile a list of Hugh7’s forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make

For the same reason I should have said to this Jennifer (not that other, foul-mouthed one), that if baby girls might routinely have their uteri cut out at parental whim, she might feel strongly about it.

“Serious as a haemorrhoid”, though? Isn’t it a relief when you go to the doctor with bleeding from the bum and s/he says “It’s just a haemorrhoid – it’s not serious.”

“Foreskin of Doom”, eh, Mikey? That sure is how some people (eg Arky H8r) imagine it.

Interesting how some people prefer empty assumtions to facts and evidence..

Dammit! I Do SO have friends. They come over on friday nights. We drink a couple Hamms and I show them my majestic penis with it’s Foreskin of Doom™. They all Oooh and Aahhh for a while, then my wife comes in, sees me showing my dick to my friends again and starts yelling. My friends all leave and I have to work for WEEKS to get them to come back to look at my wonderful dick.

My wife says I should go to therapy, but I just tell her if she’ll stop saying that I’ll let her see the Perfect Penis Of Happiness…

mikey

The ancient Egyptians felt the female in the male was in his foreskin and the male in the female was in her clitoris, so in order to fully develop and become the sex one was born as, that part of the body represented as the opposite sex must be excised. Even today, some men in societies that circumcise females do get ‘hysterical’ about a woman with the external portion of her clitoris.

I’m not a mover or shaker in the movement, but the three times I’ve met Hugh were at their International Symposia. One of them either at Oxford University, England or the University of Padua, Italy Hugh lectured on circumcision as a ‘meme.’ Good stuff. Their efforts in developing a body of knowledge helped Patricia Schroeder and Barbara Collins getting the anti Female Genital Mutilation law passed in the United States.

On the opposite side, the Poro felt that to become a complete person, a person needed both aspects of sexuality to fully develop. Thus at Poro circumcision ceremonies of both sexes initiates would eat the circumcised tissue of the opposite sex. Not sure if the Poro custom still exists, but some areas in Africa continue to do this.

So, as Stanislaus Lec asked: ‘Is it progress if a cannibal uses knife and fork?’