<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heckuva job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment on Heckuva job by Iraq » Comment on Heckuva job by &#8230; &#124; Diabetes Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593758</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment on Heckuva job by Iraq » Comment on Heckuva job by &#8230; &#124; Diabetes Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593758</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest of this great post here     Author:    Time: Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 at 2:55 pm   Category: Diabetes   Comments: You [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest of this great post here     Author:    Time: Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 at 2:55 pm   Category: Diabetes   Comments: You [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593740</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593740</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Apropos of nothing, am I the only one to find it incredibly amusing that John McCain managed to win with 73% of the PA primary vote? Last man standing, indeed.&lt;/i&gt;

The TPM tracker I read said 16% of the Republicans voted for Ron Paul and the other 11% for Huckabee.  Presumably, the Huckabee voters hope that Old John will tap Arkansas&#039; Elmer Gantry for VP, which makes perfect sense since they are good evangelicals &lt;b&gt;who believe in miracles&lt;/b&gt;.   As for the Paulistas, well, I&#039;m told it&#039;s rude to use the term &quot;cult&quot; when discussing politics, but I don&#039;t think Dr. Ron&#039;s brave defenders are going to vote for McPain in November, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Apropos of nothing, am I the only one to find it incredibly amusing that John McCain managed to win with 73% of the PA primary vote? Last man standing, indeed.</i></p>
<p>The TPM tracker I read said 16% of the Republicans voted for Ron Paul and the other 11% for Huckabee.  Presumably, the Huckabee voters hope that Old John will tap Arkansas&#8217; Elmer Gantry for VP, which makes perfect sense since they are good evangelicals <b>who believe in miracles</b>.   As for the Paulistas, well, I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s rude to use the term &#8220;cult&#8221; when discussing politics, but I don&#8217;t think Dr. Ron&#8217;s brave defenders are going to vote for McPain in November, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593727</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593727</guid>
		<description>Comrade Rutherford -

Thanks for the link. Disappointing responses indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Rutherford -</p>
<p>Thanks for the link. Disappointing responses indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMadClown</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593669</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMadClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593669</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that they aren&#039;t Real Democrats, but rather that the Democratic Party isn&#039;t really particularly liberal.  Personally, neither party really represents my beliefs -- that said, the Democrats are the closer of the two, and are far less odious than the Republicans, so I vote strategically.  I view my vote less as a vote &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; a candidate, more like a vote &lt;i&gt;against&lt;/i&gt; Grandpa Simpson.

This was more serious than usual for me...um...&lt;B&gt;BOOBIES!!!!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that they aren&#8217;t Real Democrats, but rather that the Democratic Party isn&#8217;t really particularly liberal.  Personally, neither party really represents my beliefs &#8212; that said, the Democrats are the closer of the two, and are far less odious than the Republicans, so I vote strategically.  I view my vote less as a vote <i>for</i> a candidate, more like a vote <i>against</i> Grandpa Simpson.</p>
<p>This was more serious than usual for me&#8230;um&#8230;<b>BOOBIES!!!!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593661</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593661</guid>
		<description>Clinton and Obama are Republicans in disguise.  Plain and simple.

A Real Democrat would say, &quot;Signing statements are clearly unconstitutional and I will never use them.  I will also call on Congress to pass legislation to make it very clear that signing statements are wrong.&quot;

A Real Demcrat would say, &quot;Mercenary armies have no place in this modern world.  One of my first acts as President will be to replace all mercenary armies with regular forces.  At the earliest opportunity I will direct my Sec of Commerce to revoke the charters of all mercenary armies headquartered in the US, and start prosecutions of all executives of mercenary armies based in the US for mass murder.&quot; I will also work with Congress to make sure that private corporate entities are not able to set up their own paramilitary forces. (see InfraGard).

A Real Democrat would say, &quot;I will immediately withdraw US forces from nations that the US has occupied and promise to never start a war of naked aggression as former President Bush has done.&quot;

Obama has promised to not remove troops from Iraq, and Clinton has promised to nuke Iran, so obviously neither of them are Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton and Obama are Republicans in disguise.  Plain and simple.</p>
<p>A Real Democrat would say, &#8220;Signing statements are clearly unconstitutional and I will never use them.  I will also call on Congress to pass legislation to make it very clear that signing statements are wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>A Real Demcrat would say, &#8220;Mercenary armies have no place in this modern world.  One of my first acts as President will be to replace all mercenary armies with regular forces.  At the earliest opportunity I will direct my Sec of Commerce to revoke the charters of all mercenary armies headquartered in the US, and start prosecutions of all executives of mercenary armies based in the US for mass murder.&#8221; I will also work with Congress to make sure that private corporate entities are not able to set up their own paramilitary forces. (see InfraGard).</p>
<p>A Real Democrat would say, &#8220;I will immediately withdraw US forces from nations that the US has occupied and promise to never start a war of naked aggression as former President Bush has done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama has promised to not remove troops from Iraq, and Clinton has promised to nuke Iran, so obviously neither of them are Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593655</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593655</guid>
		<description>Earlier I said:
&quot;Both have promised to continue to allow US-based merc armies to be deployed here and abroad with immunity from prosecution when they murder civilians.&quot;

Here is the link:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/scahill

&quot;A senior foreign policy adviser to leading Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has told The Nation that if elected Obama will not &quot;rule out&quot; using private security companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq. The adviser also said that Obama does not plan to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009, when a new President will be sworn in. Obama&#039;s campaign says that instead he will focus on bringing accountability to these forces while increasing funding for the State Department&#039;s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the agency that employs Blackwater and other private security contractors.&quot;

Please note that Sen Clinton was for Blackwater until only two months ago, when she suddenly switched, for political expediency, to claiming she was against Blackwater.  I don&#039;t believe her for a second, since Blackwater was fine when Clinton was President, and don&#039;t forget that Mark Penn works for Blackwater (through Burson-Marsteller) to make sure they are never held accountable to the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier I said:<br />
&#8220;Both have promised to continue to allow US-based merc armies to be deployed here and abroad with immunity from prosecution when they murder civilians.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/scahill" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/scahill</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A senior foreign policy adviser to leading Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has told The Nation that if elected Obama will not &#8220;rule out&#8221; using private security companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq. The adviser also said that Obama does not plan to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009, when a new President will be sworn in. Obama&#8217;s campaign says that instead he will focus on bringing accountability to these forces while increasing funding for the State Department&#8217;s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the agency that employs Blackwater and other private security contractors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please note that Sen Clinton was for Blackwater until only two months ago, when she suddenly switched, for political expediency, to claiming she was against Blackwater.  I don&#8217;t believe her for a second, since Blackwater was fine when Clinton was President, and don&#8217;t forget that Mark Penn works for Blackwater (through Burson-Marsteller) to make sure they are never held accountable to the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593649</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593649</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;spencer said,
April 22, 2008 at 16:55

Comrade Rutherford @16:40:

I haven’t heard about a lot of these, particularly the signing statements thing. That would be especially troubling to me, if true. Can you provide linkage? TIA.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Responding to a questionnaire late last year by the Boston Globe, Sens. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) made clear their view that Bush has gone too far in issuing signing statements -- but that there are circumstances in which such statements are necessary.

&quot;The problem with this administration is that it has attached signing statements to legislation in an effort to change the meaning of the legislation, to avoid enforcing certain provisions of the legislation that the President does not like, and to raise implausible or dubious constitutional objections to the legislation,&quot; Obama answered. But, he added: &quot;No one doubts that it is appropriate to use signing statements to protect a president&#039;s constitutional prerogatives.&quot;

In her own Globe questionnaire, Clinton made a similar point about legal issues. &quot;I would only use signing statements in very rare instances to note and clarify confusing or contradictory provisions, including provisions that contradict the Constitution,&quot; she wrote. &quot;My approach would be to work with Congress to eliminate or correct unconstitutional provisions before legislation is sent to my desk.&quot;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/24/AR2008022401995.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>spencer said,<br />
April 22, 2008 at 16:55</p>
<p>Comrade Rutherford @16:40:</p>
<p>I haven’t heard about a lot of these, particularly the signing statements thing. That would be especially troubling to me, if true. Can you provide linkage? TIA.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Responding to a questionnaire late last year by the Boston Globe, Sens. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) made clear their view that Bush has gone too far in issuing signing statements &#8212; but that there are circumstances in which such statements are necessary.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem with this administration is that it has attached signing statements to legislation in an effort to change the meaning of the legislation, to avoid enforcing certain provisions of the legislation that the President does not like, and to raise implausible or dubious constitutional objections to the legislation,&#8221; Obama answered. But, he added: &#8220;No one doubts that it is appropriate to use signing statements to protect a president&#8217;s constitutional prerogatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>In her own Globe questionnaire, Clinton made a similar point about legal issues. &#8220;I would only use signing statements in very rare instances to note and clarify confusing or contradictory provisions, including provisions that contradict the Constitution,&#8221; she wrote. &#8220;My approach would be to work with Congress to eliminate or correct unconstitutional provisions before legislation is sent to my desk.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/24/AR2008022401995.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/24/AR2008022401995.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593646</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593646</guid>
		<description>Gary Ruppert,

But the problem with America&#039;s health insurance system is that even if you CAN afford the best insurance plans, they will NOT sell one to you that will cover &quot;pre-existing&quot; conditions.

They will not cover past a certain amount (say $200,000).  They cut you off and you have to pay those bills yourself.

Only the top 1% of all Americans can afford to pay those ind of bills out of their own pockets.

I haven&#039;t had insurance since I was 18.  I am now 42.  I have no health issues, I don&#039;t smoke, and have no &#039;pre-existing&#039; conditions.

Not one single insurance company will take me on, they do not even quote me a price.  Or if they do it&#039;s $2000 a month (just for me and not my wife and children).  Since I make just over $30K a year, just how am I supposed to have health care?

By your logic no one that makes less than $200,000 should be allowed to receive health care.

Just how is this the &quot;Best&quot; system in the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Ruppert,</p>
<p>But the problem with America&#8217;s health insurance system is that even if you CAN afford the best insurance plans, they will NOT sell one to you that will cover &#8220;pre-existing&#8221; conditions.</p>
<p>They will not cover past a certain amount (say $200,000).  They cut you off and you have to pay those bills yourself.</p>
<p>Only the top 1% of all Americans can afford to pay those ind of bills out of their own pockets.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had insurance since I was 18.  I am now 42.  I have no health issues, I don&#8217;t smoke, and have no &#8216;pre-existing&#8217; conditions.</p>
<p>Not one single insurance company will take me on, they do not even quote me a price.  Or if they do it&#8217;s $2000 a month (just for me and not my wife and children).  Since I make just over $30K a year, just how am I supposed to have health care?</p>
<p>By your logic no one that makes less than $200,000 should be allowed to receive health care.</p>
<p>Just how is this the &#8220;Best&#8221; system in the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593642</link>
		<dc:creator>billy pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593642</guid>
		<description>America is, however, easily Number One in trackback spam and trolling.

And incarceration.

Especially if you count Gary&#039;s Midwest as one big isolation camp.  Apparently in Midwest Ruppertland, the proles just LOVE to get used up for their corporate overlords and tossed aside when they break, like a cheap stapler from Walmart.

Plus they get to watch with love and amusement while their corporate and governmental masters get to enjoy all the finest things in life while the Garys are being denied life, liberty, and health....

It truly seems like a horrid place, and I&#039;m glad I live in a different Heartland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America is, however, easily Number One in trackback spam and trolling.</p>
<p>And incarceration.</p>
<p>Especially if you count Gary&#8217;s Midwest as one big isolation camp.  Apparently in Midwest Ruppertland, the proles just LOVE to get used up for their corporate overlords and tossed aside when they break, like a cheap stapler from Walmart.</p>
<p>Plus they get to watch with love and amusement while their corporate and governmental masters get to enjoy all the finest things in life while the Garys are being denied life, liberty, and health&#8230;.</p>
<p>It truly seems like a horrid place, and I&#8217;m glad I live in a different Heartland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593625</link>
		<dc:creator>lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593625</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; can’t tell the difference between the real Gary and Gary parodies. I’ve just decided to assume they’re all parodies.&lt;/i&gt;

Garodies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> can’t tell the difference between the real Gary and Gary parodies. I’ve just decided to assume they’re all parodies.</i></p>
<p>Garodies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuriousGeorge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593571</link>
		<dc:creator>FuriousGeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593571</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell the difference between the real Gary and Gary parodies.  I&#039;ve just decided to assume they&#039;re all parodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell the difference between the real Gary and Gary parodies.  I&#8217;ve just decided to assume they&#8217;re all parodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593555</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593555</guid>
		<description>Yeah that figures, Gary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that figures, Gary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ruppert</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593540</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ruppert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593540</guid>
		<description>The fact is, we here in The Heartland appreciate trackbacks, as it gives us other opportunities to click links and debate how you liberals are ruining the country and will lose in November. Trackbacks and cheesesteaks are the way of The Heartland, which Hussein is unable to even comprehend because he&#039;s an elitist, unlike David Brooks who has the pulse of the nation, or Thoms Sowell who more people should be like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, we here in The Heartland appreciate trackbacks, as it gives us other opportunities to click links and debate how you liberals are ruining the country and will lose in November. Trackbacks and cheesesteaks are the way of The Heartland, which Hussein is unable to even comprehend because he&#8217;s an elitist, unlike David Brooks who has the pulse of the nation, or Thoms Sowell who more people should be like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalize</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593537</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593537</guid>
		<description>Ooh my little Gary R., Gary R. 
When you gonna give me some time, Sharia?
Ooh you make my motor run, my motor run. 
Gun it comin&#039; off the line Sharia
Never gonna stop, Gary R.. 
Such a dirty mind. Always get it up for the touch
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia...

Come a little closer huh, ah will ya huh. 
Close enough to look in my eyes, Sharia.
Keeping it a mystery gets to me
Running down the length of my thighs, Sharia
Never gonna stop, Gary R. Such a dirty mind. 
Always get it up for the touch
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia...

When you gonna give it to me, Gary R.. 
It is just a matter of time Sharia
Is it just destiny, destiny? 
Or is it just a game in my mind, Sharia?
Never gonna stop,Gary R.. 
Such a dirty mind. Always get it up for the touch
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh my little Gary R., Gary R.<br />
When you gonna give me some time, Sharia?<br />
Ooh you make my motor run, my motor run.<br />
Gun it comin&#8217; off the line Sharia<br />
Never gonna stop, Gary R..<br />
Such a dirty mind. Always get it up for the touch<br />
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia&#8230;</p>
<p>Come a little closer huh, ah will ya huh.<br />
Close enough to look in my eyes, Sharia.<br />
Keeping it a mystery gets to me<br />
Running down the length of my thighs, Sharia<br />
Never gonna stop, Gary R. Such a dirty mind.<br />
Always get it up for the touch<br />
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia&#8230;</p>
<p>When you gonna give it to me, Gary R..<br />
It is just a matter of time Sharia<br />
Is it just destiny, destiny?<br />
Or is it just a game in my mind, Sharia?<br />
Never gonna stop,Gary R..<br />
Such a dirty mind. Always get it up for the touch<br />
of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. M M M My Sharia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment on Heckuva Job &#62;&#62; Archive &#62;&#62;WTF Over &#62;&#62;Disgruntled Commenter Blog &#62;&#62; Comment by...</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593528</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment on Heckuva Job &#62;&#62; Archive &#62;&#62;WTF Over &#62;&#62;Disgruntled Commenter Blog &#62;&#62; Comment by...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593528</guid>
		<description>[...] We can haz nu post pleez?? [...] mucho pronto like maybeez [...] Kthxbye [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We can haz nu post pleez?? [...] mucho pronto like maybeez [...] Kthxbye [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593526</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593526</guid>
		<description>Is there some reason why you can&#039;t just disable &quot;TrackBack&quot; ?  From what I&#039;ve read Both sites have to have it enabled for the links to be generated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some reason why you can&#8217;t just disable &#8220;TrackBack&#8221; ?  From what I&#8217;ve read Both sites have to have it enabled for the links to be generated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuriousGeorge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593524</link>
		<dc:creator>FuriousGeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593524</guid>
		<description>I blame Hitlery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame Hitlery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedestrian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593507</link>
		<dc:creator>pedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593507</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, you finally get the windows to quit sticking and your apartment fills up with bees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, you finally get the windows to quit sticking and your apartment fills up with bees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593495</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593495</guid>
		<description>I for one look forward to my Shania Law overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one look forward to my Shania Law overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ruppert</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593493</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ruppert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9331.html#comment-593493</guid>
		<description>The fact is, America has the best health care in the world.  If you can&#039;t afford it and get sick, just shut up and leave.  We love it here in the Heartland, like everything else about our freedom and our great nation, unlike liberal eleitists who whine and want terrorists to impose Shania Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, America has the best health care in the world.  If you can&#8217;t afford it and get sick, just shut up and leave.  We love it here in the Heartland, like everything else about our freedom and our great nation, unlike liberal eleitists who whine and want terrorists to impose Shania Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

