<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wafflegate!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawnguylander</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-594237</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawnguylander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-594237</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;you idiots have doomed us all to another 4 years with a repug presnit. Morons.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you actually from the future?  And I don&#039;t mean 7 hours into the future but like, 7 months?  Forget the election, dood, who won the World Series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>you idiots have doomed us all to another 4 years with a repug presnit. Morons.</i></p>
<p>Are you actually from the future?  And I don&#8217;t mean 7 hours into the future but like, 7 months?  Forget the election, dood, who won the World Series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-594213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-594213</guid>
		<description>you idiots have doomed us all to another 4 years with a repug presnit.  Morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you idiots have doomed us all to another 4 years with a repug presnit.  Morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593994</link>
		<dc:creator>windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593994</guid>
		<description>El Cid:
&lt;i&gt;Shorter David Brooks, New York Times, Tuesday:&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;i&gt;I have to write a lot about the presidential political campaigns, which gets really dull. Wouldn’t it be cooler instead to imagine you were C. S. Lewis who in turn was imagining how medieval people looked at the night sky and stuff? That would be cool.&lt;/i&gt;

No, I guess you weren&#039;t exaggerating:

&quot;Without turning into an Arthurian cultist, it’s nice to look up from the latest YouTube campaign moment and imagine a sky populated with creatures, symbols and tales.&quot;

Yes, it&#039;s too bad that no one has dared imagine that kind of stuff since the time of that great medieval bard, Georg de Lucas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Cid:<br />
<i>Shorter David Brooks, New York Times, Tuesday:</i><br />
<i>I have to write a lot about the presidential political campaigns, which gets really dull. Wouldn’t it be cooler instead to imagine you were C. S. Lewis who in turn was imagining how medieval people looked at the night sky and stuff? That would be cool.</i></p>
<p>No, I guess you weren&#8217;t exaggerating:</p>
<p>&#8220;Without turning into an Arthurian cultist, it’s nice to look up from the latest YouTube campaign moment and imagine a sky populated with creatures, symbols and tales.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s too bad that no one has dared imagine that kind of stuff since the time of that great medieval bard, Georg de Lucas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593854</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593854</guid>
		<description>At least O&#039;bama wasn&#039;t caught eating French toast--er, Freedom toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least O&#8217;bama wasn&#8217;t caught eating French toast&#8211;er, Freedom toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMadClown</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593554</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMadClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593554</guid>
		<description>Gracias OneMan!  

Having reviewed it thoroughly, I have rendered my self-indulgent and unimportant verdict: Its crap, but not really sexist crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gracias OneMan!  </p>
<p>Having reviewed it thoroughly, I have rendered my self-indulgent and unimportant verdict: Its crap, but not really sexist crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593541</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593541</guid>
		<description>OMC, I believe there&#039;s a link to a larger pictures in the comments of the original blog post that is linked from here.  Er, that doesn&#039;t make any sense.  Follow the link above, read through the comments and you should find a linkey to a larger version of the picture.

And I used to subscribe to TNR until they got behind Bush and his Iraqian war.  That tore it for me, especially when the editorial content was &lt;i&gt;directly contradicted by&lt;/i&gt; the reporting.  It was like I was reading the WSJ and it made me want to puke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMC, I believe there&#8217;s a link to a larger pictures in the comments of the original blog post that is linked from here.  Er, that doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  Follow the link above, read through the comments and you should find a linkey to a larger version of the picture.</p>
<p>And I used to subscribe to TNR until they got behind Bush and his Iraqian war.  That tore it for me, especially when the editorial content was <i>directly contradicted by</i> the reporting.  It was like I was reading the WSJ and it made me want to puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMadClown</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593538</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMadClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593538</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a larger size pic of that TNR cover?  I&#039;m trying to read the thought bubbles -- just trying to be informed before making a decision on whether its terrible or terrible &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a larger size pic of that TNR cover?  I&#8217;m trying to read the thought bubbles &#8212; just trying to be informed before making a decision on whether its terrible or terrible <i>and</i> sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593530</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593530</guid>
		<description>o&#039;scrod - It&#039;s the picture of Hillary. It&#039;s obviously intended to make her look really, really bad. TNR is supposedly a liberal rag (funny you should call it &#039;NR&#039;, which mostly is used to refer to the National Review - they&#039;re not so different these days).

What that means is that it&#039;s not supposed to depict liberals, cheaply, in the worst possible light. Criticism is obviously fine, but for a serious, supposedly liberal policy magazine to run that photo is bottom-of-the-barrel stuff. It&#039;s as if the National Review or Weekly Standard ran a picture of monkeyboy Bush on their covers - they&#039;d never do it.

A few months ago, the Prospect ran a very unflattering photo of Giuliani on its cover. That&#039;s obviously different - the Prospect is against most everything he stands for.

So the point is, it&#039;s horrendous because it&#039;s a big giant fuck you from TNR to half its supposed allies, the people who back Hillary -- and in fact, a giant fuck you to even more people - people like me who back Obama but would support Hillary if she wins the nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o&#8217;scrod &#8211; It&#8217;s the picture of Hillary. It&#8217;s obviously intended to make her look really, really bad. TNR is supposedly a liberal rag (funny you should call it &#8216;NR&#8217;, which mostly is used to refer to the National Review &#8211; they&#8217;re not so different these days).</p>
<p>What that means is that it&#8217;s not supposed to depict liberals, cheaply, in the worst possible light. Criticism is obviously fine, but for a serious, supposedly liberal policy magazine to run that photo is bottom-of-the-barrel stuff. It&#8217;s as if the National Review or Weekly Standard ran a picture of monkeyboy Bush on their covers &#8211; they&#8217;d never do it.</p>
<p>A few months ago, the Prospect ran a very unflattering photo of Giuliani on its cover. That&#8217;s obviously different &#8211; the Prospect is against most everything he stands for.</p>
<p>So the point is, it&#8217;s horrendous because it&#8217;s a big giant fuck you from TNR to half its supposed allies, the people who back Hillary &#8212; and in fact, a giant fuck you to even more people &#8211; people like me who back Obama but would support Hillary if she wins the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593527</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593527</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the problem is so much with the article as with the cover, which plays to all of the sexist &quot;crazy woman&quot; stereotypes that we should be well beyond.

What&#039;s really horrendous is the degree to which the left has taken sides and is throwing around really damaging allegations.  And by damaging I&#039;m talking about the trivial crap that&#039;s going to hurt our side in the battle in November, when it &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the problem is so much with the article as with the cover, which plays to all of the sexist &#8220;crazy woman&#8221; stereotypes that we should be well beyond.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really horrendous is the degree to which the left has taken sides and is throwing around really damaging allegations.  And by damaging I&#8217;m talking about the trivial crap that&#8217;s going to hurt our side in the battle in November, when it <i>really</i> counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o'scrod</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593458</link>
		<dc:creator>o'scrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593458</guid>
		<description>Can we get this back to where it started - the New Republic article that D. Aristophanes calls horrendous. Apparently DA finds it horrendous because its portrayal of Clinton&#039;s campagne is sexist. I agree that Clinton has been subjected to sexist ridicule, e.g. she can&#039;t be President because she has fat legs and little sex-appeal. But I can&#039;t identify sexist ridicule in the NR article. There&#039;s discussion of Clinton&#039;s campaign organization and presentation of fairly convincing evidence drawn from interviews with insiders that the organization is a mess. The article asserts that Hilary is ultimately responsible for the mess. That&#039;s not sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get this back to where it started &#8211; the New Republic article that D. Aristophanes calls horrendous. Apparently DA finds it horrendous because its portrayal of Clinton&#8217;s campagne is sexist. I agree that Clinton has been subjected to sexist ridicule, e.g. she can&#8217;t be President because she has fat legs and little sex-appeal. But I can&#8217;t identify sexist ridicule in the NR article. There&#8217;s discussion of Clinton&#8217;s campaign organization and presentation of fairly convincing evidence drawn from interviews with insiders that the organization is a mess. The article asserts that Hilary is ultimately responsible for the mess. That&#8217;s not sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinko Punko</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593384</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinko Punko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593384</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you can flush SEIU down the toilet because of something some of their members did.  It is a gigantic union representing a lot of people working tough jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you can flush SEIU down the toilet because of something some of their members did.  It is a gigantic union representing a lot of people working tough jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneMan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593317</link>
		<dc:creator>OneMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593317</guid>
		<description>Gee, I&#039;d heard about these terists using the internets for their secret war planning but I never thought I&#039;d see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I&#8217;d heard about these terists using the internets for their secret war planning but I never thought I&#8217;d see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iranian navel general™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593274</link>
		<dc:creator>Iranian navel general™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593274</guid>
		<description>We sail tomorrow.

Hanx, CKTS, victory will be ours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We sail tomorrow.</p>
<p>Hanx, CKTS, victory will be ours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Kevlar Turban Supplier</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593260</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese Kevlar Turban Supplier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593260</guid>
		<description>Do not worry Iranian navel general but there is a slight problem with the kevlar turbans.

It turns out that, by a small miscalculation in the factory, the turbans are made of lead instead of kevlar, they&#039;re hollow, and the space is filled with a mix of mercury and roofies.

It should be fine...fine...as long as they aren&#039;t punctured.

Good luck with the invasion!

hugs, 
CKTS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not worry Iranian navel general but there is a slight problem with the kevlar turbans.</p>
<p>It turns out that, by a small miscalculation in the factory, the turbans are made of lead instead of kevlar, they&#8217;re hollow, and the space is filled with a mix of mercury and roofies.</p>
<p>It should be fine&#8230;fine&#8230;as long as they aren&#8217;t punctured.</p>
<p>Good luck with the invasion!</p>
<p>hugs,<br />
CKTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iranian navel general™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593251</link>
		<dc:creator>Iranian navel general™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593251</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t tell anyone, but I&#039;m actually from California.

Shania Law, bitches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t tell anyone, but I&#8217;m actually from California.</p>
<p>Shania Law, bitches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593249</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593249</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the Iranian navel general&lt;/i&gt;
He may well be the Great Orange Satan that you people go on about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the Iranian navel general</i><br />
He may well be the Great Orange Satan that you people go on about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rugged in Montana</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593219</link>
		<dc:creator>Rugged in Montana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593219</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Explain to me the nuts and bolts of “surrendering to the terrorists”. I mean, if one WANTED to, just exactly how would one go about it?&lt;/i&gt;

(sigh) Maybe you hadn&#039;t noticed that the USA of America has been barricaded by the Iranian Armada?  Both coasts are hemmed in by tens of thousands of Iranian aircraft carriers, the Rio Grande is filled from Baja to the Gulf with Iranian Coast Guard battle groups and the Great Lakes, along with that river that goes straight west from there (and makes our border with Canada) is chock-a-block with Iranian submarines disguised as fishing vessels and leisure craft. (Ignorant LIE-brul).

I would think that even a commie like you would grasp the idea of Ted Kennedy surrendering his sword on the deck of the Iranian flagship, the USS Sharia Law.  No?

Why do you think I constantly carry a fully erect M1 Battle Rifle™?  When the Billion man Iranian army storms ashore from those countless troop ships waiting menacingly offshore, they&#039;ll be headed straight for the heartland of the USA of America, with blood covered scimitars and kevlar turbans, killing anyone, including babies and infants, who  won&#039;t kneel down and worship an image of Allah on the cross.  These people are animals and will probably eat up everything at every local McDonald&#039;s, leaving *nothing* for the patriots of the heartland, save for the mayonaise packets (which they eschew on religious grounds).

Maybe it would be better to surrender.  There&#039;s no reason for us all to go hungry, maybe if we just said that we&#039;d promise to be good Muslins that they&#039;d just go home to their own McDonalds...I&#039;m just thinking of the safety of the heartland here.  We could give them Chuck Norris as a goodwill gesture (heh, though he&#039;d probably kick the Iranian navel general all the way back to Arabia!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Explain to me the nuts and bolts of “surrendering to the terrorists”. I mean, if one WANTED to, just exactly how would one go about it?</i></p>
<p>(sigh) Maybe you hadn&#8217;t noticed that the USA of America has been barricaded by the Iranian Armada?  Both coasts are hemmed in by tens of thousands of Iranian aircraft carriers, the Rio Grande is filled from Baja to the Gulf with Iranian Coast Guard battle groups and the Great Lakes, along with that river that goes straight west from there (and makes our border with Canada) is chock-a-block with Iranian submarines disguised as fishing vessels and leisure craft. (Ignorant LIE-brul).</p>
<p>I would think that even a commie like you would grasp the idea of Ted Kennedy surrendering his sword on the deck of the Iranian flagship, the USS Sharia Law.  No?</p>
<p>Why do you think I constantly carry a fully erect M1 Battle Rifle™?  When the Billion man Iranian army storms ashore from those countless troop ships waiting menacingly offshore, they&#8217;ll be headed straight for the heartland of the USA of America, with blood covered scimitars and kevlar turbans, killing anyone, including babies and infants, who  won&#8217;t kneel down and worship an image of Allah on the cross.  These people are animals and will probably eat up everything at every local McDonald&#8217;s, leaving *nothing* for the patriots of the heartland, save for the mayonaise packets (which they eschew on religious grounds).</p>
<p>Maybe it would be better to surrender.  There&#8217;s no reason for us all to go hungry, maybe if we just said that we&#8217;d promise to be good Muslins that they&#8217;d just go home to their own McDonalds&#8230;I&#8217;m just thinking of the safety of the heartland here.  We could give them Chuck Norris as a goodwill gesture (heh, though he&#8217;d probably kick the Iranian navel general all the way back to Arabia!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593183</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593183</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He would surrender to the terrrorists &lt;/i&gt;

I know.  I&#039;ve asked before.  But nobody&#039;s ever given me an answer.

So I&#039;ll ask again.

Explain to me the nuts and bolts of &quot;surrendering to the terrorists&quot;.  I mean, if one WANTED to, just exactly how would one go about it?

&#039;Cause I&#039;m not seeing it.  Wouldn&#039;t you have to wave a white flag or sign a article of surrender or hand over your weapons or &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt;?

Who would you surrender to?  Where would this surrender take place?  Afterwards, how would it work?

Please.  Take the fifteen minutes or whatever you need and explain this to me!  &#039;Cause I&#039;m pretty sure you can&#039;t...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He would surrender to the terrrorists </i></p>
<p>I know.  I&#8217;ve asked before.  But nobody&#8217;s ever given me an answer.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ll ask again.</p>
<p>Explain to me the nuts and bolts of &#8220;surrendering to the terrorists&#8221;.  I mean, if one WANTED to, just exactly how would one go about it?</p>
<p>&#8216;Cause I&#8217;m not seeing it.  Wouldn&#8217;t you have to wave a white flag or sign a article of surrender or hand over your weapons or <i>something</i>?</p>
<p>Who would you surrender to?  Where would this surrender take place?  Afterwards, how would it work?</p>
<p>Please.  Take the fifteen minutes or whatever you need and explain this to me!  &#8216;Cause I&#8217;m pretty sure you can&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorghagen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593168</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorghagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593168</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d like to see him crush a few reporters with his bare hands.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And then spread them over his waffles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d like to see him crush a few reporters with his bare hands.</p></blockquote>
<p>And then spread them over his waffles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagra</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593127</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9330.html#comment-593127</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Obama ate some bowling balls or crushed a few bricks with his bare hands I seriously doubt if any reporters would have the cojones to interrupt his breakfast.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to see him crush a few reporters with his bare hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Obama ate some bowling balls or crushed a few bricks with his bare hands I seriously doubt if any reporters would have the cojones to interrupt his breakfast.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see him crush a few reporters with his bare hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

