Comments on: The Actual Funniest Thing In The History Of The Universe

By: ScaryIntentions

ScaryIntentions — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:30:22 +0000

don’t mess with the Creator

By: Interrobang

Interrobang — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:37:04 +0000

The best anti-gotcha evidence for evolution -- nylon-eating bacteria.

By: eruvande

eruvande — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:31:01 +0000

Saul said, March 22, 2008 at 0:22 If it happens very slowly than how can it be proven? I think its far more logical to believe God Almighty’s account of the Creation in Genesis than it is to base your beliefs on a unprovable hunch. To be honest I don’t have enough faith to believe in evolution. I’m a simple ~~man which is why I choose to believe God at His Word.~~

Fixeded. (If the strike command worked.) Also, this.

By: The Dark Avenger

The Dark Avenger — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:00:29 +0000

Haeckel’s early version of this hypothesis (that the embryo mirrors adult evolutionary ancestors) has since been rejected, and the hypothesis amended as the embryo’s development mirroring embryos of its evolutionary ancestors.

From the Wikipedia article on Phylogenetics

By: Bitter Scribe

Bitter Scribe — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:12:37 +0000

It simply is not possible to make this shit up.

By: Prospero

Prospero — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:23:12 +0000

If men evolved from monkeys, why do we still have monkeys?

So that men could spank them, obviously.

By: Bill Frist

Bill Frist — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:29:38 +0000

One hundredth!

Zed?

By: Auguste

Auguste — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:34:07 +0000

Yeah, it’s darn near impossible for Jonah Goldberg to get head these days.

Fixed that for you.

By: jim

jim — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:59:32 +0000

Just when you thought the atavistic whackos might’ve run out of feet to shoot … BLAMMO!

Damn this is some lovely irony right here.
I believe the term I’m looking for is edutainment.
Learn while you giggle.

Also, kindly thank the troll for its own brand of edutainment, albeit minus the funny.

“I hope they found Dawkins and beat him up. That would have made me laugh.”

Wow.

Uh, you do know OTHER PEOPLE can read what you’re typing, right?
Richard Dawkins is what, in his 60s? 70s?
You’re even more of a sick sack of stupid than I thought.
Pull wings off flies in your spare time too, Bubba?

By: Tehanu

Tehanu — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:41:40 +0000

If men evolved from monkeys, why do we still have Saul and Gary?

By: justme

justme — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:37:28 +0000

Brandi said,
March 22, 2008 at 5:00

He did say human child.

Also, I get a little worried about people who are sort of unnaturally hung up on monkeysex.

If ya know what I mean.

By: justme

justme — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:35:12 +0000

SAP said,
March 22, 2008 at 2:45

Evolution is not a tide that lifts all boats, if ya know what I mean.

By: justme

justme — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:32:20 +0000

mikey,
hows about we point the ignorant thumbsucker at the panda’s cock?

http://www.allouttoons.com/simpsons/framegrabs/s12ep4/s12e056.jpg

By: Brandi

Brandi — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:00:12 +0000

It is impossible for two monkeys having intercourse to bear a human child. If it was possible why doesn’t it happen today?

And yet I can’t find any pictures of your parents.

By: rotwang

rotwang — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:54:38 +0000

Wow. Nothing brings out the “why-believe-in-science-when-talking-bushes-explain-everything” crowd like a good evolution thread.

Just FYI: I’ve “tuned” the Gary Ruppert algorithm somewhat so that it now employs occasional expressions of indignation and random flashes of “aggressively uninformed” argument, rather than the Mark I version’s predictably “Hal 9000″ voice, which was easily pegged as a “concern troll.”

With some beta shakedowns and refinements in the Boolean parameters, I’m hoping that the improved Gary Ruppert will be able to pass a Turing Test sometime in 4Q 2008.

By: Notorious P.A.T.

Notorious P.A.T. — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:39:42 +0000

Or even a common ancestor…

Well, if you think small changes over many generations can lead to new forms, then you’re just crazy talkin’.

Now, where are my rottweiler and my terrier?

By: mikey

mikey — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:37:15 +0000

Or even a common ancestor…

mikey

By: Notorious P.A.T.

Notorious P.A.T. — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:03:51 +0000

To me it makes far more scientific sense for mankind to be created as they are now by God than for mankind to have formed through the intercourse of an entirely different species!

Oh, I know! Human beings and chimpanzees only have 98.5% of their genetic code in common. Only a whacko would posit a relationship based upon that!

By: PeeJ

PeeJ — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:43:32 +0000

Then too, it *was* a Jesuit university and Professor Father Doctor whoever it was was a little loopy albeit brilliant.

By: PeeJ

PeeJ — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:42:26 +0000

That was where i learned the phrase, anyway.