<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Wingnut Mailbag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueHerald 2.0 - News You Can Abuse!</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-588255</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueHerald 2.0 - News You Can Abuse!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-588255</guid>
		<description>[...] on Dana Goldstein&#8217;s sage observation that Petraeus and Crocker at times deliberately confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with Bin Laden&#8217;s Al Qaeda. I&#8217;ll also link once again Gary Kamiya&#8217;s piece [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Dana Goldstein&#8217;s sage observation that Petraeus and Crocker at times deliberately confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with Bin Laden&#8217;s Al Qaeda. I&#8217;ll also link once again Gary Kamiya&#8217;s piece [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-582384</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-582384</guid>
		<description>Hey there. I&#039;m way late to the party. Preciate the plug :)

BTW, Devo rocks. 

Peace out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there. I&#8217;m way late to the party. Preciate the plug :)</p>
<p>BTW, Devo rocks. </p>
<p>Peace out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepoliticalcat</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-567957</link>
		<dc:creator>thepoliticalcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-567957</guid>
		<description>What someone else said about second person plural, which exists in many Asian languages, but not English, and therefore native speakers of the former often use y&#039;all, which is actually pronounced more like yuall, with very short vowels. So I&#039;m a y&#039;aller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What someone else said about second person plural, which exists in many Asian languages, but not English, and therefore native speakers of the former often use y&#8217;all, which is actually pronounced more like yuall, with very short vowels. So I&#8217;m a y&#8217;aller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Coelacanth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-564341</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Coelacanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-564341</guid>
		<description>&quot;performing songs like “Johnny Are You Queer?” in the early ’80s.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;Johnny Are You Queer&lt;/i&gt; was by Josie Cotton. Take it from someone who has watched Valley Girl within the last decade. Also, not that the Grammy&#039;s ever meant much, but the GoGos were the first female rock band to ever win a Grammy. &lt;i&gt;Going Down to Liverpool&lt;/i&gt; was a cover song? I never realized. You know they had Leonard Nemoy in the video, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;performing songs like “Johnny Are You Queer?” in the early ’80s.&#8221;</p>
<p><i>Johnny Are You Queer</i> was by Josie Cotton. Take it from someone who has watched Valley Girl within the last decade. Also, not that the Grammy&#8217;s ever meant much, but the GoGos were the first female rock band to ever win a Grammy. <i>Going Down to Liverpool</i> was a cover song? I never realized. You know they had Leonard Nemoy in the video, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562755</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562755</guid>
		<description>We do the gender-neutral &quot;you guys&quot; thing in Iowa too, Sam.  I kind of thought that was a midwestern thang.  

I love the Bangle&#039;s cover of &quot;Hazy Shade of Winter&quot;.  I actually like it better than the original.  It&#039;s got such a gloomy, mysterious vibe.  

I am quite fond of &quot;ain&#039;t&quot;.  I can take &quot;y&#039;all.&quot;  But that &quot;all y&#039;all&quot; thing?  That&#039;s full of shudder.

Crack that whip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do the gender-neutral &#8220;you guys&#8221; thing in Iowa too, Sam.  I kind of thought that was a midwestern thang.  </p>
<p>I love the Bangle&#8217;s cover of &#8220;Hazy Shade of Winter&#8221;.  I actually like it better than the original.  It&#8217;s got such a gloomy, mysterious vibe.  </p>
<p>I am quite fond of &#8220;ain&#8217;t&#8221;.  I can take &#8220;y&#8217;all.&#8221;  But that &#8220;all y&#8217;all&#8221; thing?  That&#8217;s full of shudder.</p>
<p>Crack that whip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562695</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562695</guid>
		<description>I know how the right-wing thinks...  the salitent point to them is that you are comparing al-Qaeda to Devo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know how the right-wing thinks&#8230;  the salitent point to them is that you are comparing al-Qaeda to Devo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoiseNick</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562460</link>
		<dc:creator>BoiseNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562460</guid>
		<description>BRAVO Sir !

a masterful and logical example to stymie the Bushit Chicken-hawk Delusion . 

But , Mr. Smarty-pants ,  whatda I do to get all the exploded &#039;n fetid Repiglican brain matter offa my seer-sucker suit , , , 

HMMmmmmmmM ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRAVO Sir !</p>
<p>a masterful and logical example to stymie the Bushit Chicken-hawk Delusion . </p>
<p>But , Mr. Smarty-pants ,  whatda I do to get all the exploded &#8216;n fetid Repiglican brain matter offa my seer-sucker suit , , , </p>
<p>HMMmmmmmmM ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562112</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562112</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are the Bushies that clueless, that incapable of self-assessment that they don’t realize its a song about a criminal about to be executed?&lt;/i&gt;

They have an irony barrier that encircles the White House. Kind of like the Cone of Solitude from Get Smart.

And just as effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are the Bushies that clueless, that incapable of self-assessment that they don’t realize its a song about a criminal about to be executed?</i></p>
<p>They have an irony barrier that encircles the White House. Kind of like the Cone of Solitude from Get Smart.</p>
<p>And just as effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitusmedius</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562101</link>
		<dc:creator>digitusmedius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562101</guid>
		<description>&quot;Zarquawi[,]was in fact the guest of Saddam.&quot;  Interesting phrasing for someone being under house arrest.  It&#039;s the way a dictator would put it, right?  &quot;He&#039;s my guest.&quot;  At least they&#039;ve stopped chewing on the bone that AQ was &quot;operating&quot; in NE Iraq.  There were AQ-like fighters up in the borderlands between Iran and Iraq and well beyond Saddam&#039;s reach due to the &quot;no-go zones&quot; set up after Gulf War I.  They were there because Saddam couldn&#039;t get there to eliminate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Zarquawi[,]was in fact the guest of Saddam.&#8221;  Interesting phrasing for someone being under house arrest.  It&#8217;s the way a dictator would put it, right?  &#8220;He&#8217;s my guest.&#8221;  At least they&#8217;ve stopped chewing on the bone that AQ was &#8220;operating&#8221; in NE Iraq.  There were AQ-like fighters up in the borderlands between Iran and Iraq and well beyond Saddam&#8217;s reach due to the &#8220;no-go zones&#8221; set up after Gulf War I.  They were there because Saddam couldn&#8217;t get there to eliminate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whipping It Good &#171; BIG INK</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562038</link>
		<dc:creator>Whipping It Good &#171; BIG INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562038</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#160;Good   The Sadly!Nofolk turn the bright light of 80s new wave music onto the Bush fiasco policy in the Middle East, to great effect. But wait! Which is the best DEVO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&nbsp;Good   The Sadly!Nofolk turn the bright light of 80s new wave music onto the Bush fiasco policy in the Middle East, to great effect. But wait! Which is the best DEVO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamFromUtah</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562015</link>
		<dc:creator>SamFromUtah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-562015</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;One advantage of “you all”—besides distinguishing the plural from the singular—is that it is gender neutral.&lt;/i&gt;

Interestingly, the usage of &quot;you guys&quot; in Utah is gender-neutral as well. The singular word &quot;guy&quot; is always masculine, as is the plural &quot;guys&quot; without the &quot;you&quot;, but I&#039;ve witnessed &quot;you guys&quot; being used to address a group of women and nobody but me thought it was odd. Utonics is a strange dialect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>One advantage of “you all”—besides distinguishing the plural from the singular—is that it is gender neutral.</i></p>
<p>Interestingly, the usage of &#8220;you guys&#8221; in Utah is gender-neutral as well. The singular word &#8220;guy&#8221; is always masculine, as is the plural &#8220;guys&#8221; without the &#8220;you&#8221;, but I&#8217;ve witnessed &#8220;you guys&#8221; being used to address a group of women and nobody but me thought it was odd. Utonics is a strange dialect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interrobang</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561969</link>
		<dc:creator>Interrobang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561969</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are the Bushies that clueless, that incapable of self-assessment that they don’t realize its a song about a criminal about to be executed? &lt;/i&gt;

Hmf.  These guys come from the same segment of the population that thinks &quot;Tie a Yellow Ribbon &#039;Round the Old Oak Tree&quot; is somehow about the same concept as &quot;The White Cliffs of Dover&quot; or even &quot;Leave the Dishes in the Sink, Ma&quot; (as in, &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a song about a stupid asshole begging his girl not to leave him while he&#039;s in the clink) and adopted the central symbol from it wholesale (prices cheaper by the gross, Made in China).  In other words, my money&#039;s on &quot;too clueless to know the difference and too entitled to care.&quot;

Which goes about double for the confusion between Al Qaeda and their wannabe cover band in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are the Bushies that clueless, that incapable of self-assessment that they don’t realize its a song about a criminal about to be executed? </i></p>
<p>Hmf.  These guys come from the same segment of the population that thinks &#8220;Tie a Yellow Ribbon &#8216;Round the Old Oak Tree&#8221; is somehow about the same concept as &#8220;The White Cliffs of Dover&#8221; or even &#8220;Leave the Dishes in the Sink, Ma&#8221; (as in, <i>not</i> a song about a stupid asshole begging his girl not to leave him while he&#8217;s in the clink) and adopted the central symbol from it wholesale (prices cheaper by the gross, Made in China).  In other words, my money&#8217;s on &#8220;too clueless to know the difference and too entitled to care.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which goes about double for the confusion between Al Qaeda and their wannabe cover band in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five of Diamonds</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561894</link>
		<dc:creator>Five of Diamonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561894</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bush never said Saddam and AQ were working together In fact, that was a lefty meme.&lt;/i&gt;

Bush in October of 2002:

&lt;i&gt;Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bush never said Saddam and AQ were working together In fact, that was a lefty meme.</i></p>
<p>Bush in October of 2002:</p>
<p><i>Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbear</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561862</link>
		<dc:creator>gbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561862</guid>
		<description>RBub, I&#039;ve got four original albums by Rhodes and another collection of songs he did with a band called The Merry Go Round. I found out about him in the mid 70&#039;s because a local bar band was doing a cover of a GREAT song called &#039;Really Wanted You&#039;. Even back then I had to scour the used and cut-out bins to find his music. I&#039;m not a fan of all of his musings (he can be self-indulgent), but his best songs are as good as Beatle&#039;s style pop gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBub, I&#8217;ve got four original albums by Rhodes and another collection of songs he did with a band called The Merry Go Round. I found out about him in the mid 70&#8242;s because a local bar band was doing a cover of a GREAT song called &#8216;Really Wanted You&#8217;. Even back then I had to scour the used and cut-out bins to find his music. I&#8217;m not a fan of all of his musings (he can be self-indulgent), but his best songs are as good as Beatle&#8217;s style pop gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J—</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561810</link>
		<dc:creator>J—</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561810</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&quot; is our second person plural.  Its problem is that it can easily be confused with the second person singular.  One advantage of &quot;you all&quot;—besides distinguishing the plural from the singular—is that it is gender neutral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8221; is our second person plural.  Its problem is that it can easily be confused with the second person singular.  One advantage of &#8220;you all&#8221;—besides distinguishing the plural from the singular—is that it is gender neutral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561809</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561809</guid>
		<description>My take on Devo 2.0: If it allows me to introduce my kids to Devo&#039;s music -- and then to actual real Grade A Number One Devo (from Ohio) -- that can only be a Good Thing.

More often, these days, I&#039;m subverting my son&#039;s dominant paradigm with Apples in Stereo, Little Man Tate and Richard Thompson&#039;s phenomenal live acoustic rendition of the Britney Spears magnum opus &quot;Oops...I Did It Again.&quot;.  Anything to wean him away from High School Musical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on Devo 2.0: If it allows me to introduce my kids to Devo&#8217;s music &#8212; and then to actual real Grade A Number One Devo (from Ohio) &#8212; that can only be a Good Thing.</p>
<p>More often, these days, I&#8217;m subverting my son&#8217;s dominant paradigm with Apples in Stereo, Little Man Tate and Richard Thompson&#8217;s phenomenal live acoustic rendition of the Britney Spears magnum opus &#8220;Oops&#8230;I Did It Again.&#8221;.  Anything to wean him away from High School Musical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561801</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561801</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; have heard “all y’all”, but I’ve never heard y’all as singular, except in movies with corny Southern stereotypes&lt;/i&gt;

I have heard people address an individual as &quot;y&#039;all&quot; here in Texas. I&#039;ve even called them on it, and they get just as huffy as if I&#039;d corrected a split infinitive or cited the Supreme Court ruling on &quot;Lie v. Lay&quot; again. 

And &quot;all y&#039;all&quot; is claimed to be an &quot;emphasis&quot; phrase, but there&#039;s not really a clear or obvious usage pattern I&#039;ve been able to parse out. 

Bottom line: Yes, we need a second person plural pronoun. Yes, &quot;y&#039;all&quot; often serves that function. And yes, as soon as we make &quot;y&#039;all&quot; official, one-third of the population will be found to be using it wrong in spoken English. cause we&#039;re like that.

And, I have to ask, since this is apparantly destined to become a running gag:

&lt;i&gt; Her Majesty was standing there with the tea-pot asking “Would you layke unnnh or hnnnh with your tay?” I had her repeat it — still couldn’t understand her. Then I had the wit to say, “What’s the difference?”&lt;/i&gt;

Am I the only one who has NO FUCKING CLUE what &quot;unnnnh&quot; or &quot;hnnnnh&quot; were supposed to be in that delightful WFB anecdote? I mean, how can I laugh at the poor enunciation of the undereducated underclass if I don&#039;t know what their they are supposed to be saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> have heard “all y’all”, but I’ve never heard y’all as singular, except in movies with corny Southern stereotypes</i></p>
<p>I have heard people address an individual as &#8220;y&#8217;all&#8221; here in Texas. I&#8217;ve even called them on it, and they get just as huffy as if I&#8217;d corrected a split infinitive or cited the Supreme Court ruling on &#8220;Lie v. Lay&#8221; again. </p>
<p>And &#8220;all y&#8217;all&#8221; is claimed to be an &#8220;emphasis&#8221; phrase, but there&#8217;s not really a clear or obvious usage pattern I&#8217;ve been able to parse out. </p>
<p>Bottom line: Yes, we need a second person plural pronoun. Yes, &#8220;y&#8217;all&#8221; often serves that function. And yes, as soon as we make &#8220;y&#8217;all&#8221; official, one-third of the population will be found to be using it wrong in spoken English. cause we&#8217;re like that.</p>
<p>And, I have to ask, since this is apparantly destined to become a running gag:</p>
<p><i> Her Majesty was standing there with the tea-pot asking “Would you layke unnnh or hnnnh with your tay?” I had her repeat it — still couldn’t understand her. Then I had the wit to say, “What’s the difference?”</i></p>
<p>Am I the only one who has NO FUCKING CLUE what &#8220;unnnnh&#8221; or &#8220;hnnnnh&#8221; were supposed to be in that delightful WFB anecdote? I mean, how can I laugh at the poor enunciation of the undereducated underclass if I don&#8217;t know what their they are supposed to be saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561791</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561791</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://righteousbubba.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-didnt-i-know-about-emitt-rhodes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I only recently heard Emitt Rhodes.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://righteousbubba.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-didnt-i-know-about-emitt-rhodes.html" rel="nofollow">I only recently heard Emitt Rhodes.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djur</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561785</link>
		<dc:creator>Djur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561785</guid>
		<description>Andrew Gill: Hell, pretty much the blueprint for Devo 2.0 was present in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=tXyoMMAQ7U8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Through Being Cool&lt;/a&gt; video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Gill: Hell, pretty much the blueprint for Devo 2.0 was present in the <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=tXyoMMAQ7U8" rel="nofollow">Through Being Cool</a> video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew A. Gill, SLS</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561772</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew A. Gill, SLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9029.html#comment-561772</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Having said that, the whole DEVO 2.0 thing depresses me as it seems like a pointless degradation of the band’s legacy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is a point.  Devo is the De-Evolutionary band.  After Kent State, it appeared that we were all de-evolving back to apes.

Devo would show us the ways in which we were all de-evolving.  Booji Boy and General Boy, Jocko Homo Heavenbound, a lot of the cliched lyrics that they use--it&#039;s all to show de-evolution.

What better way to show de-evolution than to have a bunch of tweens sing cleaned-up versions of your song for Walt-freaking-Disney?  Or &lt;a href=&quot;//windowsmedia.dvlabs.com/adcritic/swiffer-swiffermom.asf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a Swiffer ad&lt;/a&gt;? (that&#039;s Mothersbaugh doing the revised vocals)

It occurred to me a while back that it is logically impossible for Devo to sell out, since selling out would prove their original point.

That&#039;s not to say that I like listening to Devo 2.0. (I do listen to it in rare cases where I want to be traumatized)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Having said that, the whole DEVO 2.0 thing depresses me as it seems like a pointless degradation of the band’s legacy.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is a point.  Devo is the De-Evolutionary band.  After Kent State, it appeared that we were all de-evolving back to apes.</p>
<p>Devo would show us the ways in which we were all de-evolving.  Booji Boy and General Boy, Jocko Homo Heavenbound, a lot of the cliched lyrics that they use&#8211;it&#8217;s all to show de-evolution.</p>
<p>What better way to show de-evolution than to have a bunch of tweens sing cleaned-up versions of your song for Walt-freaking-Disney?  Or <a href="//windowsmedia.dvlabs.com/adcritic/swiffer-swiffermom.asf" rel="nofollow">a Swiffer ad</a>? (that&#8217;s Mothersbaugh doing the revised vocals)</p>
<p>It occurred to me a while back that it is logically impossible for Devo to sell out, since selling out would prove their original point.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that I like listening to Devo 2.0. (I do listen to it in rare cases where I want to be traumatized)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

