Comments on: The Beast is Red, Chapter 4: In a Mad Frenzy, Stinging Themselves to Eternal Death

By: Tnx's you guide me oh my lord,coz now very confuse that how can i survive my daily,and my heart pain to do things again that i cant accept as what i am now...thank you very much!you save me!but wheres that mart?

Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:09:02 +0000

Tnx’s for guide me,hope its true now,pls.im tired,my mind,my soul,so pls.guide and help,tnx’s!

By: As sick as it gets: Cheney gets standing ovation for torture, at CPAC « Over the line, Smokey!

Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:44:59 +0000

[...] From Sadly, No!, a description of these maniacs. I’m sorry, but I don’t recognize conservatism in this stuff. It’s just sickness. Weirdly enough – or maybe not so much – his defense of torture gets a standing ovation, but his praising of our fighting men in uniform does not. [...]

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:37:57 +0000

and Brusssel Sprouts.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:35:01 +0000

I find it strange that any organization would invite someone to their convention that would sit on several VIP panels if they had the slightest notion he would draw boos from the crowd.

You mean like John McCain?

By: Doug Watts

Doug Watts — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:01:18 +0000

Advantage, Pierce.

By: Smiling Mortician

Smiling Mortician — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:54:55 +0000

No single phrase should involve “meaningless,” “gibberish,” and “trebuchets.” To combine the three is unlogical.

Oh, and I just finished a dinner of stuffed PNW salmon and baby spinach salad with avocadoes and goat cheese.

Another dram of Glenmorangie, anyone?

By: Smut Clyde

Smut Clyde — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:41:23 +0000

I didn’t realize the comments section here was for circle jerking only.
That’s so not true. The commentariat also tolerate whisky-tasting notes, culinary reports, and any meaningless gibberish involving trebuchets.

By: Hollywood ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©

Hollywood ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:04:44 +0000

Derek reminds me of someone…libvet.

1) I’m one of you, but…
2) Are you all st00pid?
3) Stop with the ad hominem attacks, you st00pid lieberal fukcz!
4) And then it’s off into Dennis the Peasant mode for the next hundred posts….”Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.”

D00d, you’re boring. Go play in the traffic.

By: Smiling Mortician

Smiling Mortician — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:02:47 +0000

Well, he was, billy p., but he had to dash off to the check-cashing place to fill his wallet with sweet, sweet sustenance from Brian McLaughlin.

By: billy pilgrim

billy pilgrim — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:32:05 +0000

Two bucks says Derek is blogging at or near a computer with Booger-prints on it.

By: Derek

Derek — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:27:10 +0000

…writes LIKE a high schooler…

By: Derek

Derek — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:26:07 +0000

You’re right. That analogy is totally 100% appropriate, assuming I work for a company that is dedicated exclusively to insulting people every single day. At least one of them writes a high schooler reading his first Adbusters, but they’re big boys, kiki, they can take it.

By: kiki

kiki — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:56:55 +0000

kiki, way to prove that liberals aren’t intolerant of criticism by… blindly dismissing my criticism with an ad hominem.

And way to counter my point by… doing exactly the same thing that I was just berating you for.

Also, you might want to look up “ad hominem”, because my post wasn’t it. It was a specific criticism of your behaviour, to wit: transparent concern trolling.

Let’s put it this way: Imagine that somebody from your 200-strong workplace, a near-total stranger, walks up to you and says: “Hey, Derek! I know you don’t know me, but I’ve always watched you and thought you were the coolest guy ever! I mean, you are just awesome! But the last couple of days, you’ve been acting like a fucking asshole, you fucking asshole! What’s up with that? Why don’t you go back to being the super-awesome guy that I totally loved, you fucking piece of shit?”

What would you think? Well, you’d obviously think, “Who the fuck is this dickhead?” But you also might think, “Hmm, maybe this person isn’t being entirely honest about how cool they thought I was before! Maybe they’re just someone who wants to fuck with me, but wants to confuse the issue by pretending to be a ‘concerned’ friend!”

Just, y’know, for your consideration.

By: owlbear1

owlbear1 — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:42:14 +0000

Mocking and laughing at stupid Republicans = Liberal Fascism.

That does sum it up…

Thanks Derek.

By: Derek

Derek — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:41:34 +0000

kiki, way to prove that liberals aren’t intolerant of criticism by… blindly dismissing my criticism with an ad hominem.

By: kiki

kiki — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:13:46 +0000

Dare I say… liberal fascism?!

Only if I dare say: “intelligence-insultingly transparent trollery, right down to the ‘so-called liberals are so intolerant of criticism’ bullshit”.

By: Ed

Ed — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:10:53 +0000

The domain americanmilksolidscouncil.org is available for registration. (Hey, maybe you should have set it up beforehand in case any of the zombie hordes try to Google you.)

By: Hysterical Woman

Hysterical Woman — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:12:37 +0000

Niger? That is an incredibly unfortunate name.

By: Brian McLaughlin

Brian McLaughlin — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:11:46 +0000

I am glad that you admitted the truth about Niger not being the only African American on the stage. As far as the applause levels, I suggest that your readers judge by themselves and go to the CPAC website(unless you have posted yours.) They should have the video available soon. I find it strange that any organization would invite someone to their convention that would sit on several VIP panels if they had the slightest notion he would draw boos from the crowd.

By: Derek

Derek — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:50:57 +0000

Leonard, thanks for filling my request and once again mentioning the fact that you were on drugs. Encore!