Wrong twice, in two sentences! Interesting record. Let’s continue.

“The left talks energy independence, but there can be no real energy independence, except reversion to stone age lifestyles.”

I see! We can’t develop solar, geothermal, wind or water power, because those things don’t work, even though they already do.

Pray continue.

“This is transparently true, but all you lefties refuse to acknowledge, because your mommies and daddies paid your way through adulthood, and now what?”

What, they paid for me through adulthood? That’s funny – I could swear I spent years working minimum wage jobs to pay for school.

“You’re morally justified for life, just hit that button with your paw, over and over and over, without thinking, and you’re AOK no problem. What shit. You fucktards.”

You, on the other hand, sound like you have no need to justify yourself, and you certainly have no axe to grind.

So, since you’ve been wrong at a rate of at least once per sentence so far, let me recommend taking up a blog in Opposite Land. Or becoming David Brooks’ editor.

Only the most powerfully artifical denials can keep them going..but, with bipartisan politeness, Bush is treated and feted until he is unaware of the contempt he is instilling in sensible people.

so.. here is the ironic joke: Is Wal-Mart selling Hitler Smiley Faces?

rhethorical.. sadly,

Never would have happened if the French had hocked their assets to the Chinese, like prudent Americans!

Unless your local prosecutor were prosecuting Jose Padilla.

Yeah, teh Load now has has least seven new assholes as a result.

But for real funny (not funny ‘ha ha,’ but funny ‘peculiar’), here’s a long sentence by teh Cockslapper:

I haven’t yet read Jonah’s book, though the excerpts I’ve read seem diligently researched and forcefully argued — which, ironically, were we not living in an age of Liberal Fascism, would provide the intellectual basis for a serious political discussion rather than a determined smear campaign by those on the left so fearful of having a cherished identity marker (”Liberal”) tethered to a signifier they themselves presume to wield against their political enemies (”fascism”) that they have been driven to near frenzy in their efforts to dismiss the book out of hand.

Yeah, Cockslapper’s big on serious political discussion.

Via Tom Tomorrow.

Oh, how sad for you that you have missed this opportunity to serve…”

It just goes to show that Operation Yellow Elephant remains of vital importance to the war effort.

However since we are already there we might as well give it a shot.

That’s a mighty big ‘we’ there! Why don’t YOU give it a shot, Bastion! Go enlist, and kill Al Qaeda! It’s your calling!

Oh? What’s this you say? A trick knee? An ingrowing *what* on your backside?

Oh, how sad for you that you have missed this opportunity to serve…

Senator Blutarski was a Republican???????

pedestrian said,

January 24, 2008 at 20:13

I believe that it also underlines the urgent need for more tax cuts.

…and also the need to make permanent Bush’s tax cuts, which were set to expire in 2010. Crazy liburals and their “logic” will tell you that this won’t do much to help a problem that’s occurring now, but the fact is, Bush’s tax cuts were so powerful, that they’re able to transcend the time-space continuum and fix the present situation.

I believe that it also underlines the urgent need for more tax cuts.

El Cid said,

January 24, 2008 at 18:25

Ah, the free market, free of burdensome government regulation, even in over-regulated France, where one man is reported to have defrauded the country’s largest bank of $7 BILLION.

It’s because of the over-regulated market that he was able to defraud the bank of that much money. If France were only a free market, that would’ve never happened because the Magical Invisible Hand of the Market™ would’ve stopped him right away… or something like that. Indeed, this is central to my point.

The fact is, that I’ve got BDS, which I think all reasonable people can agree is indeed central to my point which has been made with such tender care and probing thoroughness.