18
Certain things deserve to be read again

Yes, they do-dilly-do. I’m just catching up on everything I’ve missed at the blog this week, and I think this amazing quote from the early National Review about the dangers of uppity commie Negroes does indeed bear revisiting:
Let us gently say the fiend who set off the bomb does not have the sympathy of the white population in the South; in fact, he set back the cause of the white people there so dramatically as to raise the question whether in fact the explosion was the act of a provocateur — of a Communist, or of a crazed Negro.
Can you imagine if they’d had blogs back then? You’d have Charles Johnson* examining every still of the blown-up churches looking for evidence of enhanced smoke. You’d have Michelle Malkin publishing articles in the New York Post mocking the press for over-reporting the bombings and gloating that the church was “still standing.” And you’d have Frank Gaffney penning a bunch of baseless BS for FOX News about Saddam Hussein being the REAL culprit behind the bombings.
Sigh. Life is terrible.
*Copy’n'paste the linky here:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=21956_Reuters_Doctoring_Photos_from_Beirut&only)






actor212 said,
January 18, 2008 at 22:59
That Islamofascist Martin Luther King Jr would be investigated as a possible front for Al Qaeda.
Nimrod Gently said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:00
If they’d had blogs back then we wouldn’t be here now.
Gundamhead said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:08
Yeah, well just remember that you Liberals are the real racists. That quote may at first seem to undermine my assertion, but in fact only strengthens my argument. Indeed, it is central to my point.
billy pilgrim said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:09
History is Fascism.
albany layman said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:16
Fascism is history is fascism.
Thursday said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:17
But getting better.
Knowing history, knowing science, knowing the world as it as and as it was, tell me:
Is there any place, any time you’d rather be?
Besides, without the blogs, how would we all get to see Doughbob Loadpants have his travesty of a book shredded into Liberal Confetti, from the Space Needle to Times Square ?
That’s got to be worth something!
Arky - Chuthuhlusexual said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:19
Later they would realize it was more efficient to assume all “Crazed Negroes” were Commies.
This also allowed the CIA to sprinkle taps, here, there and every where.
Christ. How did they explain photos of lynchings? Crazed Negroes painted to look like white people dance around their latest victim, a nice young white man painted to look like a black man.
Boy Called Sue said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:20
“Set back the cause of the white race”? You mean the effort to subjugate or drive out minorities?
This wasn’t some grand struggle for lost ideals, no matter how much they thought it was. This was looking for an excuse to kill someone to assuage feelings of desperation and frustration.
Nimrod Gently said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:21
Yes, that is what they mean.
g said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:24
Yeah, well just remember that you Liberals are the real racists.
Nuh uh. I are a fascist. Can’t you be consistent?
Snort said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:25
Let us ungently say the fiends who elected the Boosh do not have the sympathy of the population of America,in fact, they set back the cause of the American people so dramatically as to raise the question whether in fact the election was an act of provocateurs .
-of Communists or of crazed Islamobalamo fascists.
pedestrian said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:25
If Pammy could sober up long enough to write a full page, I would expect her to churn out something like:
Genocidal Muslims: Why All Followers of Islam Deserve to be Systematically Eliminated.
It would be pretty easy to write it as satire, in fact, but after J-Load, I worry that Americans are really that credulous.
Snort said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:37
g said, maybe yar a frascist. Fracist?
Gundamhead said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:40
“Can’t you be consistent?”
You are obviously to knowledgeable to offer a fair critique of my post.
The demand that I be consistent only exposes your fascist sympathies.
In fact, I would say my inconsistency only strengthens my argument. Indeed, my inconsistency is central to my point.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:43
Well, it was central, but it’s not anymore. That’s the beauty of it! And if you can’t see that, I don’t have time to respond to your deeply shallow, seriously unserious critique.
roger said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:46
Maybe Lee Siegel is right….
We are all digital Stalinist Fascist lynchmobists now.
sprezawhatsit said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:56
Lee Siegel is definitely right.
Arky - Chuthuhlusexual said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:58
Define “Central” “to” “my” and “point.”
While you’re at it, define “and” “define” “while” “you’re” “at” “it” and “”"”
actor212 said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:59
It’s a fascist! It’s a racist! Yes, it’s the latest product from Ronco! The LIBERAL!
Jules said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:00
The New York Post was a liberal newspaper back in those days.
Duros62 said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:01
Indeed, my inconsistency is central to my point.
Well, ….yeah, I got that. Indeed, it radiates from a central point and permeates every aspect of the universe.
Jay said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:02
If there were bloggers back then, one of them would’ve embedded a video like this.
Boyyeeee!
Snort said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:05
My incontinence weakens my Depends. Indeed my inctontinence is central to where I point it.
Snort said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:08
Where’s Spellcheck?
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:09
Oops. I posted this on the older thread. Of course, I posted it a while back, too. But I think now it deserves a repeat* since I haven’t noticed anyone else pointing this out.
If I were being unkind, I might suggest that people ask Jonah Goldberg why he felt it necessary to revive the theoretical burps of Josef Stalin; does he not realize that reviving Stalin might make the ghost of Ronald Reagan cry?
*Note: Although I am admittedly being self-referential in this comment, I am not primarily doing so to flog audio clips which are supposedly sagely satirical, so I think it’s okay.
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:11
Where’s Spellcheck?
Over at the union hall picking a fight with the spelling Nazis.
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:12
Let the world note that El Cid can do anything he pleases with my pixels.
The World said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:20
Let the world note that El Cid can do anything he pleases with my pixels.
Noted. Now get a room.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:23
If I were being unkind, I might suggest that people ask Jonah Goldberg why he felt it necessary to revive the theoretical burps of Josef Stalin; …
Not that I would ever cite Wikipedia as the basis of an argument, but assuming you can find a more respectable source, let me know and I’ll write an editorial somewhere about Jonah Goldberg’s revival of Stalinist polemics… :)
I’d love to run with this theme…
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:33
The Negro is the white male of liberal fascism.
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:34
Shalom, gentlemen.
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:35
Shalom Gary! Er, Bastion. Er, SAUL, Saul, sorry. What’s new?
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:37
The truth is, it is you liberals who are being shredded by the insisive logic of Goldberg, who is valiantly defending America from you, the enemy within. Soon the media will be balanced out, you will shut up, and America will get Pride back.
Gary Ruppert said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:38
The fact is, liberals have never used any facts to support their arguments at all, not logic. They shout, cry, emote and use threats, whereas the Conservatives here in the Heartland are firmly in the right because we are better informed and educated, as well as using facts and logic.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:40
“Soon the media will be balanced out, you will shut up, and America will get Pride back.
How very un-fascist…
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:40
America will get Pride back.
Pride America would be quite a party.
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:43
Pride goeth before a fall.
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:44
Is Pride anything like the America Cup? Or did we get that back?
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:45
From World O’Crap: ” Townhall.com::ENG 317: “How Not To Be Gay”::By Mike S. Adams”
They’ve got some Strong Stomachs over there.
Jerkstore said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:46
Christ. How did they explain photos of lynchings?
A bunch of Crazed Negros ruining perfectly good rope.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:46
“Pride goeth before a fall.”
I always thought that was one of the funniest things after 9/11, seeing all the wingnuts driving around with their “Power of Pride” USA sticker/magnets and knowing – just knowing – that most of them were also nutty Xtian types who seemed completely oblivious to the idea that pride is one of the worst sins (if you subscribe to that sort of thing…).
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:49
Christ. How did they explain photos of lynchings?
Err…mumble mumble KKK were Democrats OH MY GOD LOOK OVER THERE! (shoves head in Cheeto bag to hide)
Ripley said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:50
and America will get Pride back.
Two thoughts:
1 – Gay Pride? Black Pride? What are we talking about here?
2 – What about Prejudice? Or are you talking about the condensed version?
Arky - Chuthuhlusexual said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:51
Well you see LiberalFascist, Jesus was talking to Jews, Christians hadn’t been invented yet. So it is wrong for Jewish people to commit the sin of pride, especially when a bunch of snake handling wankstains burn down their synagogue.
Gundamhead said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:51
Let us gently say that Gary and Saul does not have the sympathy of the heartland; in fact, they set back the cause of the heartland so dramatically as to raise the question whether in fact the posts was the act of a provocateur — of a European, or of a crazed Coastal Elitist.
Gundamhead said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:56
“I always thought that was one of the funniest things after 9/11, seeing all the wingnuts driving around with their “Power of Pride” USA sticker/magnets and knowing – just knowing – that most of them were also nutty Xtian types who seemed completely oblivious to the idea that pride is one of the worst sins (if you subscribe to that sort of thing…).”
That’s different because…umm, it is. Shut up!
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:58
What would count as a more respectable source? The actual texts of Comintern Central Committee output from 1934 is not quite web accessible yet.
Perhaps I could quote from one Jonah Goldberg, writing for the National Review but posted by the Center for American Cultural Renewal, who is convinced that this only strengthens his point:
It’s precious because he sneers at the foolish Marxist secular in-tie-lekshul minions who, ha ha, come up with some orthodoxy that the New Deal types were really fascist, and besides, it was all about the dictates of that lunatic Stalin who just made up whatever definitions and labels he wanted.
And then Jo’butt goes write along and after much delay publishes a 400+ page book, and guess what? Goldsphincter finds that those New Dealers really were a bunch of fascists, and he ends up totally agreeing with Josef Stalin
Except for one tiny detail, except for Jobeak it’s EVERYTHING: Stalin said that the bad fascists were from the right. I say they’re from the left. OTHER THAN THAT, sure, they’re pretty much in agreement.
You can also check into Frank Warren’s Liberals and Communism: The Red Decade Revisited, but since it’s a Google page image, I can’t reproduce it here.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 0:58
Arky – Chuthuhlusexual said: Well you see LiberalFascist, Jesus was talking to Jews, Christians hadn’t been invented yet. So it is wrong for Jewish people to commit the sin of pride, especially when a bunch of snake handling wankstains burn down their synagogue.
Ahhhh…. that makes more sense. Damn, its rough being a Jew, I can’t even be proud of being a Liberal Fascist… :(
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:00
That’s different because…umm, it is. Shut up!
Well reasoned and insightful, thank you for clarifying all of that for me. :)
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:02
Ahhhh…. that makes more sense. Damn, its rough being a Jew, I can’t even be proud of being a Liberal Fascist… :(
If it makes you feel any better, white guys like me are the you of liberal fascism. So, now I like, totally sympathize with like your plight and stuff? With like being rounded up and put on trains and worked in slave camps until you died of malnourishment while your children were gassed? Because, like, seriously, there are like TWO Whole Foods markets within like a mile of me! Can I get one of those cool number tattoos by the way?
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:06
El Cid: It’s precious because he sneers at the foolish Marxist secular in-tie-lekshul minions who, ha ha, come up with some orthodoxy that the New Deal types were really fascist, and besides, it was all about the dictates of that lunatic Stalin who just made up whatever definitions and labels he wanted.
LOL, this is just too damn much. I mean, like, is there anyone – anyone at all – that really thinks he has &^$% clue?
You can also check into Frank Warren’s Liberals and Communism: The Red Decade Revisited, but since it’s a Google page image, I can’t reproduce it here.
Thanks for the reference, I’ll check into it.
Incontinentia Buttocks said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:10
Not that I would ever cite Wikipedia as the basis of an argument, but assuming you can find a more respectable source, let me know and I’ll write an editorial somewhere about Jonah Goldberg’s revival of Stalinist polemics… :)
In this case, Wikipedia is right on target. The use of the term “social fascist” by Communists during the so-called Third Period really is common knowledge.
But if you want other sources, here is an old historical article about the term “social fascism.” And here is a recent attempt to revive the concept (courtesy of a Stalinist website…now there’s something you don’t see every day!). And here‘s Stalin’s own “Concerning the International Situation” (1924), in which the Man o’ Steel writes:
Cribbing off of Stalin might, at first, appear embarrassing to teh Pantload. But, in fact, it is central to his point.
Gary Ruppert said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:11
The fact is, none of your arguments are reasoned, none of your discourse is balanced, and you have yet to convince me that liberalism is good for anything but losers and terrorists. You are like monkeys throwing your feces.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:13
If it makes you feel any better, white guys like me are the you of liberal fascism.
You know, even more shocking is the supposition that when it comes right down to it, most Jewish guys I know – including myself – just happen to be …
… wait for it…
“white guys” like you too! OMG! WTF!
So like, if you’re me (a Jew of Liberal Fascism) – and I’m you (a white guy), does this mean we’re like related or something? If so maybe you can fill in at my nephew’s bris next month? :)
Gary Ruppert said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:14
Besides, what is wrong with White Pride? Why do all the minorities get to celebrate their “diversity” and shove it in our face for one month a year, when we, the white men, who built America, and who keep it prosperous and safe, have to play the background? Here in the Heartland, we are about fed up, and want to take back our nation for God and stop genetic mixing that is watering down the racial stock that made us great. You liberal scum and your immigrant friends are doing your dirty work over generations and decades, but we are wise. We are on to you.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:14
“How Not To Be Gay”::By Mike S. Adams”
Is that Dr. Mike S. Adams, PhD?
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:15
Google scholar has plenty of articles referencing social fascism and Stalin if you have JSTOR access and the like.
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:16
I’ve noticed that leftists are always angry about something. Why not shut up and work harder?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:16
Oh, ick. Gary always goes overboard and stops being funny.
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:17
Shalom.
Crazed Negro said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:19
The white male Jew is the feminazi of the world.
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:20
“How Not To Be Gay”::By Mike S. Adams”
Is that Dr. Mike S. Adams, PhD?
Yes, they’re “doing” him and Bozol too, over there.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:22
Saul: Why not shut up and work harder?
I think you meant to post this over at Pammie’s little blog. We tried to tell her she needs to get a job, but she didn’t like that idea very much…
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:24
The white male Jew is the feminazi of the world.
Ahhh, at long last, something that finally makes a little sense. Thanks!
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:24
America will get Pride back
Here’s some Pride for you! I like the Jazzy model.
[actually, time out for non-snarkism - they have testimonials from some Iraq war vets who need to use these things.]
J— said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:28
Here’s another.
Karl Radek at the Soviet Writers Congress in 1934.
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:31
we, the white men, who built America
It’s true, those injuns, coloreds and chinamen weren’t gonna whip themselves into getting the job done!
and who keep it prosperous and safe
We’re in a recession and you let Arabs destroy the Twin Towers. You suck at your job.
Here in the Heartland, we are about fed up, and want to take back our nation for God and stop genetic mixing that is watering down the racial stock that made us great.
Priority #1: No more intermarriages with the damn Irish!
You liberal scum and your immigrant friends are doing your dirty work over generations and decades, but we are wise.
If we’ve been getting away with it for generations and decades, I’d say we’re pretty wise too! (High fives a Mexican)
We are on to you.
Oh, behave!
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:40
The truth is, you liberals and your multi-cultural agent provocutors Al Sharpton and Jesse “affirmative action” Jackson are the true rascists. You are the ones who are persecuting White People and trying to make us a minority by your encouraging of illegal immigration. You are the ones who promote rascist affirmative action in the workplace and our Nation’s Universities. The result is highly unqualified liberal minorites are hired at the expense of hardworking White Men who made it based upon their own merits. The will come and is indeed here when you leftwing race baiters will be exposed as the anti-American scum that you are!
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:42
Hoh, hoh. It looks like Gary, Bastion and Saul car-pooled today.
MileHi Hawkey said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:43
Alright, who left the back door open and let the trolls in?
Jake H. said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:43
The truth is, you liberals and your multi-cultural agent provocutors Al Sharpton and Jesse “affirmative action” Jackson are the true rascists.
Rascally rascists!
Elmer Fudd said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:46
Rascally rascists!
I envy you.
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:48
Knowing history, knowing science, knowing the world as it as and as it was, tell me:
Is there any place, any time you’d rather be?
The Caribbean. 1679. I would have made one helluva pirate. Put the men to the sword, keep the women, sell the children and take the booty!
Then have a party…
mikey
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:51
The Caribbean. 1679.
I must say the hygiene and dental care of the modern world appeal to me greatly.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:52
The Caribbean. 1679. I would have made one helluva pirate.
All praise Flying Spaghetti Monster and all the Pastafarian pirates fighting to make the world – or at least Kansas – a better place.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:55
The truth is, the democrats don’t care about stopping illegal immigration. When us Republicans think of illegal immigration we see an illegal invasion. When democrats think of illegal immigration they see votes! That is why Fred Thompson has to be elected President, because a democrat president will do nothing about our southern border, they absolutely love the fact that there are 12-20 million illegal aliens in this Country and more coming every day, to the dems that means more poor lazy folk to recive welfare benefits and vote democrat.
That is the democrat plan to allow millions upon millions of illegal aliens into this Nation so they can recieve welfare benefits and eventually the dems will give them the right to vote and the resul will be no more Republican Party! This is the democrat goal to make this Nation a one party system which is why they just love illegal immigration!
Gary Ruppert said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:56
The fact is, liberal Demoncraps like Hitlery KKKlinton are racist and biased toward minorities. Soon, white men will be a minority, and we are not taking this lying down.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:58
Exactly, that is why Fred Thompson must be elected President because he is the only candidate willing to secure our borders and deport the illegal aliens.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 1:59
wascally wacists!
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:00
we are not taking this lying down
That phrase has always struck me as being hysterically funny. Anybody know its origin?
Gary Ruppert said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:02
The fact is, here in the heartland, we have pride in America. Not the gay pride, often supported by the libs, that is for fags.
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:03
Shalom. Amen. Fred Thompson is the only true conservative running.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:04
On the subject of pirates, a friend of mine wrote the following:
Life as a stagehand
Nullifidian said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:11
LiberalFascistLover,
There’s also Fernando Claudìn’s history, The Communist Movement: From Comintern to Cominform (Penguin Books, 1975).
Righteous Bubba said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:12
Fred Thompson is the only true conservative running.
It’s more of a zombie stagger until he hits a crack in the pavement too high to lift a foot over. Then he stops.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:13
Not the gay pride, often supported by the libs, that is for fags.
“I am so smart! I am so smart! S-M-R-T! I am so smart!”
[Homer's song after being hired as a part-time teacher & burning his house down while singing it]
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:15
BTW: Thanks to everyone providing the “Stalin on ‘social fascism’” links & suggestions. I’ll explore it in detail.
ralphy said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:18
the anti-freedomites are DEMOCRATS with their gun control causing murder rampages unchecked against our people. If you are not free to defend yourself, you are only free to be murdered. Forget stupid words- cheap names that change with time and territory- the actions speak for themselves: the party of traitors, criminals and murder pigs is the democrat party. Union dues being stolen for electing those the workers do NOT vote for- all dems…illegal (mulitple) voting- illegals here, voting- with help from the traitor party. There is nothing wrong with the USA that cannot be cured by simply cleansing ourselves of the vermin.
saul said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:19
The simple thing is, I agree with the above poster. When you take guns away, you take away our freedom. All of it.
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:22
…Union dues being stolen for electing those the workers do NOT vote for…
As a union writer (NWU/UAW Local 1981) I have no idea what you’re trying to say here. Then again, I rather suspect you don’t really know either.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:25
Hoh, hoh. It looks like Gary, Bastion and Saul car-pooled today.
They often do these days, probably in their hybrid. Posers. But this time they brought Teh Apprentice Ralphy. Joy.
Oh. And Saul shalomed backwards. Isn’t that satanic or something?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:26
Yes, I would imagine that ralphy isn’t really clear on what collective bargaining means, nor has he ever read a labor union’s constitution and by-law, never attended a union meeting nor served on a negotiating committee.
But he does probably enjoy an 8 hour day and a 5 day week, and his kids aren’t working in sweatshops.
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:32
They are trying moderately hard tonight. I believe that Maximum Leader Jonah Stalin Goldberg would approve.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:35
I believe that Maximum Leader Jonah Stalin Goldberg would approve.
Well, they surely do achieve his exceedingly modest standard of excellence.
Gundamhead said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:42
Murder pigs. I really like that for some reason.
BJS said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:44
“You are like monkeys throwing your feces.”
Do Bastion, Saul and Gary duck and let it hit poor Ralphy?
Got learn ‘em somehow!
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:50
“we are not taking this lying down”
Yes Gary, were well aware that you like to be standing up when you make sweet love to the sheep.
Tell us something we don’t know.
Thursday said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:51
“Criminals and Murder Pigs” is the new name for my production company, whenever it starts.
Clint said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:57
There is nothing wrong with the USA that cannot be cured by simply cleansing ourselves of the vermin.
Right you are. Let’s start by putting you in the killfile
*ploink*
Ahhhh… I feel better already. Thanks, Ralphy; I’ll miss you!
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:59
simply cleansing ourselves of the vermin.
Eeuwwww! Doesn’t that mean you have vermin on you? Gross!
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 2:59
Can we get a new thread now?
Jennifer said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:08
actor212 said,
January 18, 2008 at 23:59
It’s a fascist! It’s a racist! Yes, it’s the latest product from Ronco! The LIBERAL!
Well, I’m a liberal, and I’m neither a fascist nor a racist.
I am, however, a floor wax and a delicious dessert topping!!!
LiberalFascistLover said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:11
g said: But he does probably enjoy an 8 hour day and a 5 day week, and his kids aren’t working in sweatshops.
True, but if he and his friends get their way I’m sure this can be corrected. Slavery is – after all – as American as apple pie.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:21
Can we get a new thread now?
Not yet, apparently. But we can go check out the latest addition to the Liberal Fascism page at wikipedia.
[whistles nonchalantly}
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:22
Obviously, the vermin, bugs and lice and nits and scabies and crud, attracted by the vast quantities of Pie, have infested the Saul, Inc. troll and begun to eat away at the vanishingly small amounts of brain tissue the poor little ratfucker started with.
Cleanse, away, Saul, Inc. I think it’s pretty much too late. Don’t let that thought keep you awake tonight – it’s likely just that last piece of pie…
mikey
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:23
The truth is, the second amendment is about freedom. When law abiding citizens are permitted to own and carry firearms crime drops dramatically. You liebrul fags however are in favor of coddling criminals. Which is why you liberal fags oppose gun ownership because you think killing criminals is teh mean. Here in the Heartland we shoot criminals and terrorists dead.
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:28
[whistles nonchalantly}
That's some good work.
Via Liberal Fascist Strike Team!
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:30
“Rascally racists!” Shouldn’t it be “Wascally Wacists!”
Fozzetti said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:34
“It’s a fascist! It’s a racist! Yes, it’s the latest product from Ronco! The LIBERAL!”
But Wait! There’s More! It’s also a floor wax! And a Liberal! And a Socialist! and a…a…record player!
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:38
Liberal Fascist Strike Team!
Shucks, ‘twern’t nothin’. But I am so ordering a LFST t-shirt.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:39
The truth is, liebruls are fascists for wanting to take away our second amendment rights, our freedom to worship God and our freedom of speech.
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:40
“But I am so ordering a LFST t-shirt.”
Is there an official graphic yet?
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:44
Try, try, try, try, try.
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:49
Is there an official graphic yet?
We need to get Gavin sobered up..
mikey
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:53
Hehehehehehehehehehe
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:53
Based upon my experience the American government should take some advice from Ho Chi Minh and the Vietcong.
There system of government was alot better for the people than the Bush regime.
mikey
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:56
Happy Friday, my fellow fascists and fascistas!
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:56
“We need to get Gavin sobered up..”
Damn. Guess I won’t hold my breath or anything.
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:57
Maybe just a Hitler smiley face with a gun?
A silhouette of a woman holding a huge pair of hedge-clippers?
Uncle Sam with a gun and a joint, pointing both at the viewer, and underneath it says “Rauch das!”?
I still hope the gonzo fist finds its way into the mix.
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 3:59
I’m about to get wasted on a bottle of jack daniels and some scotch.
mikey
tigrismus said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:00
the anti-freedomites are DEMOCRATS with their gun control causing murder rampages unchecked against our people
It’s Swanky! For your pleasure. Note especially how conservatives are so much less in favor of gun ownership rights once black folks start owning. It really is a miracle!
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:03
Wait, a book in one hand, and huge pair of hedge clippers in the other
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:04
And a period at the end of that sentence.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:04
OK, whoever’s namestealing mikey? Come back on Wednesday. It’s amateur night.
[/Mae West]
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:08
I better cut down on the heavy drinking and eating.
My gut is getting too big.
mikey
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:10
Don’t worry SM, no one will fall for it.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:10
Ya know, I have to say…as Liberal as I am I have to admit equality has a certain meaning and preference to a certain group IS NOT equality and so many fail to realize that. If we are to live in an equal society we are ALL equal, no one has special privileges regardless of wrong doing etc. I am not marginalizing anything mind you, before anyone jumps my case.
Now in the case of certain people claiming liberals are fascists, well, that is just as retarded as, well, them. To be expected, No?
If everyone is equal than it pretty much sums itself up does it not? ===.
I do admit I did not read all of this considering it is 500 bajillion lines long, but you all get my meaning. I can honestly say Conservatives and Liberals both have pissed me off with the race bullshit in these campaigns. Fuck race, we are all Americans are we not? Once everyone starts having that mindset maybe we will have a little less racism. Pretending everything is racist is as bad as pretending everything is not, it solves nothing. Equality comes when people do not add pretense to every god damn comment that is made in a race perspective. Once people do not call themselves “Black” and “White” we can have some damn progression, until then, fuck off.
As long as you insist on labeling everyone as something and considering past transgressions (Which I do not deny) you will never have equality since no one can make up for those past transgressions.
jim said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:10
The truth is, liebruls are fascists for wanting to take away our second amendment rights, our freedom to worship God and our freedom of speech.
And don’t forget your precious bodily fluids.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:11
I dunno, I was thinking something simple, like Jonah making his angry face while a smiley-hitler-headed breasted-American forces an unwanted hug on him. Not sure how to get the gonzo fist in there, but give me a minute.
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:12
the anti-freedomites are DEMOCRATS with their gun control causing murder rampages unchecked against our people
Yes, because back in the day, when a man could carry his six-shooter on his hip while walking down the street, there were never any murder rampages, and violent crime was virtually unknown.
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:12
I, for one, welcome our new hedge clipper brandishing, ball kicking, joint smoking, highly literate, organic food-eating female overloads.
Oh, I hope they wear glasses too!
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:13
I prefer the Vietnamese communists to the fascists.
I just hope some day we have a communist guerrila movement here in the usa like the vietcong.
mikey
MileHi Hawkeye said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:14
*lords* duh. Got a little over-excited there…
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:14
Pretending everything is racist is as bad as pretending everything is not, it solves nothing.
But pretending that you can erase the effects of hundreds of years of institutionalized and government-sanctioned (and often -sponsored) racism simply by saying “from now on, everybody is equal” is worse than either.
kingubu said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:15
Re: the LFST logo: what about Teh Gonzo Fist but with a Hello, Kitty head in place of the peyote button?
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:15
I’m about to get wasted on a bottle of jack daniels and some scotch.
mikey
#
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:08
I better cut down on the heavy drinking and eating.
My gut is getting too big.
mikey
OK. This is unpleasant. I didn’t post these. But they didn’t play by the rules and indicate they were fake posts.
Pretty sure that’s a banning offense, even here.
Right?
mikey
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:17
Right now Communist Vietnam has free health care and education.
There is also no private property ownership.
Vietnam truly is paradise on earth, if only I could afford to move there.
mikey
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:17
But pretending that you can erase the effects of hundreds of years of institutionalized and government-sanctioned (and often -sponsored) racism simply by saying “from now on, everybody is equal” is worse than either.
I never claimed I could, I cannot. But bringing that into the situation now solves nothing. Can we be equal when both sides consider one side either non-equal or above-equal? That is not equal. What do you want? Do you want a system that is not equal to make up for non-equilibrium in the past?
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:17
He did it to me, too, mikey. Don’t let him irk you. Gavin will get around to at least tagging the relevant ips soon enuff. Let him know they’re at it again, tho.
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:18
For a logo, how about someone do their artistic photo thing with this Portuguese poster against Social Fascism?
Grande Comicio –> Nem Social-Fascismo
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:18
I prefer the Vietnamese communists to the fascists.
I just hope some day we have a communist guerrila movement here in the usa like the vietcong.
mikey
Fucker. You wanna just get together? Maybe we could TALK about it. Get it all sorted out, y’know?
Coward ratfuck…
I’m gonna check out for a while. This weirds me out.
So pretty much everything you see for the next hour or so isn’t me..
mikey
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:20
Ya know, I have to say…as Liberal as I am I have to admit equality has a certain meaning and preference to a certain group IS NOT equality and so many fail to realize that. If we are to live in an equal society we are ALL equal, no one has special privileges regardless of wrong doing etc. I am not marginalizing anything mind you, before anyone jumps my case.
Ya know, following up vague assertions full of coded racism with a screamingly defensive plea not to have your position contested on its merits doesn’t bode well for your powers of argument.
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:20
First they chicken out of service. Then they copy other people’s names on the intertoobz. Ever the same.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:22
Ya know, I have to say…as Liberal as I am I have to admit equality has a certain meaning and preference to a certain group IS NOT equality and so many fail to realize that. If we are to live in an equal society we are ALL equal, no one has special privileges regardless of wrong doing etc. I am not marginalizing anything mind you, before anyone jumps my case.
Buddy, you could not get me more wrong. But please, explain my position sir, I would love it.
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:24
Pretty sure that’s a banning offense, even here.
Right?
mikey
As a liberal fascist, I am compelled to support the banning of boring trolls. It is central to my point.
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:25
Okay guys, forget what I said my last post, all that scotch made me feel a hell uv alot better.
So I’ll still be posting.
And you troll, wanna say that stuff to my face you goatfucker?
I’ll throw a beer bottle at you!
mikey
J— said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:28
[whistles nonchalantly]
Ha. What is this thing called “research”?
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:29
Buddy, you could not get me more wrong. But please, explain my position sir, I would love it.
Well, gee, daedme, I guess there’s this:
Can we be equal when both sides consider one side either non-equal or above-equal?
in which your Manichean view assumes that everyone chooses “sides” based on race and then gets out the yardstick.
There’s also the assumption inherent in “buddy” and “sir.”
Everything you’ve posted so far indicates a pretty narrow worldview that compartmentalizes people based on presumptions about race and gender without even a first, let alone a second, thought.
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:30
daedme- Intentionally or not, you’re using language that closely resembles that used by conservatives to argue against affirmative action, a position they take mostly because they are closet racists.
Your defense sounds like a 9/11 truther I once met getting very upset I called his beliefs that a secret cabal of bankers is behind all the world’s woes anti-semitic.
Ignorance is not innocence.
mikey said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:32
I wanna go have a beer with John Kerry and Jack Murtha.
All us Vietnam vets for commies should get together.
We’ll start a Ho Chi Minh fan club.
mikey
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:35
Ok, what do I call you oh wise and equality-informed one? So you are essentially saying we cannot have an equal society? Is that, or is that NOT what you are saying? What the hell is the point of having an equal society when you insist we cannot? That is exactly what I want, an equal society. What you are telling me is we cannot because of the dickheads of the past.
Thank you very much but I do not want anything to do with your future view. I added the marginalize line for a reason, because I do not want to marginalize what our cocksucker ancestors did but I cannot change that, should we therefore forgo any chance at a real equal society because of that?
Gavin M. said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:37
Mr. Name-stealing Troll, please take a break, ok?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:41
daedme- Intentionally or not, you’re using language that closely resembles that used by conservatives to argue against affirmative action, a position they take mostly because they are closet racists.
Your defense sounds like a 9/11 truther I once met getting very upset I called his beliefs that a secret cabal of bankers is behind all the world’s woes anti-semitic.
Ignorance is not innocence.
No, it is a real question, as long as you insist on referring to people as somehow not equal you do nothing but add to the problem. I would never bring the bullshit excuse of 9/11 up. I find it disturbing that we refer to black and white voters in this country while claiming some inherant race-less melting pot mannerism, it is just not true. Either everyone is what they are or they are not. How about we are all Americans (and, vote Democrat by the way heh). Either way, we are all Americans. I make no apologies if this sounds conservative, I hope to god it does not but either way.
Lawnguylander said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:44
As long as you insist on labeling everyone as something and considering past transgressions (Which I do not deny) you will never have equality since no one can make up for those past transgressions.
Was that idiotic sentence, a transgression against the English language, too far in the past for me to label you an idiot? Did I miss the deadline?
And I betcha some black dude killed poor Hattie Carroll just to set back the the cause of dissolute tobacco heirs.
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:46
Ok, now I have no real idea what you’re even on about, but it sounds much more personally based than I want to know about.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:46
Was that idiotic sentence, a transgression against the English language, too far in the past for me to label you an idiot? Did I miss the deadline?
And I betcha some black dude killed poor Hattie Carroll just to set back the the cause of dissolute tobacco heirs.
So, you are saying a grammar error is racist?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:47
Ok, now I have no real idea what you’re even on about, but it sounds much more personally based than I want to know about.
You know very well what I am talking about in context of my last few posts.
a different brad said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:51
Honestly, I don’t. Identity politics? Pollsters noting that black and white voters have different voting patterns?
Sounds like you’re arguing for a society so color blind it forgets its past and how that’s defined the present.
Lawnguylander said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:55
So, you are saying a grammar error is racist?
Only the first sentence addresses you. The second one references the quoted text in the post itself. You would have figured that out (well, maybe not) if you had read the post before you starting commenting.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:56
Honestly, I don’t. Identity politics? Pollsters noting that black and white voters have different voting patterns?
Sounds like you’re arguing for a society so color blind it forgets its past and how that’s defined the present.
No not at all, thank you for saying it though. Great argument. I do not deny blacks and whites may have different voting patterns but actings as if we should consider black and white different (maybe when you are referring to votes) is pretty damned stupid in my eyes. It would be like saying 20% of black Americans voted for Obama, as if being black made a difference in voting…and honestly it probably does….
My point is we talk about inequality but we than judge every statement against race. The Democrats have done this extensively in this race. Fuck race, brining up race at every damn possible chance and trying to hide it as if you are not annoys me. If we are all Americans, do not pander to one group of “Americans”. I will be the first to admit this is wishful thinking but still, it is stupid, and it is a stupid political view.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:59
Only the first sentence addresses you. The second one references the quoted text in the post itself. You would have figured that out (well, maybe not) if you had read the post before you starting commenting.
You still are not doing anything for me, either way. Hate me, love me…either way :). I am a grammar nightmare.
Smiling Mortician said,
January 19, 2008 at 5:03
Ok, what do I call you oh wise and equality-informed one? So you are essentially saying we cannot have an equal society? Is that, or is that NOT what you are saying? What the hell is the point of having an equal society when you insist we cannot?
Um, wow. Not really sure who you’re talking to here, but if it’s me, I’ve insisted nothing of the sort. Really, it helps to read what people write.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 5:05
Ok, what do I call you oh wise and equality-informed one? So you are essentially saying we cannot have an equal society? Is that, or is that NOT what you are saying? What the hell is the point of having an equal society when you insist we cannot?
Um, wow. Not really sure who you’re talking to here, but if it’s me, I’ve insisted nothing of the sort. Really, it helps to read what people write.
I am not perfect, so if I misquoted or took someone out of context I truely apologize. I, like anyone can tend to get overzealous.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 5:23
Come on guys, getting overzealous is no reason to stop the debate :). I am pretty sure for the most part I was in the right in my comments. Debate is good for everyone.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 5:48
Maybe this will breathe new life….The Pats suck and Tom Brady let down fantasy football owners when we needed him most. I wish the dolphins were still in it so they could beat them, but I count on the Giants now.
Muahaha. Down with the Pats! Viva NY!. I have faith in Peyton Jr.
N.C. said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:17
Your defense sounds like a 9/11 truther I once met getting very upset I called his beliefs that a secret cabal of bankers is behind all the world’s woes anti-semitic.
I only saw the last part of that sentence at first, and thought to myself that “the world’s woes anti-semitic” is a pitch-perfect Swanksterism.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:32
Oh, fuck. You guys are brilliant. You’ll excuse me if I don’t actually read all of the thread, being as how I’ve had a few glasses of wine?
Actually, I had a glass of the best Amarone you could imagine……sigh.
Anyway, allI can say is –
Hey!!! Daedme is a classic Concern Troll – No?
Someone contradict me.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:39
Oh, fuck. You guys are brilliant. You’ll excuse me if I don’t actually read all of the thread, being as how I’ve had a few glasses of wine?
Actually, I had a glass of the best Amarone you could imagine……sigh.
Anyway, allI can say is -
Hey!!! Daedme is a classic Concern Troll – No?
Someone contradict me.
So, blah blah blah I have nothing to add? I see that, but I do not see how your post has anything to do with it frankly.
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:43
Do you want a system that is not equal to make up for non-equilibrium in the past?
Well, if you have a balance scale, and there’s too much weight on one side, and you want it to balance evenly, then you either have to take something away from the heavier side or add something to the lighter side. Once it’s balanced, then you can add or take away equally from both sides and maintain the balance.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:45
So, blah blah blah I have nothing to add?
Exactly.
How nice of you to show up and dazzle us all with your wit and sophistication.
Do you know how many concern trolls like you visit this blog and wander away?
Feh.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:49
Well, if you have a balance scale, and there’s too much weight on one side, and you want it to balance evenly, then you either have to take something away from the heavier side or add something to the lighter side. Once it’s balanced, then you can add or take away equally from both sides and maintain the balance.
Completely valid point Dan. I agree with you. I come across as a Dickface I know but under that system equality is still not maintained simply because equality means one thing when it comes to math and a completely different thing when it comes to human beings.
I will not let the whole troll thing dissuade me. The way I see it is all Americans need to be just that, Americans. Once we put less emphasis on race the sooner we get rid of racism. Yes! I am an awful person! (That is sarcasm by the way :)). You know, I really wish I did not sound the way I did but this is one sticking point with me. Racism existed, horribly so, the only way to do away with it is to make people equals under a Republic such as ourselves. That is the fair thing to do. As long as people view race as some wall between everyone race WILL always be a wall.
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:49
Or to use a more apropos, and certainly more cliche, example: If you are having a footrace between two people, and one of the people is chained to the starting blocks while the other one runs halfway down the course, you don’t make it fair by releasing the first one and having a restart from where they are at that moment. You either bring the other runner back to the starting line or let the formerly shackled runner catch up before you restart.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:51
Exactly.
How nice of you to show up and dazzle us all with your wit and sophistication.
Do you know how many concern trolls like you visit this blog and wander away?
Feh.
What is your point? Should I crawl away to some corner somewhere, beaten by your wit and sophistication?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:51
Racism existed, horribly so, the only way to do away with it is to make people equals under a Republic such as ourselves. That is the fair thing to do. As long as people view race as some wall between everyone race WILL always be a wall.
Spoken by someone raised as a privileged white person.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:52
Should I crawl away to some corner somewhere…..
Yeah. And go eat some pie.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:55
Racism existed, horribly so, the only way to do away with it is to make people equals under a Republic such as ourselves. That is the fair thing to do. As long as people view race as some wall between everyone race WILL always be a wall.
I wish I was raised as a privileged person. Thank you for thinking as much anyway. My parents did not do badly for themselves that is true, me and my brother were awful bastards for sure. Either way, I live now struggling for insurance, to pay my rent etc. Just like any normal American. You know very well what my point is, you will just not address it directly. Straw man arguments are worthless, and that is all that you are bringing to the table. I want to oppress no one, so what are you saying? We can either suppress some or raise some above others? That seems a pretty nasty argument when talking about the potential of our form of government.
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:55
daedme, you sound a little like Mark McGuire when asked by the Mitchell commission about his steroid use: “I’m not here to talk about the past.”
The race-based errors of history don’t get magically wiped away just by everybody deciding “Hey, race doesn’t matter any more! Yay!” Leaving aside the fact that racism remains an active force in many subtle and not-so-subtle ways, there are segments of the population who are disadvantaged NOW because of racism BACK THEN, and I’m hard pressed to see any way to eliminate those disadvantages — and create a level playing field — without giving those segments of the population advantages. What those advantages should be, and how they should be applied, are valid questions for discussion, but I haven’t seen any better conceptual solutions.
Tehanu said,
January 19, 2008 at 6:57
Gary: We, the white men, who built America,….
Actually, Gary, you, the white men, imported a shitload of Africans to do the actual building and paid them in lousy food, disease, whippings, and chains. Of course, you wouldn’t have needed to import them if you hadn’t slaughtered as many of the natives as you could.
I would also fall over dead with shock if I found that you personally had ever built anything other than a pyramid of beer cans.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:00
Dan, you are way more patient with Daedme and his/her dishonesty.
I am much more tolerant of the blatant trolls like saul and gary, than I am of the kind of trolls that Daedme is a classic example of.
Daedme, at least learn some basic html so you can format your posts so they make sense.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:02
The race-based errors of history don’t get magically wiped away just by everybody deciding “Hey, race doesn’t matter any more! Yay!” Leaving aside the fact that racism remains an active force in many subtle and not-so-subtle ways, there are segments of the population who are disadvantaged NOW because of racism BACK THEN, and I’m hard pressed to see any way to eliminate those disadvantages — and create a level playing field — without giving those segments of the population advantages. What those advantages should be, and how they should be applied, are valid questions for discussion, but I haven’t seen any better conceptual solutions.
I see where you are coming from but at the same time where does it stop? If you never forget the past and move on you will never have actual cohesion among the people. I am not saying forget racism! This argument can not go on under that tone, but no one is suggesting anything besides acknowledging racism and essentially making it a point of inequality. I am not saying do away with affirmative action etc. People here tend to read whatever the hell they want into comments. I know damn well about racism but as long as we make it something to separate it us you all know as well as I do that it will be a wall.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:03
Then what the fuck are you saying?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:03
G, I do not care what you think, nor do I need to. You bring nothing but random trolling. If anyone is a troll here it is yourself. All you say is smoke and mirrors and insults. Dan at least brings arguments (It does not matter if I agree with them or not). I am not arguing AGAINST you regardless of what you want to think.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:05
The truth is, affirmative action is racsist and reverse discrimination.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:08
A troll, by defintiion, is an unwanted visitor. That would be you. You showed up here posting bullshit.
We’ve seen lots of concern trolls come and go here. You sound like a classic one. But since Sadly No doesn’t ban anyone, post away and lets see if you transcend your initial trolly first impression.
Go on. Change my opinion. Others have before.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:11
A troll, by defintiion, is an unwanted visitor. That would be you. You showed up here posting bullshit.
We’ve seen lots of concern trolls come and go here. You sound like a classic one. But since Sadly No doesn’t ban anyone, post away and lets see if you transcend your initial trolly first impression.
Go on. Change my opinion. Others have before.
So you are saying because you post regular basis you are not a troll? Fact it, I am not what you think I am but the fact is also I will not change my opinion because you disagree. Our country is great like that is it not? :)
I do not care if you think what I think is bullshit. Get used to it. You sound to me like you want no differing opinion, might as well watch FOX news.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:12
P.S. We can use HTML here? I saw you mention it in passing.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:13
The only playing field that needs to be leveled is the one that the left ruined by discriminating against White Males through affirmative action and multi-culturalism. What exactly is wrong with White Pride? If we can celebrate black pride and heritage and hispanic pride and heritage why can’t we also celebrate White Pride and Heritage?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:17
Get used to it.
hahahahahahha! What you plan to stick around?
I will not change my opinion because you disagree.
Jeebus. Do you think I give a fuck what you your opinion is? Why the fuck should I want to change what you think? Think whatever you want.
Do me a favor – if you’re planing to stick around, learn how to use html to quote. Or at least use quotation marks.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:19
Oh, and daedme?
I may be an asshole, but if you’re going to stick around, disregard saul, gary ruppert, and bastion until you have more acquaintance with them. It’s totally not worth arguing with them.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:20
I’ll ask right off the bat, what tags are usable? Either way, again…I do not care if you give a shit about my opinion. I figured that was pretty god damned obvious from my previous post.
Maybe I will just not use HTML to annoy the shit out of you heh. No, not really. You can be a dipshit all you like but are any particular tags not allowed? Its better to quote by ctrl+c-ctrl+v than put a stupid tag that ends up showing up in the post.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:26
I figured as much. Well to be honest I was not sure if Bastions comments were sarcastic or serious.
Bastion Booger said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:28
My comment are absolutely serious my liberal friend. I am a True Blue Red Blooded Conservative Patriot.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:29
OK —
the simple things work.
do to begin italics and at the end [without spaces] b instead of i for bold;
to embed links, do Whatever you want to say
eliminate spaces.
but even if you don’t know that, at least use punctuation to designate when you’re quoting someone. Jeez.
if you know the rest you know more than me.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:29
Well, that is an entirely different story. You have fun with that.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:30
I learned how to blockquote but I forgot. Oh well.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:31
I know HTML just fine, but it is almost always turned off on all forums I have ever been to. I am just in the habit of not using it. Not comment buttons so I just copy and paste, shit happens. But you are right, it does look wrong when I quote someone. Won’t happen from now on.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:32
Daedme, there’s a good reason to “italics quote” whoever you’re replying to. Just sayin’.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:35
Well, sorry, d – I tried to put in spaces to show how to use the characters and it didn’t post right — but you seem to know anyway, so that’s good.
Did I mention the glass of Amarone I enjoyed this evening?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:35
Oh I am aware of that, just was not aware we could. Like I said, nothing looks worse to me than putting an HTML tag on a quote only to have it show up because HTML is disabled. Will not happen again. Thanks though. I am glad to hear I can use them.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:36
I am enjoying myself some Hurricanes so to each their own :) Nothing hits the spot quite like malt liquor heh.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:36
You were saying?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:39
Well…You know what I was saying but either way. I am wondering if it is either worth arguing anymore. I doubt anyone is going to have any persuading arguments past what has already been said.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:44
Were we arguing? Or was I just telling you to get the fuck out [thinking you were a saul/bastion/kevin/gary]?
I actually have totally no authority here (other than the right to profanely tell whoever I want to to get the fuck out), so you can do whatever you want.
You want to hear about my shitty day, including my arguing with rockstars’ managers about money? Ask me why I’m in the mood I’m in.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:47
Well, feel free to tell me to fuck off. If so, same to you sucka. Authority does not matter, I have a tendency to argue anyway. I am glad SN has the balls to leave posts up even if they think the poster is a shit eater.
Sure tell me about your shitty day. I can tell you about mine too, which would be a lack of shitty things happening, which would be a lack of anything happening which equals shitty in the end anyway. Damn, the world sucks.
Why are you in that foul mood of yours?
duros62 said,
January 19, 2008 at 7:53
The truth is, liebruls are fascists for wanting to take away our second amendment rights, our freedom to worship God and our freedom of speech.
No, no, knock yourself out. Just do it by yourself, ‘k?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:04
tell me about your shitty day.</I.
Lesseee.
I got on the wrong side of a deal (i.e., someone owed me money after I delivered services}, and just before I went to collect for said services, an incident occurred that allowed my client to claim that I failed to deliver said services. So I had to convince my client to pay me anyway, and it wasn’t fun.
It actually involved a rock star; a burst plumbing fixture, a flood of steaming hot water, and the cost of parking.
So – you can imagine my exhaustion.
PS – I did get my money, in the end.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:05
Oh, the fucking tags.
slip said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:06
Sounds like a Noel Cowardish lead-in for a Cole Porter tune…
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:08
Well shit, at least you got your money. It can be written off as a shitty day but a pay day. Wanna hear shitty? I am on the verge of getting laid off but the people that own the company are nice enough to keep me on out of kindness. We work with Realtors and I am sure you can imagine how nasty that is right now.
Looking for another job as we speak but I’m not holding my breath for anything great. Hell, you get to bitch at rockstar managers, I get to argue with pissy ass realtors.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:14
Sounds like a Noel Cowardish lead-in for a Cole Porter tune…
I had to wikipedia Coward sadly, and still I am in the dark…Whole lotta gay going on there though. To quote Seinfeld…”Not that there is anything wrong with that”.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:14
Hell, you get to bitch at rockstar managers, I get to argue with pissy ass realtors.
Um. Trade you.
It sounds glamorous, but you have not met the Beast From Hell until you’ve faced the Bitch from CCA telling you that because of the “mental anguish” the performer suffered because the water for the shower wasn’t hot enough to suit his tastes, they don’t want to pay the event day rental.
Cry me a fuckin river. The guy is staying in the luxury hotel across the street [I know - his bus is parked there], and I know for a FACT he only spent 2.5 hours in my building.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:15
Looking for another job as we speak
Where y’at?
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:17
and I know for a FACT he only spent 2.5 hours in my building.
And 1.5 of those hours were spent performing onstage. So. for 1 hour he maybe couldn’t get as hot a shower as he liked?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:18
You would think realtors are not so bad but they seem to have a complex of stardom. They think they are gods…”DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?”…no I do not and why the fuck do I care? You spend 400 bucks every three month, you suck horse testicles. But, that is why I tend to stay off the phone with them and let someone else handle the bastards.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:19
So, d. Where are you living/working? What do you want to do instead?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:20
Im in Northern Virginia. MS-13 country. Nice machete-hand incident pretty regularly. The problem is the damned cost of living here. If it were not so damned high I would be golden. One bedroom apartments start at about 1100 a month, and thats those shitty places where you have to have 2000 people living with you not working. I tried, believe me.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:22
Well, I did the whole college thing for a few years, just could not afford it. Even with financial aid I was paying almost 6-700 dollars per quarter. State tuition is going through the roof so it was no better. If I had my way I would be doing something involving programming but I would really just be happy sitting working on computers (as in technician, A+ stuff) if I could actually make a living from it.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:26
Well, I live in what’s called the Westside, in Los Angeles county. Even though I don’t actually live in the city of LA it’s pricey.
I work in a fucked up business. You could call it the Event Business, or Show Business, or Entertainment, and I’ve been in it for many years in many capacities, but right now I work in the capacity of managing a venue that people want to present their Event in.
Event venue management is somewhat related to Real Estate. It sure as hell is interesting.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:30
If by interesting you mean a bunch of puffed up cocksuckers running around thinking they are important I totally agree with you. At least entertainment rarely goes out of favor. The damn housing market like it is, it is like selling ketchup Popsicles to women in white gloves getting business. About 20 trillion houses for sale in this area and about 2 are selling.
The grass is always greener as they say though. Granted I think I would hate your job just as much. Any time I have to deal with bitchy people things get a little hairy.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:32
Actually, to be accurate, the Westside of LA is the most expensive living areas, whether its incorporated into the city of LA or not.
I work in a small beach city that is really expensive to live in. I live in an unincorporated rural area of LA county.
Most people dont think of LA that way.
Dan Someone said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:33
daedme,
I would love to live in a world where skin color, religion, cultural heritage, sex, national origin, sexual orientation and all the rest didn’t matter, and every person was judged solely on the basis of his or her actions and character. Never going to happen. Humans congregate and aggregate on the basis of those categories, and as long as there are differences within the categories, there will be people who think those differences are what’s important about people, and that only those who have stars on their bellies are worthy of the name “Sneetch.”
If we were designing a society from scratch, where everybody was starting from a place of equal opportunity, then maybe it would be possible for that social construct to be completely blind to all of those category distinctions. That doesn’t mean people wouldn’t eventually separate themselves according to differences, real or perceived; but it might at least be possible to create a body of laws and customs and traditions that would ignore the differences at the beginning.
But we’re not doing that. We (at least some people) are trying to repair a tragically broken society whose history was filled with — at some points totally characterized by — invidious discrimination against vast segments of the population on the basis of their skin color, their sex, their point of origin, etc., etc. And you can’t do that by saying “Wow, I sure am glad that’s over. Please pass the sweet potatoes.”
Not to mention the fact that there is still a boatload of racial and other forms of discrimination and prejudice at large in our society. So the problems of the past are not in the past; they are still with us. I suppose that aspect of the problem could be eliminated if we all woke up tomorrow and said “Hey, remember that race stuff? Man, what were we thinking?” But that would still leave massive gouges in the social landscape, lingering inequities that require some redress. How does your “we’re all color-blind” utopia address that?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:35
I sure do not. If I did not love the east coast so much I would probably head for greener pastures. Not that there is anything stopping me, just no real reason to either. Cheap ass tuition rates would be nice like CA has but then again the Terminator seems to be making some big ass cuts from what I hear, I wonder how long it will be until Higher Education feels the whip. Unless by education cuts they mean college to.
Not to mention, what does it matter. I would be that weird older guy with a bunch of 18 year olds who want me to buy them beer. Here, the cheap place is WV, but they have realized it and have started raising prices accordingly, the bastards.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:37
Granted I think I would hate your job just as much. Any time I have to deal with bitchy people things get a little hairy.
Oh, it sometimes has its redeeming moments.
If you’re into real estate or property management, and you want a little more fun in your life, you might look into event venues.
I came into it from the event side of things – I worked for the shows, and now I process the rental contracts. But, equally, someone could come from the other direction. It can be fun, and creative, and you are dealing with commercial customers for a short-term gig, instead of dealing with people’s primary assets, like their homes.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:39
Well said Dan. Im to tired right now to argue my point but I do not have much to argue. I think you hit the nail on the head. I just think that the sooner we accept each other the sooner we can get somewhat past it. As long as we accept racism as a major issue (even when it is not in a lot of cases, not all mind you) or overblow racism we just inflate the problem even more so. If we make the fact that Obama is black an issue for example, it does nothing but point out racism rather than overcome it. It should not matter.
I know, I know…perfect world and all that :)
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:44
would be that weird older guy with a bunch of 18 year olds who want me to buy them beer.
Oh, ferfucks sake.
I took classes in college at the age of 50 and 51 (and plan to take more). I loved it.
Sit at the front of the room and make eye contact with the teacher/professor/lecturer and listen to what he/she has to say. If you talk to the kids, talk about the content of the class. What the fuck do you think you’re paying for, anyway? What the teacher has to say, or buying beers for freshmen?
BTW – Arnolt is either making an idle threat or he will be cutting higher education here in CA. It is fucked up.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:44
Well, you have redeeming qualities in your job but when I look at it its the same shit pie sliced a different way. That is why I would like to hole myself up and work on computers all day hah. I do not dislike people, I just dislike customers. I like working with people, but not customers.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:47
I would like to hole myself up and work on computers all day hah.
Damn.
Come help me set up this goddam data baseI need and have no fucking time to do it.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:47
Well, to be fair I guess in comparison I am not that much older than them, only 10 years or so but I have this overwhelming urge to get it done, and working, surviving etc I cannot take a full course load, which just compounds the problem. I just have to figure out a way to finish, and cheaper than I have paid. The upperhand is the damn loans go back into deferment.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:50
Holy hell, I would rather take a spork straight to the eyeball than deal with databases. I can just remember my relational database class… I aced it, but that is just my way, sheer determination. It was worse than watching paint dry.
Snowwy said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:50
Feh, I always miss the good stuff…
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:52
Feh, I always miss the good stuff…
Feel free to verbally smash my face in. I will not mind.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:54
I will tell you what. You like computers, you like systems, you want to work anywhere in the world; here is a company & a product that has jobs anywhere:
http://www.sentrycontrol.com/
Computerized parking control systems. Sounds fucked up, but, man, we bought their product and worked with their trainers, and I was impressed. The shit is very complicated and they need serious trainers to work with their new customers. And – hell – you become a parking systems expert, you got a job any fucking where in the US.
Parking. Its a frickin’ job.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:55
Shit, ill look into it. I am not above telling people I work in the parking industry haha.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 8:58
In a geek-like way, I am totally awed by the things our parking computer system can do.
When Lindsey Lohan got arrested in Santa Monica this last July, it was in my fucking parking lot, and I could read the computer read-out and know exactly what her car did or did not do – is that not cool or what?
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:00
What is with celebrities being nuttier than squirrel turds these days? It would be interesting being able to be the one to say, look at what this crazy beotch did though!
Well, I am going to hit the damn hay. Glad we do not hate each other, but I am sure there will be heated moments later on. Call me Ron Paul of the democratic persuasion without the crazy, racist libertarian streak.
You guys take care.
daedme said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:01
what the hell would a Ron Paul of the democratic persuasion without the crazy be anyway? I do not even know in retrospect, so maybe scratch that…or do not. I don’t know.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:03
Seriously, daedme, if you are interested, check into the Skidata system. Its the newest rage in computerize parking, and I think Sentry is the sole source in the US.
I bet there would be jobs with Sentry, but also with whoever buys Skidata systems, too.
I work for a City government that has some 12 or so parking structures that uses
Skidata stuff. You can’t beat public employers for benefits and retirement.
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:04
Night , all. The Amarone gave me a sweet knockout punch.
Xenos said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:15
Gavin M. said,
January 19, 2008 at 4:37
Mr. Name-stealing Troll, please take a break, ok?
Damn liberal fascist… Now we see the violence inherent in the system – ‘Help, help, I am being repressed!
/troll
g said,
January 19, 2008 at 9:17
Hey, all you Sadlys
Just a reminder. -
My young friend ZK is still in what is probably now called a “vegetative state” after his heart attack while running on the track at his high school. It’s been since early November. His parents are caring for him at home now – since he is only 16, of course they have the right to decide his care.
I’m lighting my evening candles to help inspire him to heal, as his mom requests. If you happen to light candles at home, would you please think about ZK when you light them? Just to help.
old said,
January 19, 2008 at 14:40
I saw no mention of the word ‘ilk’ in this post, or in the comments, neither did my browser’s find feature. I suggest Sadly No!, an otherwise fine weblog, use the word ‘ilk’ more often. I wish I could use the word ‘ilk’ often in my private life, but it reads so much better than it sounds. The word ‘ilk’ rolls off the keyboards of 101st, but just try to use it real life, I dare you.
El Cid said,
January 19, 2008 at 17:41
I am a daring rebel who is amazingly pleased with myself for typing words into an internet blog which I think the other readers of the internet blog will disagree with.
You will never defeat such resistance!
Smut Clyde said,
January 19, 2008 at 23:13
OK, g, I lit a candle. But to tell the truth, I still prefer cursing the darkness.
Thursday said,
January 21, 2008 at 0:49
First, I wanna say that reading the entire conversation between g and daedme was pretty fucking cool. Very David Mamet, except in reverse: by the end, instead of actually talking, you’d be fucking each other’s wives and knifing the tires of the other’s Suburbans.
g -
First thought – check to see if he was on any supplements and where they came from. Let his doctors know STAT. Sorry if it’s obvious, but being a hidebound skeptic the pathetic regulation and atrocious history of those things terrifies me.
actor212 said,
January 21, 2008 at 17:49
I am, however, a floor wax and a delicious dessert topping!!!
Can I have your phone number?
bily2001 said,
January 21, 2008 at 20:34
hi, guys, nice discussion, I am Kily. A cute white girl with perfect sexy stature.
I am eager for a good man, All can view my crazy hot photos at multiraciallove.com by searching “Wildrose2008″. No matter who you are and where you come from…
bily2001 said,
January 22, 2008 at 19:25
Me love you LOOONG time…