<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Don&#8217;t Live On The Same Planet As The Rest Of Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23as</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-714362</link>
		<dc:creator>23as</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-714362</guid>
		<description>www.iwowleveling.com  cheap WOW Power Leveling, WOW Warcraft 

Gold, World Of Warcraft Power</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.iwowleveling.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.iwowleveling.com</a>  cheap WOW Power Leveling, WOW Warcraft </p>
<p>Gold, World Of Warcraft Power</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-408967</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-408967</guid>
		<description>This is easy. They are saying Iraq is won now, so when the situation collapses (like it is destined to do), the loss can be &quot;pinned&quot; on the President, who won&#039;t be Bush, who will in all likelihood be a Democrat. Then they will have a meme they can repeat for decades even stronger than the &quot;they got spit on&quot; BS for Vietnam: The Glorious Republican Party led the USA to victory until the traitorous Democratic party intentionally let us lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is easy. They are saying Iraq is won now, so when the situation collapses (like it is destined to do), the loss can be &#8220;pinned&#8221; on the President, who won&#8217;t be Bush, who will in all likelihood be a Democrat. Then they will have a meme they can repeat for decades even stronger than the &#8220;they got spit on&#8221; BS for Vietnam: The Glorious Republican Party led the USA to victory until the traitorous Democratic party intentionally let us lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-399799</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-399799</guid>
		<description>El Cid,

Damn, I was hoping I&#039;d be the first...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Cid,</p>
<p>Damn, I was hoping I&#8217;d be the first&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not completely useless</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-397662</link>
		<dc:creator>not completely useless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-397662</guid>
		<description>Back on topic ...

The Congressional Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 authorized the President to do two things:

    (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
    (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

Regardless of the conditions in 2002, the state of Iraq is clearly no longer a threat to the United States. Certainly no one believes there is any further need for the U. S. to enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions. These two things have been resolved; the war is over.

On March 19, 2003, President Bush announced the U. S. invasion of Iraq with these words:

    My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.

Despite numerous subsequent attempts by the administration to recast the invasion as having some other mission, these three goals were the purpose of the invasion: &quot;to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger&quot;. All of these goals have been either accomplished or shown to have been unnecessary. The war is over.

The war is clearly over, it&#039;s the occupation that&#039;s still being fucked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on topic &#8230;</p>
<p>The Congressional Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 authorized the President to do two things:</p>
<p>    (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and<br />
    (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.</p>
<p>Regardless of the conditions in 2002, the state of Iraq is clearly no longer a threat to the United States. Certainly no one believes there is any further need for the U. S. to enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions. These two things have been resolved; the war is over.</p>
<p>On March 19, 2003, President Bush announced the U. S. invasion of Iraq with these words:</p>
<p>    My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.</p>
<p>Despite numerous subsequent attempts by the administration to recast the invasion as having some other mission, these three goals were the purpose of the invasion: &#8220;to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger&#8221;. All of these goals have been either accomplished or shown to have been unnecessary. The war is over.</p>
<p>The war is clearly over, it&#8217;s the occupation that&#8217;s still being fucked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396974</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396974</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

So your idea of a book review should be “There are 456 pages, encompassing 256,398 words and 35,000 paragraphs. There are 34,967 commas, 22,712 periods, five colons and one semi-colon. Also three ellipses. I believe you’ll find those numbers are accurate.”

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, there was that famous &lt;i&gt;Spin&lt;/i&gt; magazine review of Jewel&#039;s book of poetry.

&lt;blockquote&gt;

Jewel’s collection of poetry has her picture on the front, back, and spine. Inside, the poems are set in a font called Fairfield. It’s a bookish and professional-looking font. Yet it remains friendly, with well-defined (but never excessive) serifs and excellent readability. It’s sort of like the agreeable chardonnay of typefaces. The stem of the lower-case y seems a little frail, but fear not – the j and p are sturdy enough in that regard. The verses themselves tend to start at the top of the page, with the title, and then continue on down. Available on CD: very shiny.

http://www.metafilter.com/38191/Now-thats-a-pan#809682

&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>So your idea of a book review should be “There are 456 pages, encompassing 256,398 words and 35,000 paragraphs. There are 34,967 commas, 22,712 periods, five colons and one semi-colon. Also three ellipses. I believe you’ll find those numbers are accurate.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, there was that famous <i>Spin</i> magazine review of Jewel&#8217;s book of poetry.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Jewel’s collection of poetry has her picture on the front, back, and spine. Inside, the poems are set in a font called Fairfield. It’s a bookish and professional-looking font. Yet it remains friendly, with well-defined (but never excessive) serifs and excellent readability. It’s sort of like the agreeable chardonnay of typefaces. The stem of the lower-case y seems a little frail, but fear not – the j and p are sturdy enough in that regard. The verses themselves tend to start at the top of the page, with the title, and then continue on down. Available on CD: very shiny.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.metafilter.com/38191/Now-thats-a-pan#809682" rel="nofollow">http://www.metafilter.com/38191/Now-thats-a-pan#809682</a></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396869</link>
		<dc:creator>(Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396869</guid>
		<description>Oh no, I just typed so much and accidentally lost it...ugh....here goes again.

Regarding the Iraq War and the question posed to me when I started questioning things more seriously, &quot;Who profits?&quot;. Here&#039;s just one example, (Retired) General &quot;Rifle&quot; Mike DeLong, the short Google results version:

First, his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/finance/mktguideapps/personinfo/FromPersonIdPersonTearsheet.jhtml?passedPersonId=931025&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;. Note that he has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.strategypage.com/bookreviews/247.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;written a book&lt;/a&gt; (icing on the cake, baby) and was one of the principle planners of the Iraq War. What? You noticed The Shaw Group and that he joined them in 2003? What happened with Shaw after this? Oh yeah, they got a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ir.shawgrp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=61066&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=497240&amp;highlight&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lucrative deal&lt;/a&gt; in , let&#039;s see, Baghdad.

This is just the first example I decided to look up, and this is just what I found on Google. Imagine the rest. Not even mentioning my more personal gripe about the fact that the waterfront around St. Pete (Florida&#039;s) Pass-a-Grille Beach area has all been privatized by land development, one of the multi-million $$$ homes being owned by (guess who?) DeLong! Not for sale like one of his other multi-million $$$ homes near CENTCOM in S. Tampa. 

Oh, damn me for questioning things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, I just typed so much and accidentally lost it&#8230;ugh&#8230;.here goes again.</p>
<p>Regarding the Iraq War and the question posed to me when I started questioning things more seriously, &#8220;Who profits?&#8221;. Here&#8217;s just one example, (Retired) General &#8220;Rifle&#8221; Mike DeLong, the short Google results version:</p>
<p>First, his <a href="http://www.forbes.com/finance/mktguideapps/personinfo/FromPersonIdPersonTearsheet.jhtml?passedPersonId=931025" rel="nofollow">bio</a>. Note that he has <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/bookreviews/247.asp" rel="nofollow">written a book</a> (icing on the cake, baby) and was one of the principle planners of the Iraq War. What? You noticed The Shaw Group and that he joined them in 2003? What happened with Shaw after this? Oh yeah, they got a <a href="http://ir.shawgrp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=61066&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=497240&amp;highlight" rel="nofollow">lucrative deal</a> in , let&#8217;s see, Baghdad.</p>
<p>This is just the first example I decided to look up, and this is just what I found on Google. Imagine the rest. Not even mentioning my more personal gripe about the fact that the waterfront around St. Pete (Florida&#8217;s) Pass-a-Grille Beach area has all been privatized by land development, one of the multi-million $$$ homes being owned by (guess who?) DeLong! Not for sale like one of his other multi-million $$$ homes near CENTCOM in S. Tampa. </p>
<p>Oh, damn me for questioning things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396656</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-396656</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Gary Ruppert said,
December 29, 2007 at 0:33

The fact is, the NYT review is biased&lt;/i&gt;

Wow. You mean book reviews shouldn&#039;t reflect an opinion?

So your idea of a book review should be &quot;There are 456 pages, encompassing 256,398 words and 35,000 paragraphs. There are 34,967 commas, 22,712 periods, five colons and one semi-colon. Also three ellipses. I believe you&#039;ll find those numbers are accurate.&quot;

There&#039;s a ringing endorsement any author would love to have on his blurb...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gary Ruppert said,<br />
December 29, 2007 at 0:33</p>
<p>The fact is, the NYT review is biased</i></p>
<p>Wow. You mean book reviews shouldn&#8217;t reflect an opinion?</p>
<p>So your idea of a book review should be &#8220;There are 456 pages, encompassing 256,398 words and 35,000 paragraphs. There are 34,967 commas, 22,712 periods, five colons and one semi-colon. Also three ellipses. I believe you&#8217;ll find those numbers are accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a ringing endorsement any author would love to have on his blurb&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-395726</link>
		<dc:creator>(Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-395726</guid>
		<description>OK, so it isn&#039;t just me then? That is my main argument from robotguy over at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqvU0Y1zQcQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bikini video&lt;/a&gt; (where my bikini clad butt is getting kicked by Pamela&#039;s BTW). We WON the war in 2003, that&#039;s why it&#039;s not on TV anymore. So bad you can hardly respond sort of stuff:

&quot;The reason that Iraq is hardly ever on the news is that America won. The press doesn&#039;t want you to see that; they want every war to be Vietnam.&quot; --Robotguy

And now Bush is vetoing &lt;b&gt;another&lt;/b&gt; pay raise. And people wonder why I&#039;m so cynical (you guys ever get that?....LOL).

On the up-side, I figured out how to bold something. Now I want to learn quoting people. Arky--I feel you on that one. Yeah, interesting news take back there, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so it isn&#8217;t just me then? That is my main argument from robotguy over at the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqvU0Y1zQcQ" rel="nofollow">bikini video</a> (where my bikini clad butt is getting kicked by Pamela&#8217;s BTW). We WON the war in 2003, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s not on TV anymore. So bad you can hardly respond sort of stuff:</p>
<p>&#8220;The reason that Iraq is hardly ever on the news is that America won. The press doesn&#8217;t want you to see that; they want every war to be Vietnam.&#8221; &#8211;Robotguy</p>
<p>And now Bush is vetoing <b>another</b> pay raise. And people wonder why I&#8217;m so cynical (you guys ever get that?&#8230;.LOL).</p>
<p>On the up-side, I figured out how to bold something. Now I want to learn quoting people. Arky&#8211;I feel you on that one. Yeah, interesting news take back there, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394930</link>
		<dc:creator>atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394930</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;this is…totally off-topic, but does anyone happen to know what happened to The Editors?&lt;/i&gt;

I dunno- been wondering that myself. Hope the eds is OK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>this is…totally off-topic, but does anyone happen to know what happened to The Editors?</i></p>
<p>I dunno- been wondering that myself. Hope the eds is OK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patkin</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394642</link>
		<dc:creator>Patkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394642</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He’s got I believe the knowledge and the judgment to attack one of the most difficult problems in current history and that is the rise of the Muslims, and make no mistake about it, this hasn’t happened for a thousand years&lt;/i&gt;. 

Oh good, Crusade talk again. That&#039;ll go over well. When do we get to burn down Istanbul (was Constantinople)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He’s got I believe the knowledge and the judgment to attack one of the most difficult problems in current history and that is the rise of the Muslims, and make no mistake about it, this hasn’t happened for a thousand years</i>. </p>
<p>Oh good, Crusade talk again. That&#8217;ll go over well. When do we get to burn down Istanbul (was Constantinople)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worst. President. Ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394531</link>
		<dc:creator>Worst. President. Ever.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394531</guid>
		<description>Exactly, owlbear1.

We&#039;ll remove our troops the very same day that very last drop of oil is pumped out of there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, owlbear1.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll remove our troops the very same day that very last drop of oil is pumped out of there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394419</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-394419</guid>
		<description>All you people asking &quot;Since we won can we pull the troops out now?&quot;


Silly people.

VICTORY means keeping Troops in Iraq forever.
Removing troops means DEFEAT.

That will be the calculus of it for people like Noonan until the day they die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you people asking &#8220;Since we won can we pull the troops out now?&#8221;</p>
<p>Silly people.</p>
<p>VICTORY means keeping Troops in Iraq forever.<br />
Removing troops means DEFEAT.</p>
<p>That will be the calculus of it for people like Noonan until the day they die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cokane</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393384</link>
		<dc:creator>cokane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393384</guid>
		<description>i can agree that we&#039;ve won, if that means we can pull our troops out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can agree that we&#8217;ve won, if that means we can pull our troops out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Coelacanth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393328</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Coelacanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393328</guid>
		<description>&quot;the purpose of a business is to provide the best product or service it can, while to modern coporate executives it is to provide the highest profit in any given business quarter, next quarter be damned.&quot;

Gee, Mr. Noonan, you sound like that&#039;s a bad thing. Don&#039;t ya believe in Capitalism? Making sure a business provides the best product or service might involve some sort of, I dunno, &lt;i&gt;regulation&lt;/i&gt;. Such talk is dangerous for a true disciple of Reagan. You DO love Reagan, don&#039;t ya Mr. Noonan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the purpose of a business is to provide the best product or service it can, while to modern coporate executives it is to provide the highest profit in any given business quarter, next quarter be damned.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gee, Mr. Noonan, you sound like that&#8217;s a bad thing. Don&#8217;t ya believe in Capitalism? Making sure a business provides the best product or service might involve some sort of, I dunno, <i>regulation</i>. Such talk is dangerous for a true disciple of Reagan. You DO love Reagan, don&#8217;t ya Mr. Noonan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsnarkle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393215</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsnarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393215</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Been saving a bottle of B&amp; B for my victory bash&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I like my Benedictine in a tall glass over ice, with a splash of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Mi-Oc/Mineral-Waters-and-Spas.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Pluto Water&lt;/a&gt; and a sprig of mint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Been saving a bottle of B&amp; B for my victory bash&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I like my Benedictine in a tall glass over ice, with a splash of <a href="http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Mi-Oc/Mineral-Waters-and-Spas.html" rel="nofollow"> Pluto Water</a> and a sprig of mint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393032</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-393032</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Pakistan now says Bhutto’s cause of death was hitting her head on the sunroof, or something. I immediately figured they had consulted Arlen “One Bullet” Specter for help. Then I find out Specter WAS IN Pakistan at the time! With…wait for it….quiver with anticipation….Patrick KENNEDY! &lt;/i&gt;

Yah, well, a sniper might eventually be traced back to the ISI, but if it was the *sunroof* that killed her, then all we can do is blame the lousy automotive industry&#039;s design flaws, knowhutamean?  Having Arlen &quot;I Roll Over for All Repubs&quot; Spector and Patrick &quot;Absolutely the Dumbest Member of the Family&quot; Kennedy on hand for the kill just proves that the ISI is now getting their Secret Spycraft Tips from old episodes of the X-Files, which still gives them a considerable technological lead over the SooperJeenyuses our own Oval Office Occupants has on call.

Also, to return to the original topic, Noonan&#039;s trope on how &quot;we&quot; already &quot;won&quot; in Iraq is almost certainly intended as a prequel to the Repub&#039;s planned 2009 &quot;We had Iraq in the palm of our hand, but then the Demon-crats took the election away from us, so it&#039;s NOT OUR FAULT!!!!11!!&quot;.   Mark Noonan is to the Republican Party as a fruitfly is to the human genome -- a very simple organism showing the common DNA heritage writ small.  So it looks like even the hardcore Rethugs are planning for the withdrawal of American forces, which in their world means finding somebody else to take the blame for their crimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pakistan now says Bhutto’s cause of death was hitting her head on the sunroof, or something. I immediately figured they had consulted Arlen “One Bullet” Specter for help. Then I find out Specter WAS IN Pakistan at the time! With…wait for it….quiver with anticipation….Patrick KENNEDY! </i></p>
<p>Yah, well, a sniper might eventually be traced back to the ISI, but if it was the *sunroof* that killed her, then all we can do is blame the lousy automotive industry&#8217;s design flaws, knowhutamean?  Having Arlen &#8220;I Roll Over for All Repubs&#8221; Spector and Patrick &#8220;Absolutely the Dumbest Member of the Family&#8221; Kennedy on hand for the kill just proves that the ISI is now getting their Secret Spycraft Tips from old episodes of the X-Files, which still gives them a considerable technological lead over the SooperJeenyuses our own Oval Office Occupants has on call.</p>
<p>Also, to return to the original topic, Noonan&#8217;s trope on how &#8220;we&#8221; already &#8220;won&#8221; in Iraq is almost certainly intended as a prequel to the Repub&#8217;s planned 2009 &#8220;We had Iraq in the palm of our hand, but then the Demon-crats took the election away from us, so it&#8217;s NOT OUR FAULT!!!!11!!&#8221;.   Mark Noonan is to the Republican Party as a fruitfly is to the human genome &#8212; a very simple organism showing the common DNA heritage writ small.  So it looks like even the hardcore Rethugs are planning for the withdrawal of American forces, which in their world means finding somebody else to take the blame for their crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392989</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392989</guid>
		<description>Clint I haz a feeling annie is still with us...just using other names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint I haz a feeling annie is still with us&#8230;just using other names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arky - Fascistianata</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392813</link>
		<dc:creator>Arky - Fascistianata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392813</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;These are familiar words, eerily reminiscent of the “adrelaline-soaked” clichés of John F. Kennedy as he railed against Soviet expansion around the globe. But I dare not call them fascist. That would be unfair.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

At Haus L&#156;dedH&#246;sen: &quot;Moooooom! Is this a good review of my book?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>These are familiar words, eerily reminiscent of the “adrelaline-soaked” clichés of John F. Kennedy as he railed against Soviet expansion around the globe. But I dare not call them fascist. That would be unfair.</p></blockquote>
<p>At Haus L&#339;dedH&ouml;sen: &#8220;Moooooom! Is this a good review of my book?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392812</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392812</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fact is, the NYT review is biased, which only re-confirms the Times as the pre-eminemt bias purveyor and mouthpiece of liberal nutballs.&lt;/i&gt;

Nonononono, it&#039;s nutBARS, as per the late, unlamented AnnieAnal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fact is, the NYT review is biased, which only re-confirms the Times as the pre-eminemt bias purveyor and mouthpiece of liberal nutballs.</i></p>
<p>Nonononono, it&#8217;s nutBARS, as per the late, unlamented AnnieAnal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392759</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8361.html#comment-392759</guid>
		<description>Is South Carolina considered the Heartland now? Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is South Carolina considered the Heartland now? Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

