Just sayin’.

And please stop associating him with the movie. He’s hated and refused to be involved in any film adaptations of his work.

high-larious… we must kick him out of the movement at our next meeting

Awesome. A perfect description.

Limpsocks like Todd masturbate to the fantasy that they are Denny Crane. They are not smart enough to pick up the concept of “comic relief”*, or the fact that Shatner’s witty lines are written by lefty-liberal-Hollywood-unionist writers. Just as Todd and his fellow travellers (as I understand it, libertarians reject the concept of “friends”) saw the original Star Trek series as “Dashing Captain Kirk travels the universe screwing all the women & killing all the men”, they see Boston Legal as “Crafty Denny Crane does whatever he feels like and never gets punished because Money Rulez!!!1!”

*No, Mr. Seavy, it has nothing to do with “fart jokes”

You’re just ticked that gay hippies are coming to put white men like you into concentration camps.

I love how we have Republican candidates running for office that don’t believe in the right to Habeas Corpus, believe that the President can do everything and anything he wants, any time, for whatever reason — and the people who *don’t* believe that are the fascists.

Up is down. Black is white. Yawn.

When you look at what characterized the Nazis it’s not that Hitler owned a dog or that his college roommate smoked pot. If you honestly make a list of what made the Nazis Nazis that list looks suspiciously like Romney’s and Guiliani’s campaign platforms.

What Republicans believe about the law, the nature of government and the rights of citizens is almost exactly what the Nazis believed. They both believe that the legislative branch has little authority, that the Constitution is outdated and can be suspended, that a single authority figure is the right form of government, that preventive wars are wonderful, etc etc etc.

But we’re supposed to believe that it’s people who like dogs that are the real fascists.

There’s a sucker born every minute and apparently that’s the audience for this dreck. A book by and for the very stupid.

Or perhaps this guy.

This “amateur lawyer” does seem to have inspired a clarification posting.

Next, you might want to do one correcting my significantly understated salary, since you can hardly argue that your erroneous post was done without malice.

You called?