Comments on: And Now, Your Daily Liberal Fascism Moment of Zen [Updated x2]

By: ipad case

ipad case — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:18:40 +0000

Goldberg is sadness

By: ?????

????? — Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:27:01 +0000

Goldberg actually wrote that

By: Various items

Various items — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:36:44 +0000

[...] phenomena — the superb Sadly, No series highlighting some of the most inane passages (here, here, here, here, here, and here, just for starters) more than satisfies that [...]

By: Substance McGravitas

Substance McGravitas — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:56:03 +0000

did you actually read the book? jonah goldberg only points out things that need to be said, but people like you love to take things out of context to make it seem as if hes crazy. the biggest points of the book are about how mussolini and hitler were giant socialists, and that if they were alive today they would consider themselves liberals.

That is completely crazy. As is Jonah's crackpot explanation of why the white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism.

By: “The white male is the Jew of liberal fascism” « The United States of Jamerica

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:55:00 +0000

[...] And yes, Goldberg actually wrote that. [...]

By: yeap

yeap — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:17:12 +0000

did you actually read the book? jonah goldberg only points out things that need to be said, but people like you love to take things out of context to make it seem as if hes crazy. the biggest points of the book are about how mussolini and hitler were giant socialists, and that if they were alive today they would consider themselves liberals. the next point the book makes is how woodrow wilson and FDR ran the US like they were saddam hussein. they thought they could do whatever they wanted because they could do no wrong. FDR sent military equipment to the UK during WW2, and he put the navy in the pacific to stop the flow of merchant ships into japan. Woodrow wilsion established the income tax and federal reserve. woodrow wilson was the first president to require all citizens to pay taxes as a means of keeping track of people, and FDR gave every american citizen a number (sound like how the nazis gave jews numbers during the holocaust). i think FDR was a great president, and so was clinton. though that does not mean that history did not happen and that you shouldnt be able to write a book that simply says that if any president tried to do the things that woodrow wilson or FDR did, their would be an overthrow of the government and mass rioting. most people dont even know that 250 thousand people tried to overthrow the whitehouse during FDR’s term. woodrow wilson, FDR, Harry Truman, and Lyndon B Johnson. what do all of these men have in common? yes they were all democrats, but they were also all responsible for the largest wars in the 20th century.

By: xevycosq ktecd

xevycosq ktecd — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:08:22 +0000

soxv upohqbtjd spxzd dflxtm otba fwazb joticey

By: Sadly, No! » Shorter Bryan Fischer

Sadly, No! » Shorter Bryan Fischer — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:37:46 +0000

[...] * Cf. [...]

By: sovietguy

sovietguy — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:08 +0000

There are those who would say that i am about as far to the left as one can get, and i don’t see the big deal with the book. We have had our growing pains, but i don’t see anything in the book that is so far out of whack with our history. I take no offense, but i say, “so what?”.

By: James McGee

James McGee — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:43:21 +0000

Incredible. Have ANY of you been in a “liberal” university in the past 10 years. Whiteness–like Jewishness–is consistently linked to greed and capitalism, which in turn is responsible for starvation, draught, aggression, and all genocide. If someone died for any geopolitical reason in the past century, you can be sure a white male conspiracy was at the heart of it. Further, ANYONE who’s read the public statements of the Nation of Islam in the 60s will know that works like those of Amiri Baraka explicitly called for white genocide. And I’m telling you folks, for real, people in the Humanities in tons of elite schools are proud of these legacies. So, yeah, in the realm of ideology, political rhetoric, and justification for totalitarian unity and overturning of the private sphere, white men are, in fact, the new Jews. Like the Jews, their perceived success is hated by the poor and dispossessed. Just look at the comments here emphasizing white privilege to dismiss Goldberg’s argument. Yeah, all white men live in suburbs. Anyone reading whiteness studies articles need only replace the word Whiteness with the word Jewishness to see the parallels. Look a little further–not far–and you’ll find white men, especially Christian ones, linked conspiratorially to Israel again and again in academic discourse. Not to put too fine a point on it.

By: JaDeD1

JaDeD1 — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:09:57 +0000

God, what a bunch of tools. It amazes me that you are all able to judge a WHOLE body of work (That no one has read) by a few strategic talking points(Hannity and Rhodes would be sooo proud) But why should I be surprised, both sides touch their money, or their inner child, in an inappropriate way. The funny thing is, that both sides are right, but too arrogant to see it.

By: jimmiraybob

jimmiraybob — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:55:37 +0000

“The Goldberg Principle”
You can prove any thesis to be true if you make up your own definitions of words.

I do not deny that Doughy definitions differ from classical definitions. Indeed, it is central to my point. For a Doughy definition must not define the character of an object or an idea too narrowly, that could lead to a unique and identifiable trait – in this way lies madness.
A Doughy definition must remain fluid and must maximize the freedom of the object and cannot be hindered by rhyme, reason or independent ideas that exist outside of the Doughy mind. The Doughy definition must leave the object or idea unfettered and unconstrained and free to float like the butterfly, for this way lies maximum obfuscation and plausible deniability.

A passage from The Tao of Jonah

By: Politic crap news » Jonah Goldberg Presents: The White Man’s Shoah

Politic crap news » Jonah Goldberg Presents: The White Man’s Shoah — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:17:46 +0000

[...] December 22nd, 2007 [Promoted by DHinMI; some may squawk that this is an offensive parody, that it’s making a glib joke about one of the darkest, most evil events of modern history just to make a cheap political point. Well, they would be correct that there’s a cruel joke here, but the cruelty isn’t in this diary. This diary just spells out the absurd implications inherent in Jonah Goldberg’s ridiculous and offensively absurd screed.] “The white man is the Jew of liberal fascism.” [...]

By: jgmurphy

jgmurphy — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:30:17 +0000

“A salad is the hot dog of liberal fascism, and Thousand Island dressing is its ketchup.”

:”Thousand Island” dressing? isn’t that some sore of creeping liberal multiculturalism that the left is trying to force down the innocent throats of our children? (And don’t forget—-it used to be called RUSSIAN dressing!!!!!)

Where exactly ARE these “Thousand Islands”? They’re probably out in the ocean somewhere, inhabited by people who we know aren’t white, and who worship gods that look like the cocktail stirrers in Chinese restaurants. No wonder the left is trying to force all those brown pagans into our all-American lettuec and tomatoes.

By: 5thKolumnisto

5thKolumnisto — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:49:46 +0000

Oh, for the love of... As a newly discovered Jew, I am offended that Goldberg's cover seems to have been inspired by Aryan Wear T-Shirt designs (modeled by the White Nationalist pedo-pop duo Prussian Blue at Hatewatch.)

By: AMERICAN NONSENSE » Jonah Goldberg Presents: The White Man’s Shoah

AMERICAN NONSENSE » Jonah Goldberg Presents: The White Man’s Shoah — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:44:46 +0000

[...] [Promoted by DHinMI; some may squawk that this is an offensive parody, that it’s making a glib joke about one of the darkest, most evil events of modern history just to make a cheap political point. Well, they would be correct that there’s a cruel joke here, but the cruelty isn’t in this diary. This diary just spells out the absurd implications inherent in Jonah Goldberg’s ridiculous and offensively absurd screed.] “The white man is the Jew of liberal fascism.” [...]

By: Gary Ruppenfuhrer

Gary Ruppenfuhrer — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:07:52 +0000

The Jew is using the black as muscle against you. And you are left there helpless. Well, what are you going to do about it, whitey? Just sit there?

By: phil

phil — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:32:30 +0000

It’s worse when you realize this book was ghost-written by Ignatius J. Reilly.

By: aleks

aleks — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:26:31 +0000

Maybe he’s taking one for the team? Ramesh Ponnuru can say “No, liberals aren’t fascists,” and everyone will report how fair and balanced he is. Then he’ll say “But they’re still the Party of Death,” and the pundits will take out their measuring sticks, rememberthat they just called Ponnuru a moderate centrist, and rule that the responsible, nonpartisan position is that the Dems are indeed not fascists but mere murderers.

By: aleks

aleks — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:58:10 +0000

First they came for the Jews, and I said nothing, because I was Aryan.
Then they came for the white man, and I said nothing, because now I’m Jewish.