<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Reasons I </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tritonesub</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-367157</link>
		<dc:creator>tritonesub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-367157</guid>
		<description>@Ian

Like &quot;Death Tax&quot;, the rebranding of VAT as the &quot;Fair Tax&quot; is a great idea if you are a plutocrat and is pretty good or at least inoffensive if you are in poverty, but is a mighty sucking wind of suckitude for the 80% of us in the middle.  Yeah, let&#039;s be &quot;fair&quot; to the richest people, &#039;cause, you know, their wealth in no way has anything to do with the rest of us.  The money they get is simply created out of the aether in response to their merit.  Why should they shoulder more of the burden than anyone else?
It&#039;s their money dammit, they earned it, they didn&#039;t need us to get it and they sure don&#039;t need us taking it from them for some so called &quot;shared interest&quot; or other governmental nonsense.  Are there no workhouses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ian</p>
<p>Like &#8220;Death Tax&#8221;, the rebranding of VAT as the &#8220;Fair Tax&#8221; is a great idea if you are a plutocrat and is pretty good or at least inoffensive if you are in poverty, but is a mighty sucking wind of suckitude for the 80% of us in the middle.  Yeah, let&#8217;s be &#8220;fair&#8221; to the richest people, &#8217;cause, you know, their wealth in no way has anything to do with the rest of us.  The money they get is simply created out of the aether in response to their merit.  Why should they shoulder more of the burden than anyone else?<br />
It&#8217;s their money dammit, they earned it, they didn&#8217;t need us to get it and they sure don&#8217;t need us taking it from them for some so called &#8220;shared interest&#8221; or other governmental nonsense.  Are there no workhouses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; More On The Conservative Crackup</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-365971</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; More On The Conservative Crackup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-365971</guid>
		<description>[...] and their little bait-and-switch isn&#8217;t working anymore. There have been a number of gleeful commentaries about this, but the best is clearly from the great James Wolcott. (Bush&#8217;s compassionate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and their little bait-and-switch isn&#8217;t working anymore. There have been a number of gleeful commentaries about this, but the best is clearly from the great James Wolcott. (Bush&#8217;s compassionate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobbey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364579</link>
		<dc:creator>lobbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364579</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;OK, now that I’ve stopped laughing over the Death Star…sort of….&lt;/i&gt;

i&#039;m late to this party, but I have to add that the pantload with the deathstar picture cracks me up every time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>OK, now that I’ve stopped laughing over the Death Star…sort of….</i></p>
<p>i&#8217;m late to this party, but I have to add that the pantload with the deathstar picture cracks me up every time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uppity kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364164</link>
		<dc:creator>uppity kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364164</guid>
		<description>Jesus W. Bush? Ok, now, I really have to take offense to that. 
Branding is important.  May I suggest,  W. Satan Failure, or perhaps, George,.... W.T.F iswrongwithme. Please do not associate the Christian savior with this piece of shit president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus W. Bush? Ok, now, I really have to take offense to that.<br />
Branding is important.  May I suggest,  W. Satan Failure, or perhaps, George,&#8230;. W.T.F iswrongwithme. Please do not associate the Christian savior with this piece of shit president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamFromUtah</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364006</link>
		<dc:creator>SamFromUtah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-364006</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He doesn’t have a foreign policy advisor? Is that worse than having one in John Podhoretz?&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s better, but if he were to get the nomination the vacuum would almost certainly be filled by someone just as bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He doesn’t have a foreign policy advisor? Is that worse than having one in John Podhoretz?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s better, but if he were to get the nomination the vacuum would almost certainly be filled by someone just as bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363807</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363807</guid>
		<description>Huck doesn&#039;t stand a chance because his constituency doesn&#039;t have any money.

He doesn&#039;t have a foreign policy advisor?  Is that worse than having one in John Podhoretz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huck doesn&#8217;t stand a chance because his constituency doesn&#8217;t have any money.</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t have a foreign policy advisor?  Is that worse than having one in John Podhoretz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363661</link>
		<dc:creator>(Lex) Skink Tyree (Azagthoth)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363661</guid>
		<description>OK, now that I&#039;ve stopped laughing over the Death Star...sort of....

What Sender said. Add annoyingly cutesy jokes and some Jared-like weight loss that doesn&#039;t help anything. Aww, the Huckster. Really, though, he doesn&#039;t want to bomb everyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now that I&#8217;ve stopped laughing over the Death Star&#8230;sort of&#8230;.</p>
<p>What Sender said. Add annoyingly cutesy jokes and some Jared-like weight loss that doesn&#8217;t help anything. Aww, the Huckster. Really, though, he doesn&#8217;t want to bomb everyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian from Ann Arbor</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian from Ann Arbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363323</guid>
		<description>Rich Lowry needs to get in touch with his non-elitist side.

Wait. Rich Lowry doesn&#039;t have a non-elitist side.

Someone should tell him that, sitting around all day, dreaming up anti-Huckabee tomes is going to make him a dull boy. Get the message: Huckabee &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://snipr.com/leaderlook&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what Leadership looks like&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;!

Be careful Richy.  Your readership may drop off with your continued rants.

Now, will you please get on the correct side of the FairTax.  For goodness sake, man, we want to get the paws of politicians and lobbyists out of our paychecks. We want to pay for government the way that working Americans are paid - when, and because, somethin is sold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Lowry needs to get in touch with his non-elitist side.</p>
<p>Wait. Rich Lowry doesn&#8217;t have a non-elitist side.</p>
<p>Someone should tell him that, sitting around all day, dreaming up anti-Huckabee tomes is going to make him a dull boy. Get the message: Huckabee <i>is</i> <b><a href="http://snipr.com/leaderlook" rel="nofollow">what Leadership looks like</a></b>!</p>
<p>Be careful Richy.  Your readership may drop off with your continued rants.</p>
<p>Now, will you please get on the correct side of the FairTax.  For goodness sake, man, we want to get the paws of politicians and lobbyists out of our paychecks. We want to pay for government the way that working Americans are paid &#8211; when, and because, somethin is sold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363126</link>
		<dc:creator>dSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363126</guid>
		<description>A broken voice, and his whole function suiting
 	 With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing—
 	 For Huckabee!
 	 What&#039;s Huckabee to him or he to Huckabee
 	 That he should weep for [him]? What would he do
	 Had he the motive and the cue for passion
 	 That I have? He would drown the stage with tears
 	 And cleave the general ear with horrid speech,
 	 Make mad the guilty and appall the free, 
        Confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed
	 The very faculties of eyes and ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A broken voice, and his whole function suiting<br />
 	 With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing—<br />
 	 For Huckabee!<br />
 	 What&#8217;s Huckabee to him or he to Huckabee<br />
 	 That he should weep for [him]? What would he do<br />
	 Had he the motive and the cue for passion<br />
 	 That I have? He would drown the stage with tears<br />
 	 And cleave the general ear with horrid speech,<br />
 	 Make mad the guilty and appall the free,<br />
        Confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed<br />
	 The very faculties of eyes and ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cole, Former Republican&#8230; &#171; Beware The Man</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363111</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cole, Former Republican&#8230; &#171; Beware The Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363111</guid>
		<description>[...] He kindly and graciously documents the GOP anxiety over the monster of their own creation.  Hilarious stuff.  There&#8217;s more all over the place, and as usual Sadly, No! has a good summary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He kindly and graciously documents the GOP anxiety over the monster of their own creation.  Hilarious stuff.  There&#8217;s more all over the place, and as usual Sadly, No! has a good summary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDC</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363105</link>
		<dc:creator>JDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363105</guid>
		<description>As for candidate super-vehicles, I&#039;m a nostalgist. Bring back &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGlq8ozV7us&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Silhouette!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for candidate super-vehicles, I&#8217;m a nostalgist. Bring back <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGlq8ozV7us" rel="nofollow">The Silhouette!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML Mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363059</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML Mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-363059</guid>
		<description>Rock on, Brad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock on, Brad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Oh Stewardess, I Speak 'Nut"</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362967</link>
		<dc:creator>"Oh Stewardess, I Speak 'Nut"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362967</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The GOP’s social conservatism inarguably has been an enormous benefit to the party throughout the past 30 years, winning over conservative Democrats and lower-income voters who otherwise might not find the Republican limited-government message appealing.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

This sentence was a real puzzler, until I realized that by &quot;limited government&quot; the GOP&#039;s Thousand-Year Majority is simply referring to Halliburton and Blackwater, et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The GOP’s social conservatism inarguably has been an enormous benefit to the party throughout the past 30 years, winning over conservative Democrats and lower-income voters who otherwise might not find the Republican limited-government message appealing.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>This sentence was a real puzzler, until I realized that by &#8220;limited government&#8221; the GOP&#8217;s Thousand-Year Majority is simply referring to Halliburton and Blackwater, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenga</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362894</link>
		<dc:creator>kenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362894</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Republican Party married the radical religious right. It was a marriage of convenience and now they are full of regret. Too bad.

A Christmas Card for you.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/T-13/x.jpg&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whuh? 
Haven&#039;t they seen &lt;i&gt;Footloose&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Republican Party married the radical religious right. It was a marriage of convenience and now they are full of regret. Too bad.</p>
<p>A Christmas Card for you.<br />
<a href="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/T-13/x.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/T-13/x.jpg</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Whuh?<br />
Haven&#8217;t they seen <i>Footloose</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362858</link>
		<dc:creator>huxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362858</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m voting for the first candidate who tools around the campaign trail in this beauty …

http://www.spencer1984.com/image/m232a.jpg&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s Dick Cheney&#039;s vice-pimpmobile, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m voting for the first candidate who tools around the campaign trail in this beauty …</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spencer1984.com/image/m232a.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.spencer1984.com/image/m232a.jpg</a></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s Dick Cheney&#8217;s vice-pimpmobile, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignant Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362845</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignant Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362845</guid>
		<description>Allow me to quote &lt;a href=&quot;http://mbouffant.blogspot.com/2007/12/shorter-aei-literally.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;myself&lt;/a&gt; (as if you could stop me!):

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Republicans are bankrupt. They&#039;re not raising money like they used to (for the first time in recorded history, it seems, the Democrats are out-raising them) and those who would lead them are bankrupt as well. Not a complete man (nor even one woman) among them, as Hayward admits. They&#039;ve been too busy fooling around in men&#039;s rooms &amp; diapers, corrupting the government, giving no-bid contracts, selling themselves to lobbyists &amp; earmarking the Federal budget to pay attention to their next generation of &lt;strike&gt;little Hitlers&lt;/strike&gt;leaders. They&#039;ll be moping around for another Reagan for quite a few more yrs., until the verdict of history comes in &amp; they realize what a complete crock his &quot;legacy&quot; is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

None of the current crop of creeps even comes close to satisfying all of the stitched-together parts of the Republican Frankenstein monster. I&#039;ll soon be marketing &quot;Schadenfreude&quot; brand popcorn, w/ real butter!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to quote <a href="http://mbouffant.blogspot.com/2007/12/shorter-aei-literally.html" rel="nofollow">myself</a> (as if you could stop me!):</p>
<blockquote><p>The Republicans are bankrupt. They&#8217;re not raising money like they used to (for the first time in recorded history, it seems, the Democrats are out-raising them) and those who would lead them are bankrupt as well. Not a complete man (nor even one woman) among them, as Hayward admits. They&#8217;ve been too busy fooling around in men&#8217;s rooms &amp; diapers, corrupting the government, giving no-bid contracts, selling themselves to lobbyists &amp; earmarking the Federal budget to pay attention to their next generation of <strike>little Hitlers</strike>leaders. They&#8217;ll be moping around for another Reagan for quite a few more yrs., until the verdict of history comes in &amp; they realize what a complete crock his &#8220;legacy&#8221; is.</p></blockquote>
<p>None of the current crop of creeps even comes close to satisfying all of the stitched-together parts of the Republican Frankenstein monster. I&#8217;ll soon be marketing &#8220;Schadenfreude&#8221; brand popcorn, w/ real butter!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalize</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362818</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362818</guid>
		<description>Is this where we&#039;re supposed to shed a tear for the GOP&#039;s &quot;Jebus Problem&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this where we&#8217;re supposed to shed a tear for the GOP&#8217;s &#8220;Jebus Problem&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBuddha</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362817</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBuddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362817</guid>
		<description>Said it before, will say it again: Huckabee / Paul in 2008! A true &quot;Dream Team&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Said it before, will say it again: Huckabee / Paul in 2008! A true &#8220;Dream Team&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362777</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362777</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And, voilà! It doesn’t matter that he’s screwed up everything he’s touched; as long as NRO’s corporate masters can get tax breaks, all is well in the universe.&lt;/I&gt;

Yes indeed.  And the one and only reason the right wing hates Bill Clinton so furiously is because practically the first thing he did as President was raise the percentage rate of the highest tax brackets. 

Look. They accused Clinton of unforgiveable sexual immorality.  &lt;I&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Henry Hyde&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Bob Livingston&lt;/I&gt; accused Bill Clinton of sexual immorality! No one actually ever gave a damn about his sexual morals.  

They accused him of playing fast and loose with the civil rights of American citizens.  Waco Waco, Janet Reno, black helicopters, New World Order.  This is the same party that is virtually unanimous today in favor of throwing away &lt;I&gt;habeas corpus&lt;/I&gt; and legalizing torture.  Try and imagine the right wing actually being upset over a President whose actions may have truncated the average citizen&#039;s privacy or civil rights!

They called him a bloodthirsty warmonger when NATO bombed Serbia.  They accused him of &quot;wagging the dog&quot; when he Tomahawked bin Laden&#039;s training camps in Afghanistan.  Then they blasted Iraq to bloody shreds in order to protect the American public from the desperate imminent threat of anthrax bombs being manufactured in canvas-sided semi-trailers, being delivered by pilotless aircraft made out of balsa wood.

It&#039;s always all about the class war.  Taking from the poor and giving to the rich is the only thing the Republicans have ever been really serious about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And, voilà! It doesn’t matter that he’s screwed up everything he’s touched; as long as NRO’s corporate masters can get tax breaks, all is well in the universe.</i></p>
<p>Yes indeed.  And the one and only reason the right wing hates Bill Clinton so furiously is because practically the first thing he did as President was raise the percentage rate of the highest tax brackets. </p>
<p>Look. They accused Clinton of unforgiveable sexual immorality.  <i>Newt Gingrich</i> and <i>Henry Hyde</i> and <i>Bob Livingston</i> accused Bill Clinton of sexual immorality! No one actually ever gave a damn about his sexual morals.  </p>
<p>They accused him of playing fast and loose with the civil rights of American citizens.  Waco Waco, Janet Reno, black helicopters, New World Order.  This is the same party that is virtually unanimous today in favor of throwing away <i>habeas corpus</i> and legalizing torture.  Try and imagine the right wing actually being upset over a President whose actions may have truncated the average citizen&#8217;s privacy or civil rights!</p>
<p>They called him a bloodthirsty warmonger when NATO bombed Serbia.  They accused him of &#8220;wagging the dog&#8221; when he Tomahawked bin Laden&#8217;s training camps in Afghanistan.  Then they blasted Iraq to bloody shreds in order to protect the American public from the desperate imminent threat of anthrax bombs being manufactured in canvas-sided semi-trailers, being delivered by pilotless aircraft made out of balsa wood.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always all about the class war.  Taking from the poor and giving to the rich is the only thing the Republicans have ever been really serious about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simba B</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362730</link>
		<dc:creator>Simba B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8169.html#comment-362730</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Poorly-driven minivans with eight little blond toddlers in the back seat are known as “Mormon Assault Vehicles” around here.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, as they say on the Internets, full of win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Poorly-driven minivans with eight little blond toddlers in the back seat are known as “Mormon Assault Vehicles” around here.</i></p>
<p>That is, as they say on the Internets, full of win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

