<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Convinced!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RodeoBob</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-360017</link>
		<dc:creator>RodeoBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-360017</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well if you think about the amount of energy it takes to conceive and raise a child, don’t you think that diverting that energy to porn might be criminally wasteful?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&#039;wasteful&#039;? I do not think that word means what you think it means. 
I think you probably meant &lt;i&gt;negligent&lt;/i&gt;, but &quot;criminally negligent&quot; has a defined meaning in the legal code. Which means you probably &lt;b&gt;also&lt;/b&gt; shouldn&#039;t be using &#039;criminally&#039; as a descriptor.

Oh, and let&#039;s not conflate two seperate items. The amount of energy it takes to [b]raise[/b] a child is several orders of magnitude larger than the amount of energy it takes to [b]concieve[/b] a child. Combining the two is nonsensical. It&#039;s like saying &quot;if you think about the cost to buy a car and equip it with fuzy seat cushions...&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess this is TABOO. I apologize for speech.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Hasbro-4015-S5-Taboo/dp/B00005UKIZ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this is Taboo&lt;/a&gt;. What your speech was is just plain stupid. It&#039;s a nice bit of trolling, because the frame you use is so universally applicable...

&quot;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#039;t you think diverting that energy to getting a Master&#039;s Degree might be criminally wasteful?&quot;

&quot;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#039;t you think diverting that energy towards making your spouce feel loved might be criminally wasteful?&quot;

&quot;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#039;t you think diverting that energy towards repairing your house might be criminally wasteful?&quot;


Seriously, nice troll. You hit all the basics:
*conflating dissimilar measurements
*using an absurdist frame
*picking inflammatory, extremist language (criminally?)
*generally abusing the Engligh language
*Using at least one word in ALL CAPS
*Offering a fake apology at the end. 

Fake Gary Ruppurt, Saul, you could learn a thing or two from this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well if you think about the amount of energy it takes to conceive and raise a child, don’t you think that diverting that energy to porn might be criminally wasteful?</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8216;wasteful&#8217;? I do not think that word means what you think it means.<br />
I think you probably meant <i>negligent</i>, but &#8220;criminally negligent&#8221; has a defined meaning in the legal code. Which means you probably <b>also</b> shouldn&#8217;t be using &#8216;criminally&#8217; as a descriptor.</p>
<p>Oh, and let&#8217;s not conflate two seperate items. The amount of energy it takes to [b]raise[/b] a child is several orders of magnitude larger than the amount of energy it takes to [b]concieve[/b] a child. Combining the two is nonsensical. It&#8217;s like saying &#8220;if you think about the cost to buy a car and equip it with fuzy seat cushions&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>I guess this is TABOO. I apologize for speech.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hasbro-4015-S5-Taboo/dp/B00005UKIZ" rel="nofollow">this is Taboo</a>. What your speech was is just plain stupid. It&#8217;s a nice bit of trolling, because the frame you use is so universally applicable&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#8217;t you think diverting that energy to getting a Master&#8217;s Degree might be criminally wasteful?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#8217;t you think diverting that energy towards making your spouce feel loved might be criminally wasteful?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If you think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child, don&#8217;t you think diverting that energy towards repairing your house might be criminally wasteful?&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, nice troll. You hit all the basics:<br />
*conflating dissimilar measurements<br />
*using an absurdist frame<br />
*picking inflammatory, extremist language (criminally?)<br />
*generally abusing the Engligh language<br />
*Using at least one word in ALL CAPS<br />
*Offering a fake apology at the end. </p>
<p>Fake Gary Ruppurt, Saul, you could learn a thing or two from this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porcoises And Tuna</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359582</link>
		<dc:creator>Porcoises And Tuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359582</guid>
		<description>Well if you think about the amount of energy it takes to conceive and raise a child, don&#039;t you think that diverting that energy to porn might be criminally wasteful?

I guess this is TABOO. I apologize for speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you think about the amount of energy it takes to conceive and raise a child, don&#8217;t you think that diverting that energy to porn might be criminally wasteful?</p>
<p>I guess this is TABOO. I apologize for speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forked tongue</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359498</link>
		<dc:creator>forked tongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359498</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But when I would try to read scripture, my mind would wander onto sexual thoughts, and when I would try to pray my mind would fill with pornographic images&lt;/i&gt;

Uh.  So:

(1) Looking at porn made you think sexual thoughts; and
(2) Reading scripture made you think sexual thoughts; and
(3) Praying made you think sexual thoughts.

I would say that with porn or without it, you tend to think a lot of sexual thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But when I would try to read scripture, my mind would wander onto sexual thoughts, and when I would try to pray my mind would fill with pornographic images</i></p>
<p>Uh.  So:</p>
<p>(1) Looking at porn made you think sexual thoughts; and<br />
(2) Reading scripture made you think sexual thoughts; and<br />
(3) Praying made you think sexual thoughts.</p>
<p>I would say that with porn or without it, you tend to think a lot of sexual thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perv53</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359341</link>
		<dc:creator>Perv53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359341</guid>
		<description>Does she do anal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does she do anal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobbey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359339</link>
		<dc:creator>lobbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359339</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;An eighteen year old guy turning down sex to watch porn? That’s so wrong it’s scary.&lt;/i&gt;

He implied it was hetrosexual porn he turned down, I thing our man has had a &#039;problem&#039; with his sexuality for a long time.

For those of you who couldn&#039;t listen all the way through, the way he was &#039;cured&#039; of his porn deviance was via a &#039;correspondence course&#039;........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>An eighteen year old guy turning down sex to watch porn? That’s so wrong it’s scary.</i></p>
<p>He implied it was hetrosexual porn he turned down, I thing our man has had a &#8216;problem&#8217; with his sexuality for a long time.</p>
<p>For those of you who couldn&#8217;t listen all the way through, the way he was &#8216;cured&#8217; of his porn deviance was via a &#8216;correspondence course&#8217;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Qaveat Qat</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359336</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Qaveat Qat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359336</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fact is, homosexuality is evil because it tempts the sexes away from procreation and toward sick pleasure of no purpose. &lt;/i&gt;

Whereas I like my sick pleasure to be purposeful. Filled to the brim with lovely purpose.


&lt;i&gt;Men know best how to pleasure themselves, so they do. So do women. It is about selfishness in self abuse.&lt;/i&gt;

Is there then such a thing as selfless self-abuse? Is that like Professor Geekozoid Sexpert a few posts down, valiantly choosing one off the wrist so as to save some poor girly from the hideous mistake that is instant sex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fact is, homosexuality is evil because it tempts the sexes away from procreation and toward sick pleasure of no purpose. </i></p>
<p>Whereas I like my sick pleasure to be purposeful. Filled to the brim with lovely purpose.</p>
<p><i>Men know best how to pleasure themselves, so they do. So do women. It is about selfishness in self abuse.</i></p>
<p>Is there then such a thing as selfless self-abuse? Is that like Professor Geekozoid Sexpert a few posts down, valiantly choosing one off the wrist so as to save some poor girly from the hideous mistake that is instant sex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359326</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359326</guid>
		<description>Time for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rathergood.com/donkey/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Don Key&lt;/A&gt; song!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for the <a href="http://www.rathergood.com/donkey/" rel="nofollow">Don Key</a> song!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359324</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359324</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s only me, but this guy&#039;s droning voice kinda reminded me of the guy who used to do the Disney nature shows.

I made it to 5:17...then i started to nod off.  My finger must have hit the X key or something, accidentally, because next thing I know Porntube is on my screen.  heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s only me, but this guy&#8217;s droning voice kinda reminded me of the guy who used to do the Disney nature shows.</p>
<p>I made it to 5:17&#8230;then i started to nod off.  My finger must have hit the X key or something, accidentally, because next thing I know Porntube is on my screen.  heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359318</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359318</guid>
		<description>Gary Ruppert said

&lt;blockquote&gt;The fact is, homosexuality is evil because it tempts the sexes away from procreation and toward sick pleasure of no purpose. Men know best how to pleasure themselves, so they do. So do women. It is about selfishness in self abuse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting confession there Gary. So what you&#039;re saying is that gay sex is vastly better than straight sex but you are not gonna go that route because that would be selfish of you. You long for teh gay sex but you deny yourself that pleasure (men know how to pleasure me best)  out of a sense of duty and self sacrifice. This makes you a better man.

Is there something you&#039;d like to tell us Gary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Ruppert said</p>
<blockquote><p>The fact is, homosexuality is evil because it tempts the sexes away from procreation and toward sick pleasure of no purpose. Men know best how to pleasure themselves, so they do. So do women. It is about selfishness in self abuse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting confession there Gary. So what you&#8217;re saying is that gay sex is vastly better than straight sex but you are not gonna go that route because that would be selfish of you. You long for teh gay sex but you deny yourself that pleasure (men know how to pleasure me best)  out of a sense of duty and self sacrifice. This makes you a better man.</p>
<p>Is there something you&#8217;d like to tell us Gary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359308</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359308</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I caught anhedonia from Don Key.&lt;/i&gt;

I am so putting that on a t-shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I caught anhedonia from Don Key.</i></p>
<p>I am so putting that on a t-shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctorb Science</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359279</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctorb Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359279</guid>
		<description>Mister Mahan, are you familiar with Rule #34 of teh internets?  &quot;If it exists, there is porn of it&quot;.

&lt;i&gt;Sexual solicitations of youth made in chat rooms: 89%&lt;/i&gt;

I think that&#039;s a good thing, really, because the other 11% are probably, like, &lt;i&gt;in person&lt;/i&gt; from an idling windowless van or something like that.  Plus,

Sexy teen cheerleaders who are actually middle-aged FBI agents: 85% 

&lt;i&gt;Received unwanted exposure to sexual material: 34%&lt;/i&gt;
Received unwanted exposure to Rick Astley singing &quot;Never Gonna Give You Up: 38%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mister Mahan, are you familiar with Rule #34 of teh internets?  &#8220;If it exists, there is porn of it&#8221;.</p>
<p><i>Sexual solicitations of youth made in chat rooms: 89%</i></p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a good thing, really, because the other 11% are probably, like, <i>in person</i> from an idling windowless van or something like that.  Plus,</p>
<p>Sexy teen cheerleaders who are actually middle-aged FBI agents: 85% </p>
<p><i>Received unwanted exposure to sexual material: 34%</i><br />
Received unwanted exposure to Rick Astley singing &#8220;Never Gonna Give You Up: 38%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentlewoman</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359272</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentlewoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359272</guid>
		<description>I caught anhedonia from Don Key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught anhedonia from Don Key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalize</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359244</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359244</guid>
		<description>Thankfully it is impossible for me to imagine the not-sex this man and that other man next to him were not having, in favor of watching porno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully it is impossible for me to imagine the not-sex this man and that other man next to him were not having, in favor of watching porno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignant Bouffant, gigolo wanna-be,</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359243</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignant Bouffant, gigolo wanna-be,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359243</guid>
		<description>Jillian, let me know when you hit that lottery. I&#039;ll be waiting beside the internets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jillian, let me know when you hit that lottery. I&#8217;ll be waiting beside the internets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Mahan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359225</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Mahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359225</guid>
		<description>The real tragedy here is Key&#039;s flagrant abuse of horse tranquilizers, based on that audio.  Interventions aside, though, this whole site is a gold mine of hilarity.  Check out the &quot;Alarming Stats!&quot; page. Some highlights:

&lt;I&gt;Sexual solicitations of youth made in chat rooms:       89%
Received unwanted exposure to sexual material:        34%&lt;/I&gt;

I don&#039;t think those are complete statistics.

&lt;I&gt;Children&#039;s character names linked to thousands of porn links: 26 (Including Pokemon and Action Man) &lt;/I&gt;

I suspect Key is the only person surprised that googling &quot;Action Man&quot; is going to turn up some porn. Otherwise, this seems pointless. Let&#039;s do a quick google check on Pokemon (with Safe Search off, natch). Hmm, 63 million hits. Now, I&#039;m sure some of those links are indeed porn - Pokemon porn does exist, I&#039;m horrified to say - but I&#039;m not seeing any of it in the first 200 links. The only way that Billy is going to find porn here accidentally is if he&#039;s searching for a video of Pikachu&#039;s Teabag attack.

I&#039;m also very curious as to how they settled upon as exact a number as 26. Does this mean that Teen Titans will give you porn, but Yu-gi-oh! is safe? Does that leaked sex tape of Spongebob and Patrick count as two characters, or just one? We need guidelines, damn it!

&lt;I&gt;Women keeping their cyber activities secret:        70%&lt;/I&gt;

This one is just creepy.  How dare those women have any desire for privacy?! There isn&#039;t a similar statistic on how many men are privacy-loving commies, which should give you an idea who these women are keeping secrets from.


&lt;I&gt;7-17 year olds who would freely give out home address: 29%
7-17 year olds who would freely give out email address: 14%&lt;/I&gt;

What, really? Come on, kids, you do know you can have more than one e-mail account, right? Surely more than 14% of you have a e-mail account set up for spam.



&lt;I&gt;Promise Keeper men who viewed pornography in last week: 53%&lt;/I&gt;

This one made me chuckle smugly, then feel slightly guilty.

&lt;i&gt;Ratio of women to men favoring chat rooms:        2X&lt;/I&gt;

Another odd one. I&#039;m not sure if Key understands that chat rooms can be used for things besides cybersex. Apparently this stat is from an alternate universe where 19-year-old co-eds pretend to be teenage boys and Spock has a goatee.

&lt;i&gt;8-16 year olds having viewed porn online:        90% (most while doing homework)&lt;/I&gt;

10% of 8-16 year olds must lack internet access. And finally: 

&lt;I&gt;Largest consumer of Internet pornography:     35 - 49 age group&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, younger Americans are tech-savvy enough to locate *free* porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real tragedy here is Key&#8217;s flagrant abuse of horse tranquilizers, based on that audio.  Interventions aside, though, this whole site is a gold mine of hilarity.  Check out the &#8220;Alarming Stats!&#8221; page. Some highlights:</p>
<p><i>Sexual solicitations of youth made in chat rooms:       89%<br />
Received unwanted exposure to sexual material:        34%</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think those are complete statistics.</p>
<p><i>Children&#8217;s character names linked to thousands of porn links: 26 (Including Pokemon and Action Man) </i></p>
<p>I suspect Key is the only person surprised that googling &#8220;Action Man&#8221; is going to turn up some porn. Otherwise, this seems pointless. Let&#8217;s do a quick google check on Pokemon (with Safe Search off, natch). Hmm, 63 million hits. Now, I&#8217;m sure some of those links are indeed porn &#8211; Pokemon porn does exist, I&#8217;m horrified to say &#8211; but I&#8217;m not seeing any of it in the first 200 links. The only way that Billy is going to find porn here accidentally is if he&#8217;s searching for a video of Pikachu&#8217;s Teabag attack.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also very curious as to how they settled upon as exact a number as 26. Does this mean that Teen Titans will give you porn, but Yu-gi-oh! is safe? Does that leaked sex tape of Spongebob and Patrick count as two characters, or just one? We need guidelines, damn it!</p>
<p><i>Women keeping their cyber activities secret:        70%</i></p>
<p>This one is just creepy.  How dare those women have any desire for privacy?! There isn&#8217;t a similar statistic on how many men are privacy-loving commies, which should give you an idea who these women are keeping secrets from.</p>
<p><i>7-17 year olds who would freely give out home address: 29%<br />
7-17 year olds who would freely give out email address: 14%</i></p>
<p>What, really? Come on, kids, you do know you can have more than one e-mail account, right? Surely more than 14% of you have a e-mail account set up for spam.</p>
<p><i>Promise Keeper men who viewed pornography in last week: 53%</i></p>
<p>This one made me chuckle smugly, then feel slightly guilty.</p>
<p><i>Ratio of women to men favoring chat rooms:        2X</i></p>
<p>Another odd one. I&#8217;m not sure if Key understands that chat rooms can be used for things besides cybersex. Apparently this stat is from an alternate universe where 19-year-old co-eds pretend to be teenage boys and Spock has a goatee.</p>
<p><i>8-16 year olds having viewed porn online:        90% (most while doing homework)</i></p>
<p>10% of 8-16 year olds must lack internet access. And finally: </p>
<p><i>Largest consumer of Internet pornography:     35 &#8211; 49 age group</i></p>
<p>In other words, younger Americans are tech-savvy enough to locate *free* porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359189</guid>
		<description>Oh, and someday when I&#039;m rich, you can be my kept man! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and someday when I&#8217;m rich, you can be my kept man! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359187</guid>
		<description>But he&#039;s claiming this all started when he got married the first time - at eighteen.

An eighteen year old guy turning down sex to watch porn?  That&#039;s so wrong it&#039;s scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But he&#8217;s claiming this all started when he got married the first time &#8211; at eighteen.</p>
<p>An eighteen year old guy turning down sex to watch porn?  That&#8217;s so wrong it&#8217;s scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignant Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359185</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignant Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359185</guid>
		<description>Jillian: take a look at Pastor DonKey&#039;s wife, or whoever that is next to him. I&#039;d have to guess that he&#039;s not interested in her, &amp; she&#039;s not interested in &quot;it.&quot; Of course, any one who becomes a porn addict at ten &amp; waggles his weenie has some pretty serious issues w/ sex anyway, though I doubt if he was turning down sex w/ wifey for porn.

If you&#039;d like to move out here &amp; pay for everything, I&#039;m available. (Which just shows what a prize I am.) It&#039;s like Florida, but not as humid, &amp;  the &lt;strike&gt;&lt;i&gt;cucarachas&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strike&gt;Palmetto bugs aren&#039;t as large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jillian: take a look at Pastor DonKey&#8217;s wife, or whoever that is next to him. I&#8217;d have to guess that he&#8217;s not interested in her, &amp; she&#8217;s not interested in &#8220;it.&#8221; Of course, any one who becomes a porn addict at ten &amp; waggles his weenie has some pretty serious issues w/ sex anyway, though I doubt if he was turning down sex w/ wifey for porn.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to move out here &amp; pay for everything, I&#8217;m available. (Which just shows what a prize I am.) It&#8217;s like Florida, but not as humid, &amp;  the <strike><i>cucarachas</i></strike>Palmetto bugs aren&#8217;t as large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignant Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359173</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignant Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359173</guid>
		<description>Don Key? That makes it a &quot;Don Key Show&quot; doesn&#039;t it?

What a fucking sap. Just as w/ drugs &amp; other drugs (liquor) if you have a problem, there&#039;s something deeper causing the symptoms of excessive smut or intoxication. But we&#039;ll blame Satan &amp; smut, rather than being sexually molested, otherwise abused, sent off to war, or whatever, &amp; taking responsibility by getting some brain help. 
Is there anything in the bible about smut? &#039;Cause Ol&#039; Don says they only preach the KJV bible at his church.

&quot;Ever-where.&quot; 

I&#039;ve looked at some smut in my life. Once or twice. Mostly made me laugh. And I&#039;ve never wanted to wave my weenie at strangers. (&quot;I swear, officer, I was just taking a piss. I didn&#039;t even know that Girl Scout troop was there.&quot;)

&lt;i&gt;[T]he values of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers who built America up in the Edwardian and Victorian ages.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah yes, the Robber Barons. Those are some values. And nothing was built &quot;up&quot; after WWII, when the rest of the industrialized world was a smoking ruin. Nope, it was values like the 60-hour work week, child labor, slavery, impure food &amp; drugs, trusts, yada yada that built this country &quot;up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Key? That makes it a &#8220;Don Key Show&#8221; doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>What a fucking sap. Just as w/ drugs &amp; other drugs (liquor) if you have a problem, there&#8217;s something deeper causing the symptoms of excessive smut or intoxication. But we&#8217;ll blame Satan &amp; smut, rather than being sexually molested, otherwise abused, sent off to war, or whatever, &amp; taking responsibility by getting some brain help.<br />
Is there anything in the bible about smut? &#8216;Cause Ol&#8217; Don says they only preach the KJV bible at his church.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ever-where.&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at some smut in my life. Once or twice. Mostly made me laugh. And I&#8217;ve never wanted to wave my weenie at strangers. (&#8220;I swear, officer, I was just taking a piss. I didn&#8217;t even know that Girl Scout troop was there.&#8221;)</p>
<p><i>[T]he values of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers who built America up in the Edwardian and Victorian ages.</i></p>
<p>Ah yes, the Robber Barons. Those are some values. And nothing was built &#8220;up&#8221; after WWII, when the rest of the industrialized world was a smoking ruin. Nope, it was values like the 60-hour work week, child labor, slavery, impure food &amp; drugs, trusts, yada yada that built this country &#8220;up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/8130.html#comment-359164</guid>
		<description>Stuff like this baffles me.

I like porn as much as the next person - as long as the next person is someone who likes pornography, of course.  But picking a fight with an actual flesh and blood person with whom you could have sex so that you could go watch porn?  I cannot even imagine.

Seriously - how many people, given a choice between real sex with someone they love, and petting the kitty to pornography, would choose the latter?  Heck, most of my interest in porn at this point comes from the fact that I haven&#039;t had a significant other in (mumble, mumble) years, and eventually you reach a point in your life where the thought of picking up a person in a bar, or doing the blind date thing, and taking them home sounds about as erotic as a gynecological examination. 

If you&#039;re turning down sex to watch porn, I humbly submit that the pornography is not your problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuff like this baffles me.</p>
<p>I like porn as much as the next person &#8211; as long as the next person is someone who likes pornography, of course.  But picking a fight with an actual flesh and blood person with whom you could have sex so that you could go watch porn?  I cannot even imagine.</p>
<p>Seriously &#8211; how many people, given a choice between real sex with someone they love, and petting the kitty to pornography, would choose the latter?  Heck, most of my interest in porn at this point comes from the fact that I haven&#8217;t had a significant other in (mumble, mumble) years, and eventually you reach a point in your life where the thought of picking up a person in a bar, or doing the blind date thing, and taking them home sounds about as erotic as a gynecological examination. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re turning down sex to watch porn, I humbly submit that the pornography is not your problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

