Can we add “consensual” and “with adults” and “not for money” to this? I just want to make sure we’re really separating from the GOP.

I was surprised when a usually rather conservative acquaintance, an immigrant from Bangladesh, ranted in 2000 that Dubya should not be allowed to run for president. “First the father, then the son?” he explained. “This is making a prince! I came to America to get *away* from such children of privilege!”

The intertoobz were not nearly so all-encompassing then, but from the international media I could find off-line, he wasn’t the only person to find the whole Bush Dynasty meme… less than true to the American Ideal. In retrospect, of course, we should have paid more attention to our more experienced global neighbors about this.

Do we have a namespoofer?

Herr Doktor Bimler said,

November 2, 2007 at 23:13

“Krauthammer, being a psychologist, has nothing else but sophistry and logical fallacies in his rhetorical arsenal.

Amended.”
Arsenhole,ReAmendified.That’s better…

mikey

Years of tradition and all that.

Calling him the ‘First Husband” would be really fucking sexist.

“typically blonde bit of horsey sloane.” I do believe Mr. Kyra Sedgewick w/ Play-Doh© summed the late Lady up perfectly. “Sloane” indeed!

It’s not just you. The Littlest Rabbi reads like a “fortune” program farting out lines from a 2003 Limbaugh program.

They made a movie about that, y’know.

mikey

mikey

I didn’t say I wanted to become her partner.

And I certainly didn’t concern myself with anything as trivial as her social-economic position in the world.

In as delicate language as possible, I said I’d like to bang her.

And, well, if she wasn’t dead? I really would. And I remain convinced that it would be rockin fun…

mikey

The relationship between a father and an adult son is psychological and abstract;

That is where Craphammer makes his big mistake, George Jr. is anything but adult:

I am the decider, bwah, bwah, bwah!

I am relevant, bwah, bwah, bwah!

Gimme my dummy, bwah, bwah, bwah!

Bush Jr. never even made it out of the fucking pram!

Which is a mental illness rather than a character flaw.

On the other hand she fucked every cauliflower eared upper class prat who came her way simply to spite Charles and the rest of his family… where as Charles at least loved Camilla, and is still with her today; but still, how crap a wife must you be to lose out to Camilla?

What’s more, Diana also pretended to care about various charities purely as a public relations exercise, but then didn’t leave a penny to charity in her will; And obsessively courted the gutter press paparazzi to the point of deliberately staging “See Through Dress” moments, then howled about the horrors of that self same paparazzi intruding into her life; and eventually died due to one high speed chase too many with them, due to being too stupid or arrogant to wear a seat belt whilst her drunken driver careened regally across public roads.

I could go on; but let’s just say that the fact that even some liberal people seem to be unable to tell the difference between someone who’d actually be just the right side of crazily fun in bed, and nothing more exotic than a typically blonde bit of horsey sloane with a neurotically needy and self obsorbed/self obsessed personality, on top of which is supported at the British taxpayers expense and the ever fattening wallet of vultures like the Murdoch press… well, I’d say that’s not a phenominal argument for once for republicanism of the best sort, wouldn’t you?