Comments on: Meanwhile In Malkinland

By: Latina Shouts

Latina Shouts — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 06:09:19 +0000

Somebody essentially assist to make critically articles I’d state. That is the first time I frequented your website page and to this point? I surprised with the analysis you made to make this actual publish extraordinary. Excellent task!

By: Nom De Guerre - Bethany Wilkerson fights for SCHIP !

Nom De Guerre - Bethany Wilkerson fights for SCHIP ! — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:54:35 +0000

[...] sadlyno [...]

By: joannegm

joannegm — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:15:32 +0000

Yes, and why doesn’t anyone on the left ever make the breathtakingly obvious point that EVERY SINGLE ONE of the rightwing legislators fighting national health care, are ALL lavishly covered by the taxpayers themselves. For LIFE!

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:29:51 +0000

Righteous Bubba …From Alabama?..Make an argument or go away.

Lawnguylander…..Give me a policy issue, I will give you a course of action.

g….Bill O is mainstream? LOL Here is mainstream…NBC, CBS, ABC, NYT, The Globe, L.A. Times ect, ect ect. To argue otherwise is to be dishonest or, I apologize, stoopid.

Rachel…..sorry where did she suggest that? Please quote her.

By: rachel

rachel — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:30:02 +0000

Sorry I read what’s been posted but where oh where is the attack on the 2 year old?

Really, suggesting that the 2-year-old’s mother should have aborted her rather than undergo pregnancy with no health insurance isn’t an attack.

By: g

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:29:14 +0000

the main stream media will fall and the power Bill O and Malkin will grow.

You’re kidding, right? Bill O’Reilly as the antithesis of main stream media? The maverick, the rebel Bill O’Reilly? Bill O’ Reilly IS Main Stream Media at its ugliest, you knucklehead.

Oh, this is too funny. Dave’s staking the future of right-thinkers on prince and princess consort Bill O’Reilly and Michelle Malkin?

And what position will you hold in the great O’Reilly/Malkin administration, Dave? Speechwriter maybe? Let us know how that works out.

By: Your Modern GOP In Action « Beware The Man

Your Modern GOP In Action « Beware The Man — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:54:22 +0000

[...] goverment help (try not to forget all our elected officials have goverment subsidized health care), but on a two year old. And the post right above it details some support of this position. Nice people, for [...]

By: Lawnguylander

Lawnguylander — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:42:35 +0000

Dave’s blog gives clear indications that he is a fell creature but beyond that there’s nothing to suggest that he has any idea what would be a prudent course of action on any policy issue. He’s a bundle of incoherence and contradictory pronouncements with enemies to the left and right. In his most recent post he asks; Who is worse Move-on or Conservatives (lack of question mark in the original). Here’s the closing excerpt:

American war dead…
Democrats and fringe….0
Conservatives….4144 and counting…

Good job there people…For 4 years soldiers and civilians have been dying and the friggin Dems control the agenda, media and every other thing. Bush is a weakling, wimp like his old man and our sons and daughters, mothers and fathers are dying because the pulpit (see Nero) on our side won’t take the fight to them. If this is the best support we got, if this is all there is, blogs and night after friggin night of Bill O and Hannity..I say …BRING THEM HOME NOW.

As you can see I clearly think the political will to win is gone, I do not want a single American or innocent killed while the leaders in this country haggle over the outcome. What price is the life of a single American soldier or Iraqi civilian worth to these people? Do they care? The answer quite simply is no they don’t. Not then not now

By: Suspect Device: The Blog » Thought Malkin couldn’t get lower than sliming a 12 year-old accident victim?

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:35:28 +0000

[...] course she can, you silly monkeys! I’ll see your 12 year-old boy and raise you a 2-year-old girl with heart trouble! Today’s extreme right: They’ll protect to the death the rights of the unborn, but once [...]

By: Righteous Bubba

Righteous Bubba — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:32:32 +0000

Sorry I read what’s been posted but where oh where is the attack on the 2 year old?

Well Dave, let me know after you come to grips with your status as a witless tool of Michelle Malkin.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:29:05 +0000

“Michelle whooped up an attack against a 2-year-old girl”….Sorry I read what’s been posted but where oh where is the attack on the 2 year old? The pattern seems to be deceive and distort from those who have screamed about Limbaugh for ever and anon. Taking a page from the proverbial playbook perhaps? Comically sophmoric but not altogether unheard of. Unfortunately the fringe, or progressives are putting themselves further and further out on the edge. The Hill machine continues to roll, the war will continue, gay marriage will fail, the main stream media will fall and the power Bill O and Malkin will grow.
The democrat party faithful are much smarter than the Youtube crowd you and your ilk play to. Were it not for the “wimp” we now suffer under the conservatives would own the entire government. You got lucky in 06 and perhaps will again in 08 but ultimately the american people look upon you and the rest of the, well, fringe with distaste (see Betrayus) and generally view your objectives with contempt.
So again I would ask…where exactly is that attack?

By: Dr Zen

Dr Zen — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:53:24 +0000

Hats off to the strategists. The Frost family are sort of ambiguous. Attackable. But the new family! Brilliant. And the the kid is cuuuuuute. It’s like, what’s next.I think the next ad has to be just a still of a puppy: “SCHIP: the puppy wants it.”

By: Grand Moff Texan

Grand Moff Texan — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:58:41 +0000

“Human shields” from what?

These losers think we need to be shielded from them? “Oh, dear, the rightard is stepping on his dick again! Whatever shall I do?”

Uh, no. More like a splatter-guard or a raincoat. They done gone Gallagher on us.
.

By: wordyeti

wordyeti — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:07:34 +0000

I had such high hopes for my generational cohort (we used to be known as Generation X, back when we were still in our 20s), but so many people my age are conservative jingoistic rubes… What the hell happened to us?

Well, if you go back and actually look at all us Xers back when we were in college, we weren’t such a great bunch. We were all completely “Sedated in the 80s” complacently going along with the feel-good Ronnie Reagan, more concerned with getting into the job market and getting our mitts on Gordon Gekko-type money. See: “Generation of Swine,” Hunter S. Thompson.

I was a college newspaper reporter/editor at the time, and I was appalled at how little my fellow X-ers cared about politics, current events, the ecology, justice, human rights, etc. The most telling stat was that in 1972, the most popular course on my campus was “Current Environmental Problems,” and it was taught stadium-style, to hundreds of people, a couple times a day. By 1986 (and I realize I’m dating myself here), the most popular course was “Human Sexual Biology,” which was an excuse for horndogs to leer at each other and get cheap thrills from the vibrators, butt plugs, etc., that the instructor would pass around class as “learning aids.” Not that there’s anything wrong with naughty fun, but dude – after the serious stuff as been dealt with…

Strange, all the buzzcut frat boys and poofy-haired sorority girls who were so into that class were also the same ones that gave lip service (yeah, OK, double entendre, move along) to the Meese Commission’s anti-porn crusade. Which is when I got my first lesson in rightwing religious wackjob morals: They’re good for other people.

Goddam shiftless lazy welfare fucks are robbing this country blind, someone oughtta just line ‘em up and shoot ‘em, and oh by the way Billy Bob didja hear I managed to skim an extra couple hunnert thousand off the defense contract for toilet seats and hammers? Helps to know other right-thinking folks in the procurement chain, don’t it, hyuck-hyuckitty-hyuck…

That pattern continues to this day, as I find endless outraged screeds about the stealing done of the relief for Katrina … but strangely, no such outrage for the stealing done by KBR et alles in Iraq. Despite the fact that the amounts stolen/wasted are an order of magnitude greater.

By: FlipYrWhig

FlipYrWhig — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:31:35 +0000

The louder and meaner you are, the righter you must be.

The whole movement comes down to three words: Show Of Force.

By: joannegm

joannegm — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:26:10 +0000

I would like to add, what I think is happening is that the residents of Wingnuttistan have realized that they really did step in it this time—-but rather than backpedal, they are desperate to bolster their case by intensifying their attacks, beyond even all reason. They figure if they keep pounding away and pounding away, the public will simply conclude that they must be right or else, why would they sound so forceful?

This, btw, is their preferred technique on every controversy, whether it be Schiavo, global warming, evolution, Iraq or anything else. The louder and meaner you are, the righter you must be.

By: shystee

shystee — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:45:32 +0000

Rush Drugballs just named this kid. Introduced the item by quoting, you guessed it, The Politico. Went on to mimic libruls whining about him and Michelle Malkin attacking another poor family, waaah.

From Corporate Media to Wingnut Blogger to Broadcast Radio. Triangle accomplished!

When’s the last time you saw this kind of collaboration on the non-RightWingoFascist side of things?

By: joanne murphy

joanne murphy — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:34:42 +0000

Lorraine Hansberry had a great line in her play “Raisin in the sun” which is apropos here:

“Where is the bottom? Where is the honest to God bottom so he can’t sink any further?”

Subsitute “Republicans” for “he”.

I don’t think it occurres to the brain dead Malkinites that the fact that Bethany already qualifies is an ENDORSEMENT of the program, not an indictment. And is a good example of OTHER kids that the program would help. So, one is even more astounded by the sheer fatuosity of her comment (i.e. this kid got help therefore the program does not need any improvement).

Grrrrrrrr!

By: Dana

Dana — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:33:03 +0000

Otto: I’ve had single-payer care here in the United States. It’s called the military healthcare system and it used to be single-payer for active duty military servicemembers. I had it for almost three years. It had its flaws but as I might have had serious complications from or died of pneumonia had I not been under its care, I can’t complain. (I came down with a 103-degree-plus F fever in my early twenties, but no cough and no hurt when I went pee. I had no idea what was wrong. Minus health coverage I might have tried to soldier on without getting care. Baaad idea.)

I grew up under military healthcare generally because I was born a Navy brat and then got married after the Army, for 25 years total. It started getting really shitty when a private company, Tricare, took it over for family member and retiree care. Before then, it was at least tolerable.

I’m flummoxed as to why the conservabots don’t mention anything about the military system when we discuss healthcare in this country. Apparently they are perfectly all right with socialized medicine for the military and its family members. No objection there. WTF?

By: Dana

Dana — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:25:52 +0000

I don’t get why she keeps bringing up that their family already gets CHIP when their ENTIRE point in the FIRST DAMN PLACE was, “We are on CHIP and it helped us a lot and therefore we want to see other people helped too.” Marked contrast, in fact, to the I-got-mine-so-fuck-you mentality of the wingnuts. But maybe that’s why they keep distracting from that point in the first place.