<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guess no one ever tried ringing her door bell (But she don&#8217;t need any of your pity)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: t239t</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-727715</link>
		<dc:creator>t239t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-727715</guid>
		<description>c78t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c78t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t380t</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-727700</link>
		<dc:creator>t380t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-727700</guid>
		<description>c838t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c838t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next week, how I used my power as a woman to trick a guy into buying me a $3 cherry bomb, proving feminism unnecessary at PunkAssBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-291191</link>
		<dc:creator>Next week, how I used my power as a woman to trick a guy into buying me a $3 cherry bomb, proving feminism unnecessary at PunkAssBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-291191</guid>
		<description>[...] fact that the vast majority of students have sex lives that rival that of their parents in terms of frequency and variation of partners and go straight to giving yourself a wedgie over the fraction of the 20% who are actually getting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact that the vast majority of students have sex lives that rival that of their parents in terms of frequency and variation of partners and go straight to giving yourself a wedgie over the fraction of the 20% who are actually getting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289985</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289985</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t ever give a damn too much about the sex end of it.  When I hear wingnuts doing their Cultural Degeneration thing about the surge in teenage sex - and man, I&#039;ve heard it like a zillion times over the decades, and every time it&#039;s like &lt;I&gt;Breaking News!&lt;/I&gt; - the image that comes to mind is an angry old lady standing knee-deep in the surf in one of those prissy swimsuits with like flounce around the edge, lips pursed with disapproval at the naughty, awful tide, parasol in one hand, slap slap slapping at the waves with the palm of her other hand.

Who fails to grin and snort when you read how some big hit teevee show, or some political tendency, or this or that pop-musical genre, or some teenage clothing trend is &lt;I&gt; thing somehow responsible for teenagers being so unnaturally interested in sex the way they are these days? And that if the purported cause was just banned by legislation, from then on America&#039;s Youth would naturally become indifferent and totally cease kissing and fondling one another until well after the age of legal majority?  The idea being that teenagers would be indifferent to sex altogether if not for the third-hand abstract stimulation they get from the to-be-proscribed influence, yeah, right.

Another good one is that if those darn breweries would stop making beer ads featuring pretty girls in bikinis, then never ever again would teenage boys want to drink beer.  Because aside from the artificially induced subliminal connection between bikinis and beer there really isn&#039;t any reason anyone would ever want to drink beer.

So I read that junk and it just rolls right off.  But now when I read

&lt;i&gt;In modern America, a college degree is now almost a given&lt;/I&gt;

by which she means

&lt;I&gt;Oh that other half?  Tee hee! &lt;/I&gt;What &lt;I&gt; other half?  They don&#039;t exist!&lt;/I&gt;

Now &lt;I&gt;that&lt;/I&gt; I don&#039;t, what kind of worthless moron, I can&#039;t laugh that off, I&#039;d like to grab, you &lt;I&gt;stupid&lt;/I&gt; son-of-a, I get all, I just wanna, arr arrh &lt;I&gt;arrhghg&lt;/I&gt; rippp! &lt;B&gt;AHHGH AK AK AKK &lt;I&gt;HULK SMASH&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t ever give a damn too much about the sex end of it.  When I hear wingnuts doing their Cultural Degeneration thing about the surge in teenage sex &#8211; and man, I&#8217;ve heard it like a zillion times over the decades, and every time it&#8217;s like <i>Breaking News!</i> &#8211; the image that comes to mind is an angry old lady standing knee-deep in the surf in one of those prissy swimsuits with like flounce around the edge, lips pursed with disapproval at the naughty, awful tide, parasol in one hand, slap slap slapping at the waves with the palm of her other hand.</p>
<p>Who fails to grin and snort when you read how some big hit teevee show, or some political tendency, or this or that pop-musical genre, or some teenage clothing trend is <i> thing somehow responsible for teenagers being so unnaturally interested in sex the way they are these days? And that if the purported cause was just banned by legislation, from then on America&#8217;s Youth would naturally become indifferent and totally cease kissing and fondling one another until well after the age of legal majority?  The idea being that teenagers would be indifferent to sex altogether if not for the third-hand abstract stimulation they get from the to-be-proscribed influence, yeah, right.</p>
<p>Another good one is that if those darn breweries would stop making beer ads featuring pretty girls in bikinis, then never ever again would teenage boys want to drink beer.  Because aside from the artificially induced subliminal connection between bikinis and beer there really isn&#8217;t any reason anyone would ever want to drink beer.</p>
<p>So I read that junk and it just rolls right off.  But now when I read</p>
<p></i><i>In modern America, a college degree is now almost a given</i></p>
<p>by which she means</p>
<p><i>Oh that other half?  Tee hee! </i>What <i> other half?  They don&#8217;t exist!</i></p>
<p>Now <i>that</i> I don&#8217;t, what kind of worthless moron, I can&#8217;t laugh that off, I&#8217;d like to grab, you <i>stupid</i> son-of-a, I get all, I just wanna, arr arrh <i>arrhghg</i> rippp! <b>AHHGH AK AK AKK <i>HULK SMASH</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J—</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289929</link>
		<dc:creator>J—</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289929</guid>
		<description>Smiling Mortician: Don&#039;t ask me why, I never will know, but writing out &quot;strike&quot; will make the line go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smiling Mortician: Don&#8217;t ask me why, I never will know, but writing out &#8220;strike&#8221; will make the line go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dancing in outer space</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289878</link>
		<dc:creator>Dancing in outer space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289878</guid>
		<description>I just learned what Dick Cheney did in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_09_24/review.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;college&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just learned what Dick Cheney did in <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_09_24/review.html" rel="nofollow">college</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commie atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289790</link>
		<dc:creator>commie atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289790</guid>
		<description>

I doubt that McArdle would enjoy being that close to &quot;liberal,&quot; even with the &quot;neo&quot; in front of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that McArdle would enjoy being that close to &#8220;liberal,&#8221; even with the &#8220;neo&#8221; in front of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commie atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289773</link>
		<dc:creator>commie atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289773</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;She can take comfort from the fact that many of these students will go on to grad. school and then sex–and most other pleasurable activities–will be drained of joy. That should make her happy.&lt;/i&gt;

For those of us who only made it through our bachelor&#039;s, I would substitute &quot;marriage&quot; for grad school.  Same difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>She can take comfort from the fact that many of these students will go on to grad. school and then sex–and most other pleasurable activities–will be drained of joy. That should make her happy.</i></p>
<p>For those of us who only made it through our bachelor&#8217;s, I would substitute &#8220;marriage&#8221; for grad school.  Same difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289695</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289695</guid>
		<description>Strike-through worked in preview. I guess commenting, like college, looks a bit better in retrospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strike-through worked in preview. I guess commenting, like college, looks a bit better in retrospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289694</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289694</guid>
		<description>When I was in college, I got laid a lot. &#039;Course, that was in the late &#039;70s and early &#039;80s. And I was an English major and we listened to a lot of The Pretenders and The Cars and had living-room keggers in our off-campus apartments, and so I&#039;m sure things have gotten worse better by now . . .

Sorry, what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in college, I got laid a lot. &#8216;Course, that was in the late &#8217;70s and early &#8217;80s. And I was an English major and we listened to a lot of The Pretenders and The Cars and had living-room keggers in our off-campus apartments, and so I&#8217;m sure things have gotten worse better by now . . .</p>
<p>Sorry, what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289654</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289654</guid>
		<description>No no no, Qetesh, don&#039;t believe all that &quot;prison/shipboard/college ghey sex is just &#039;cause there are no women around&quot; crap! We&#039;ll just use our paws, as nature intended (also for bananas, heh heh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no, Qetesh, don&#8217;t believe all that &#8220;prison/shipboard/college ghey sex is just &#8217;cause there are no women around&#8221; crap! We&#8217;ll just use our paws, as nature intended (also for bananas, heh heh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289649</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289649</guid>
		<description>And if all the girls are keeping their legs crossed, doesn&#039;t that mean the boys will have to have sex with each other? Strange that a wingnut would promote teh ghey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if all the girls are keeping their legs crossed, doesn&#8217;t that mean the boys will have to have sex with each other? Strange that a wingnut would promote teh ghey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289647</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289647</guid>
		<description>Monsieur Le Chat Noir and Some Guy, you beat me to it. Rats.

Mind you, TISM are something that Australia can be very proud of: as they put it, we are &quot;Australia, The Lucky Cunt&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monsieur Le Chat Noir and Some Guy, you beat me to it. Rats.</p>
<p>Mind you, TISM are something that Australia can be very proud of: as they put it, we are &#8220;Australia, The Lucky Cunt&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosier X</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289637</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosier X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289637</guid>
		<description>Thank you, J-

I was afraid I might be going out on a limb by making fun of McArdle for getting her panties in a twist for something I know nothing about. Although I figured, it&#039;s McArdle; of course she&#039;s being a twit.

And I was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, J-</p>
<p>I was afraid I might be going out on a limb by making fun of McArdle for getting her panties in a twist for something I know nothing about. Although I figured, it&#8217;s McArdle; of course she&#8217;s being a twit.</p>
<p>And I was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289632</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289632</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;while 80 percent of students had 0 or 1 sexual partner during the preceding year&lt;/i&gt;

The other 20% were rooting like rabbits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>while 80 percent of students had 0 or 1 sexual partner during the preceding year</i></p>
<p>The other 20% were rooting like rabbits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289605</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289605</guid>
		<description>Dude, i can&#039;t believe I forgot about this.
http://www.jokefrog.com/flash/everyone-has-had-more-sex.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, i can&#8217;t believe I forgot about this.<br />
<a href="http://www.jokefrog.com/flash/everyone-has-had-more-sex.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.jokefrog.com/flash/everyone-has-had-more-sex.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J—</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289592</link>
		<dc:creator>J—</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289592</guid>
		<description>Hoosier X: Briefly, import substitution or import substitution industrialization (ISI) is a development policy that seeks to protect and develop native industries so that foreign-produced products—most often finished goods—can be replaced by their locally produced equivalents.  This was a prevalent model for economic development in many (though not all) parts of  Latin America in the middle of the 20th century, beginning in the 30s when it was a matter of necessity (thanks to the Great Depression) and continuing through the 40s and 50s when it was clearly articulated as an industrialization model and became the guiding economic policy for many governments.  Neoliberals like McArdle have knee-jerk negative reactions to its mention because ISI implies an active role on the part of the state in cultivating and protecting local targeted industries.

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoosier X: Briefly, import substitution or import substitution industrialization (ISI) is a development policy that seeks to protect and develop native industries so that foreign-produced products—most often finished goods—can be replaced by their locally produced equivalents.  This was a prevalent model for economic development in many (though not all) parts of  Latin America in the middle of the 20th century, beginning in the 30s when it was a matter of necessity (thanks to the Great Depression) and continuing through the 40s and 50s when it was clearly articulated as an industrialization model and became the guiding economic policy for many governments.  Neoliberals like McArdle have knee-jerk negative reactions to its mention because ISI implies an active role on the part of the state in cultivating and protecting local targeted industries.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289569</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289569</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But of course this would negate the need for the numerous college programs designed to promote promiscuity and ready students for a lifetime of random and rampant sex: the very reason you slaved all your life to send them off to college.&lt;/i&gt;

The same thing as &quot;teaching second graders about homosexuality.&quot; To ninnies like Lisa Fabrizio (any bets on her religious affiliation/indoctrination?) any thing that mentions sex, or that a family may have &quot;two mommies&quot; is considered a graphic sex instruction class, with no suggestions that you should keep it in your pants, or &quot;keep your legs crossed&quot; or use &quot;protection.&quot; 

And certainly when parents, priests, teachers, &lt;i&gt;etc.&lt;/i&gt;, take the attitude that &quot;sex is for making babies, &amp; it makes your body ugly afterwards, &amp; let&#039;s not talk about it, shall we?&quot; (or mom/dad are just too hung-up to have &quot;the talk&quot;) &amp; the high schools are teaching &quot;abstinence only,&quot; it&#039;s not a good idea to tell young, healthy, hormonal adults, on their own for the first time, that IF they are going to do it, thay shouldn&#039;t put themselves at risk.

But no, for the righties merely mentioning sex means that not only is it OK, but that students HAVE to go out &amp; get some, and sex would never have occurred to them w/o one of these &quot;numerous college programs designed to promote promiscuity and ready students for a lifetime of random and rampant sex.&quot; You know, just shut up about it &amp; it stays in the pants &amp; the legs stay crossed. But even mention it &amp; the hormones are released, in an &quot;explosion.&quot;

Classic wingnut logic, combined w/ classic religious based erotophobia. Virtually everything scares these fools, from sex to Mooooslims to organic food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But of course this would negate the need for the numerous college programs designed to promote promiscuity and ready students for a lifetime of random and rampant sex: the very reason you slaved all your life to send them off to college.</i></p>
<p>The same thing as &#8220;teaching second graders about homosexuality.&#8221; To ninnies like Lisa Fabrizio (any bets on her religious affiliation/indoctrination?) any thing that mentions sex, or that a family may have &#8220;two mommies&#8221; is considered a graphic sex instruction class, with no suggestions that you should keep it in your pants, or &#8220;keep your legs crossed&#8221; or use &#8220;protection.&#8221; </p>
<p>And certainly when parents, priests, teachers, <i>etc.</i>, take the attitude that &#8220;sex is for making babies, &amp; it makes your body ugly afterwards, &amp; let&#8217;s not talk about it, shall we?&#8221; (or mom/dad are just too hung-up to have &#8220;the talk&#8221;) &amp; the high schools are teaching &#8220;abstinence only,&#8221; it&#8217;s not a good idea to tell young, healthy, hormonal adults, on their own for the first time, that IF they are going to do it, thay shouldn&#8217;t put themselves at risk.</p>
<p>But no, for the righties merely mentioning sex means that not only is it OK, but that students HAVE to go out &amp; get some, and sex would never have occurred to them w/o one of these &#8220;numerous college programs designed to promote promiscuity and ready students for a lifetime of random and rampant sex.&#8221; You know, just shut up about it &amp; it stays in the pants &amp; the legs stay crossed. But even mention it &amp; the hormones are released, in an &#8220;explosion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Classic wingnut logic, combined w/ classic religious based erotophobia. Virtually everything scares these fools, from sex to Mooooslims to organic food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289483</link>
		<dc:creator>cur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289483</guid>
		<description>I blame the rock and roll for this predicament.  Specifically, Jimmy Buffet.  These kids, the high risk ones, they listen to this stuff and start believing it. Otherwise nice young wholesome fraternity and sorority kids get turned away from god and down the worldly path every day due to this initiation to  “fun republican” music.

Anyway, I can prove her theory of binge drinking and sex wrong with two words: “Whisky” and “dick”

2drnk 2fuk 

Cur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame the rock and roll for this predicament.  Specifically, Jimmy Buffet.  These kids, the high risk ones, they listen to this stuff and start believing it. Otherwise nice young wholesome fraternity and sorority kids get turned away from god and down the worldly path every day due to this initiation to  “fun republican” music.</p>
<p>Anyway, I can prove her theory of binge drinking and sex wrong with two words: “Whisky” and “dick”</p>
<p>2drnk 2fuk </p>
<p>Cur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289455</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7278.html#comment-289455</guid>
		<description>LuLu,

right on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LuLu,</p>
<p>right on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

