<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Now, Your Daily Transhumanism Fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Doktor Bimler</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-282008</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Doktor Bimler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-282008</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But in modern first-world societies, there is no single accepted General Universal Theory of Everything.&lt;/i&gt;
I think that situation is called &#039;Modernism&#039;. A lot of people don&#039;t seem comfortable with it.

It I ever see a book in the shops with &quot;Anne Laurie&quot; as the author, I for one will be buying several copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But in modern first-world societies, there is no single accepted General Universal Theory of Everything.</i><br />
I think that situation is called &#8216;Modernism&#8217;. A lot of people don&#8217;t seem comfortable with it.</p>
<p>It I ever see a book in the shops with &#8220;Anne Laurie&#8221; as the author, I for one will be buying several copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281906</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281906</guid>
		<description>The thought of an eternity surrounded by Glenn Reynolds and Megan McArdles, not to mention their even-less-attractive camp followers, should be enough deterrence for any sensible person.  But after half a century among humans, I&#039;ve come to believe there is some widespread genetic variance, distributed at about the same ratio as handedness, that predisposes the vast majority of us to a greater or lesser degree of Religious Inclination.   For most of human history, any individual&#039;s particular expression of their natural RI polyvalence was restricted by the cultural norms of his or her birth-tribe or socioeconomic status.  People had the choice of devout, whole-hearted belief in the regional General Universal Theory of Everything (GUTE) – earth mother, sky father, the divine right of kings, supply-side economics – or of just learning to perform the rites well enough to ensure the necessary harvest succession and neighborhood peace of mind.   Those in the minority born with no Religious Inclination, like kids born left-handed, were usually lectured or beaten into submission to the &lt;b&gt;right&lt;/b&gt; frame of mind.  Most people, most of the time, were content to live in the broad middle GUTE range, neither burdensomely devout nor difficultly iconoclastic... the social equivalent of modern “non-practicing Christians” or “mostly Republican voters” or “secular humanists”.

But in modern first-world societies, there is no single accepted General Universal Theory of Everything.  Even individuals born into the most isolated self-selected communities, like the Amish or the Upper West Side, are eventually exposed to an infinite smorgasbord of philosophical choices.  Those of us born on the high-GUTE-seeking “devout” end of the Religious Inclination spectrum don&#039;t have the relative ease of a society where, for instance, Isaac Newton&#039;s extraordinary scientific accomplishments and his studies in esoteric Christian theology were considered equally valid habits of mind.  The strain of choosing one self-sustaining GUTE among the many available leads to some very weird biographies – David Horowitz, for instance, pivoted from rigid Marxist to rigid Neoconservative with no sense of irony; he said that if he&#039;d been born a century earlier he&#039;d have been &#039;the most committed Talmudist in the local temple&#039;.   And some people born to a “non-religious” background end up embracing the Singularity, or Calorie Restricted Immortality, or CSICOP, or Libertarianism, or Cheney&#039;s personal supervision of the detonation of the World Trade Center, with a dedication worthy of Savonarola... or Torquemada.

Sidelight on C.M. Kornbluth:  It&#039;s not mentioned in Kornbluth&#039;s Wikipedia biography, but I remember both Frederick Pohl and Damon Knight saying one of the great tragedies of Kornbluth&#039;s life was the fact that his two children were born “mentally defective” or “damaged”.  I don&#039;t know if any more specific information has been made public, but given both Futurians&#039; stress on Kornbluth&#039;s brilliance and his “eccentricity”, I&#039;ve wondered if the kids might have been autistic.  Ironic if the man responsible for “The Marching Morons” turned out to be another victim of the syndrome Hunter S. Thompson used in a metaphor about the Kentucky Derby and his own family tree:  “You breed fast &amp; a little crazy to fast &amp; a little crazy for a few generations, you end up with &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; fast and &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; crazy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thought of an eternity surrounded by Glenn Reynolds and Megan McArdles, not to mention their even-less-attractive camp followers, should be enough deterrence for any sensible person.  But after half a century among humans, I&#8217;ve come to believe there is some widespread genetic variance, distributed at about the same ratio as handedness, that predisposes the vast majority of us to a greater or lesser degree of Religious Inclination.   For most of human history, any individual&#8217;s particular expression of their natural RI polyvalence was restricted by the cultural norms of his or her birth-tribe or socioeconomic status.  People had the choice of devout, whole-hearted belief in the regional General Universal Theory of Everything (GUTE) – earth mother, sky father, the divine right of kings, supply-side economics – or of just learning to perform the rites well enough to ensure the necessary harvest succession and neighborhood peace of mind.   Those in the minority born with no Religious Inclination, like kids born left-handed, were usually lectured or beaten into submission to the <b>right</b> frame of mind.  Most people, most of the time, were content to live in the broad middle GUTE range, neither burdensomely devout nor difficultly iconoclastic&#8230; the social equivalent of modern “non-practicing Christians” or “mostly Republican voters” or “secular humanists”.</p>
<p>But in modern first-world societies, there is no single accepted General Universal Theory of Everything.  Even individuals born into the most isolated self-selected communities, like the Amish or the Upper West Side, are eventually exposed to an infinite smorgasbord of philosophical choices.  Those of us born on the high-GUTE-seeking “devout” end of the Religious Inclination spectrum don&#8217;t have the relative ease of a society where, for instance, Isaac Newton&#8217;s extraordinary scientific accomplishments and his studies in esoteric Christian theology were considered equally valid habits of mind.  The strain of choosing one self-sustaining GUTE among the many available leads to some very weird biographies – David Horowitz, for instance, pivoted from rigid Marxist to rigid Neoconservative with no sense of irony; he said that if he&#8217;d been born a century earlier he&#8217;d have been &#8216;the most committed Talmudist in the local temple&#8217;.   And some people born to a “non-religious” background end up embracing the Singularity, or Calorie Restricted Immortality, or CSICOP, or Libertarianism, or Cheney&#8217;s personal supervision of the detonation of the World Trade Center, with a dedication worthy of Savonarola&#8230; or Torquemada.</p>
<p>Sidelight on C.M. Kornbluth:  It&#8217;s not mentioned in Kornbluth&#8217;s Wikipedia biography, but I remember both Frederick Pohl and Damon Knight saying one of the great tragedies of Kornbluth&#8217;s life was the fact that his two children were born “mentally defective” or “damaged”.  I don&#8217;t know if any more specific information has been made public, but given both Futurians&#8217; stress on Kornbluth&#8217;s brilliance and his “eccentricity”, I&#8217;ve wondered if the kids might have been autistic.  Ironic if the man responsible for “The Marching Morons” turned out to be another victim of the syndrome Hunter S. Thompson used in a metaphor about the Kentucky Derby and his own family tree:  “You breed fast &amp; a little crazy to fast &amp; a little crazy for a few generations, you end up with <i>very</i> fast and <i>very</i> crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281740</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281740</guid>
		<description>Imagine George Bush and Dick Cheney living forever.  I&#039;ll take death please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine George Bush and Dick Cheney living forever.  I&#8217;ll take death please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Doktor Bimler</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281674</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Doktor Bimler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281674</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As an economist, I immediately think in terms of paying people to undergo risky therapies.&lt;/i&gt;

As a deranged, amoral scientist, &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; immediately think in terms of trading poor people to the Grays in exchange for their advanced technology. The Grays get slave labour for their desert planet... we get quantum computers that can run 5 games of Minesweeper &lt;i&gt;at the same time&lt;/i&gt;. Seems a fair swap to me. This is no time for scruples. Or qualms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As an economist, I immediately think in terms of paying people to undergo risky therapies.</i></p>
<p>As a deranged, amoral scientist, <i>I</i> immediately think in terms of trading poor people to the Grays in exchange for their advanced technology. The Grays get slave labour for their desert planet&#8230; we get quantum computers that can run 5 games of Minesweeper <i>at the same time</i>. Seems a fair swap to me. This is no time for scruples. Or qualms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zsa</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281602</link>
		<dc:creator>zsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281602</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh my stars and garters&quot;??

Is that you, Grandma?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh my stars and garters&#8221;??</p>
<p>Is that you, Grandma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Coelacanth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281171</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Coelacanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281171</guid>
		<description>&quot;It would be frightening if their sci-fi visions had any basis in real science. Today its just dorks wanking over SF novels and message boards.&quot;

Sadly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;no&lt;/a&gt;. Real scientists ( and Sciffy dorks) have been talking about this for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It would be frightening if their sci-fi visions had any basis in real science. Today its just dorks wanking over SF novels and message boards.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity" rel="nofollow">no</a>. Real scientists ( and Sciffy dorks) have been talking about this for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breasticle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281138</link>
		<dc:creator>Breasticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281138</guid>
		<description>Well, SAD, they can impugn my motives to their mortal hearts&#039; content; they&#039;re still wrong, regardless of what they claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, SAD, they can impugn my motives to their mortal hearts&#8217; content; they&#8217;re still wrong, regardless of what they claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saddened</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281134</link>
		<dc:creator>saddened</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281134</guid>
		<description>Breasticle, believe me, you will get absolutely nowhere with a CRONie trying to argue that death has any constructive natural purpose. I tried. They see that as false consciousness--i.e., we only think that way because we don&#039;t know any better, *or* we are too lazy and undisciplined to do the work of slowing our own aging process. To them, there is not and cannot be anything positive about the downward curve of the life cycle. To them, it is unnatural and horrific and must be stopped. It&#039;s that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breasticle, believe me, you will get absolutely nowhere with a CRONie trying to argue that death has any constructive natural purpose. I tried. They see that as false consciousness&#8211;i.e., we only think that way because we don&#8217;t know any better, *or* we are too lazy and undisciplined to do the work of slowing our own aging process. To them, there is not and cannot be anything positive about the downward curve of the life cycle. To them, it is unnatural and horrific and must be stopped. It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mechanical Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281125</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mechanical Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281125</guid>
		<description>Spooooky.

Political fanatics tend to be megalomaniacs -- imposing their vision on a poor, imperfect world. It&#039;s their way of achieving immortality.

The &quot;Singularity&quot; types just embody this (so to speak) on a pure level, wanting to enjoy their strange, inhuman anarcho-libertarian world for all time, treating the rest of humanity as an appendage at best. 

It would be frightening if their sci-fi visions had any basis in real science. Today its just dorks wanking over SF novels and message boards. 

DU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spooooky.</p>
<p>Political fanatics tend to be megalomaniacs &#8212; imposing their vision on a poor, imperfect world. It&#8217;s their way of achieving immortality.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Singularity&#8221; types just embody this (so to speak) on a pure level, wanting to enjoy their strange, inhuman anarcho-libertarian world for all time, treating the rest of humanity as an appendage at best. </p>
<p>It would be frightening if their sci-fi visions had any basis in real science. Today its just dorks wanking over SF novels and message boards. </p>
<p>DU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breasticle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281121</link>
		<dc:creator>Breasticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281121</guid>
		<description>Death is a highly useful friend to humanity. Without it, fundamentalists of another age – perhaps cavemen who objected to starting new fires when they could just carry a burning stick from camp to camp – would hold sway over our social development today. 

Forget flight; we’d still be arguing about whether crop failure – and this is assuming we’d have progressed to agriculture yet – was due to sorcery or to an angry fertility god.    

It’s only when old things die – trees in forest fires, for example – that new things can grow unimpeded. Without death, there would be no physical evolution and nor would there be much social change.

This idiot speaks of weighing evils – harm now through unethical experimentation on other people or harm later through his having to die (OMG Nos!1!) – and yet he thinks nothing of creating a new stress on finite resources without first solving the existing distribution and replenishment problems. 

Forget living forever; lots of kids around the world are simply concerned with surviving to the age of majority. Why doesn’t he apply his, um, intellect to addressing that problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death is a highly useful friend to humanity. Without it, fundamentalists of another age – perhaps cavemen who objected to starting new fires when they could just carry a burning stick from camp to camp – would hold sway over our social development today. </p>
<p>Forget flight; we’d still be arguing about whether crop failure – and this is assuming we’d have progressed to agriculture yet – was due to sorcery or to an angry fertility god.    </p>
<p>It’s only when old things die – trees in forest fires, for example – that new things can grow unimpeded. Without death, there would be no physical evolution and nor would there be much social change.</p>
<p>This idiot speaks of weighing evils – harm now through unethical experimentation on other people or harm later through his having to die (OMG Nos!1!) – and yet he thinks nothing of creating a new stress on finite resources without first solving the existing distribution and replenishment problems. </p>
<p>Forget living forever; lots of kids around the world are simply concerned with surviving to the age of majority. Why doesn’t he apply his, um, intellect to addressing that problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281105</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281105</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t wanting to be like the gods the very definition of hubris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t wanting to be like the gods the very definition of hubris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281104</guid>
		<description>Mmmmmm, vat meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmmm, vat meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281065</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281065</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I made that joke two centuries ago.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, but mikey&#039;s pot pie really sits &lt;i&gt;around&lt;/i&gt; the house.  No, wait... that&#039;s not...  mmmmm, pie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I made that joke two centuries ago.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, but mikey&#8217;s pot pie really sits <i>around</i> the house.  No, wait&#8230; that&#8217;s not&#8230;  mmmmm, pie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281064</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281064</guid>
		<description>The flat creature is &quot;Lady Cassandra O&#039;Brian.?17&quot;, the last &#039;true human&#039; in the Universe who kept extending her life through more and more radical surgeries. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Cassandra&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia Entry&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flat creature is &#8220;Lady Cassandra O&#8217;Brian.?17&#8243;, the last &#8216;true human&#8217; in the Universe who kept extending her life through more and more radical surgeries.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Cassandra" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia Entry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Coelacanth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281058</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Coelacanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281058</guid>
		<description>&quot;What’s the second picture from?&quot;

That&#039;s a character from Dr. Who, but I don&#039;t know uh whom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What’s the second picture from?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a character from Dr. Who, but I don&#8217;t know uh whom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281056</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281056</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Cool! I could tell you about my new pot pie recipe!&lt;/i&gt;

I made that joke two centuries ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Cool! I could tell you about my new pot pie recipe!</i></p>
<p>I made that joke two centuries ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger Yellow</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Yellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281054</guid>
		<description>With apologies to Monty Python and Larry above:

In the past only the gods could fly. And the birds. OK, in the past only the gods and the birds could fly. And the insects. I&#039;ll start again. In the past only the gods, the birds and the insects could fly. Maybe bats too. Damn. In the past only the gods, the birds, the insects and the bats could fly. *What about those baby spiders?* Alright. In the past only the gods, the birds, the insects, the bats and some kinds of infant arachnids could fly. And that is why immortality is inevitable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With apologies to Monty Python and Larry above:</p>
<p>In the past only the gods could fly. And the birds. OK, in the past only the gods and the birds could fly. And the insects. I&#8217;ll start again. In the past only the gods, the birds and the insects could fly. Maybe bats too. Damn. In the past only the gods, the birds, the insects and the bats could fly. *What about those baby spiders?* Alright. In the past only the gods, the birds, the insects, the bats and some kinds of infant arachnids could fly. And that is why immortality is inevitable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281051</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Imagine being able to waste time in comments here for eternity.&lt;/i&gt;

Cool!  I could tell you about my new pot pie recipe!

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Imagine being able to waste time in comments here for eternity.</i></p>
<p>Cool!  I could tell you about my new pot pie recipe!</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281049</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281049</guid>
		<description>I would pay good money for a Roy Edrosobot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pay good money for a Roy Edrosobot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blowback</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281044</link>
		<dc:creator>blowback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7188.html#comment-281044</guid>
		<description>There is a &quot;natural order&quot; to things after all. When we become machines we might all start speaking with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2174051,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Received Pronunciation (RP) accent&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;What greater shock could befall a &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZMSyZDq2I5Q&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;down-to-earth Yorkshire***&lt;/a&gt; couple than to find their son suddenly speaking with a grand RP accent? This is what has happened to Mr and Mrs McCartney-Moore from York, whose 10-year-old son, William, speech-impaired after brain surgery, eventually spoke again, but with a voice like &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=u3G618-hxgA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian Sewell&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;


*** - first thirty seconds is of Geoffrey Boycott, well-known cricketeer, Yorkshireman and wife-beater.

Does this mean that all English people naturally speak RP underneath but have added a regional accent filter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a &#8220;natural order&#8221; to things after all. When we become machines we might all start speaking with a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2174051,00.html" rel="nofollow">Received Pronunciation (RP) accent</a>.</p>
<p><i>What greater shock could befall a <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZMSyZDq2I5Q" rel="nofollow">down-to-earth Yorkshire***</a> couple than to find their son suddenly speaking with a grand RP accent? This is what has happened to Mr and Mrs McCartney-Moore from York, whose 10-year-old son, William, speech-impaired after brain surgery, eventually spoke again, but with a voice like <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=u3G618-hxgA" rel="nofollow">Brian Sewell&#8217;s</a>.</i></p>
<p>*** &#8211; first thirty seconds is of Geoffrey Boycott, well-known cricketeer, Yorkshireman and wife-beater.</p>
<p>Does this mean that all English people naturally speak RP underneath but have added a regional accent filter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

