Comments on: Where Chickenhawks Dare

By: Avrqtddf

Avrqtddf — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:18:29 +0000

uBaMhC

By: DEMIZE!

DEMIZE! — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:20:37 +0000

Isn’t this the rectum that has been railing against Affirmative Action and ,Woops,turns out he’s attending college on an AA.scholarship for Puerto Ricans?WTF.is with these people.NO SENSE OF IRONY.

By: GoatBoy

GoatBoy — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:50:57 +0000

“Too late. You missed it goatman “

Ah, so I did. I see it up there now; “Resolved: that calling Foghorn Leghorn a hawk is antithetical to the enjoyment of pie”. I don’t know how I missed that stirring debate earlier.

By: Herr Doktor Bimler

Herr Doktor Bimler — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:24:21 +0000

Will liberals ever learn that they can’t stifle debate with condescension?
Condescension? Stifling debate? Easy. Though you’re taking the risk that there’s an autopsy, where the pathologist might notice the broken capillaries under the debate’s eyelids.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:47:22 +0000

As this is the last night I can make fun of your absolutely positively non-liberating liberal ways for at least 10 days, I’m choosing to do it on a more recent thread. But don’t think I don’t love you hippie people! Groove on with your ‘freedom for us, and no one else’ stance!

It’s ‘liberating’ :).

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:42:48 +0000

Too late. You missed it goatman :(.

Hey, Noone doesn’t know Kevin! “Noone said, Kevin who?” Suddenly I feel important. There is no one who doesn’t know me? Geez!

*blush*

By: GoatBoy

GoatBoy — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:39:52 +0000

“Will liberals ever learn that they can’t stifle debate with condescension?”

A debate? Wake me up as soon as one breaks out.

By: (: Tom :)

(: Tom :) — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:51:47 +0000

I only made it part way through the comments before I hit the trifecta: Mattera then mugged a shit-eating little grin for the camera and went back to his base . . . ment. “For gallentry above and beyond the call of doody, for repeated acts of courage and sacrifice, while not actually under fire, but still stuff mighta happened, I award you, Jason Mattera, the Cross of the Chickenhawk along with the Order of the Wingnut with Cheetos clusters. A grateful nation thanks you for service”… If it weren’t for the 101st Chairborn, we’d all be wearing burkas… Awesome stuff. Now I need to hook up another monitor to viddy the rest of them...

By: Noone

Noone — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:30:37 +0000

Kevin who?

By: Noone

Noone — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:29:02 +0000

“I believe the term for young Mr. Mattera is “shameless”.”

I was going for “douchbag”…or is that an insult to douches?

By: t4toby

t4toby — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:28:25 +0000

I think you guys are too hard on Kevin.

This is a comedy blog, after all, and his logic is so tortured, I get a chuckle out of almost anything he says.

I don’t understand how Lil’ Kevie can cause so much anger. He’s like Wingnut Light…Now with 20% less substance and 10% less total assholery.

And once, I had a Mango & Fresh Blackberry Pie. With a homemade crust. I ate half of it in one sitting. It was divine. Divine Pie.

By: Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » When chickenhawks attack

Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » When chickenhawks attack — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:15:43 +0000

[...] out for the shrapnel of stupidity. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]

By: Kevie-Wevie's Mum

Kevie-Wevie's Mum — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:41:45 +0000

Don’t be quite so hard on the boy, now. He was dropped as a child. Damn babies are so slippery when you pop ‘em out, you know?

By: William F. Buckley

William F. Buckley — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:47:40 +0000

God, I hate Kevin. It makes me sad knowing that someone that fucking stupid walks the earth.

By: Kevin Bacon Holding A Short Roll Of Playdoh

Kevin Bacon Holding A Short Roll Of Playdoh — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:10:02 +0000

Poor, poor Kevin. Reduced to incoherence again by what ever mental illness addles him in real life, he has to resort to taking the typical adolescent route of “Well, that as may be, but you’re still a…” route to get out of the fact that he is incapable of even understanding a simple visual joke anymore, if it’s not used in a context he personally can relate too. I’m still taking bets on it being a severe form of autism myself, a complete inability to understand external context or communication. I could also point out the sheer insanity of people pointing him to the context of the Cartoons themselves, “you know, we’ve used Foghorn because, in the cartoons in which he appears…” to explain the joke, then his going on to claim that HE is the only one who knows what a chicken is, and why isn’t anyone explaining the disdain “Kevin” is held in to him… but every one of you not cripplingly addicted to trying to control the conversation in has already seen it as clear as day, which is why his attempts to elicit response are so full of fail.
Ahhh, can’t you just picture Kevin… he’s the guy in the office who no one really likes, so he tries to emulate social practices and conventions and repeats the joke of the week for week after week just to be noticed, but because he doesn’t understand nuance or wit or just plain humanity, he repeats it months and then years after the joke has worn thin in the eyes of a culture he can’t relate too, so it just makes himself appear less popular and tolerable instead. But… but… isn’t he being what you all say you want?! But he doesn’t have the sense or dignity to know when to just stop.
Sometime somewhere, trolling was that joke for Kevin. He thought it made him cool or in control of whatever voices he was listening too at the time, and now here he is, years later, unable to even recall what got him the reaction at the time, now just repeating the hollow exterior forms of the act, wondering why no one reacts any more to it’s obvious patheticness. And can’t you just see him, going out to nightclubs and getting really hurt and wounded that women SAY they want X, Y, Z and here he is, pretending to be it… But then they reject him, as if he wasn’t that at all! Bitches! What they really want is A, B and C! But if he says that to them directly, they reject him even more! So I know, I’ll go onto Sadly No! and try to offend all those cool liberal types who no doubt got laid at University by knowing that secret way to really think was too. Bastards! They think they are so smart; They’re not so smart…

… And then he’s going to respond to THIS post no doubt with some incoherent rubbish, hinting at some hidden knowledge or a joke without a clear punchline because he doesn’t understand people or true intelligence, and because he hopes that if he’s just vague enough, somehow I’ll find the way to read offense into what he writes but isn’t smart enough to actually cause anymore. But nope “Kevin”, not gonna happen, because I can still see you trying to say, after you were told what the joke was, that no one else but you understood Foghorn Leghorn is the chicken.

He’s the chicken, you know Kevin…

Poor, poor Kevin

By: kiki

kiki — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:32:37 +0000

Kevin, you are an asshole.

This derision is needed because you are an asshole.

See how that works?

By: Jrod

Jrod — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:14:11 +0000

Fuckwit, listen close. The chickenhawk in the picture is not Foghorn Leghorn. The other guy is the chickenhawk. OK? The person in the picture is the chickenhawk, not the rooster standing behind him. OK? I realize you like to say stupid things in the hope that someone will pay you a little attention, but this is stupid even for you.

By: The Disgruntled Chemist

The Disgruntled Chemist — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:43:17 +0000

Armed to the teeth with a video camera and a preposterous haircut, Mattera infiltrated the Rayburn House Office Building and hunkered down to wait for the Congressman.

Come on, Clif. We go to war with the haircut we have, not the haircut we might want to have.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:06:29 +0000

Hah! “The Transposeur said,
re:Kevin’s post
It’s just too faulty, and not at all fun.”

My God, you are a perfect liberal. Deride, but don’t explain why derision is needed. Make it sound like you can’t be bothered explaining things or something. Too funny. I wouldn’t say you are the problem with debate, but you’re certainly an example. Will liberals ever learn that they can’t stifle debate with condescension? Time will tell.

Jrod, I sa I say, I know the difference between a chicken and a chickenhawk. I appear to be da only one.

Shorter fake kevin, you might as well go back to leaving out the ‘and fake’ part. Intelligent people understood that it was implied. And I bet even liberals don’t find ‘shorter so and so’ to be humorous anymore. All tastes sophisticate. Even liberal’s.

By: Shorter (and Fake) Kevin

Shorter (and Fake) Kevin — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:44:50 +0000

“…and even after brushing against how silly the idea of calling someone a chickenhawk is in the first place…”

Calling my heroes ‘chickenhawks’ hurts! Make it stop!