<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actually, My Real Point Has Always Been This [Updated]:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free sex stories.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-817624</link>
		<dc:creator>Free sex stories.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-817624</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free online sex games.....&lt;/strong&gt;

Free lesbian sex videos. Animal sex free. Free sex videos....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free online sex games&#8230;..</strong></p>
<p>Free lesbian sex videos. Animal sex free. Free sex videos&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267735</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267735</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This question has been puzzling me lately: can a woman be a part of a circle jerk?&lt;/i&gt;

In the name of all that is good, do NOT seek the answer to this question in Japanese porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This question has been puzzling me lately: can a woman be a part of a circle jerk?</i></p>
<p>In the name of all that is good, do NOT seek the answer to this question in Japanese porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipYrWhig</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267642</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipYrWhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267642</guid>
		<description>Touch&#233;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touch&eacute;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klein's tiny left nut</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267459</link>
		<dc:creator>Klein's tiny left nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267459</guid>
		<description>Flip,

Or perhaps the &quot;Cul de Whack&quot;, non?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flip,</p>
<p>Or perhaps the &#8220;Cul de Whack&#8221;, non?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipYrWhig</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267253</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipYrWhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267253</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ohhhhh, I always thought a circle jerk was a wanker than lived in the suburbs&lt;/i&gt;

No, that&#039;s a cul de sack.  

(For your European friends, coule de sac.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ohhhhh, I always thought a circle jerk was a wanker than lived in the suburbs</i></p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s a cul de sack.  </p>
<p>(For your European friends, coule de sac.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsaneInTheCheneyBrain</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267210</link>
		<dc:creator>InsaneInTheCheneyBrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-267210</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That Ivy League Insider Club membership card sure has some great rewards, I guess. Or else she’s sleeping with the entire editorial staff of The Atlantic.

Or they just have no standards at all.&lt;/i&gt;

I submit to you that these statements are not mutually exclusive, and I would venture the first is strongly dependent on the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That Ivy League Insider Club membership card sure has some great rewards, I guess. Or else she’s sleeping with the entire editorial staff of The Atlantic.</p>
<p>Or they just have no standards at all.</i></p>
<p>I submit to you that these statements are not mutually exclusive, and I would venture the first is strongly dependent on the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LACJ</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266740</link>
		<dc:creator>LACJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266740</guid>
		<description>Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266607</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266607</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&#039;d end with a stack of dead John &amp; Jane Galts. I&#039;m all for share &amp; share alike&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s charming but I don&#039;t think I want one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I&#8217;d end with a stack of dead John &amp; Jane Galts. I&#8217;m all for share &amp; share alike</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s charming but I don&#8217;t think I want one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seanly</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266603</link>
		<dc:creator>Seanly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266603</guid>
		<description>When the Randroids get their dream world, can I shoot them for setting foot on my property? I&#039;d end with a stack of dead John &amp; Jane Galts. I&#039;m all for share &amp; share alike, but once they get the lonely hard cruel world of Rand&#039;s crappy books, I will play by their rules. I picture myself in a one-armed leather jacket ala Mad Max blasting through hordes of starving Randriod nerds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Randroids get their dream world, can I shoot them for setting foot on my property? I&#8217;d end with a stack of dead John &amp; Jane Galts. I&#8217;m all for share &amp; share alike, but once they get the lonely hard cruel world of Rand&#8217;s crappy books, I will play by their rules. I picture myself in a one-armed leather jacket ala Mad Max blasting through hordes of starving Randriod nerds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266577</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kelso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266577</guid>
		<description>Actually, this could explain a lot of Megan&#039;s disdain for the not-so-well-off getting sick and stuff. There&#039;s no greater animus than that off the &quot;well-off&quot; branch of a family for those pathetic, loser relatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this could explain a lot of Megan&#8217;s disdain for the not-so-well-off getting sick and stuff. There&#8217;s no greater animus than that off the &#8220;well-off&#8221; branch of a family for those pathetic, loser relatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266575</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kelso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266575</guid>
		<description>Here is McCardle&#039;s explanation of her &quot;deeply proletarian roots&quot;: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;a) My parents did not spring, full grown from the head of Zeus, into being on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. I have relatives elsewhere
b) There are a surprising number of working class old people on Manhattan&#039;s Upper West Side.
Posted by Megan McArdle &#124; August 25, 2007 12:32 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, it could be kind of like the Irish Jeffersons, with George McCardle &lt;i&gt;moving  on up&lt;/i&gt; when Megan was a kid, except, uh, the &quot;born and raised&quot; part. 

Tangled Web Woven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is McCardle&#8217;s explanation of her &#8220;deeply proletarian roots&#8221;: </p>
<blockquote><p>a) My parents did not spring, full grown from the head of Zeus, into being on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. I have relatives elsewhere<br />
b) There are a surprising number of working class old people on Manhattan&#8217;s Upper West Side.<br />
Posted by Megan McArdle | August 25, 2007 12:32 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>So, it could be kind of like the Irish Jeffersons, with George McCardle <i>moving  on up</i> when Megan was a kid, except, uh, the &#8220;born and raised&#8221; part. </p>
<p>Tangled Web Woven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vin Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266503</link>
		<dc:creator>Vin Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266503</guid>
		<description>Darn! She did make the &quot;list of tall women,&quot; is what I was saying.

And as I apparently felt the need to post - twice - about a libertarian blogger&#039;s height, I am off to reconsider how I am spending my life ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn! She did make the &#8220;list of tall women,&#8221; is what I was saying.</p>
<p>And as I apparently felt the need to post &#8211; twice &#8211; about a libertarian blogger&#8217;s height, I am off to reconsider how I am spending my life &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vin Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266502</link>
		<dc:creator>Vin Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266502</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s 6&#039;2&quot; - Wikipedia doesn&#039;t tell you much about her background, but she did m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s 6&#8217;2&#8243; &#8211; Wikipedia doesn&#8217;t tell you much about her background, but she did m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266480</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;...the idea behind the ’starve the beast’ theory is to rack up so much Federal debt via tax cuts and deficit spending that the government will be unable to fund any major social programs — 4EVAR!!1&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Not to mention all the &quot;Defense&quot; spending going out to every asshole who can plop down $10,000 a year for the National Repug Club membership fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;the idea behind the ’starve the beast’ theory is to rack up so much Federal debt via tax cuts and deficit spending that the government will be unable to fund any major social programs — 4EVAR!!1&#8243;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to mention all the &#8220;Defense&#8221; spending going out to every asshole who can plop down $10,000 a year for the National Repug Club membership fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crissa</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266469</link>
		<dc:creator>Crissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266469</guid>
		<description>I can type thirty words per minute;
I can use a spellchecker;
I know little brown book grammar;
I understand sentence construction;
I can use Google while typing;
I can do math, algebra, calculus;
I can understand complex or previously unknown to me concepts.

...But none of those things are why they hired her.  They hired her because she has connections and takes a conservative viewpoint.

I&#039;d most definitely like her job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can type thirty words per minute;<br />
I can use a spellchecker;<br />
I know little brown book grammar;<br />
I understand sentence construction;<br />
I can use Google while typing;<br />
I can do math, algebra, calculus;<br />
I can understand complex or previously unknown to me concepts.</p>
<p>&#8230;But none of those things are why they hired her.  They hired her because she has connections and takes a conservative viewpoint.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d most definitely like her job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266442</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266442</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But on my list of policy priorities it’s somewhere around “What shall we do about France?”&lt;/i&gt;

I understand your concern, Meggie-baby. Let me help here: the reason everybody hates the French is because they&#039;re so smug. And why are they so smug? Because they&#039;re French Face it: when you think of France, what do you think of?

1) Great food.
2) Great wine.
3) Movies full of sex.
4) Jean Reno.

How can any mere American or Australian beat that? Lordy, having a French accent automatically gives you an extra 30 cool points. There&#039;s no way the nasal drone of the ocker, or the various amusing US accents, can ever hope to compete.

So here&#039;s what I suggest you do, Megsy: suck up to the French. Wildly. Learn the language, read the philosophy, watch the movies. And by all that&#039;s holy, eat the baguettes and drink the wine. Think of the children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But on my list of policy priorities it’s somewhere around “What shall we do about France?”</i></p>
<p>I understand your concern, Meggie-baby. Let me help here: the reason everybody hates the French is because they&#8217;re so smug. And why are they so smug? Because they&#8217;re French Face it: when you think of France, what do you think of?</p>
<p>1) Great food.<br />
2) Great wine.<br />
3) Movies full of sex.<br />
4) Jean Reno.</p>
<p>How can any mere American or Australian beat that? Lordy, having a French accent automatically gives you an extra 30 cool points. There&#8217;s no way the nasal drone of the ocker, or the various amusing US accents, can ever hope to compete.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s what I suggest you do, Megsy: suck up to the French. Wildly. Learn the language, read the philosophy, watch the movies. And by all that&#8217;s holy, eat the baguettes and drink the wine. Think of the children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266335</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266335</guid>
		<description>Mike is right that The Atlantic has the right to publish whatever they want and to hire whomever they please. Others are also right that we get to bitch and moan and point and laugh at clowns like McArdle. There is another side to this that I think needs to be brought out.

There is an agenda. That agenda is to transform this country into a police state. We are already a surveillance society and we have some ways to go before we become a full blown police state but I am absolutely convinced that is the goal. We will take another step towards that goal next year when the Real ID Act goes into effect. People are in for a big surprise when that happens.

Many years ago, before even some people here were born, conservatives decided they had enough. They felt shut out and so they quite openly formulated a plan. If you can&#039;t beat them, buy them. This is no secret, no conspiracy and the calls made by certain conservatives back in the 60&#039;s or early 70&#039;s to wrest control of the media away from liberals are public knowledge. CNN for instance was simply taken away from Ted Turner. He was paid well, it wasn&#039;t stolen outright but he wasn&#039;t looking to step down or turn the business over to Time either. It wasn&#039;t his idea and he was not at all happy abut it.

So today those of us on the left look at the media and now we feel left out in the cold. Add to this that the internet lets us see how the media sausage gets made and people are I think justifiably horrified. But we should be very clear about one ting, the shift to the right in our national media has nothing to do with &quot;business&quot;. Media &lt;i&gt;creates&lt;/i&gt; demand, it shapes conventional opinion. I suppose it could work the other way around but it rarely has.

I don&#039;t know. Maybe The Atlantic isn&#039;t a part of this and it really is just responding to the political landscape. I do however think that landscape is heavily slanted to the right, no, not even to the right but to the &lt;i&gt;far&lt;/i&gt; right. 

And Media isn&#039;t just about business. They don&#039;t produce widgets after all. &lt;i&gt;They are a part of a conversation.&lt;/i&gt; as participants in that conversation we have the right to a voice also. No no no no.. strike all that. That isn&#039;t what this is about. This isn&#039;t old fashioned conservative vs liberal. Neocons are not conservatives, they are deeply, deeply radical and ultimately, I believe, fascists. They hide under the rubric of conservativism  or libertarianism or whatever suits their purpose. We have to fight them every inch of the way or we will lose and lose big.

Maybe you all think I&#039;m nuts but those are my thoughts about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike is right that The Atlantic has the right to publish whatever they want and to hire whomever they please. Others are also right that we get to bitch and moan and point and laugh at clowns like McArdle. There is another side to this that I think needs to be brought out.</p>
<p>There is an agenda. That agenda is to transform this country into a police state. We are already a surveillance society and we have some ways to go before we become a full blown police state but I am absolutely convinced that is the goal. We will take another step towards that goal next year when the Real ID Act goes into effect. People are in for a big surprise when that happens.</p>
<p>Many years ago, before even some people here were born, conservatives decided they had enough. They felt shut out and so they quite openly formulated a plan. If you can&#8217;t beat them, buy them. This is no secret, no conspiracy and the calls made by certain conservatives back in the 60&#8242;s or early 70&#8242;s to wrest control of the media away from liberals are public knowledge. CNN for instance was simply taken away from Ted Turner. He was paid well, it wasn&#8217;t stolen outright but he wasn&#8217;t looking to step down or turn the business over to Time either. It wasn&#8217;t his idea and he was not at all happy abut it.</p>
<p>So today those of us on the left look at the media and now we feel left out in the cold. Add to this that the internet lets us see how the media sausage gets made and people are I think justifiably horrified. But we should be very clear about one ting, the shift to the right in our national media has nothing to do with &#8220;business&#8221;. Media <i>creates</i> demand, it shapes conventional opinion. I suppose it could work the other way around but it rarely has.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. Maybe The Atlantic isn&#8217;t a part of this and it really is just responding to the political landscape. I do however think that landscape is heavily slanted to the right, no, not even to the right but to the <i>far</i> right. </p>
<p>And Media isn&#8217;t just about business. They don&#8217;t produce widgets after all. <i>They are a part of a conversation.</i> as participants in that conversation we have the right to a voice also. No no no no.. strike all that. That isn&#8217;t what this is about. This isn&#8217;t old fashioned conservative vs liberal. Neocons are not conservatives, they are deeply, deeply radical and ultimately, I believe, fascists. They hide under the rubric of conservativism  or libertarianism or whatever suits their purpose. We have to fight them every inch of the way or we will lose and lose big.</p>
<p>Maybe you all think I&#8217;m nuts but those are my thoughts about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalrob</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266319</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266319</guid>
		<description>Cokie Roberts is on the air because her daddy was a Washington mover and shaker.  GW is President for the same reason.  McArdle probably got her gig because she went to UChicago (all hail Milton Friedman) and met the right people.

Like most things in life, it&#039;s who you know more than what you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cokie Roberts is on the air because her daddy was a Washington mover and shaker.  GW is President for the same reason.  McArdle probably got her gig because she went to UChicago (all hail Milton Friedman) and met the right people.</p>
<p>Like most things in life, it&#8217;s who you know more than what you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_millionaire_lebowski</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266296</link>
		<dc:creator>the_millionaire_lebowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266296</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To use your analogy, let’s say that the Atlantic used to produce the journalistic equivalent of a Saab: kinda staid, nobody’s ‘concept’ car, and pricey as well, but a certain class of readers were committed buyers because they associated the brand with reliable intelligent commentary.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My 1995 Aero takes offense to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To use your analogy, let’s say that the Atlantic used to produce the journalistic equivalent of a Saab: kinda staid, nobody’s ‘concept’ car, and pricey as well, but a certain class of readers were committed buyers because they associated the brand with reliable intelligent commentary.</p></blockquote>
<p>My 1995 Aero takes offense to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266282</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7058.html#comment-266282</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[S]he fucking claims “deeply proletairian roots” but won’t back up the claim when challenged. Anyone with anything like actual prole roots has a right to outrage.&lt;/i&gt; 

Must be some deep roots, as she was &quot;born &amp; raised on the Upper West Side.&quot; She did mention relatives in Western New York once. Maybe a great-grandparent was a supervisor in a factory in Buffalo or something. That would qualify as &quot;proletarian&#039; roots for someone as fact-challenged as Ms. McA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[S]he fucking claims “deeply proletairian roots” but won’t back up the claim when challenged. Anyone with anything like actual prole roots has a right to outrage.</i> </p>
<p>Must be some deep roots, as she was &#8220;born &amp; raised on the Upper West Side.&#8221; She did mention relatives in Western New York once. Maybe a great-grandparent was a supervisor in a factory in Buffalo or something. That would qualify as &#8220;proletarian&#8217; roots for someone as fact-challenged as Ms. McA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

