I think the Sox will keep Brad close to the Steel Reserve the rest of the season. If he were to become a Yankees fan then we’d know he was on the crack.
Oh, looky there, a new item @ S, N! Huh. Well, that’s Brad & Gavin accounted for. Where’re the other ones? What’s that? You two were SO HUNGRY once you finally ran out of rock that you…you…you what? You ate them¡?!¿
Mikey, I laughed so hard I . . . I’m so tired I can’t think of an analogy, but believe me when I say that I laughed, and I laughed hard.
Teh Prodigal, that damned ELO song has been going through my head all day. Sadly, it’s the second time in about five days I’ve had it stuck on brain loop; I heard it at Walgreen’s the other day. I hope it’s gone in the morning. And now I must to bed.
What if this was some kind of insideous, Coulter/Maher-type hype machine, orchestrated merely to drive up hit counts, revenues, profile, etc. of the two sites?
If it was ever alleged to have gone down that way, I bet anything it would be hotly denied by the regulars of both places. Which is good, because blowing the cover off this operation would be like walking away from a gold mine.
A gold mine, I tell ya! A gold mine!
(As long as we space it out, and don’t oversaturate. Kill the golden-egg laying goose, etc.)
You forget, Dogstar, that the Coulter/Maher imbroglio was fueled by lots and lots of terrifying to comtemplate sexual encounters between the two. It’s safe to assume that isn’t the case here. Right?
I refuse to slog through the previous comments thread. I’m guessing it’s the usual – wingnut “visitor” says something stupid and innacurate, S,N! regular demolishes said “arguement”, wingnut ignores proof and goes on to talking point #2, lather/rinse/repeat until wingnut runs out of talking points and goes back to #1, claiming that “nobody’s proved it wrong a WINNER IS ME” and so on, world without end amen.
Well, WordPress seems to have eaten my previous post – prob’ly has the munchies from all that crack. (Does crack do that? Why not? Why not just claim it does? How do YOU know, Mr. Middle America? Maybe you’d like to step over here and have a chat with Officer Friendly…)
Suffice to say it was my version of the Oroborous that “arguing” with a wingnut always ends up being – they make stupid assertion/talking point #1, it gets demolished, then they go on to #2 etc. etc. until it’s back to #1 again & they claim nobody’s contradicted that one yet.
I thought he was going to tell us not to masturbate in an adult theater.
Still strikes me as kind of messed up to arrest someone for masturbating in an adult theater. What else are you going to do in there? It’s porn for goddess sake. Is anybody going to be offended seeing a guy masturbate when up on the screen some blonde is taking twenty cocks? Why would you go to an adult theater when there is VHS (and now DVD) available? Especially with the strangely prudish undercover agents?
Oh, that is a great point. Sincerely, I had a blast the other night. Hope it was all in good fun. If you find any more info (pro or con) about the Schulte/Oreskes thing, shoot me an e-mail or something because I would love to know how the story ends.
The guys who run this site should have my e-mail – I used it to post. Rock on, honorable opponents!
Is anybody going to be offended seeing a guy masturbate when up on the screen some blonde is taking twenty cocks?
Well, I dunno about being offended by some dude wanking in an adult theater… but 20 cocks? In a row? That’s at least eight cocks too many for a proper gangbang. Really, anything past twelve is just gratuitous. Standards are slipping.
I’d try to figure out how one woman could deal with 20 cocks at a time, but I think my brain would break.
Anyway, I just wanted to point out that I was very surprised that a certain law professor-blogger-oenophile-narcissist, whose initials are suspiciously the same as those of an organization dedicated to assisting alcoholics (anonymously), failed to make an appearance, even through identity theft, in the Dogstar Global Warming Thread of Doom.
Of course, I might just have missed her appearance in there among the 42,355,146 comments in the thread.
Since I was bored, I thought that I would scientifically test the hypothesis, and I can clearly state, that it was impossible to get twenty cocks in me…
You could do it, AkaDad, with the assistance of a little crack, the wonder drug of the eighties. It’s Marion Barry approved!
And no, crack doesn’t give the munchies, I assume, since plain Jane coke is, like most stimulants, an appetite suppresant. That’s why most diet pills are packed with caffeine.
Ever heard of the Jenny Crank diet? Works like a charm (until you drop dead of malnutrition).
Dogstar said,
Oh, that is a great point. Sincerely, I had a blast the other night. Hope it was all in good fun
This is sirius thread. We iz sirius koment8ors.
Roger said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:19
Wow.
Neal Peart said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:19
Geddy, Alex and I were having severe SN! withdrawals up north
mdhatter said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:20
I think the Sox will keep Brad close to the Steel Reserve the rest of the season. If he were to become a Yankees fan then we’d know he was on the crack.
norbizness said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:21
Dude, I would totally jack off in a public theater for some crack right about now.
Col Bat Guano said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:22
I am still waiting for the punch line.
mikey said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:23
Holy shit.
Its a good thing we’ve got plenty of crack out here.
‘Cause I get the impression shit could get ugly in a hurry.
Let’s roll….
mikey
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:25
Postage test.
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:27
Ah well. I guess I’m still in the free speech zone.
Simba B. said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:28
OMG! A new thread!
I can breathe in here again!
J— said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:30
LOL…
Sadly, No! raises the white flag of a new post. Dogstar wins. To the victor, the spoils.
zsa said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:37
SN! fails it.
Spokane Moderate said,
September 4, 2007 at 5:54
Okay, no crack. But where’s my damn cake?
M. Bouffant said,
September 4, 2007 at 6:35
Oh, looky there, a new item @ S, N! Huh. Well, that’s Brad & Gavin accounted for. Where’re the other ones? What’s that? You two were SO HUNGRY once you finally ran out of rock that you…you…you what? You ate them¡?!¿
Steve Kelso said,
September 4, 2007 at 6:37
OK, but what about poppers?
M. Bouffant said,
September 4, 2007 at 6:42
Begone, previous thread, & never darken the door again!!
Bistroist said,
September 4, 2007 at 6:56
Dammit, it’s 7 AM, and I need a whole lot of smoke in my lungs before I watch that again.
Hallucinogeneriffic!
Incontinentia Buttocks said,
September 4, 2007 at 6:56
Our long national nightmare is over!
…but where’s Bruce?
Incontinentia Buttocks said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:00
And a big “thank you” to PeeWee.
I operate under our society’s well-known presumption of truth, and some dude had told me that crack was cool.
Thank goodness I don’t have to believe that anymore.
Candy said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:01
If we only just believe, and clap really, really hard, the Prodigal Bruce will return. Have faith.
mikey said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:08
Guys? Sit down. No. I know. Just sit down.
**SIGH***
Ok. See, sometimes things happen. And it’s kinda like PeeWee said.
Nobody knows how much it takes.
Bruce had FOUR dimes of crack.
That’s a lot, kids. When you start getting way out there like that, well, you can DIE.
What? No, Bruce didn’t OD. That’s silly.
What happened?
Well, like I said, Bruce had four dimes of crack.
So I killed him and took it. Yeah, I know, I’ll miss him too. But you mess with stuff like crack, you’re playin with fire, y’know?
mikey
Teh Prodigal Groos said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:09
You got me runnin’, goin’ out of my mind,
You got me thinkin’ that I’m wastin’ my time.
Don’t bring me down,
No, no, no, no, no (oo-ee-hoo)…
Candy said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:25
So I killed him and took it.
Mikey, I laughed so hard I . . . I’m so tired I can’t think of an analogy, but believe me when I say that I laughed, and I laughed hard.
Teh Prodigal, that damned ELO song has been going through my head all day. Sadly, it’s the second time in about five days I’ve had it stuck on brain loop; I heard it at Walgreen’s the other day. I hope it’s gone in the morning. And now I must to bed.
At least I got my damned paper written.
Jrod said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:36
…Bruce?
BRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCE!!
*sob*
Kathleen said,
September 4, 2007 at 7:48
thank god for a new thread. though when I think of all the in jokes I missed… *sob*
what was the best thing you ate this weekend? It’s a tough call for me, I am going with tazito – cuban cafe. mmmmm.
C Nelson Reilly said,
September 4, 2007 at 8:34
Jesus!
noen said,
September 4, 2007 at 10:20
I love the smell of fresh thread in the morning.
Dogstar said,
September 4, 2007 at 10:26
What if this was some kind of insideous, Coulter/Maher-type hype machine, orchestrated merely to drive up hit counts, revenues, profile, etc. of the two sites?
If it was ever alleged to have gone down that way, I bet anything it would be hotly denied by the regulars of both places. Which is good, because blowing the cover off this operation would be like walking away from a gold mine.
A gold mine, I tell ya! A gold mine!
(As long as we space it out, and don’t oversaturate. Kill the golden-egg laying goose, etc.)
noen said,
September 4, 2007 at 10:44
Remember kids, No Smoking.
Cause having a cig is just like smoking crack. You I speak the truth because we live in a truth based society.
noen said,
September 4, 2007 at 10:45
test
noen said,
September 4, 2007 at 10:47
GOD DAMN IT!
El Cid said,
September 4, 2007 at 11:16
Why is Al Gore afraid to debate this man?
Jrod said,
September 4, 2007 at 13:09
You forget, Dogstar, that the Coulter/Maher imbroglio was fueled by lots and lots of terrifying to comtemplate sexual encounters between the two. It’s safe to assume that isn’t the case here. Right?
…
Right? Guys?! Right???
Crack is a hell of a drug.
Pere Ubu said,
September 4, 2007 at 15:07
Well, THAT was disturbing. (The ad, I mean.)
I refuse to slog through the previous comments thread. I’m guessing it’s the usual – wingnut “visitor” says something stupid and innacurate, S,N! regular demolishes said “arguement”, wingnut ignores proof and goes on to talking point #2, lather/rinse/repeat until wingnut runs out of talking points and goes back to #1, claiming that “nobody’s proved it wrong a WINNER IS ME” and so on, world without end amen.
Pere Ubu said,
September 4, 2007 at 15:29
Well, WordPress seems to have eaten my previous post – prob’ly has the munchies from all that crack. (Does crack do that? Why not? Why not just claim it does? How do YOU know, Mr. Middle America? Maybe you’d like to step over here and have a chat with Officer Friendly…)
Suffice to say it was my version of the Oroborous that “arguing” with a wingnut always ends up being – they make stupid assertion/talking point #1, it gets demolished, then they go on to #2 etc. etc. until it’s back to #1 again & they claim nobody’s contradicted that one yet.
Hysterical Woman said,
September 4, 2007 at 15:30
I thought he was going to tell us not to masturbate in an adult theater.
Still strikes me as kind of messed up to arrest someone for masturbating in an adult theater. What else are you going to do in there? It’s porn for goddess sake. Is anybody going to be offended seeing a guy masturbate when up on the screen some blonde is taking twenty cocks? Why would you go to an adult theater when there is VHS (and now DVD) available? Especially with the strangely prudish undercover agents?
Fishbone McGonigle said,
September 4, 2007 at 16:27
Why would you go to an adult theater when there is VHS (and now DVD) available?
Perhaps because you (note that I am using the hypothetical “you,” and do not necessarily mean you in particular) like to diddle yerself in public?
Dogstar said,
September 4, 2007 at 16:59
Right? Guys?! Right???
HAAAAAAAA!!!
Oh, that is a great point. Sincerely, I had a blast the other night. Hope it was all in good fun. If you find any more info (pro or con) about the Schulte/Oreskes thing, shoot me an e-mail or something because I would love to know how the story ends.
The guys who run this site should have my e-mail – I used it to post. Rock on, honorable opponents!
billy pilgrim said,
September 4, 2007 at 16:59
what was the best thing you ate this weekend?
my wife!
Okay, that was probably unneccessary. I’m not apologizing though.
C. elegans said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:00
Well, I dunno about being offended by some dude wanking in an adult theater… but 20 cocks? In a row? That’s at least eight cocks too many for a proper gangbang. Really, anything past twelve is just gratuitous. Standards are slipping.
Nikki said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:01
mikey,
I nearly choked from that killing Bruce for crack. Very nice.
Did Bruce not return?! I though he was lying!
Dorothy said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:08
Is anybody going to be offended seeing a guy masturbate when up on the screen some blonde is taking twenty cocks?
Well, I dunno about being offended by some dude wanking in an adult theater… but 20 cocks? In a row?
No, silly: at a time.
Dan Someone said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:23
I’d try to figure out how one woman could deal with 20 cocks at a time, but I think my brain would break.
Anyway, I just wanted to point out that I was very surprised that a certain law professor-blogger-oenophile-narcissist, whose initials are suspiciously the same as those of an organization dedicated to assisting alcoholics (anonymously), failed to make an appearance, even through identity theft, in the Dogstar Global Warming Thread of Doom.
Of course, I might just have missed her appearance in there among the 42,355,146 comments in the thread.
atheist said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:28
I always felt so sorry for Pee Wee. He is obviously so talented, and what can I say, often talented people are quirky too.
I thought people should have forgiven him, but it seemed like that adult theatre thing was the end of his career.
C. elegans said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:28
I’m thinking it’d be a little bit like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon… With cocks.
Ann Alt-Del House said,
September 4, 2007 at 17:38
I was (hic) lurching, I mean lurking.
Lurking. L-L-L-LURKING. Lurk….
That’s a funny word…lurking.
stogoe said,
September 4, 2007 at 18:37
Roads. Ro-ads. Heh heh. Rooo-addsssssss.
Now, if you will, I’m off to Tyrone Biggum’s Five O’Clock Free Crack Giveaway.
H. Hughes said,
September 4, 2007 at 19:00
The way of the future. The way of the FU-ture. The way of the future. The way of the FU-ture. The way of the future.
…
The way of the future. The way of the FU-ture. The way of the future.
The. Way. Of. The. Fu. Ture.
AkaDad said,
September 4, 2007 at 19:03
Since I was bored, I thought that I would scientifically test the hypothesis, and I can clearly state, that it was impossible to get twenty cocks in me…
Jrod said,
September 4, 2007 at 22:44
You could do it, AkaDad, with the assistance of a little crack, the wonder drug of the eighties. It’s Marion Barry approved!
And no, crack doesn’t give the munchies, I assume, since plain Jane coke is, like most stimulants, an appetite suppresant. That’s why most diet pills are packed with caffeine.
Ever heard of the Jenny Crank diet? Works like a charm (until you drop dead of malnutrition).
Mehitabel the Abyssinian said,
September 4, 2007 at 23:02
Dogstar said,
Oh, that is a great point. Sincerely, I had a blast the other night. Hope it was all in good fun
This is sirius thread. We iz sirius koment8ors.
wordyeti said,
September 5, 2007 at 6:27
Every day. In every way.
The crack is getting better. And better.
I’m an excellent driver. Dad lets me drive on crack in the driveway all the time.
Jillian said,
September 6, 2007 at 1:43
So, which one of the Sadlies is this video portraying?