<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Friday Megan McArdle Moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fucked It Up, cont&#8217;d. &#124; Notes from Underground</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-1131077</link>
		<dc:creator>You Fucked It Up, cont&#8217;d. &#124; Notes from Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-1131077</guid>
		<description>[...] financial institutions and brokerage houses.  As we know, people like Megan McArdle are quick to blame (poor) individuals for their bad actions, but loath to condemn rich-ass corporations:  “But financial meltdowns don’t offer villains, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] financial institutions and brokerage houses.  As we know, people like Megan McArdle are quick to blame (poor) individuals for their bad actions, but loath to condemn rich-ass corporations:  “But financial meltdowns don’t offer villains, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; You, Too, Can Be an Econoblogger!</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-1069444</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; You, Too, Can Be an Econoblogger!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-1069444</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;megan mcardle is an idiot&#8221; sometimes, and you&#8217;ll find links to some of the best writers on the web, reduced to blubbering at the magnitude of McCardle&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;megan mcardle is an idiot&#8221; sometimes, and you&#8217;ll find links to some of the best writers on the web, reduced to blubbering at the magnitude of McCardle&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Government Extremism &#171; Weilerblog</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-958920</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Government Extremism &#171; Weilerblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-958920</guid>
		<description>[...] not just McArdle, of course. She happens to be a high-profile and particularly shameless purveyor of the heart of Reaganism - that government is the problem, not the solution. And central to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not just McArdle, of course. She happens to be a high-profile and particularly shameless purveyor of the heart of Reaganism &#8211; that government is the problem, not the solution. And central to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Midpoint &#187; Voting Obama Will Get You Laid</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-703088</link>
		<dc:creator>The Midpoint &#187; Voting Obama Will Get You Laid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-703088</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;I got mine, so fuck you!&#8221;  (BTW, this particular fallacy of glibertarianism has been refuted to death.) 2. Social Security. Democrats constantly talk about how Republicans are going to take away [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;I got mine, so fuck you!&#8221;  (BTW, this particular fallacy of glibertarianism has been refuted to death.) 2. Social Security. Democrats constantly talk about how Republicans are going to take away [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Unintended irony</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-316125</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Unintended irony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-316125</guid>
		<description>[...] McArdle does rather well for herself in terms of traffic, if for no other reason than people like us are linking to (and laughing at) her on a fairly regular basis. Memo to Atlantic editors: if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McArdle does rather well for herself in terms of traffic, if for no other reason than people like us are linking to (and laughing at) her on a fairly regular basis. Memo to Atlantic editors: if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forked tongue</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256927</link>
		<dc:creator>forked tongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256927</guid>
		<description>117 comments and nobody mentions that she used the word &quot;dranked&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>117 comments and nobody mentions that she used the word &#8220;dranked&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256876</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256876</guid>
		<description>Notice the classware: its &quot;young and health&quot; v. &quot;old and sick&quot; and really she means: young v. old. 
her argument: your taking from the young to give to the old which is bad.
In reality the classes are :&quot;health&quot; v. &quot;sick&quot; .
young and old may make one more likely, but are not determinitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the classware: its &#8220;young and health&#8221; v. &#8220;old and sick&#8221; and really she means: young v. old.<br />
her argument: your taking from the young to give to the old which is bad.<br />
In reality the classes are :&#8221;health&#8221; v. &#8220;sick&#8221; .<br />
young and old may make one more likely, but are not determinitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: islmfaoscist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256836</link>
		<dc:creator>islmfaoscist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256836</guid>
		<description>Forget the old and sick, it&#039;s those helpless infants who as a group just want to unfairly rob us of all our money. How can that possibly be justified on utilitariolibertarian grounds?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the old and sick, it&#8217;s those helpless infants who as a group just want to unfairly rob us of all our money. How can that possibly be justified on utilitariolibertarian grounds?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256831</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256831</guid>
		<description>&quot;If my health care isn&#039;t tied directly to my employment WHY should I put up with all this bullshit?&quot; 

&quot;A Human resource asset that isn&#039;t deathly afraid of unemployment is a more volatile resource to manage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If my health care isn&#8217;t tied directly to my employment WHY should I put up with all this bullshit?&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;A Human resource asset that isn&#8217;t deathly afraid of unemployment is a more volatile resource to manage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J—</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256799</link>
		<dc:creator>J—</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256799</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t look now, but McYardle the Turtle has &lt;a href=&quot;http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/08/how_low_can_you_go.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another health care post up&lt;/a&gt;, this one complaining about the WHO&#039;s 2000 ranking of world health care systems.  She takes issue with the United States&#039; position, wouldn&#039;t you know.  Among other failings, she cannot or cares not to distinguish Latin American countries.  They&#039;re all just one amorphous blob of poor.  All the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t look now, but McYardle the Turtle has <a href="http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/08/how_low_can_you_go.php" rel="nofollow">another health care post up</a>, this one complaining about the WHO&#8217;s 2000 ranking of world health care systems.  She takes issue with the United States&#8217; position, wouldn&#8217;t you know.  Among other failings, she cannot or cares not to distinguish Latin American countries.  They&#8217;re all just one amorphous blob of poor.  All the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256719</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256719</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wow, a dumbshit troll came to SN and didn’t get fed? I’m very proud of all of you.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, thanks, but honestly?  It&#039;s helpful when they&#039;re that incoherent.  It&#039;s hard to respond to a post that looks for all the world like a message that&#039;s been encrypted using a word-replacement scheme based on a one-time pad...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wow, a dumbshit troll came to SN and didn’t get fed? I’m very proud of all of you.</i></p>
<p>Well, thanks, but honestly?  It&#8217;s helpful when they&#8217;re that incoherent.  It&#8217;s hard to respond to a post that looks for all the world like a message that&#8217;s been encrypted using a word-replacement scheme based on a one-time pad&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimai</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256679</link>
		<dc:creator>aimai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256679</guid>
		<description>I gtihnk the thing that so staggers me about mccardles piece is how stunningly illogical it is while posing as logical and rational. The bizarre division of society into taxpaying healthy young people and health care producing/non tax paying/sick old people is simply absurd. A single payer health system means that every person who pays taxes is subsidizing every other person who may get sick and need care.  Elderly working people who pay taxes, or elderly people who pay taxes on their assets, are just as likely to be paying into the health care system as young people. And, of course, young people do need health care and young families need health care all the time. But in adedition the category of &quot;healthy young person&quot; who pays into the system without needing it is a vanishingly small portion of the population because being young, like being healthy, is a transitory state. *even if it were true* that the entire burden of the payments fell on some hypothetical &quot;young and healthy&quot; class of persons how long does any individual person fall into that category of paying out before they enter (however unwillingly) into the category of those receiving payments? What does she think the human lifecycle looks like? Is it largely composed of healthy working 18-25 year olds and the rest of us are old codgers? Cause if we are the 18-25 year olds aren&#039;t really paying taxes for the rest of us for very long before, well, they are 26 and starting to need serious care.

aimai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gtihnk the thing that so staggers me about mccardles piece is how stunningly illogical it is while posing as logical and rational. The bizarre division of society into taxpaying healthy young people and health care producing/non tax paying/sick old people is simply absurd. A single payer health system means that every person who pays taxes is subsidizing every other person who may get sick and need care.  Elderly working people who pay taxes, or elderly people who pay taxes on their assets, are just as likely to be paying into the health care system as young people. And, of course, young people do need health care and young families need health care all the time. But in adedition the category of &#8220;healthy young person&#8221; who pays into the system without needing it is a vanishingly small portion of the population because being young, like being healthy, is a transitory state. *even if it were true* that the entire burden of the payments fell on some hypothetical &#8220;young and healthy&#8221; class of persons how long does any individual person fall into that category of paying out before they enter (however unwillingly) into the category of those receiving payments? What does she think the human lifecycle looks like? Is it largely composed of healthy working 18-25 year olds and the rest of us are old codgers? Cause if we are the 18-25 year olds aren&#8217;t really paying taxes for the rest of us for very long before, well, they are 26 and starting to need serious care.</p>
<p>aimai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrod</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256678</guid>
		<description>Wow, a dumbshit troll came to SN and didn&#039;t get fed?  I&#039;m very proud of all of you.

As for McGalt, you gotta love avoid someone who can spend 3000 words on the morality of single payer health care without ever considering the morality of letting people suffer and die because they&#039;re poor.  OMG wealth transfer!!!

Well maybe she considered it somewhere in that mess, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever been able to finish one of this moron&#039;s posts.  I get halfway through or so and decide my time would be better spent staring blankly into space and drooling.  I learn more from the later activity as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a dumbshit troll came to SN and didn&#8217;t get fed?  I&#8217;m very proud of all of you.</p>
<p>As for McGalt, you gotta love avoid someone who can spend 3000 words on the morality of single payer health care without ever considering the morality of letting people suffer and die because they&#8217;re poor.  OMG wealth transfer!!!</p>
<p>Well maybe she considered it somewhere in that mess, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever been able to finish one of this moron&#8217;s posts.  I get halfway through or so and decide my time would be better spent staring blankly into space and drooling.  I learn more from the later activity as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256602</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256602</guid>
		<description>A few years back, the Federal government and the Florida government built a new exit onto I-75 at SR56 just North of Tampa.  I would like to ask Ms. McArdle, what &quot;moral claim&quot; did the beneficiaries of this construction have upon the taxpayers as a whole?

Proponents of the new multi-million dollar exit doubtless made all kinds of claims about how it will pay for itself in the long run (improved access to land = more real-estate development = more jobs and increased property taxes = profit!), but that really seems to be beside the point with McArdle.  The backbone of McArdle&#039;s argument is that governments may only provide services when the recipients have some kind of &quot;moral claim&quot; to these services.  Regarding the services governments may offer, you can&#039;t have them if you just &lt;I&gt;want&lt;/I&gt; them, or even if the government can clearly provide these goods considerably cheaper and better than private industry.  Governments, even democratic ones, may not just pay for things the silly old public merely &lt;I&gt;desires,&lt;/I&gt; like an Interstate exit over here, a library over there.  No, they may do only what the iron law of some kind of unimpeachable morality &lt;I&gt;demands,&lt;/I&gt; that and no more.

But why?  Why can&#039;t the U.S. government supply the citizenry with a single-payer scheme like every civilized country in the world already has?  Not because of some airy Randian moral razzmatazz, but because single-payer is cheaper, and far more humanely decent (by which I mean, in my soft-hearted way, that &lt;I&gt;gosh&lt;/I&gt; it&#039;s so much more &lt;I&gt;nice&lt;/I&gt; not to strand your ailing Grandpa out on the ice floe), and cheaper, and leads to superior results as measured by obvious statistical bottom lines such as child mortality and life expectancy, and did I mention that atop its other advantages it&#039;s cheaper - a Hell of a lot cheaper - than the ridiculous Wild-West medico-entrepreneurial chaos we U.S. citizens endure today?

But no, we citizens mustn&#039;t have all these benefits, nor will we be allowed to save and keep the really enormous cash money difference between the cost of single-payer and the cost of the world&#039;s-most-expensive U.S. system, because we citizens lack the &quot;moral right&quot; to single-payer.  &quot;Morals&quot;!  &lt;I&gt;Ptui!&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years back, the Federal government and the Florida government built a new exit onto I-75 at SR56 just North of Tampa.  I would like to ask Ms. McArdle, what &#8220;moral claim&#8221; did the beneficiaries of this construction have upon the taxpayers as a whole?</p>
<p>Proponents of the new multi-million dollar exit doubtless made all kinds of claims about how it will pay for itself in the long run (improved access to land = more real-estate development = more jobs and increased property taxes = profit!), but that really seems to be beside the point with McArdle.  The backbone of McArdle&#8217;s argument is that governments may only provide services when the recipients have some kind of &#8220;moral claim&#8221; to these services.  Regarding the services governments may offer, you can&#8217;t have them if you just <i>want</i> them, or even if the government can clearly provide these goods considerably cheaper and better than private industry.  Governments, even democratic ones, may not just pay for things the silly old public merely <i>desires,</i> like an Interstate exit over here, a library over there.  No, they may do only what the iron law of some kind of unimpeachable morality <i>demands,</i> that and no more.</p>
<p>But why?  Why can&#8217;t the U.S. government supply the citizenry with a single-payer scheme like every civilized country in the world already has?  Not because of some airy Randian moral razzmatazz, but because single-payer is cheaper, and far more humanely decent (by which I mean, in my soft-hearted way, that <i>gosh</i> it&#8217;s so much more <i>nice</i> not to strand your ailing Grandpa out on the ice floe), and cheaper, and leads to superior results as measured by obvious statistical bottom lines such as child mortality and life expectancy, and did I mention that atop its other advantages it&#8217;s cheaper &#8211; a Hell of a lot cheaper &#8211; than the ridiculous Wild-West medico-entrepreneurial chaos we U.S. citizens endure today?</p>
<p>But no, we citizens mustn&#8217;t have all these benefits, nor will we be allowed to save and keep the really enormous cash money difference between the cost of single-payer and the cost of the world&#8217;s-most-expensive U.S. system, because we citizens lack the &#8220;moral right&#8221; to single-payer.  &#8220;Morals&#8221;!  <i>Ptui!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256593</guid>
		<description>So, is the point of the blogs at the &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt; to increase print circulation? Or to drive up pageviews in anticipation of the print edition&#039;s irrelevancy? If the latter, advantage: &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;. According to this bold new business model, I figure Ace will join Regina Lynn over at Wired any day now, so there can be anger-induced apoplexy and generalized orgasm all at once. Orgasplexy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is the point of the blogs at the <i>Atlantic</i> to increase print circulation? Or to drive up pageviews in anticipation of the print edition&#8217;s irrelevancy? If the latter, advantage: <i>Atlantic</i>. According to this bold new business model, I figure Ace will join Regina Lynn over at Wired any day now, so there can be anger-induced apoplexy and generalized orgasm all at once. Orgasplexy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256562</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256562</guid>
		<description>I hate it when all the GOOD snark has been taken by the time I get here. 

One can only hope that this spawn of Harry &amp; Louise discovers the wonderful world of: copays, deductibles, approved drug/treatment protocols, out-of-plan providers, the Plan approval process, non-covered services and treatments, claims reimbursement and (--drumroll please--) COBRA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it when all the GOOD snark has been taken by the time I get here. </p>
<p>One can only hope that this spawn of Harry &amp; Louise discovers the wonderful world of: copays, deductibles, approved drug/treatment protocols, out-of-plan providers, the Plan approval process, non-covered services and treatments, claims reimbursement and (&#8211;drumroll please&#8211;) COBRA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.dmocrats.org</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256553</link>
		<dc:creator>www.dmocrats.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256553</guid>
		<description>We already have socialized firefighting and socialized policing in this country as we do not pay for each incidence of fighting a fire or preventing or solving a crime against us when the police come to our home in order to help us. So if we pay taxes for firefighting and crimefighting, I consider it good enough that our tax dollars should pay for the medical care that we get.


We already have transfer of money from liberals to Republican war mongers who make preemptive strikes on countries that did not pose a threat to us. So Republican regressives can shut up about transfer of money and wealth against their will.



Do you want to destroy the hold that corporations have over congress and the president? Simple. Organize and Demand progressive legislation from some of these corporations and do not buy from them until they get the GOP to get congress to enact this legislation.

If you want to put an end to the Republiklan party, then

Send this letter to the Republican party now! Also put this on your web page so others can see it.

Copy and paste the letter below and email it directly to info@gop.com the Republican Party and get 2 friends to send this letter and have those 2 friends get 2 friends to send it and so on. Thank you. Drop me a message to info@dmocrats.org with the subject Done after you have sent the email.

Hello

Get your Republican party to end the war in Iraq, with Bush and Cheney resigning, and until you do we stop buying televisions, refrigerators, stoves, ovens, dishwashers, dvd players, stereo equipment, light bulbs from one of your party&#039;s major contributors and War contractors General Electric Corporation ( 203 373 2211 ) who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to remove the FICA taxable income cap and tax all of a person&#039;s income for social security purposes and enact HR 676 Single payer universal health care into law and repeal Medicare Part D and place the prescription drug benefit in Medicare Part B covering 80 percent of all medication with no extra premiums, no extra deductibles, no means tests, no coverage gaps, and completely remove the means test to Medicare Part B and until you do, we will not buy consumer products and prescription drugs from one of the biggest pharmacy chains and GOP contributors in the country, Rite Aid, who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to enact a $10 an hour minimum wage, and until you do, we will not go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy&#039;s, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to enact into law Universal vote by mail with paper ballots counted by civil servants with civil servants registering voters and keeping track of registrations, and until you do, we will not buy any GOP contributor Dell computers or monitors or go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy&#039;s, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to get congress to pass and enact a law legalizing abortions from conception to six months, and to nine months when the life of the mother appears threatened, and until you do we stop doing business with two of your biggest contributors Dominos Pizza and Curves for Women Health Clubs.

Signed,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already have socialized firefighting and socialized policing in this country as we do not pay for each incidence of fighting a fire or preventing or solving a crime against us when the police come to our home in order to help us. So if we pay taxes for firefighting and crimefighting, I consider it good enough that our tax dollars should pay for the medical care that we get.</p>
<p>We already have transfer of money from liberals to Republican war mongers who make preemptive strikes on countries that did not pose a threat to us. So Republican regressives can shut up about transfer of money and wealth against their will.</p>
<p>Do you want to destroy the hold that corporations have over congress and the president? Simple. Organize and Demand progressive legislation from some of these corporations and do not buy from them until they get the GOP to get congress to enact this legislation.</p>
<p>If you want to put an end to the Republiklan party, then</p>
<p>Send this letter to the Republican party now! Also put this on your web page so others can see it.</p>
<p>Copy and paste the letter below and email it directly to <a href="mailto:info@gop.com">info@gop.com</a> the Republican Party and get 2 friends to send this letter and have those 2 friends get 2 friends to send it and so on. Thank you. Drop me a message to <a href="mailto:info@dmocrats.org">info@dmocrats.org</a> with the subject Done after you have sent the email.</p>
<p>Hello</p>
<p>Get your Republican party to end the war in Iraq, with Bush and Cheney resigning, and until you do we stop buying televisions, refrigerators, stoves, ovens, dishwashers, dvd players, stereo equipment, light bulbs from one of your party&#8217;s major contributors and War contractors General Electric Corporation ( 203 373 2211 ) who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.</p>
<p>Get your Republican party to remove the FICA taxable income cap and tax all of a person&#8217;s income for social security purposes and enact HR 676 Single payer universal health care into law and repeal Medicare Part D and place the prescription drug benefit in Medicare Part B covering 80 percent of all medication with no extra premiums, no extra deductibles, no means tests, no coverage gaps, and completely remove the means test to Medicare Part B and until you do, we will not buy consumer products and prescription drugs from one of the biggest pharmacy chains and GOP contributors in the country, Rite Aid, who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.</p>
<p>Get your Republican party to enact a $10 an hour minimum wage, and until you do, we will not go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy&#8217;s, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.</p>
<p>Get your Republican party to enact into law Universal vote by mail with paper ballots counted by civil servants with civil servants registering voters and keeping track of registrations, and until you do, we will not buy any GOP contributor Dell computers or monitors or go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy&#8217;s, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.</p>
<p>Get your Republican party to get congress to pass and enact a law legalizing abortions from conception to six months, and to nine months when the life of the mother appears threatened, and until you do we stop doing business with two of your biggest contributors Dominos Pizza and Curves for Women Health Clubs.</p>
<p>Signed,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256523</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256523</guid>
		<description>What? 

You don&#039;t think it is covert racism causing all these differentials?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t think it is covert racism causing all these differentials?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomObserver</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256519</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomObserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256519</guid>
		<description>Is there some law that says libertarians have to be selfish flaming retards?

The entire political philosophy is just looking out for number 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some law that says libertarians have to be selfish flaming retards?</p>
<p>The entire political philosophy is just looking out for number 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ortega &#187; Meghan McArdle on Single-Payer Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256501</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ortega &#187; Meghan McArdle on Single-Payer Healthcare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/6929.html#comment-256501</guid>
		<description>[...] Tags: Healthcare    24Aug  The Hon. Dr. St. Rev. Bradley S. Rocket, Esq, PhD, MD schooled The Atlantic&#8217;s Meghan McArdle &#8212; and hey, he should know, he&#8217;s a doctor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tags: Healthcare    24Aug  The Hon. Dr. St. Rev. Bradley S. Rocket, Esq, PhD, MD schooled The Atlantic&#8217;s Meghan McArdle &#8212; and hey, he should know, he&#8217;s a doctor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

