August 8, 2007 at 5:06

Hey You-Are-So-Silly, you know what other great idea Mao (and Reagan) endorsed? Exogamy.

Finally for tonight, uhhhhh….What? Are you saying this ideal is good? Are you comparing Reagan to Mao? Do you have any proof Reagan endorsed this ideal? Why would you pull this out of no-where? At least my neck and gut are getting a good workout as I laugh and shake my head.

August 8, 2007 at 3:57

Dear you-are-silly:
You, unsurprisingly, make the mistake of conflating 21st-century US liberals with anything that reared its head under the “communist/socialist” banner at any time in the 20th century. Oh yes, how totally appropriate and sensible to fold “health care for all” (imagine! what a silly notion!) into Maoist-style totalitarianism/groupthink. You fucking tool.

Well first off like the other guy i’m glad you resort to name calling to show your true IQ and ability to handle converstation when you really can’t come back with a good point. I never confused liberals with communist/socialist banner of the day because many of the same ideals of then are still spouted off today so its not really a confusion. I’m sorry I should have stated many points instead of just one. Health care for all, government subsidized food, housing…I mean the list goes on. It was a general point not a statement of one fact. I mean I personally feel healthcare for all is a fools errand because it doesn’t really allow for competition which breeds thought and forward thinking. I mean Russia had a form of everyone gets everything the same and the economy stalled because humans will either fight for something if you aren’t given it or take whats given and kick back and be lazy. Its a nice dream though.

I can’t add sound files to this site.

*You seem to have a very limited knowledge of (a) political thought, (b) history, and (c) the political climate of the late 19th and early twentieth centuries, partocularly in China*

So explain to me my limits of what you think I know. You can say I have a limited knowledge and yet show nothing for it. Anyways what does what I said have anything to do with my “limited knowledge.” I’m just stating that he was liked for his ideals. He strove for a form of socialism which was at the core of his work. During his Great Leap Forward he attempted setting up communes for the poor, which led to millions dying of starvation. So there is just a smidgen of my knowledge of history. I have a hard time staying at a higher level than you, since you felt the need to attack me instead of responding with solid statements, but do you really know political thought? Do you know the difference between socialism, facism, liberalism, communism and all the other isms. What does the political climate have to do with anything as well? You should also work on your spelling.

*How much worse is that than murdering millions of other people? It’s a quantitative difference, that’s all. It’s not qualitative.*

This point is senseless. What is your basis of quantitative and qualitative? In comparison to what world event, or what other mass murdering do you feel is a worthwhile comparison. This may have sounded like a good point in your head but really its baseless.

*Does this mean you think that universal health care leads invariably to murdering millions of people? Wow, I want what you’re on.*

How does what I said mean that one has to do with the other? Its like saying that turning on the lights makes food taste good. I was just saying that because he was a socialist and had happy ideas like free healthcare for all, that that meant it was ok for him to murder over 40 million of his own people at least in a lot of circles on the left the worshipped him as a forward thinker.

*Man, you’re so dumb in so very many ways. Firstly, no-one here really hates Malkin, at least in the sense in which her frothing-at-the-mouth minions seem to hate everyone who’s not like them. Secondly, her ideals are not so much ‘think for yourself’ as ‘kill everyone who’s got something we want, throw everyone else in jail, and if you don’t agree with me you’re a traitor’. Oh, and a cavalier disregard for logic and evidence.*

Again with the personal attacks, can’t you just stay above saying things like that and stick to a solid political argument or is that too hard. You know its funny that you would jump to a point of her disregarding logic and evidence when you really have no real evidence to back up what you are saying. Show me where she says she wants to kill everyone who’s got what we want and whatever other crap you felt the need to spout out.

*I’d also add that, in common with the various other Republican wanna-be’s, she has a strong authoritarian inclination (if I haven’t already made that abundantly clear).*

Wanna-be what? Strong leaders? Sensible thinkers? So no you haven’t already made it abundantly clear, you haven’t even made it minutely clear.

*And, of course, they also share a sociopathic fear/hatred of anyone who’s not like them, as well as a total inability to see any issue in other than binary terms, which leads to ridiculous proclamations about good and evil such as you are making.*

Are you sure sociopath is the correct terminology here? Look up the definition, try a different word and them come back with that baseless argument again if you wish. However it really has no function in reality since its just not true. Not to mention the fact that there really wasn’t any proclamtion by myself about good and evil. But if you want me to make a clear one here. Mao Zedong murdered 40,000,000 people – BAD, Michelle Malkin murdered 0 people – GOOD. We could go into the colorful realm instead of just black and white but for now we can stick to the black and white as each person does have their goods and bads but I think Mao was overwhelmingly bad and Michelle while maybe annoying to you guys is good. Anyways the only real fear and hatred is directed toward those who fear and hate us. To not fear someone who hates you is setting yourself up for being taken advantage of or worse and is a very simple minded way of looking at life. Maybe you are just trying to play the devil’s advocate here but its not sensible and doesn’t fit the arguement.

*[Sigh]. Sonny, point to just one post on this site, just one, where anybody, even a commenter, evinces a love for Mao. If you can’t, then admit that you’re fantasising yet again and agree to shut the fuck up. Mkay?*

I really don’t have the time to dive through this entire site to find one post about Mao. I doubt I would find one seeing as how this is not a site conducive to higher thinking and debate about history and political viewpoints. Check out the comments on this site though http://leftspot.com/blog/?q=node/235#comment. This one looks past the deaths and even down plays them just so that he doesn’t seem so bad. http://www.lastsuperpower.net/docs/hinton-mao. I’m sure I could find more but I’m getting bored with this.

OOOOO, I seriously doubt your my dad and a nice shut the fuck up at the end, Mr. Garrison, I didn’t think you use those words. At least I see you can be highbrow when it comes to discussion. Usually people resort to that when they can’t do any better and apparently you can’t. If you are going to come at me come with sense and a solid arguing ability, I really shouldn’t respond to someone who has to resort to name calling and such but you wrote a lot and I had some time to kill.

(mikey) So, you’ve picked a side you WANT to be right and just decided by pulling the answer out of your ass and claiming it as fact? There’s only one letter’s difference between “fact” and “fart.” You’re asking a lot of Lord Ha HA there, to keep those two straight. After all, he’s just imitating arguments that worked against him (as A.D. Brad has also noticed).

(Sarcastro) Uncle Joe’s dicks? Jeez, no wonder he’s movin’ kinda slow. Especially with all those cute chicks taking baths in the water tower and all.

Hey now, that’s no better than talk of ping pong balls.

It’s odd that a bunch of dumb leftist fucks who actually worship Mao would portray Malkin in this way.

Projection?

No, I wouldn’t say the preceeding statement was projection exactly. More like wishfull thinking… except that would require you to think.

It wasn’t so long ago that leftist fuckheads were sucking Uncle Joe’s dicks and telling us that you’ve got to break a few eggs to make an omelet.

Uncle Joe? Moving kinda slow? At the Junction!!??

How many of you are allowed to leave your room without supervision?

Now THAT is projection.

It’s odd that a bunch of dumb leftist fucks who actually worship Mao would portray Malkin in this way.

Projection?

It wasn’t so long ago that leftist fuckheads were sucking Uncle Joe’s dicks and telling us that you’ve got to break a few eggs to make an omelet.

How many of you are allowed to leave your room without supervision?

Tell me his name in Mandarin and I’ll answer that.

Loved by most liberals in his socialist ideals.

You seem to have a very limited knowledge of (a) political thought, (b) history, and (c) the political climate of the late 19th and early twentieth centuries, partocularly in China.

At least until he murdered millions of his own people.

How much worse is that than murdering millions of other people? It’s a quantitative difference, that’s all. It’s not qualitative.

But hey he had some good socialist ideals like healthcare for all, right?

Does this mean you think that universal health care leads invariably to murdering millions of people? Wow, I want what you’re on.

Its quite the funny juxtapostion that you would put someone that you hate because of her Republican think for yourself ideals,

Man, you’re so dumb in so very many ways. Firstly, no-one here really hates Malkin, at least in the sense in which her frothing-at-the-mouth minions seem to hate everyone who’s not like them. Secondly, her ideals are not so much ‘think for yourself’ as ‘kill everyone who’s got something we want, throw everyone else in jail, and if you don’t agree with me you’re a traitor’. Oh, and a cavalier disregard for logic and evidence.

I’d also add that, in common with the various other Republican wanna-be’s, she has a strong authoritarian inclination (if I haven’t already made that abundantly clear).

And, of course, they also share a sociopathic fear/hatred of anyone who’s not like them, as well as a total inability to see any issue in other than binary terms, which leads to ridiculous proclamations about good and evil such as you are making.

when this guy was loved by you guys for his far left socialism and I will do everything for you cause you are too dumb to do it for yourself.

[Sigh]. Sonny, point to just one post on this site, just one, where anybody, even a commenter, evinces a love for Mao. If you can’t, then admit that you’re fantasising yet again and agree to shut the fuck up. Mkay?

“As far as I know, converting Mau-Mau from a noun to a verb was Tom Wolf’s innovation. Having Malkin be the leader of a Mao-Maoing truth squad in support for Dear Leader is so damn witty on so many levels that I will be giggling for hours. Well done. And for those of you who don’t get the joke, phooey on you.”

Good. I’m not the only one who both got the joke AND laughed, for a considerable and sustained period, afterward. THXBAI!

So silly.

Gavin, why isn’t Michelle Malkin wearing a muu-muu?

Woah. Woah. Woah.

“Genuinely” crazy for resisting a military invasion of their homeland that involved forcing the male population into serving on tropical cotton plantation labor-gangs for 1/2 to 2/3 of their days for pennies in pay, and thusly forcing the women of the country to make up for lost male labor at home? Crazy for wanting to overthrow a regime which allowed public whippings –by non-state officials–of offenders for the slightest of slights to their masters?

Crazy because they believed magic water would protect them? (The Germans and other Europeans there certainly believed in their own magic water–baptism.) Or crazy because they didn’t quite grasp how effective machine guns were or severe German retribution would be?

Oh yeah, and it was 50 years earlier–if you count Mau-Mau from the date where the British declared an Emergency.

LOL

No! Please! GO THERE! The wankfest will be awe-inspiring.

This is so delicious I could just spoon it over some ice cream.
As a matter of fact, I think I will.

Oh. You have first hand knowledge of what actually happened? Well, clear it up for us, then.

What? You’ve never met Beauchamp? You’ve never been to Iraq? You have no idea if what he wrote actually happened or not? You have NO independent evidence of which story is accurate?

So, you’ve picked a side you WANT to be right and just decided by pulling the answer out of your ass and claiming it as fact?

Y’know, at some time in our lives (most of us it was elementary school) we’ve all tried that. It’s not a very satisfying form of shadenfreunde, is it, mein herr?

A little like masturbating over the football video and claiming to have had sex with all the cheerleaders. Even if people believe you…Well, YOU know the truth…

mikey