If anyone in here thinks that 50 million Muslims in Europe is a good thing, then you are ignorant of Islam’s true motives. And what of Muslim demonstrations in London, where the Union Flag is burned and death threats are made against those who dare to question Islam?

Here in Canada we are smugly secure within the confines of multiculturalism and political correctness, But these are the fuels that will ignite an even bigger problem in the long run. There are those of you here who would deny Steyn’s right to make his point, but he is entitled to his opinion, even if the facts make us uncomfortable. So far we have seen Muslims kill a gay politician and a left wing film maker in Holland for daring to question Islam. Then we had bombings in London, and a Muslim plot to blow up Parliament in Ottawa and behead the Prime Minister. That plot, by the way, was being planned when Paul Martin was occupying 24 Susses Drive. Just in case you try to tell me that it was all Stephen Harper’s fault.

Islam has no place for women’s rights, gay rights, different religious faiths, freedom of speech or anything else that Canadians take for granted. I find it rather obscene that Jack Layton, our very own Marxist working class hero, wants to negotiate with the Taliban, the very same group that forbade woman medical treatment if she was ill, forbade woman the right to an education, and hanged men for merely being suspected of being homosexual. Just make sure that your “life partner” Olivia Chow is covered from head to foot when you sit down to negotiate, Jack.

If you care about Canada remaining “strong and free” – whatever that means in this age of politial correctness,” just make sure you don’t wake up one morning and find that its been taken away from you. Perhaps Stephen Harper has the right idea after all. Let’s be more selective about the sort of immigrants we decide to take in.

As we all know, Mohamed Elmasry and Naiyer Habib of the Canadian Islamic Congress complained to the Canadian, Ontario and B.C. human rights authorities after the Toronto-based magazine published the article, titled The future belongs to Islam, in October of 2006. Elmasry is the same old git that proclaimed on TV no less, that all Israelis over the age of 18 were legitimate targets for terrorists. And he compalins that his feelings were “offended” when Steyn wrote a factual book (too factual for some) about the growth of Islam in Europe. Well, that’s only the start for those of us in Canada who risk a fine or even imprisonment for daring to publicly express views that are not politically correct.

Canada is no longer a democracy in the true sense of that word. And the “Super Mosque” in Calgary is only the beginning.

Yoshida. Sort of.

On behalf of Canada, I would like to thank you, America, for taking all our wingnuts from us (Steyn, Black, Frum). If you could be so kind as to take Paul Jackson, Colby Cosh, and the entire Byfield family from us, it would be most appreciated.

Polygamist…like ABRAHAM? Do these people use their Bibles for anything other than as a device against which to thump their foreheads?

Londonium:
I think he was the dickless EPA bureaucrat in “Ghostbusters.”

Mitt –

Just thought you should know: you fucking Mormons are “non-Abrahamic”.
Neener-neener!

Hugs and Kisses –
Marky

One would have to only imply that; otherwise, readers would note that men in the Torah (say, Jacob) had two concurrent wives, and a mistresses or two as well.

The “atheist multiculturalist homo ninny who probably supports FGM and honor killings and only likes these Native Americans because they don’t drive big cars and are non-white” is not lauding the religion because it *exists*, but because it recognizes that the rules about two-partner relationships is quite arbitrary, and that *our* rules are a result of history and experience, not *ethics*. There is no conflict with having left-wing values yet supporting one religion more than the other because it happens to be more lax on love issues.

HOWEVER: If the tolerance and allowing of polygamy *only* extends to men in the community in question, then it is quite dumb and should not be applauded.

Hey! I always find myself nodding when reading Mark Steyn…oh, wait, that’s nodding off. Never mind.

Was he actually surprised that a gay activist was in favor of cultures that don’t condemn homosexuality? Really? I’m almost tempted to go read him and find out.

Nah–not worth it. I’ll take your word for it.

also, it’s a universal belief system that alleges to trump all other explanations of reality. so whether or not polygamy is ok hardly seems central…

see, i’m doing it. i’m taking a mark steyn argument seriously. it’s just impossible.

he’s a total fucking idiot. there is simply no more to it. people who read him and find themselves nodding are idiots.

Here’s some more on Steyn’s inner Paul Lynde:

http://tinyurl.com/2wgndg

Well I for one have no problem taking seriously those whose essential message is, “Gosh golly I hate them ay-rabs so much because they’re such a threat to everything I hate about America.”

Yes.