Comments on: Fun with a virgin

By: jim hurt

jim hurt — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:10:45 +0000

Moral Relativism is change the value from good or evil into some sort of sliding scale. whereas changeing the word for a particular act to make it fall into the good or evil is just fine.

By: Bill S

Bill S — Sat, 05 Jun 2004 08:53:05 +0000

well, procreation requires a penis and a vagina, and the jury is still out as to whether Bennie has either.

By: Patrick Taylor

Patrick Taylor — Fri, 04 Jun 2004 21:36:21 +0000

The Virgin Ben: What you need to procreate is a man and a woman.

Oh behave, Ben! A kinkmeister like him might want to have both a man and woman, but, strictly speaking he only needs a woman to procreate. Naughty little sausage … must like to watch.

By: BGN

BGN — Fri, 04 Jun 2004 05:04:02 +0000

“moral relativism” = “naughty sex”

By the way–Ben Shapiro’s mum a reality TV producer? So much for the myth of Hollywood liberalism. Or is it just the actors & scriptwriters who are Hollywood liberals, and reality TV is supposed to be a right-wing runaround of them?

By: Harry

Harry — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:11:27 +0000

What do wingnuts mean when they blab about moral relativism? And more importantly, where can I get some of this heavy, heavy shit they smoke?

By: J Edgar

J Edgar — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 08:58:25 +0000

Ronn Owens had already tested Ben on basic matters of reasoning and reality. Ben was way deep into degrees of moral absolutism (AKA “relativism”, Ben!). Ronn was probably annoyed that Ben, author and future law student, couldn’t think his way out of a paper bag, but could remember his coaching points and stick the full title of his book into his lame spiel.

By: Bill S

Bill S — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:35:20 +0000

As punishment, Ben should write the full title of Fiona Apple’s second album on the blackboard fifty times, in longhand.

By: Sadly, No!

Sadly, No! — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:36:18 +0000

We think.

By: Sadly, No!

Sadly, No! — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:35:59 +0000

Why did Owens lower the smackdown on Shapiro for mentioning his book? Is that considered wrong?

It was Ben’s giving the long title of his book that Owens didn’t care for.

By: Linnaeus

Linnaeus — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:31:31 +0000

Why did Owens lower the smackdown on Shapiro for mentioning his book? Is that considered wrong? Mind you, I want nothing to do with his book, but I would be surprised if he didn’t mention it.

By: Pete M.

Pete M. — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:05:26 +0000

“You chose to have sex and mistakes were made…”

If Ben ever gets some, I’m guessing this is a phrase he’ll be hearing with some frequency.

By: dmm

dmm — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 02:01:26 +0000

– Did he really say that?
– Sorry we forgot to fix this one typo

Either way, it’s a pretty special comment. In the original version it was sheer simple-mindedness. Now it’s “Shorter Virgin Ben: When I talk about moral absolutes, I mean it in a relative sort of way.”

By: J Edgar

J Edgar — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:35:55 +0000

Thank you for doing the lifting for me. “one hour of our lives we’ll never get back” should be a universal link to a ben shapiro site. Perhaps one concerning relative moral absolutes. I could handle only 10 minutes of the live radio show. In that time I heard all the quotes except the sex stuff. Lucky me.

By: (: Tom :)

(: Tom :) — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:44:42 +0000

[shameless plug]

I think you need a little pizazz for this post. Why don’t you link to this picture so everyone can see what the cover of his new book looks like?

[/shameless plug]

By: George Johnston

George Johnston — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:40:46 +0000

Didn’t VBen misquote his own title? Shouldn’t it be Brainwashed, the story of my life?

Brainwashing is a euphemism for torture through sensory deprivation. Kind of like having a bag over you head for a few days and deprived of sleep. So it seems like Abu Ghraib is some sort of liberal arts college, no wonder Bush wants to close it down.

Speaking of Iraq, where is the moral absolutism in supporting the murder of over 10,000 civilians so Cheney and his henchmen can own Iraqi oil fields?

By: NTodd

NTodd — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:41:56 +0000

I hope Ben’s next book is about giving women orgasms through oral sex. I smell a best seller–I know I’d buy it.

By: Sadly, No!

Sadly, No! — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:58:31 +0000

Did he really say that?

Sorry we forgot to fix this one typo — we’ll upload sound clips in the near future.

By: dmm

dmm — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:55:47 +0000

Moral absolutism doesn’t mean there are complexities…

Did he really say that?