Oxycodone extraction. Oxycodone extraction gel. Oxycodone extraction iv….

I believe Fred Thompson has already announced.

Mr. Wonderful, you rule. That totally made my day.

You really should check out Psycheout’s blog. It’s just as funny as Blogs for Bush without that distracting veneer of sophistication provided by Margolis’ East Coast education!

But I’m just a liberal who can’t take care of myself no matter how hard I try!

The moral of that story was, essentially, that at least one of the people watching the naked emperor on the march REALLY DOES see clothing on his frame.

If you check out the most recent post, it’s a bizarre swipe at liberals over the Iran mess. Apparently, that can be politicized. What would Hannity say?

As you wish….

Toodles!

Historians favor the term ‘Reagangrene’.

I’d also bet that “princella” was a sock puppet, but I refuse to parse the minutiae of Wingnut Welfare Wurlitzer wanking sufficiently to distinguish the exact levels of grammatical error and logical incontinence of each player. As with the ‘nationwide’ vote totals for American Idol, I believe the conservative blogodump consists of a relatively few extremely dedicated “fans” whose fervor (and lack of healthier outlets for their obsessions) make up in volume for what they lack in number (and IQ points).

Ah, but isn’t that the mind-set? The serious wingnuts believe that everyone agrees with their POV. I think it’s a good idea to reinforce that idea because, for starters, it’s so massively unrealistic. Second, none of the GOP frontrunners are at all strong on that singular “criteria”, whatever it is. It’s kinda funny to hear them go on about how the Dems are in disarray when in fact it’s the GOP that can’t agree on much of anything anymore — even their core members on core issues. Be it global warming, Alberto Gonzalez, Walter Reed and the rest of the VA, Katrina recovery, the unitary executive, torture, Gitmo, borrow and spend… there’s no concensus within the GOP. They’re auguring into the ground. Too bad, so sad.

I did indeed. I’d love to claim that it was confusion based on similar initials, or something, but really, I’m just a moron.

The world still waits for Jeffie’s “What He Really Meant: Authorial Intent, Cockslapping, Hemmingway , and How I’m Not Really A Violent Sublimated Homo (So Stop Asking Already)”.

Thank god.

My money’s on
Reaganarok.

Sadly, Jillian, I fear you may be correct. It continually amazes me how the Reagan legend grows with each telling. I mean, anyone who was conscious at the time knew that Reagan wasn’t the sharpest pencil in the box even before the Alzheimer’s set in, and was given to some very alarming statements which he cheerfully repudiated later. It’s not like Preznits need to be accurate or anything.

But these days, he’s worshipped like a combination of Moses, Babe Ruth, and Old Yeller. How can they claim that any of his ideas were any good? I’m fairly sure they White House staff didn’t let him near decision-making most of the time. Give him credit, the man was good at smiling and waving, but let him get involved in policy and all hell would break loose.

And these right wing piss bags like Hannity are really, really going to hate it, but it’s not their version which is going to be remembered.

Sadly, El Cid, I fear you may be incorrect. The US has been shitting from a great height upon other countries now for over a century, yet everyone still believes in the One True Light Of Freedom And Democracy and Keeping The World Safe For Ponies.

Ptchah. I spit them from my mouth.

MrWonderful, that was wonderful. The earth, or at least the blogosphere, moved. I feel I need a cigarette now.

I want to call on the conservative constituency to keep their eye on the ball
Furthermore, they need to keep their noses to the grindstone, and their ears to the ground. Terrible things happen if you mix up your sense organs.

Herr Doktor, terrible things may happen to anyone who has a ball on their eye, their ears pinned to the grind, while simultaneously having their nostrils ground down to a nubbin.

our criteria for the 2008 Republican candidate should … be: “who stands for the same things we stand for?â€?
There is something profoundly non-serious about anyone who uses ‘criteria’ as a singular noun. That is all.