A good effort, they got in the Bolton luv, and did a good job of mimicking her style of “making up playground doodie-head nicknames” for people.
However, she is CLEARLY not drunk enough to really channel the spirit of Atlas “Social Services Nightmare” Shrugs.
Next time, i would humbly suggest you really focus in on two major aspects of Pam: One, pick a group (preferably political in nature, but just fly with whatever tickles your fancy) and explain, in obtuse and incomplete detail, why they’re secretly helping Al-Qaeda (or mix it up with Hamas or North Korea.) to destroy America. And two, really bring a flavor that every who isn’t you (or John Bolton) is is mentally, spiritually, culturally, physically and genetically inferrior to you.
Oh, and you need better lighting. Over sized cocktail was an excellent touch.
NTodd is right, showing how important it is to get the opinion of a completely non-involved, disinterested bystander when dealing with subtle, technical videography issues …
I’ve seen porn videos with better production values than that one. I’ve learned this through vigorous and extensive scholarly research, and things of that nature.
Great stuff, but it really needs more disturbing manipulation of small children. Preferably a nine year old being forced to mouth off about the Dhimmicrats.
If any of you had any decency you would all be thanking Ambassador Bolton right now for all of the work he has done to defend you, your families and all of the world from the threat of terrorists. He is one of the greatest if not the greatest ambassador to the United Nations of all time.
Whoever is pretending to be Shoelimpy, stop it! Even he isn’t THAT delusional. It is just not nice at all to put such stupid words in someone else’s mouth like that.
Miss Shrugs has respect for Mr. Bolton because he had the balls to stand up to one of the most corrupt organizations on Earth, the United Nations, and fight for truth, justice and the American Way. Miss Shrugs is a good person who is trying to fight against and expose evil forces who are doing everything in their power to destroy you, me, and every person who believes in freedom on the face of the earth. The fact that you would attempt to mock her (and i do mean attempt, here, the video above is so pathetic that even SNL would be ashamed of themselves) just shows how wrong and deluded you are about the state of the world today.
But even though it is funny, it is mean to mock people in such a manner. Real Shoelimpy will come back and he will feel bad that people can think he is that dumb.
On behalf of SNL, I would like to apologize to the real Shoelimpy for the conduct of some of the contributors.
If one believes that the belief in freedom, the belief in truth, the belief in liberty and the belief that one has the right to live as one sees fit is dumb, then Donut one can only conclude that yes, Shoelimpyâ„¢ is dumb because he believes in all of these things, just as our Founding Fathers did, when they made them the founding principles of this great nation that we live in.
As for Saturday Night Live, their lack of humorous content is well known, especially by themselves. On behalf of lovers of good humor everywhere, I would like to apologize to those who have hoisted the above shown video monstrosity for the fact that we think it sucks. We hope that we did not hurt your feelings.
Shoelimpyâ„¢’s views on Mr. Bolton and Miss Shrugs are well known. In fact Shoelimpyâ„¢ made an excellent video in memory of Mr. Bolton’s service which Miss Annie linked to before, featuring Miss Shrugs. That video can be seen here:
Miss Shrugs was so appreciative of the effort that she made a rare appearance off of her own blog to post on Blogging Points thanking Shoelimpyâ„¢ for the wonderful video, as Miss Annie also mentioned above. You can see the link again below. I mean, really.
Oh, man, that’s COMEDY GOLD, fake Shoelimpy! Comparing your beliefs and intellectual contributions to the Founding Fathers, that is hysterical!
But, c’mon, you’re overdoing it. If real Shoelimpy doesn’t think SNL is funny, then he could go to one of the many very humorous conservative blogs, such as the Fox News site. I mean, why would you go to a humor blog if you didn’t think it was funny? It makes no sense.
Why do people watch SNL in the first place? Why does Chewbacca live on Endor? There are many unsolved mysteries of life.
However, I think your understanding of Sadly, No! is sadly, mistaken. Sadly, No! is not intended to be funny but is rather designed to jealously snipe at those more successful than Brad and Gavin.
Shoelimpy is not funny. Everytime he comes on I have to point that out to you people. Saying that Shoelimpy is comedy gold is going against my word, Donut. Why would you post here if you are going to disagree with me?
If it walks like a shoe, talks like a shoe and smells like a shoe, it’s Shoelimpy. So let’s all agree that this is the real Shoelimpy and stop calling him comedy gold. Please.
One could ask why you must so continuously ignore the topic of the thread and instead troll those who are seriously trying to comment on the topic of the above post. After all, one would assume that is the purpose of coming to a blog: to make comments about posts made by the bloggers. To act as you are doing, well, it just doesn’t make much sense, does it? Which is the problem with your entire reasoning. While trying to point things out as nonsense you are creating nonsense yourself, thus creating a never-ending spiral of nonsensicality until at some theoretical point (I won’t go into the exact mathematics of determining this point here, it would take days to explain even in laymen’s terms) the universe will burst into a bubble of nonexistence thanks to the virtue of its own incontrovertible contradictory nature.
Since we can also assume that this is not your purpose here, I think it would behoove us best to take in stride the nonsensical nature of human behavior and move past this point so that we can once more discuss the content (or lack thereof) which was provided in the main post of this thread.
One could ask why you must so continuously ignore the topic of the thread and instead troll those who are seriously trying to comment on the topic of the above post. After all, one would assume that is the purpose of coming to a…
About the video – the character says “champagne,â€? but the glass screams “Manhattan.â€?
Well, it’s a martini glass, and Manhattan’s are just as often — if not more frequently — served in a rocks glass. But I agree, drinking champagne from a martini glass would be idiotic, since it would go flat even faster than it does when served in a coupe. But then, if you’re tossing the bubble back as fast as I suspect Pammy does, there’s really no time for it to lose it’s fizz, is there?
ifthethunderdontgetya®©³² said,
March 18, 2007 at 19:51
Great Flying Spaghetti Monster!
I can’t help but note that the youtube references one “NTodd”. This renders the question of “responsibility” totally moot.
/duncan
NTodd said,
March 18, 2007 at 19:55
I didn’t do it.
Thers said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:00
I don’t know who’s responsible either. But that Bolton moustache was itchy. I, uh, imagine. Because it looks itchy.
Some Guy said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:00
A good effort, they got in the Bolton luv, and did a good job of mimicking her style of “making up playground doodie-head nicknames” for people.
However, she is CLEARLY not drunk enough to really channel the spirit of Atlas “Social Services Nightmare” Shrugs.
Next time, i would humbly suggest you really focus in on two major aspects of Pam: One, pick a group (preferably political in nature, but just fly with whatever tickles your fancy) and explain, in obtuse and incomplete detail, why they’re secretly helping Al-Qaeda (or mix it up with Hamas or North Korea.) to destroy America. And two, really bring a flavor that every who isn’t you (or John Bolton) is is mentally, spiritually, culturally, physically and genetically inferrior to you.
Oh, and you need better lighting. Over sized cocktail was an excellent touch.
watertiger said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:02
everybody’s a critic.
[reapplies ice pack to forehead]
steve ex-expat said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:05
I admit I was halfway through before I realized it wasn’t her. It wasn’t annoying me enough, so I started to get suspicious.
ifthethunderdontgetya®©³² said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:07
As long as it isn’t an ice pick, WT.
P.S. I would have subtitled that one, “Sieg Heil, Bushler!”, but then I flunked subtle 101 in college.
Molly Ivors said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:09
Better lighting was one of our self-critiques.
Black NASCAR Star said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:10
It’s like being in Bogota, New Jersey — but actually not.
NTodd said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:12
I like the crappy lighting. It’s part of the low-rent quality.
Black NASCAR Star said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:14
NTodd is right, showing how important it is to get the opinion of a completely non-involved, disinterested bystander when dealing with subtle, technical videography issues …
Black NASCAR Star said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:16
It oozes this Eve 120 menthol cigarette from a Teaneck, New Jersey italian restaurant where the menus have big red velvet tassles vibe ….
I like it !!!
watertiger said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:17
I can’t work under these conditions. I’ll be in my trailer.
NTodd said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:18
Whoever edited this should win an Oscar. Same goes for the cinematographer.
John Bolton®©³² said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:29
My moustache is falling out. I don’t know why?
annieangel said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:36
Is that Ntodd’s mother?
John Bolton®©³² said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:39
My moustache brings all the wingnutz to the yard.
That’s right, it’s better than yours…
Ann Althouse said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:43
My electrum gilded Dagny Taggart helmet coiffure would have lit the entire scene, obviating the need for additional lighting …
Smiling Mortician said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:44
She’s not insane enough, of course, but “diplomacy out the wazoo” was a nice touch.
Lesley said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:53
Since the real Pam is already a stereotype on steroids, she wouldn’t be hard to mimic. There’s nothing subtle about the real Pam.
That said, perhaps Elaine May emerged from retirement. It’s that good.
Lesley said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:56
Jesus, is that you, watertiger?
What’s the squealing in the background?
annieangel said,
March 18, 2007 at 20:59
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8cfEGm3lTI
A touching tribute to John Bolton, which the real Atlas liked so much that she called Shoe a “mensch.”
http://bloggingpoints.blogspot.com/2006/12/farewell-mr-bolton.html
Pinko Punko said,
March 18, 2007 at 21:10
That was pretty funny. TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE. If she busted out the 6 footer baloney sub with party toothpicks I would have lost my mind.
mikey said,
March 18, 2007 at 21:14
I mostly can’t watch the Pammy vlogs, but THIS is hilarious. Can you do one weekly? Or with the JB appearance have you used up teh funny?
mikey
AkaDad said,
March 18, 2007 at 21:26
I’ve seen porn videos with better production values than that one. I’ve learned this through vigorous and extensive scholarly research, and things of that nature.
mikey said,
March 18, 2007 at 21:27
I am kind of curious about the genesis of Gavin’s recent obsession with breakfast at Denny’s ™…
mikey
billy pilgrim said,
March 18, 2007 at 22:32
THE ONLY WAY
Molly Ivors said,
March 18, 2007 at 22:32
What’s the squealing in the background?
A bratty child, for the full Atlas effect. We couldn’t pay any of them enough to appear.
Ginger Yellow said,
March 18, 2007 at 22:53
Great stuff, but it really needs more disturbing manipulation of small children. Preferably a nine year old being forced to mouth off about the Dhimmicrats.
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 18, 2007 at 23:13
If any of you had any decency you would all be thanking Ambassador Bolton right now for all of the work he has done to defend you, your families and all of the world from the threat of terrorists. He is one of the greatest if not the greatest ambassador to the United Nations of all time.
Woodrowfan said,
March 19, 2007 at 0:45
the book was better.
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:08
Whoever is pretending to be Shoelimpy, stop it! Even he isn’t THAT delusional. It is just not nice at all to put such stupid words in someone else’s mouth like that.
Reveal yourself and apologize.
Sifu Tweety said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:34
I’m all for the crappy lighting, and the “aquarium” rules.
Also phat moustache.
I bet you would have a hell of a fun time with a better microphone.
I say this not to criticize, but to encourage. For me to criticize low-rent blog videography… yeah. Not so much.
tb said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:35
Freakshow. That’s how I refer to Pam from now on.
J— said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:40
I’m afraid Carmella Hayersprai doesn’t do it for me the way Pamela Geller Oshry does. But that’s just me.
Doodle Bean said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:40
Well done! Well done! Brava! Bravo! And bravi, as it were!
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:44
Miss Shrugs has respect for Mr. Bolton because he had the balls to stand up to one of the most corrupt organizations on Earth, the United Nations, and fight for truth, justice and the American Way. Miss Shrugs is a good person who is trying to fight against and expose evil forces who are doing everything in their power to destroy you, me, and every person who believes in freedom on the face of the earth. The fact that you would attempt to mock her (and i do mean attempt, here, the video above is so pathetic that even SNL would be ashamed of themselves) just shows how wrong and deluded you are about the state of the world today.
John Bolton®©³² said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:47
Don’t forget the Martians, Mr. Limpyâ„¢. We forgot Poland once, remember?
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:53
Stop it, fake Shoelimpy! You are killing me!
But even though it is funny, it is mean to mock people in such a manner. Real Shoelimpy will come back and he will feel bad that people can think he is that dumb.
On behalf of SNL, I would like to apologize to the real Shoelimpy for the conduct of some of the contributors.
g said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:57
Now THAT’s the real Shoelimpy!
You just can’t fake that kind of pomposity!
Righteous Bubba said,
March 19, 2007 at 1:59
Both Shoelimpies like pie, and I support that.
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:03
If one believes that the belief in freedom, the belief in truth, the belief in liberty and the belief that one has the right to live as one sees fit is dumb, then Donut one can only conclude that yes, Shoelimpyâ„¢ is dumb because he believes in all of these things, just as our Founding Fathers did, when they made them the founding principles of this great nation that we live in.
As for Saturday Night Live, their lack of humorous content is well known, especially by themselves. On behalf of lovers of good humor everywhere, I would like to apologize to those who have hoisted the above shown video monstrosity for the fact that we think it sucks. We hope that we did not hurt your feelings.
Righteous Bubba said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:05
Y’see? Y’SEE?
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:11
Shoelimpyâ„¢’s views on Mr. Bolton and Miss Shrugs are well known. In fact Shoelimpyâ„¢ made an excellent video in memory of Mr. Bolton’s service which Miss Annie linked to before, featuring Miss Shrugs. That video can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8cfEGm3lTI
Miss Shrugs was so appreciative of the effort that she made a rare appearance off of her own blog to post on Blogging Points thanking Shoelimpyâ„¢ for the wonderful video, as Miss Annie also mentioned above. You can see the link again below. I mean, really.
http://bloggingpoints.blogspot.com/2006/12/farewell-mr-bolton.html#c116550406364011275
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:17
Oh, man, that’s COMEDY GOLD, fake Shoelimpy! Comparing your beliefs and intellectual contributions to the Founding Fathers, that is hysterical!
But, c’mon, you’re overdoing it. If real Shoelimpy doesn’t think SNL is funny, then he could go to one of the many very humorous conservative blogs, such as the Fox News site. I mean, why would you go to a humor blog if you didn’t think it was funny? It makes no sense.
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:37
Why do people watch SNL in the first place? Why does Chewbacca live on Endor? There are many unsolved mysteries of life.
However, I think your understanding of Sadly, No! is sadly, mistaken. Sadly, No! is not intended to be funny but is rather designed to jealously snipe at those more successful than Brad and Gavin.
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:44
Sadly, No! is not intended to be funny but is rather designed to jealously snipe at those more successful than Brad and Gavin.
That supports my point. Why would the real Shoelimpy spend so much time at such a place?
It makes no sense.
Gavin M. said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:47
Shoelimpy is not funny. Everytime he comes on I have to point that out to you people. Saying that Shoelimpy is comedy gold is going against my word, Donut. Why would you post here if you are going to disagree with me?
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:49
Little in this world makes sense, Mr. Donut. Once you understand that you will be on your way towards the path of true wisdom.
Gavin M. said,
March 19, 2007 at 2:50
If it walks like a shoe, talks like a shoe and smells like a shoe, it’s Shoelimpy. So let’s all agree that this is the real Shoelimpy and stop calling him comedy gold. Please.
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:03
Little in this world makes sense.
I know that, fake Shoelimpy. It certainly explains all the people pretending to be Shoelimpy. There is only one Shoelimpy. And that is annieangel.
Gavin M. said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:13
One could ask why you must so continuously ignore the topic of the thread and instead troll those who are seriously trying to comment on the topic of the above post. After all, one would assume that is the purpose of coming to a blog: to make comments about posts made by the bloggers. To act as you are doing, well, it just doesn’t make much sense, does it? Which is the problem with your entire reasoning. While trying to point things out as nonsense you are creating nonsense yourself, thus creating a never-ending spiral of nonsensicality until at some theoretical point (I won’t go into the exact mathematics of determining this point here, it would take days to explain even in laymen’s terms) the universe will burst into a bubble of nonexistence thanks to the virtue of its own incontrovertible contradictory nature.
Since we can also assume that this is not your purpose here, I think it would behoove us best to take in stride the nonsensical nature of human behavior and move past this point so that we can once more discuss the content (or lack thereof) which was provided in the main post of this thread.
Gavin M. said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:13
Yeah, that really sounds like me, Shlimp.
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:14
Gavin, why are you trying to speak for me? I mean, really. Get a life.
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:16
It should sound like you, Gavin. Since I mean, it is you, isn’t it?
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:23
How many fake Shoelimpys can one thread take? I count at least 16.
And I don’t think any of them are annie.
What are the odds?
Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:27
What are the odds that a couple of jokels could make a really bad parody of Atlas Shrugs and have everyone thinking they are creative geniuses?
4,281,397,222,859 to 1? Just a ball park estimate.
Retarded Donut said,
March 19, 2007 at 3:35
a really bad parody of Atlas Shrugs
What’s this Atlas Shrugs thing? I never heard of it.
RubDMC said,
March 19, 2007 at 5:09
About the video – the character says “champagne,” but the glass screams “Manhattan.”
Which is it, really?
freq flag said,
March 19, 2007 at 5:15
Excuse me…I hate to intrude on the Great Fake Shoe Debate of 2008,
but I think someone upthread mentioned something about pie.
Is there going to be some or was that fake, too?
Sincerely,
Fake Pastry
Qetesh the Shaved Abyssinian said,
March 19, 2007 at 5:50
Shoelimpy does not, however, believe in freedom, truth, liberty, or the right to live as one sees fit: it just believes in the belief of those things.
the universe will burst into a bubble of nonexistence
Technically, that should be “the universe will collapse into a singularity”. Know your physics before you attempt the jump, Limpster.
About the video – the character says “champagne,â€? but the glass screams “Manhattan.â€?
I think that was a cunning and subtle dig at the sort of pinhead who’d put champagne in a martini glass. Problem solvered.
K. Ron Silkwood said,
March 19, 2007 at 10:12
An award must be created and awarded to that video.
Scott C. said,
March 19, 2007 at 23:41
About the video – the character says “champagne,â€? but the glass screams “Manhattan.â€?
Well, it’s a martini glass, and Manhattan’s are just as often — if not more frequently — served in a rocks glass. But I agree, drinking champagne from a martini glass would be idiotic, since it would go flat even faster than it does when served in a coupe. But then, if you’re tossing the bubble back as fast as I suspect Pammy does, there’s really no time for it to lose it’s fizz, is there?