<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WingNet Refuses To Exorcise The Coultergeist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Various matters - Salon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-1198967</link>
		<dc:creator>Various matters - Salon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 07:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-1198967</guid>
		<description>[...] This post from HTML Mencken should put an end to the brewing notion that any substantial part of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post from HTML Mencken should put an end to the brewing notion that any substantial part of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Various matters</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-1109038</link>
		<dc:creator>Various matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-1109038</guid>
		<description>[...] This post from HTML Mencken should put an end to the brewing notion that any substantial part of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post from HTML Mencken should put an end to the brewing notion that any substantial part of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Super Wingnut: Rich Lowry (Part II)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-257439</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Super Wingnut: Rich Lowry (Part II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-257439</guid>
		<description>[...] basically a Coulter, too. Case in point is when Coulter called John Edwards a faggot, and Lowry was right there to defend her from cruel, unfair lefties. He might as well have been defending himself. And in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basically a Coulter, too. Case in point is when Coulter called John Edwards a faggot, and Lowry was right there to defend her from cruel, unfair lefties. He might as well have been defending himself. And in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Super Wingnut: Rich Lowry</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-251361</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Super Wingnut: Rich Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-251361</guid>
		<description>[...] basically a Coulter, too. Case in point is when Coulter called John Edwards a faggot, and Lowry was right there to defend her from cruel, unfair lefties. He might as well have been defending himself. And in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basically a Coulter, too. Case in point is when Coulter called John Edwards a faggot, and Lowry was right there to defend her from cruel, unfair lefties. He might as well have been defending himself. And in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Bad Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-161399</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Bad Behavior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-161399</guid>
		<description>[...] is Barack Obama buying into the fascist, &#8216;Cult of Teh Macho&#8216; smear on John Edwards: Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) slipped in a compliment â€” of sorts â€” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is Barack Obama buying into the fascist, &#8216;Cult of Teh Macho&#8216; smear on John Edwards: Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) slipped in a compliment â€” of sorts â€” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-151770</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-151770</guid>
		<description>The best thing I&#039;ve read about Coulter&#039;s use of &quot;faggot&quot; is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenboo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CitizenBoo&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; blog, where she describes their torrid &lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenboo.com/?p=129&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lesbian affair.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing I&#8217;ve read about Coulter&#8217;s use of &#8220;faggot&#8221; is at <a href="http://citizenboo.com/" rel="nofollow">CitizenBoo&#8217;s</a> blog, where she describes their torrid <a href="http://citizenboo.com/?p=129" rel="nofollow">lesbian affair.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jâ€”</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jâ€”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149915</guid>
		<description>So, do you think you&#039;re ready to make &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tv.com/the-backyardigans/show/28687/episode-samurai-pie/topic/13203-496991/msgs.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Pie&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do you think you&#8217;re ready to make <a href="http://www.tv.com/the-backyardigans/show/28687/episode-samurai-pie/topic/13203-496991/msgs.html" rel="nofollow">The Great Pie</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger That</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149753</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149753</guid>
		<description>Annieangel, everyones favorite phony Christian.

Annie, go back to your day job of shooting ping pong balls out of your cooter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annieangel, everyones favorite phony Christian.</p>
<p>Annie, go back to your day job of shooting ping pong balls out of your cooter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Rove II</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149735</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Rove II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149735</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was a lot of pie...time to hose down Limpy and Analannie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was a lot of pie&#8230;time to hose down Limpy and Analannie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149729</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149729</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So if I call you a Jew itâ€™s ok, but a Kike and itâ€™s bad?&lt;/i&gt;

Are you kidding here?  If I call you a women it&#039;s ok, but a cunt and it&#039;s bad, right?  White is ok, peckerwood is bad, black is ok, nigger is bad ... you really can&#039;t NOT see there&#039;s a difference.

&lt;i&gt; If your[sic] Muslim??&lt;/i&gt;

Wait, I thought you and your shadow thought context didn&#039;t matter, bad is bad and a slur is a slur?  Are you saying there might be a difference when a member of a group purported to hate another group uses a term than when someone who doesn&#039;t hate does?  Or a member of the hated group itself?  So it might be a teensy weensy bit different if someone who is on the record as thinking homosexuality is narcissistic and a gateway to pedophilia calls someone a &quot;faggot&quot; versus if someone who&#039;s pro-gay rights says they think Bush seems to enjoy stroking bald heads more than one would expect in a straight man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So if I call you a Jew itâ€™s ok, but a Kike and itâ€™s bad?</i></p>
<p>Are you kidding here?  If I call you a women it&#8217;s ok, but a cunt and it&#8217;s bad, right?  White is ok, peckerwood is bad, black is ok, nigger is bad &#8230; you really can&#8217;t NOT see there&#8217;s a difference.</p>
<p><i> If your[sic] Muslim??</i></p>
<p>Wait, I thought you and your shadow thought context didn&#8217;t matter, bad is bad and a slur is a slur?  Are you saying there might be a difference when a member of a group purported to hate another group uses a term than when someone who doesn&#8217;t hate does?  Or a member of the hated group itself?  So it might be a teensy weensy bit different if someone who is on the record as thinking homosexuality is narcissistic and a gateway to pedophilia calls someone a &#8220;faggot&#8221; versus if someone who&#8217;s pro-gay rights says they think Bush seems to enjoy stroking bald heads more than one would expect in a straight man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prozacula</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149057</link>
		<dc:creator>prozacula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-149057</guid>
		<description>oh annie, you stupid wench!

I called you Mannie Angel, because it&#039;s FUNNY, it wasn&#039;t a transsexual joke.  I never make transsexual jokes.

I didn&#039;t call you ButchDyke, which would be somewhat  like what Mann Coulter did, minus the fact that she was speaking in a public forum as a representative for all conservatives.

No, I just call you what you are: stupid bitch, stinking, washed up old hag, hypocritical fake Christian, annoying wrinkled troll, etc, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh annie, you stupid wench!</p>
<p>I called you Mannie Angel, because it&#8217;s FUNNY, it wasn&#8217;t a transsexual joke.  I never make transsexual jokes.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t call you ButchDyke, which would be somewhat  like what Mann Coulter did, minus the fact that she was speaking in a public forum as a representative for all conservatives.</p>
<p>No, I just call you what you are: stupid bitch, stinking, washed up old hag, hypocritical fake Christian, annoying wrinkled troll, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Kaus Stands By His Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148985</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Kaus Stands By His Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148985</guid>
		<description>[...] like the rest of his fellow-travelers, ain&#8217;t about to give up on Ann [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like the rest of his fellow-travelers, ain&#8217;t about to give up on Ann [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Shaved Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148360</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Shaved Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148360</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Anne, in my excitement at the gladiatorial spectacle that is our democratic right as a subject peoples, I forgot to concur with you about The Pie People. Apparently, use of logic is deemed idiocy in Pieland, so perhaps they&#039;ll have allergic reactions and go away. Let&#039;s hope so: they do so lower the tone of the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Anne, in my excitement at the gladiatorial spectacle that is our democratic right as a subject peoples, I forgot to concur with you about The Pie People. Apparently, use of logic is deemed idiocy in Pieland, so perhaps they&#8217;ll have allergic reactions and go away. Let&#8217;s hope so: they do so lower the tone of the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qetesh the Shaved Abyssinian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148351</link>
		<dc:creator>Qetesh the Shaved Abyssinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148351</guid>
		<description>Anne Laurie: your dad is way cool. :-) I particularly like the &#039;forks&#039; touch: adds a soupcon of ludicrousness (ludicrity? ludicrelliousness?) to the battle the the death.

And as for me, I&#039;d sell my house and fly to the US just to watch. Man, imagine the fun, although I think they&#039;d have to do it before the primaries, and include the VP contenders as well, to give it that &quot;Saturday night round closing time at the local&quot; feel.

Cheney would be safe, of course, because he keeps his heart in a box in a fortress on top of a mountain. Dennis Kucinich might be short enough to run around and slash the achilles tendons of the favourites, so they get wiped out by others early on, reducing the field. All the blokes would probably gang up on Hillary, and Giuliani would be busy trying to hold a photo op standing on the pile of bodies.

Liebermann would be in there, but no one would ally with him, because they know he&#039;d turn on them immediately afterwards. People &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; ally with McCain, only to find he turned on them too. Romney would get the vapours as soon as a spurt of blood drenched his coiffure, they&#039;d all be afraid of Obama so they&#039;d rush him, and Howard Dean would make his opponents kill themselves through stupidity.

How&#039;s that for a scenario? I love the idea of it all happening with forks and nakedness. For extra fun they could be greased, so grappling wouldn&#039;t work, and you&#039;d get lots of laughs from the &#039;pig-wrestling&#039; scenes.

As for killing the last guy, well, couldn&#039;t happen to a nicer guy. And the English used to do it, after all. Not the fork-armed free-for-all, but the killing the last guy. At least the Celts did: the Norse killed everyone else, and the Normans kept them because they needed servants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Laurie: your dad is way cool. :-) I particularly like the &#8216;forks&#8217; touch: adds a soupcon of ludicrousness (ludicrity? ludicrelliousness?) to the battle the the death.</p>
<p>And as for me, I&#8217;d sell my house and fly to the US just to watch. Man, imagine the fun, although I think they&#8217;d have to do it before the primaries, and include the VP contenders as well, to give it that &#8220;Saturday night round closing time at the local&#8221; feel.</p>
<p>Cheney would be safe, of course, because he keeps his heart in a box in a fortress on top of a mountain. Dennis Kucinich might be short enough to run around and slash the achilles tendons of the favourites, so they get wiped out by others early on, reducing the field. All the blokes would probably gang up on Hillary, and Giuliani would be busy trying to hold a photo op standing on the pile of bodies.</p>
<p>Liebermann would be in there, but no one would ally with him, because they know he&#8217;d turn on them immediately afterwards. People <i>might</i> ally with McCain, only to find he turned on them too. Romney would get the vapours as soon as a spurt of blood drenched his coiffure, they&#8217;d all be afraid of Obama so they&#8217;d rush him, and Howard Dean would make his opponents kill themselves through stupidity.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that for a scenario? I love the idea of it all happening with forks and nakedness. For extra fun they could be greased, so grappling wouldn&#8217;t work, and you&#8217;d get lots of laughs from the &#8216;pig-wrestling&#8217; scenes.</p>
<p>As for killing the last guy, well, couldn&#8217;t happen to a nicer guy. And the English used to do it, after all. Not the fork-armed free-for-all, but the killing the last guy. At least the Celts did: the Norse killed everyone else, and the Normans kept them because they needed servants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148122</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-148122</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Man Coulter is an accepted bash at Ann Coulter. Iâ€™ve also heard Man Hands. And tranny.

So you can make gay slurs at her, but she does it and itâ€™s wrong.&lt;/i&gt;

Minor point of fact: Implying that a woman is really a man is not a gay slur. All the &quot;slurs&quot; you mention that are used against Coulter have nothing to do with her sexuality - they have to do with her gender. Nobody means to ridicule Ann for being gay, rather, they mean to ridicule her for her appearance and the hint of an Adam&#039;s apple that she seems to have. Not that I condone the namecalling, but at least you could get your analogy straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Man Coulter is an accepted bash at Ann Coulter. Iâ€™ve also heard Man Hands. And tranny.</p>
<p>So you can make gay slurs at her, but she does it and itâ€™s wrong.</i></p>
<p>Minor point of fact: Implying that a woman is really a man is not a gay slur. All the &#8220;slurs&#8221; you mention that are used against Coulter have nothing to do with her sexuality &#8211; they have to do with her gender. Nobody means to ridicule Ann for being gay, rather, they mean to ridicule her for her appearance and the hint of an Adam&#8217;s apple that she seems to have. Not that I condone the namecalling, but at least you could get your analogy straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML Mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147925</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML Mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147925</guid>
		<description>I like that, Anne Laurie. But it also scares me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that, Anne Laurie. But it also scares me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147922</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147922</guid>
		<description>HTML, maybe we could give every troll its own fork, and let the sole survivor be our mascot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTML, maybe we could give every troll its own fork, and let the sole survivor be our mascot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML Mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147919</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML Mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147919</guid>
		<description>You know, I purposely phrased this post to guard against -- and simultaneously if subtlely give the finger to -- the continual PC sniping one can see linked in our referral logs (not that we can go over there anymore and say anything about such sniping, no, because that is *their turf!!!*), and what happens?! Annie and Limpy do it for them, less skillfully but more hilariously.

What matters are Coulter&#039;s and indeed the whole rightwing&#039;s sentiments, not the *word* &#039;faggot&#039;, which if banned from the lexicon would supposedly solve homophobia now and forever. But I totally expect an explicit formula stated that &#039;liberal&#039;s fat joke = Coulter&#039;s smear&#039; any minute now, if I haven&#039;t missed it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I purposely phrased this post to guard against &#8212; and simultaneously if subtlely give the finger to &#8212; the continual PC sniping one can see linked in our referral logs (not that we can go over there anymore and say anything about such sniping, no, because that is *their turf!!!*), and what happens?! Annie and Limpy do it for them, less skillfully but more hilariously.</p>
<p>What matters are Coulter&#8217;s and indeed the whole rightwing&#8217;s sentiments, not the *word* &#8216;faggot&#8217;, which if banned from the lexicon would supposedly solve homophobia now and forever. But I totally expect an explicit formula stated that &#8216;liberal&#8217;s fat joke = Coulter&#8217;s smear&#8217; any minute now, if I haven&#8217;t missed it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrod</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147908</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s check some quotes from the first result on your Google search, Limp.

&lt;i&gt;Now, since you are more or less anonymous on here, I think you are a troll, judging from the fact you like anal sex, I think you are a gay male troll.

Thatâ€™s about it. Their site is ultragay. And not in the campy good way.

Trolls are teh gay.&lt;/i&gt;

So which of our bigoted regulars made those statements?  Why, it was annieangel!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/002605.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See for yourself.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s check some quotes from the first result on your Google search, Limp.</p>
<p><i>Now, since you are more or less anonymous on here, I think you are a troll, judging from the fact you like anal sex, I think you are a gay male troll.</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s about it. Their site is ultragay. And not in the campy good way.</p>
<p>Trolls are teh gay.</i></p>
<p>So which of our bigoted regulars made those statements?  Why, it was annieangel!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/002605.html" rel="nofollow">See for yourself.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoelimpyâ„¢</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147894</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoelimpyâ„¢</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/5261.html#comment-147894</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-16,GGGL:en&amp;q=gay+annieangel+site%3Asadlyno.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I take it Mo never won no spelling bees&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-16,GGGL:en&amp;q=gay+annieangel+site%3Asadlyno.com" rel="nofollow">I take it Mo never won no spelling bees</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

